Re: [aur-general] package deletion request

2009-07-12 Thread Daniel J Griffiths

F B wrote:

Hi,

the package codecs-extra could be deleted (it has been replaced by the new version of 
"codecs")
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26969

and also this package is a duplicate of "codecs" but the maintainer seems to be 
inactive: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14946

Thank you in advance.



  

  

Deleted!

--
Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)
griffith...@archlinux.us
http://ghost1227.com



[aur-general] package deletion request

2009-07-12 Thread F B

Hi,

the package codecs-extra could be deleted (it has been replaced by the new 
version of "codecs")
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26969

and also this package is a duplicate of "codecs" but the maintainer seems to be 
inactive: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14946

Thank you in advance.






Re: [aur-general] dmraid 1.0.0-rc15

2009-07-12 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Am Samstag 04 Juli 2009 schrieb Hvannentir:
> I dont apply any extra patches, one of them break the corrected issue
> for jmicron on device names.
>
> I'll try to find the one that causing this and report it.
>
> > 2009/7/4 Tobias Powalowski :
> >> Am Donnerstag 02 Juli 2009 schrieb Hvannentir:
> >>> Hi
> >>> I have tested the testing package, and it does not work.
> >>> Same problem as dmraid rc14 with jmicron : whitespaces in devices name
> >>> ( "jmicronRAID0p1" )
> >>> So back to my own package of dmraid rc15. As soon as I get back my
> >>> install running - I still have to remake initram with my working dmraid
> >>> ( yeah yeah I should not test here ... :) ) - I will send you my
> >>> pkgbuild if you want.
> >>>
> >>> 2009/7/2 Antoine Noal 
> >>>
> >>> > Hi
> >>> > I have tested the testing package, and it does not work.
> >>> > Same problem as dmraid rc14 with jmicron : whitespaces in devices
> >>> > name ( "jmicronRAID0p1" )
> >>> > So back to my own package of dmraid rc15. As soon as I get back my
> >>> > install running - I still have to remake initram with my working
> >>> > dmraid ( yeah yeah I should not test here ... :) ) - I will send you
> >>> > my pkgbuild if you want.
> >>> >
> >>> > 2009/6/21 Tobias Powalowski 
> >>> >
> >>> > Am Donnerstag 04 Juni 2009 schrieb Hvannentir:
> >>> >> > Additional p ? What do you mean ?
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > 2009/6/4 Tobias Powalowski 
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > > Am Donnerstag 04 Juni 2009 schrieb Hvannentir:
> >>> >> > > > Ok then so I can tell you that on arch64 with a jmicron
> >>> >> > > > chipset it's working fine.
> >>> >> > > > I'll send you all the needed info you want later, I'm not on
> >>> >> > > > my box
> >>> >>
> >>> >> now
> >>> >>
> >>> >> > > but
> >>> >> > >
> >>> >> > > > I haven't applied any extra patchs.
> >>> >> > > >
> >>> >> > > > 2009/6/4 Tobias Powalowski 
> >>> >> > > >
> >>> >> > > > > Am Donnerstag 04 Juni 2009 schrieb Hvannentir:
> >>> >> > > > > > Hi
> >>> >> > > > > >
> >>> >> > > > > > I flagged out of date dmraid quite some time ago because I
> >>> >> > > > > > had
> >>> >>
> >>> >> to
> >>> >>
> >>> >> > > build
> >>> >> > >
> >>> >> > > > > my
> >>> >> > > > >
> >>> >> > > > > > own package for dmraid rc15.
> >>> >> > > > > >
> >>> >> > > > > > Indeed, in order to make my software raid work with a
> >>> >> > > > > > Jmicron
> >>> >> > >
> >>> >> > > chipset,
> >>> >> > >
> >>> >> > > > > > an important fix was necessary.
> >>> >> > > > > > ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219058 )
> >>> >> > > > > >
> >>> >> > > > > > Why the package is still oudated ?
> >>> >> > > > >
> >>> >> > > > > I'm looknig for dmraid users, i can't test it, last time i
> >>> >> > > > > bumped
> >>> >>
> >>> >> it
> >>> >>
> >>> >> > > > > to .15 and a lot of dmraid users had broken machines.
> >>> >> > > > > We can do again a testrun if it works now better with some
> >>> >> > > > > patches from redhat.
> >>> >> > > > >
> >>> >> > > > >
> >>> >> > > > > --
> >>> >> > > > > Tobias Powalowski
> >>> >> > > > > Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
> >>> >> > > > > http://www.archlinux.org
> >>> >> > > > > tp...@archlinux.org
> >>> >> > >
> >>> >> > > Do you need the additional p too?
> >>> >> > >
> >>> >> > > --
> >>> >> > > Tobias Powalowski
> >>> >> > > Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
> >>> >> > > http://www.archlinux.org
> >>> >> > > tp...@archlinux.org
> >>> >>
> >>> >> The new dmarid package is in testing, please test and give feedback,
> >>> >> thanks
> >>> >> greetings
> >>> >> tpowa
> >>> >> --
> >>> >> Tobias Powalowski
> >>> >> Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
> >>> >> http://www.archlinux.org
> >>> >> tp...@archlinux.org
> >>
> >> What is the difference to my package?
> >> It's the standard tarball with the most recent fedora patches.
> >> greetings
> >> tpowa
> >>
> >> --
> >> Tobias Powalowski
> >> Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
> >> http://www.archlinux.org
> >> tp...@archlinux.org
any status update on this, which one breaks it for you?

-- 
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tp...@archlinux.org


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [aur-general] pike

2009-07-12 Thread taptaptap dödödö
"--traditional" instead of --traditional ?



2009/7/12 nathan owe. 

> ok i finished the pkgbuild but it finishes successfully but not
> successfully, it makes the pkg and installs to the correct dir. but during
> the compile process it leaves out master.pike
>


[aur-general] pike

2009-07-12 Thread nathan owe.

nm i got it to work :-)