Re: [aur-general] virtualbox_bin status

[Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)]

On 02/17/2010 01:52 AM, Lex Rivera wrote:

Current virtualbox_bin maintainer (Dop182) adopted package, but has not
updated package (even with working patch in comment) and has not replied
nor to mail nor to comments. What we must do now?
   
If a reasonable amount of time has passed, you can request that one of 
us orphan it... assuming you're willing to maintain it.

[aur-general] virtualbox_bin status

[Lex Rivera]

Current virtualbox_bin maintainer (Dop182) adopted package, but has not
updated package (even with working patch in comment) and has not replied
nor to mail nor to comments. What we must do now?


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

[aur-general] please remove perl-perl6-junction

[Caleb Cushing]

due to a change in the package generation it's been deprecated by perl6-junction

-- 
Caleb Cushing

http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com

Re: [aur-general] minitube

[Frikilinux]

On Mar 09 Feb 2010 23:54:35 Giovanni Scafora escribió:
> Hi TUs,
> 
> only to let you know that I just orphaned community/minitube.
> Free to take it or I will be moving it to the AUR.

Adopted from AUR

-- 
GPG Key ID: 3AA76426
F2CA 440D CA72 FC9C FC67 3946 557F DBEB 3AA7 6426


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] dpkg outdated - orphan request

[Chris Giles]

Sorry, I wasn't watching this tread as closely as I was this
one.
I'm thankful to Lukas for being able to empathise with my position.  Users
do have a habit of mistakenly flagging AUR packages as outdated; I thought
this was the case here, after Firefox still maintained that v1.4.25 was the
latest stable release.

I'm going to blame the matter on Firefox, for not invalidating my cache fast
enough.  If I do several 'soft' refreshes, over a period of weeks, a quality
web browser should get the message that I want to see the latest version of
the webpage.  Since that's obviously too much to ask for, I'll just do
'hard' refreshes from now on.

Re: [aur-general] orphans in [community] - full list

[Ronald van Haren]

On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)
 wrote:
> On 02/16/2010 10:00 AM, Ronald van Haren wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)
>>   wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>    gdal (out of date)
>>>
>>
>> updated as it needed a rebuild for netcdf 4.1-1. I did not adopt it
>> though.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>    opendx
>>>        Depends: imagemagick,lesstif,netcdf
>>>        Required by: none
>>>
>>
>> broken by the netcdf 4.1-1 update. Doesn't build as it did use klibc
>> which is now deprecated. Unless someone wants to fix this we should
>> remove this one from the repos.
>>
>> Ronald
>>
>>
>
> +1 for removing opendx
>
moved opendx to unsupported.

Ronald

[aur-general] orphan aCiD2 package list

[Caleb Cushing]

just a short list of what I see out of date right now.

perl-class-c3
perl-sql-abstract
perl-data-visitor
perl-catalyst-plugin-authentication
perl-module-install
perl-moosex-traits
-- 
Caleb Cushing

http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com

Re: [aur-general] Deletion Request

[Ray Rashif]

On 16/02/2010, Christoph  wrote:
> In this case please orphan:
> otf-adf - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24551
> (for the reasons already described in my first request)
>
> and remove the packages:
> adffonts-otf - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34669
> adffonts-ttf - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34671
> adffonts-type1 - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34672
>
> I will then adopt otf-adf and then upload new pkgbuilds for
> otf-adf
> ttf-adf
> type1-adf
> all then belonging to the group adf-fonts

Aight done :)


--
GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD

Re: [aur-general] orphans in [community] - full list

[Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)]

On 02/16/2010 10:00 AM, Ronald van Haren wrote:

On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)
  wrote:
   

gdal (out of date)
 

updated as it needed a rebuild for netcdf 4.1-1. I did not adopt it though.

   

opendx
Depends: imagemagick,lesstif,netcdf
Required by: none
 

broken by the netcdf 4.1-1 update. Doesn't build as it did use klibc
which is now deprecated. Unless someone wants to fix this we should
remove this one from the repos.

Ronald

   

+1 for removing opendx

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: ID=32248 (firstclass 10.009-1)

[Ranguvar]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 20:07, Tom Wizetek  wrote:
> Please go ahead and remove the package.
> It is indeed a duplicate and apparently upstream will not be releasing
> any more Linux binaries in the foreseeable future.

Deleted, thank you.
Please provide a link to the package in the future.

  -- Ranguvar
  [Devin Cofer]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
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=T5/P
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [aur-general] orphans in [community] - full list

[Ronald van Haren]

On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)
 wrote:
>    gdal (out of date)

updated as it needed a rebuild for netcdf 4.1-1. I did not adopt it though.

>    opendx
>        Depends: imagemagick,lesstif,netcdf
>        Required by: none

broken by the netcdf 4.1-1 update. Doesn't build as it did use klibc
which is now deprecated. Unless someone wants to fix this we should
remove this one from the repos.

Ronald

Re: [aur-general] Deletion Request

[Christoph]

> The naming standard we've used has been ttf-foo, so naturally you
> should try to follow that. All three can be parts of the group
> "adf-fonts":
> 
> ttf-adf
> otf-adf
> type1-adf

That's the way I wanted to go first, too, but then I saw that there is not any 
package named type1-xxx, but there is a package 
xorg-fonts-type1
and another one called
ttf-indic-otf
in the extra repository, so I thought appendig the type might be the better 
choice.

Anyway, if somebody who is part of the TU-Olympus tells me to take a different 
way, naturally I will follow ;-)

In this case please orphan:
otf-adf - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24551
(for the reasons already described in my first request)

and remove the packages:
adffonts-otf - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34669
adffonts-ttf - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34671
adffonts-type1 - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34672

I will then adopt otf-adf and then upload new pkgbuilds for
otf-adf
ttf-adf
type1-adf
all then belonging to the group adf-fonts

Okay?
Thanks, Christoph

> 
> 
> --
> GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD