[aur-general] Please move orphaned package tor from extra to AUR
Hi, the package tor in the extra repository (http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/tor/) has no maintainer at the moment. Next to that there are two security vulnerabilities in that version in extra at the moment. Can you move it to AUR so I can maintain it? greetings signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Please move orphaned package tor from extra to AUR
Rorschach wrote: Hi, the package tor in the extra repository (http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/tor/) has no maintainer at the moment. Next to that there are two security vulnerabilities in that version in extra at the moment. Can you move it to AUR so I can maintain it? greetings usually a package from an official repo will come to community first if a TU wants to maintain it and then in unsupported. Like a side note, did you contact the maintainer of the package and sent an updated build? -- Ionut
Re: [aur-general] Please move orphaned package tor from extra to AUR
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Biru Ionut wrote: > Rorschach wrote: > >> Hi, >> the package tor in the extra repository ( >> http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/tor/) has no maintainer at >> the moment. Next to that there are two security vulnerabilities in that >> version in extra at the moment. >> >> Can you move it to AUR so I can maintain it? >> >> greetings >> > usually a package from an official repo will come to community first if a > TU wants to maintain it and then in unsupported. > > Like a side note, did you contact the maintainer of the package and sent > an updated build? > > -- > Ionut > Yes for further reference, please don't ask for that here in the future. If there is no maintainer (and also none listed in the PKGBUILD), you can send an updated PKGBUILD to arch-general, there are more devs reading that mailing list, one of them may have time to update it for you. Well, I bumped the version of tor for you to 0.2.0.35 so let me know if something does not work as expected as I've no idea how to test it. Ronald
Re: [aur-general] Please move orphaned package tor from extra to AUR
thx for explaining that to me! I will do so in future. Your tor-package works without problems for me. greetings signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[aur-general] Please delete my package 'newton-archemedia'
Hey, please delete my package 'newton-archemedia ' as it appears to have been superseded by 'newton-dynamics-beta'.
Re: [aur-general] Please delete my package 'newton-archemedia'
2009/6/29 Sven-Hendrik Haase : > Hey, > > please delete my package 'newton-archemedia ' as it appears to have been > superseded by 'newton-dynamics-beta'. > Deleted. -- Abhishek
[aur-general] Can not upload moinmoin package
Hi, after aur moving, I can't upload package, bigger than 100-200Kb. connection hangs after this size uploaded. I sniff conversation with wireshark and found 'TCP Acked lost segment' packet near the end. May be uploading is in progress, but very very slow. Please advise, how can I test it to find where is the problem? (ssh, cvs works quite slowly, but don't hangs)
Re: [aur-general] Can not upload moinmoin package
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Sergej Pupykin wrote: > > Hi, > > after aur moving, I can't upload package, bigger than 100-200Kb. > > connection hangs after this size uploaded. > > I sniff conversation with wireshark and found 'TCP Acked lost segment' > packet near the end. May be uploading is in progress, but very very slow. > > Please advise, how can I test it to find where is the problem? > > (ssh, cvs works quite slowly, but don't hangs) This could be a bug in the current scripts - can you scp the package? If so, then we might as well just wait for the svn move :S
Re: [aur-general] AUR Moving
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Abhishek Dasgupta wrote: > >From the ftp://archlinux.org/community/os/i686 page > community.db.tar.gz. . . . . . . Jun 27 18:01 > so it hasn't been updated at all since the AUR move. If the > new [community] repo is at the new server, then what's the > link to access the repofiles, or does gerolde sync the packages > back to itself? Since the mirrors all sync from archlinux.org they'll > be getting the old community.db.tar.gz only. Actually, this wasn't setup it seems - gerolde should be rsyncing the repo back to itself. I'll get to this today
Re: [aur-general] Can not upload moinmoin package
>AG> This could be a bug in the current scripts - can you scp the package? >AG> If so, then we might as well just wait for the svn move :S scp works slightly better. It reports 36.1KB/s average speed taking into accout 3 or 4 'stale' state period. scp moinmoin-1.8.4-1.pkg.tar.gz spupy...@aur.archlinux.org:/tmp/ moinmoin-1.8.4-1.pkg.tar.gz 100% 5518KB 36.1KB/s 02:33
Re: [aur-general] AUR Moving
On Monday 29 June 2009 18:03:50 Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Abhishek Dasgupta wrote: > > >From the ftp://archlinux.org/community/os/i686 page > > > > community.db.tar.gz. . . . . . . Jun 27 18:01 > > so it hasn't been updated at all since the AUR move. If the > > new [community] repo is at the new server, then what's the > > link to access the repofiles, or does gerolde sync the packages > > back to itself? Since the mirrors all sync from archlinux.org they'll > > be getting the old community.db.tar.gz only. > > Actually, this wasn't setup it seems - gerolde should be rsyncing the > repo back to itself. > > I'll get to this today Btw: The new website is prety slow for me. Is there some configuration issue with mysql or php? Maybe forgot to isntall apc or mysql cache to small? -- Pierre Schmitz, http://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
Re: [aur-general] AUR Moving
Excerpts from Pierre Schmitz's message of Mon Jun 29 15:33:34 -0400 2009: > Btw: The new website is prety slow for me. Is there some configuration issue > with mysql or php? Maybe forgot to isntall apc or mysql cache to small? We thought it was a bit slower today too, but not terrible. -- Andrei Thorp, Developer: Xandros Corp. (http://www.xandros.com)
Re: [aur-general] AUR Moving
Pierre Schmitz wrote: On Monday 29 June 2009 18:03:50 Aaron Griffin wrote: On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Abhishek Dasgupta wrote: >From the ftp://archlinux.org/community/os/i686 page community.db.tar.gz. . . . . . . Jun 27 18:01 so it hasn't been updated at all since the AUR move. If the new [community] repo is at the new server, then what's the link to access the repofiles, or does gerolde sync the packages back to itself? Since the mirrors all sync from archlinux.org they'll be getting the old community.db.tar.gz only. Actually, this wasn't setup it seems - gerolde should be rsyncing the repo back to itself. I'll get to this today Btw: The new website is prety slow for me. Is there some configuration issue with mysql or php? Maybe forgot to isntall apc or mysql cache to small? I've noticed this as well, as have several other Devs/TUs and also a user[1]. It looks like a networking issue (i.e. the load on the server is not excessive). @Aaron (or whoever has contact with the host): Is it possible to have the company providing the server look into this? [1] http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=75047
Re: [aur-general] AUR Moving
>> Btw: The new website is prety slow for me. Is there some configuration >> issue with mysql or php? Maybe forgot to isntall apc or mysql cache to >> small? >> > > I've noticed this as well, as have several other Devs/TUs and also a > user[1]. It looks like a networking issue (i.e. the load on the server is > not excessive). > > @Aaron (or whoever has contact with the host): Is it possible to have the > company providing the server look into this? > I saw 'TCP Acked lost segment' and TCP retransmissions. It seems as some packets was dropped.
Re: [aur-general] AUR Moving
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Evangelos Foutras wrote: > Pierre Schmitz wrote: >> >> On Monday 29 June 2009 18:03:50 Aaron Griffin wrote: >> >>> >>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Abhishek Dasgupta >>> wrote: >>> >From the ftp://archlinux.org/community/os/i686 page community.db.tar.gz. . . . . . . Jun 27 18:01 so it hasn't been updated at all since the AUR move. If the new [community] repo is at the new server, then what's the link to access the repofiles, or does gerolde sync the packages back to itself? Since the mirrors all sync from archlinux.org they'll be getting the old community.db.tar.gz only. >>> >>> Actually, this wasn't setup it seems - gerolde should be rsyncing the >>> repo back to itself. >>> >>> I'll get to this today >>> >> >> Btw: The new website is prety slow for me. Is there some configuration >> issue with mysql or php? Maybe forgot to isntall apc or mysql cache to >> small? >> > > I've noticed this as well, as have several other Devs/TUs and also a > user[1]. It looks like a networking issue (i.e. the load on the server is > not excessive). > > @Aaron (or whoever has contact with the host): Is it possible to have the > company providing the server look into this? > > [1] http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=75047 It's weird that it seems to work fine for me: $ ping aur.archlinux.org ... --- aur.archlinux.org ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 8996ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 12.244/12.402/12.666/0.184 ms Is anyone from North America having issues? Is it a continental thing?
Re: [aur-general] AUR Moving
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote: > Is anyone from North America having issues? Is it a continental thing? > No trouble here, it pings just fine here in Washington state. --- aur.archlinux.org ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9025ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 72.044/74.287/78.242/1.592 ms
Re: [aur-general] AUR Moving
Aaron Griffin schrieb: On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Evangelos Foutras wrote: Pierre Schmitz wrote: On Monday 29 June 2009 18:03:50 Aaron Griffin wrote: On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Abhishek Dasgupta wrote: >From the ftp://archlinux.org/community/os/i686 page community.db.tar.gz. . . . . . . Jun 27 18:01 so it hasn't been updated at all since the AUR move. If the new [community] repo is at the new server, then what's the link to access the repofiles, or does gerolde sync the packages back to itself? Since the mirrors all sync from archlinux.org they'll be getting the old community.db.tar.gz only. Actually, this wasn't setup it seems - gerolde should be rsyncing the repo back to itself. I'll get to this today Btw: The new website is prety slow for me. Is there some configuration issue with mysql or php? Maybe forgot to isntall apc or mysql cache to small? I've noticed this as well, as have several other Devs/TUs and also a user[1]. It looks like a networking issue (i.e. the load on the server is not excessive). @Aaron (or whoever has contact with the host): Is it possible to have the company providing the server look into this? [1] http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=75047 It's weird that it seems to work fine for me: $ ping aur.archlinux.org ... --- aur.archlinux.org ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 8996ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 12.244/12.402/12.666/0.184 ms Is anyone from North America having issues? Is it a continental thing? Hello, not slower from wester europe (Germany) --- aur.archlinux.org ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9011ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 163.687/165.039/165.703/0.783 ms But uploading seems to be much slower now. Regards Stefan
Re: [aur-general] AUR Moving
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 04:09:23PM -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Evangelos Foutras wrote: > > Pierre Schmitz wrote: > >> > >> On Monday 29 June 2009 18:03:50 Aaron Griffin wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Abhishek Dasgupta > >>> wrote: > >>> > > >From the ftp://archlinux.org/community/os/i686 page > > community.db.tar.gz. . . . . . . Jun 27 18:01 > so it hasn't been updated at all since the AUR move. If the > new [community] repo is at the new server, then what's the > link to access the repofiles, or does gerolde sync the packages > back to itself? Since the mirrors all sync from archlinux.org they'll > be getting the old community.db.tar.gz only. > > >>> > >>> Actually, this wasn't setup it seems - gerolde should be rsyncing the > >>> repo back to itself. > >>> > >>> I'll get to this today > >>> > >> > >> Btw: The new website is prety slow for me. Is there some configuration > >> issue with mysql or php? Maybe forgot to isntall apc or mysql cache to > >> small? > >> > > > > I've noticed this as well, as have several other Devs/TUs and also a > > user[1]. It looks like a networking issue (i.e. the load on the server is > > not excessive). > > > > @Aaron (or whoever has contact with the host): Is it possible to have the > > company providing the server look into this? > > > > [1] http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=75047 > > It's weird that it seems to work fine for me: > $ ping aur.archlinux.org > ... > --- aur.archlinux.org ping statistics --- > 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 8996ms > rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 12.244/12.402/12.666/0.184 ms > > Is anyone from North America having issues? Is it a continental thing? I had been seeing issues this afternoon but they seem to have cleared up since this email because I can't reproduce them.
Re: [aur-general] AUR Moving
On Monday 29 June 2009 23:09:23 Aaron Griffin wrote: > It's weird that it seems to work fine for me: > $ ping aur.archlinux.org 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9011ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 161.853/163.993/166.675/1.484 ms But atm the site loads fast again. When it did not half of the page loaded and then it hung for a minute or so before loading the complete page. Maybe its just a routing problem and they are surprised by the sudden increase of traffic. :-) -- Pierre Schmitz, http://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
Re: [aur-general] AUR Moving
On Mon 29 Jun 2009 16:09 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Evangelos Foutras wrote: > > Pierre Schmitz wrote: > >> > >> On Monday 29 June 2009 18:03:50 Aaron Griffin wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Abhishek Dasgupta > >>> wrote: > >>> > > >From the ftp://archlinux.org/community/os/i686 page > > community.db.tar.gz. . . . . . . Jun 27 18:01 > so it hasn't been updated at all since the AUR move. If the > new [community] repo is at the new server, then what's the > link to access the repofiles, or does gerolde sync the packages > back to itself? Since the mirrors all sync from archlinux.org they'll > be getting the old community.db.tar.gz only. > > >>> > >>> Actually, this wasn't setup it seems - gerolde should be rsyncing the > >>> repo back to itself. > >>> > >>> I'll get to this today > >>> > >> > >> Btw: The new website is prety slow for me. Is there some configuration > >> issue with mysql or php? Maybe forgot to isntall apc or mysql cache to > >> small? > >> > > > > I've noticed this as well, as have several other Devs/TUs and also a > > user[1]. It looks like a networking issue (i.e. the load on the server is > > not excessive). > > > > @Aaron (or whoever has contact with the host): Is it possible to have the > > company providing the server look into this? > > > > [1] http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=75047 > > It's weird that it seems to work fine for me: > $ ping aur.archlinux.org > ... > --- aur.archlinux.org ping statistics --- > 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 8996ms > rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 12.244/12.402/12.666/0.184 ms > > Is anyone from North America having issues? Is it a continental thing? I've noticed the connection issues. It seems to be an off and on thing. We should definitely investigate if it continues.
Re: [aur-general] deletion of netbeans-prerelease
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:10 AM, Alper KANAT wrote: > Hey There, > > Could someone please delete the package > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25239 ? The final release is out > now; so there's no need to maintain this package any more..? > > > Alper KANAT > done ronald
Re: [aur-general] AUR Moving
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Loui Chang wrote: > On Mon 29 Jun 2009 16:09 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Evangelos Foutras >> wrote: >> > Pierre Schmitz wrote: >> >> >> >> On Monday 29 June 2009 18:03:50 Aaron Griffin wrote: >> >> >> >>> >> >>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Abhishek Dasgupta >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >> >> >From the ftp://archlinux.org/community/os/i686 page >> >> community.db.tar.gz. . . . . . . Jun 27 18:01 >> so it hasn't been updated at all since the AUR move. If the >> new [community] repo is at the new server, then what's the >> link to access the repofiles, or does gerolde sync the packages >> back to itself? Since the mirrors all sync from archlinux.org they'll >> be getting the old community.db.tar.gz only. >> >> >>> >> >>> Actually, this wasn't setup it seems - gerolde should be rsyncing the >> >>> repo back to itself. >> >>> >> >>> I'll get to this today >> >>> >> >> >> >> Btw: The new website is prety slow for me. Is there some configuration >> >> issue with mysql or php? Maybe forgot to isntall apc or mysql cache to >> >> small? >> >> >> > >> > I've noticed this as well, as have several other Devs/TUs and also a >> > user[1]. It looks like a networking issue (i.e. the load on the server is >> > not excessive). >> > >> > @Aaron (or whoever has contact with the host): Is it possible to have the >> > company providing the server look into this? >> > >> > [1] http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=75047 >> >> It's weird that it seems to work fine for me: >> $ ping aur.archlinux.org >> ... >> --- aur.archlinux.org ping statistics --- >> 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 8996ms >> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 12.244/12.402/12.666/0.184 ms >> >> Is anyone from North America having issues? Is it a continental thing? > > I've noticed the connection issues. It seems to be an off and on thing. > We should definitely investigate if it continues. Maybe related, just got this email from SevenL: - In our ongoing effort to improve the service experience, we will be performing network maintenance on Tuesday June 30th at 6:30PM EDT. This procedure will enhance the stability of our network and increase the overall speed of our network. You may experience a period of service inaccessibility while our Network Administrators perform the maintenance. Downtime should be limited to no more than 5 minutes throughout the scheduled maintenance period. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. Procedure: Maintenance on Customer-Side Switches Duration: 30 minutes Start Time: 6:30PM EDT Completion Time: 7:00PM EDT Downtime: Loss of network connection lasting up to 5 minutes over a 30-minute span -
[aur-general] deletion of netbeans-prerelease
Hey There, Could someone please delete the package http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25239 ? The final release is out now; so there's no need to maintain this package any more..? Alper KANAT
Re: [aur-general] AUR Moving
>> I've noticed the connection issues. It seems to be an off and on thing. >> We should definitely investigate if it continues. > > Maybe related, just got this email from SevenL: > Today it works quickly.
[aur-general] (no subject)
Is anyone having a problem with yaourt? mine isnt finding packages in aur that i know exists
[aur-general] mulk pkgbuild
the pkgbuild i am working on is mulk. it has a optdepends of libmetalink but to make it optional i have to do ./configure --disable-metalink do i do it like that or should i just put libmetalink as a regular depends?
Re: [aur-general] (no subject)
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:22:41 -0500 "nathan owe." wrote: > Is anyone having a problem with yaourt? mine isnt finding packages in > aur that i know exists a) it may be related to the changes AUR is currently undergoing b) yaourt is buggy anyway, it doesn't find all packages (for example none that contain '+' in their names)
Re: [aur-general] (no subject)
hollun...@gmx.at wrote: On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:22:41 -0500 "nathan owe." wrote: Is anyone having a problem with yaourt? mine isnt finding packages in aur that i know exists a) it may be related to the changes AUR is currently undergoing b) yaourt is buggy anyway, it doesn't find all packages (for example none that contain '+' in their names) what aur helper do u recommend that will download/build/install all deps too like yaourt
