Re: [aur-general] test request
On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 12:59 +0800, Gergely Imreh wrote:
> 2009/6/4 M Rawash :
> > i'd like people with 32bit machines to test
> > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26733 for me.
> >
> > for some reason it gives me a "wrong ELF class" error on my i686
> > machine, so you'd have to actually run it before you can confirm that it
> > works..
> >
> > thanks,
> > M Rawash
> >
> >
>
> Hi, some comments about the package:
>
> 1) for me it compiles just fine, but when try to run it, pops up an
> error dialog with:
> /usr/share/textadept//core/lua_dialog.lua:33: module 'gtk' not found:
> no field package.preload['gtk']
> no file '/usr/share/textadept//core/gtk.lua'
> no file './gtk.lua'
> no file '/usr/local/share/lua/5.1/gtk.lua'
> no file '/usr/local/share/lua/5.1/gtk/init.lua'
> no file '/usr/local/lib/lua/5.1/gtk.lua'
> no file '/usr/local/lib/lua/5.1/gtk/init.lua'
> no file 'gtk.so'
indeed, this is caused by the ELF error, so i guess i'll be removing the
i686 support for now, until i find a solution..
>
> 2) lua is listed as optional dependency, but in the PKGBUILD it is
> explicitly included. Is that right that way?
>
the source package includes a (slightly) modified lua distribution, so
it doesn't need to call the system-wide headers. lua is only needed for
scripting in this case.
> 3) according to namcap libffi is not needed, and it compiles fine
> without it. couldn't run it yet, so not sure that's really necessary
i'm not sure where it's needed exactly (obviously a runtime dependency),
but it's mentioned there on the project's homepage.
> 4) ".so" files are usually located at /usr/lib/${pkgname}
which ".so" are you talking about? if you mean "gtk.so" (the one that's
causing all the errors), that one is used internally by the editor, and
its position is essential for it to run successfully..
>
> 5) LICENSE is installed twice, once in /usr/share/licenses, and once
> in /use/share/textadept
yes, i noticed, i'm taking care of it.
> Cheers,
>Greg
thanks,
M Rawash
Re: [aur-general] test request
2009/6/4 M Rawash :
> i'd like people with 32bit machines to test
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26733 for me.
>
> for some reason it gives me a "wrong ELF class" error on my i686
> machine, so you'd have to actually run it before you can confirm that it
> works..
>
> thanks,
> M Rawash
>
>
Hi, some comments about the package:
1) for me it compiles just fine, but when try to run it, pops up an
error dialog with:
/usr/share/textadept//core/lua_dialog.lua:33: module 'gtk' not found:
no field package.preload['gtk']
no file '/usr/share/textadept//core/gtk.lua'
no file './gtk.lua'
no file '/usr/local/share/lua/5.1/gtk.lua'
no file '/usr/local/share/lua/5.1/gtk/init.lua'
no file '/usr/local/lib/lua/5.1/gtk.lua'
no file '/usr/local/lib/lua/5.1/gtk/init.lua'
no file 'gtk.so'
2) lua is listed as optional dependency, but in the PKGBUILD it is
explicitly included. Is that right that way?
3) according to namcap libffi is not needed, and it compiles fine
without it. couldn't run it yet, so not sure that's really necessary
4) ".so" files are usually located at /usr/lib/${pkgname}
5) LICENSE is installed twice, once in /usr/share/licenses, and once
in /use/share/textadept
Cheers,
Greg
[aur-general] test request
i'd like people with 32bit machines to test http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26733 for me. for some reason it gives me a "wrong ELF class" error on my i686 machine, so you'd have to actually run it before you can confirm that it works.. thanks, M Rawash
Re: [aur-general] announcing hsftp pkg
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Daenyth Blank > wrote: > On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 01:56, Nathan Owe. wrote: > > I have created another pkg called hsftp if anyone would like to try it. > > > > You know, you don't have to announce new packages to the list. There > is an RSS feed... > +1
Re: [aur-general] announcing hsftp pkg
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 01:56, Nathan Owe. wrote: > I have created another pkg called hsftp if anyone would like to try it. > You know, you don't have to announce new packages to the list. There is an RSS feed...
Re: [aur-general] Package Removal Request - traverso-cvs
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:44 PM, wrote: > Please remove traverso-cvs: > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22753 > > The hoster, savannah had trouble with cvs/git/... which accelerated > the move to git. Now git is functional and cvs is gone. Consequently > traverso-cvs doesn't work anymore and got superseded by traverso-git. > > Regards, > Philipp Done.
[aur-general] Package Removal Request - traverso-cvs
Please remove traverso-cvs: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22753 The hoster, savannah had trouble with cvs/git/... which accelerated the move to git. Now git is functional and cvs is gone. Consequently traverso-cvs doesn't work anymore and got superseded by traverso-git. Regards, Philipp
