Re: [aur-general] virtualbox_bin status
No. I am too lazy to generate for md5sums for all achitectures =/ But looks like Dop just adopted most-voted package in AUR. On 17/02/10 01:55, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) wrote: On 02/17/2010 01:52 AM, Lex Rivera wrote: Current virtualbox_bin maintainer (Dop182) adopted package, but has not updated package (even with working patch in comment) and has not replied nor to mail nor to comments. What we must do now? If a reasonable amount of time has passed, you can request that one of us orphan it... assuming you're willing to maintain it. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
[aur-general] removal request perl-net-ssleay
sorry accidentally uploaded this package because it's not up to date in extra. please remove (already flagged the extra one as out of date) -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com
Re: [aur-general] removal request perl-net-ssleay
On 02/17/2010 02:44 AM, Caleb Cushing wrote: sorry accidentally uploaded this package because it's not up to date in extra. please remove (already flagged the extra one as out of date) Done
[aur-general] Bugs Everywhere?
I've found a few distributed bugtrackers on AUR, but I really wanted to check out Bugs Everywhere[1]. I can't find it on AUR though. This could be due to my weak search-fu skills, so I thought I'd asking here before going the manual route. /M [1]: http://bugseverywhere.org/be/show/HomePage -- Magnus Therning(OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) magnus＠therning．org Jabber: magnus＠therning．org http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe
[aur-general] removal request and issue with the replacing package
Hi, I packaged two simple documentation packages: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34297 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34298 They come from the same source package but at that time, I didn't even know build multiple binaries from a single PKGBUILD was possible. So I've merged them in a new PKGBUILD and I ask for the removal of these two obsolete ones. But then I can't upload the new source package. I get: Invalid name: only lowercase letters are allowed. lpod-docs-html was accepted so I'm surprised lpod-docs isn't. Here is my PKGBUILD: http://pastebin.ca/1799987 Thanks for your help, -- Hervé Cauwelier
Re: [aur-general] removal request and issue with the replacing package
On 18/02/10 00:08, Hervé Cauwelier wrote:
Hi,
I packaged two simple documentation packages:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34297
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34298
They come from the same source package but at that time, I didn't even
know build multiple binaries from a single PKGBUILD was possible.
So I've merged them in a new PKGBUILD and I ask for the removal of these
two obsolete ones.
But then I can't upload the new source package. I get:
Invalid name: only lowercase letters are allowed.
lpod-docs-html was accepted so I'm surprised lpod-docs isn't.
But that is not the pkgname...
pkgname=('lpod-docs-html' 'lpod-docs-pdf')
Split packages are not supported by the AUR.
Re: [aur-general] removal request and issue with the replacing package
On 02/17/10 15:15, Allan McRae wrote:
On 18/02/10 00:08, Hervé Cauwelier wrote:
[...]
But then I can't upload the new source package. I get:
Invalid name: only lowercase letters are allowed.
lpod-docs-html was accepted so I'm surprised lpod-docs isn't.
But that is not the pkgname...
pkgname=('lpod-docs-html' 'lpod-docs-pdf')
Split packages are not supported by the AUR.
Is it planned or do you recommend that I stick with separate PKGBUILDs
with the same source tarball?
Regards
--
Hervé Cauwelier
Re: [aur-general] mass orphan aCiD2's packages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA224 On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:46:06 -0500 Caleb Cushing xenoterrac...@gmail.com wrote: I don't know if it's possible... but aCiD2 left the arch community a while ago... is it possible to mass orphan his packages? or transfer them? I've picked up a good share already. At the time we were just going do them as they needed to be updated. if it's not possible mass do it, should I just request them here as needed? Asked for approval from his side and done so after I got his permission. - -- Jabber: atsut...@freethoughts.de Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/ Key: 295AFBF4 FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iFYEARELAAYFAkt8D8kACgkQOeTxfyla+/RarQDgo523+Mp+AiNvGOPsznjbf4+I h5XX9xGZVa+j/wDg4Zga7X/99xW427wEWNdsWsaqccVaPu9sPqi1Bg== =s/H1 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [aur-general] Bugs Everywhere?
Attached is a PKGBUILD that should work. It fails due to a bug in their version numbering system. Oh the irony! Chris On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Magnus Therning mag...@therning.orgwrote: I've found a few distributed bugtrackers on AUR, but I really wanted to check out Bugs Everywhere[1]. I can't find it on AUR though. This could be due to my weak search-fu skills, so I thought I'd asking here before going the manual route. /M [1]: http://bugseverywhere.org/be/show/HomePage -- Magnus Therning(OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) magnus＠therning．org Jabber: magnus＠therning．org http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe PKGBUILD Description: Binary data
Re: [aur-general] removal request and issue with the replacing package
Am Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:19:14 +0100 schrieb Hervé Cauwelier he...@oursours.net: Is it planned or do you recommend that I stick with separate PKGBUILDs with the same source tarball? Maybe you should vote for this feature request: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16394?project=2 Greetings, Heiko
Re: [aur-general] please remove perl-perl6-junction
On 17 February 2010 15:13, Caleb Cushing xenoterrac...@gmail.com wrote: due to a change in the package generation it's been deprecated by perl6-junction -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com Done. -- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD
Re: [aur-general] Bugs Everywhere?
On 17/02/10 16:29, Chris Baker wrote:
Attached is a PKGBUILD that should work. It fails due to a bug in their
version numbering system. Oh the irony!
Thanks for that. It got me off in the right direction.
I've attached a slightly updated version that seems to work fine.
/M
--
Magnus Therning(OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
magnus＠therning．org Jabber: magnus＠therning．org
http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe
# Contributor: Chris Baker baker.chri...@gmail.com
# Unfortunately it's not possible to get bzr to show version info of remote
# repos, to find pkgver manually use:
# bzr version-info --custom --template={revno}\n
pkgname=bugseverywhere-bzr
pkgver=330
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc=Distributed bugtracker
arch=('x86', 'x86_64')
url=http://bugseverywhere.org/;
license=('GPL2')
depends=('python-yaml')
makedepends=('bzr')
_bzrroot=http://bzr.bugseverywhere.org/be;
_bzrname=be
build() {
cd $srcdir
msg Connecting to Bazaar server...
if [ -d $_bzrname ] ; then
msg Updating local files...
cd $_bzrname
bzr revert --no-backup
bzr up
else
msg Checking out repository...
bzr get $_bzrroot $_bzrname
cd $_bzrname
fi
msg Bazaar checkout done or server timeout
msg Starting make...
# remove the man page, docbook-to-man doesn't seem to exist in ArchLinux
sed -e s,.*share/man.*,,g -i setup.py
# only do the relevant bits of the Makefile
make libbe/_version.py
python setup.py install --root=$pkgdir/ --optimize=1 || return 1
}
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
