[aur-general] etc dir
the app i am trying to pkg: gnu rush is wanting to install etc in /usr/etc, i tried something like etcdir=$pkgdir/etc but it isn't working
Re: [aur-general] etc dir
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 2:50 AM, nathan owe.ndowen...@gmail.com wrote: the app i am trying to pkg: gnu rush is wanting to install etc in /usr/etc, i tried something like etcdir=$pkgdir/etc but it isn't working try: ./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc
Re: [aur-general] etc dir
Eric Bélanger wrote: On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 2:50 AM, nathan owe.ndowen...@gmail.com wrote: the app i am trying to pkg: gnu rush is wanting to install etc in /usr/etc, i tried something like etcdir=$pkgdir/etc but it isn't working try: ./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc ok fixed that. now namcap says file is not world readable
[aur-general] Package Removal Request
Hi, KVM is located in the extra repo [1]http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/kvm/(X86_64 linked, but same applys to i686) and there is also an out of date version located in the AUR [2]http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24537 . I request that the kvm in the AUR. Thanks Ronnie [1] http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/kvm/http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/kvm/ [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24537http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24537
Re: [aur-general] Leaving Arch
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 20:15:22 +0200 Christoph Zeiler rab...@moonblade.org wrote: This is to a) inform the TUs that I've switched distros and won't be able to maintain my packages in the AUR anymore. Feel free to orphan all 358 of them. b) say Thank you! to everybody who notified me of outdated packages, sent suggestions and/or patches or helped otherwise. c) give reasons for leaving: My mind is on things other than bleeding-edge and system-tinkering. Over time I also became dissatisfied with the official way of handling source packages. IMO Arch could be great at both source and binary, but the source part doesn't get enough love. Why not add source support for pacman? Oh, and why not compress packages with LZMA? d) wish every Arch user all the best and lots of fun with his/her/its distro of choice! Greetings, Christoph Zeiler aka rabyte aka Moonborn Have fun there. I'd be interested in maintaining some of your packages: glista: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19388 swami: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11642 klick: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20840 gtklick: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20841 pianobooster: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24276 Best regards, Philipp
Re: [aur-general] Leaving Arch
hollun...@gmx.at wrote: On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 20:15:22 +0200 Christoph Zeiler rab...@moonblade.org wrote: This is to a) inform the TUs that I've switched distros and won't be able to maintain my packages in the AUR anymore. Feel free to orphan all 358 of them. b) say Thank you! to everybody who notified me of outdated packages, sent suggestions and/or patches or helped otherwise. c) give reasons for leaving: My mind is on things other than bleeding-edge and system-tinkering. Over time I also became dissatisfied with the official way of handling source packages. IMO Arch could be great at both source and binary, but the source part doesn't get enough love. Why not add source support for pacman? Oh, and why not compress packages with LZMA? d) wish every Arch user all the best and lots of fun with his/her/its distro of choice! Greetings, Christoph Zeiler aka rabyte aka Moonborn Have fun there. I'd be interested in maintaining some of your packages: glista: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19388 swami: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11642 klick: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20840 gtklick: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20841 pianobooster: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24276 Best regards, Philipp The requested packages have been disowned. Feel free to adopt them! -- Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) griffith...@archlinux.us http://ghost1227.com
Re: [aur-general] Leaving Arch
Could I have: 1: gx (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11197) 2: freespeak (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21897) 3: ipodfs (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10237) 4: tangerine (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10192) 5: ripenc (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7947) 6: ocre (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22407) 7: simpleburn (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23670) 8: mp3plot (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25671) Thanks, Laurie 2009/6/13 Daniel J Griffiths ghost1...@archlinux.us: hollun...@gmx.at wrote: On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 20:15:22 +0200 Christoph Zeiler rab...@moonblade.org wrote: This is to a) inform the TUs that I've switched distros and won't be able to maintain my packages in the AUR anymore. Feel free to orphan all 358 of them. b) say Thank you! to everybody who notified me of outdated packages, sent suggestions and/or patches or helped otherwise. c) give reasons for leaving: My mind is on things other than bleeding-edge and system-tinkering. Over time I also became dissatisfied with the official way of handling source packages. IMO Arch could be great at both source and binary, but the source part doesn't get enough love. Why not add source support for pacman? Oh, and why not compress packages with LZMA? d) wish every Arch user all the best and lots of fun with his/her/its distro of choice! Greetings, Christoph Zeiler aka rabyte aka Moonborn Have fun there. I'd be interested in maintaining some of your packages: glista: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19388 swami: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11642 klick: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20840 gtklick: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20841 pianobooster: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24276 Best regards, Philipp The requested packages have been disowned. Feel free to adopt them! -- Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) griffith...@archlinux.us http://ghost1227.com
Re: [aur-general] Leaving Arch
Laurie Clark-Michalek wrote: Could I have: 1: gx (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11197) 2: freespeak (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21897) 3: ipodfs (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10237) 4: tangerine (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10192) 5: ripenc (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7947) 6: ocre (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22407) 7: simpleburn (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23670) 8: mp3plot (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25671) Thanks, Laurie 2009/6/13 Daniel J Griffiths ghost1...@archlinux.us: hollun...@gmx.at wrote: On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 20:15:22 +0200 Christoph Zeiler rab...@moonblade.org wrote: This is to a) inform the TUs that I've switched distros and won't be able to maintain my packages in the AUR anymore. Feel free to orphan all 358 of them. b) say Thank you! to everybody who notified me of outdated packages, sent suggestions and/or patches or helped otherwise. c) give reasons for leaving: My mind is on things other than bleeding-edge and system-tinkering. Over time I also became dissatisfied with the official way of handling source packages. IMO Arch could be great at both source and binary, but the source part doesn't get enough love. Why not add source support for pacman? Oh, and why not compress packages with LZMA? d) wish every Arch user all the best and lots of fun with his/her/its distro of choice! Greetings, Christoph Zeiler aka rabyte aka Moonborn Have fun there. I'd be interested in maintaining some of your packages: glista: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19388 swami: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11642 klick: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20840 gtklick: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20841 pianobooster: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24276 Best regards, Philipp The requested packages have been disowned. Feel free to adopt them! -- Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) griffith...@archlinux.us http://ghost1227.com The requested packages have been orphaned. Please feel free to adopt them. -- Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) griffith...@archlinux.us http://ghost1227.com
Re: [aur-general] Leaving Arch
I'll take: - ruby-sdl - rubygame Thanks, -AT
Re: [aur-general] Leaving Arch
Andrei Thorp wrote: I'll take: - ruby-sdl - rubygame Thanks, -AT The requested packages have been disowned. -- Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) griffith...@archlinux.us http://ghost1227.com
Re: [aur-general] etc dir
That may be okay, but you can solve the situation by chmod +r. I've seen you post a lot recently, consider perhaps doing a bit of research/reading to dispell easy questions. If you really have no idea what's going on and have a hard time googling for it, do feel free to ask though. Cheers, -AT
Re: [aur-general] Leaving Arch
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 20:15 +0200, Christoph Zeiler wrote: This is to a) inform the TUs that I've switched distros and won't be able to maintain my packages in the AUR anymore. Feel free to orphan all 358 of them. b) say Thank you! to everybody who notified me of outdated packages, sent suggestions and/or patches or helped otherwise. c) give reasons for leaving: My mind is on things other than bleeding-edge and system-tinkering. Over time I also became dissatisfied with the official way of handling source packages. IMO Arch could be great at both source and binary, but the source part doesn't get enough love. Why not add source support for pacman? Oh, and why not compress packages with LZMA? d) wish every Arch user all the best and lots of fun with his/her/its distro of choice! Greetings, Christoph Zeiler aka rabyte aka Moonborn i'll take these: go_big: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24621 gnome-whitenoise: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19818 viewnior: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26547 gitg: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26045 uget: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25887 streamtuner2: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23738 gnetworktester: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24321 thanks, M Rawash
Re: [aur-general] Leaving Arch
M Rawash wrote: On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 20:15 +0200, Christoph Zeiler wrote: This is to a) inform the TUs that I've switched distros and won't be able to maintain my packages in the AUR anymore. Feel free to orphan all 358 of them. b) say Thank you! to everybody who notified me of outdated packages, sent suggestions and/or patches or helped otherwise. c) give reasons for leaving: My mind is on things other than bleeding-edge and system-tinkering. Over time I also became dissatisfied with the official way of handling source packages. IMO Arch could be great at both source and binary, but the source part doesn't get enough love. Why not add source support for pacman? Oh, and why not compress packages with LZMA? d) wish every Arch user all the best and lots of fun with his/her/its distro of choice! Greetings, Christoph Zeiler aka rabyte aka Moonborn i'll take these: go_big: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24621 gnome-whitenoise: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19818 viewnior: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26547 gitg: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26045 uget: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25887 streamtuner2: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23738 gnetworktester: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24321 thanks, M Rawash The requested packages have been disowned. -- Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) griffith...@archlinux.us http://ghost1227.com
Re: [aur-general] Leaving Arch
Why don't disown all packages at one time? and people will take care of adopt them, and let this thread die? Thanks -- Angel Velásquez angvp @ irc.freenode.net Linux Counter: #359909
