Re: [aur-general] Delete Request
On 14 September 2010 07:18, Nathan O ndowens@gmail.com wrote: Probably if somebody updated the package to the latest version, I would think it would end up being the same as mysql in the official mysql package. On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:53 AM, jwbirdsong jwbirds...@jwbirdsong.homelinux.com wrote: I think so. Given it doesn't contain necessary sources I removed it.
Re: [aur-general] Delete Request
Thanks 2010/9/14 Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkov...@gmail.com On 14 September 2010 07:18, Nathan O ndowens@gmail.com wrote: Probably if somebody updated the package to the latest version, I would think it would end up being the same as mysql in the official mysql package. On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:53 AM, jwbirdsong jwbirds...@jwbirdsong.homelinux.com wrote: I think so. Given it doesn't contain necessary sources I removed it.
[aur-general] new packages in [extra]
Dear TUs, The following packages have been added to [extra], so their counterparts can safely be removed from the AUR. libcue http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25766 libguesshttp://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39416 ttf-sazanamihttp://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6268 vim-spell-bghttp://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21898 vim-spell-cshttp://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15551 vim-spell-dehttp://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13863 vim-spell-frhttp://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15155 vim-spell-huhttp://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32262 vim-spell-ithttp://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13929 vim-spell-nlhttp://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26366 vim-spell-plhttp://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19509 vim-spell-pthttp://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21997 vim-spell-rohttp://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32263 vim-spell-skhttp://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27116 vim-spell-slhttp://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35345 Best. -- Gaetan
Re: [aur-general] new packages in [extra]
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Gaetan Bisson bis...@archlinux.org wrote: Dear TUs, The following packages have been added to [extra], so their counterparts can safely be removed from the AUR. libcue http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25766 libguess http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39416 ttf-sazanami http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6268 vim-spell-bg http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21898 vim-spell-cs http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15551 vim-spell-de http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13863 vim-spell-fr http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15155 vim-spell-hu http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32262 vim-spell-it http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13929 vim-spell-nl http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26366 vim-spell-pl http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19509 vim-spell-pt http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21997 vim-spell-ro http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32263 vim-spell-sk http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27116 vim-spell-sl http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35345 Best. -- Gaetan Done, thanks.
[aur-general] delete merkaartor-svn
Hi, please remove the package merkaartor-svn [1] from AUR. It now uses git as version control and an respective package is already available. The svn directory [2] does not exist anymore. Thanks! [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18182 [2] http://svn.openstreetmap.org/applications/editors/merkaartor/
Re: [aur-general] delete merkaartor-svn
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Simon Legner simon.leg...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, please remove the package merkaartor-svn [1] from AUR. It now uses git as version control and an respective package is already available. The svn directory [2] does not exist anymore. Thanks! [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18182 [2] http://svn.openstreetmap.org/applications/editors/merkaartor/ Done, thanks.
[aur-general] nini package
hi, i have a little problem with nini package this package is a makedepend of a package that i adopted, smuxi, but the nini package actually be broken, this subject was notificated to the pkgbuild mantainter, directly in the aur page, marked this package as not up to date, and your personal e-mail, without any response. a user provided in the coments of nini package, a src.tar.gz that works fine can you mark as orphaned the nini package, for adopt it and update the pkgbuild thanks
[aur-general] voting period: Peter Lewis
Hello TUs, This message marks the start of the seven-day voting period for Peter Lewis's application to the position of Trusted User. If you wish to reread the application, find it here: http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2010-September/010751.html Good luck, Pete! -- Chris pgpizCe1m7fgg.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] nini package
On 2010-09-14 14:39 -0400 (37:2) Gonzalo Seguel wrote: hi, i have a little problem with nini package this package is a makedepend of a package that i adopted, smuxi, but the nini package actually be broken, this subject was notificated to the pkgbuild mantainter, directly in the aur page, marked this package as not up to date, and your personal e-mail, without any response. a user provided in the coments of nini package, a src.tar.gz that works fine can you mark as orphaned the nini package, for adopt it and update the pkgbuild thanks Orphaned: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21389 Please provide a link next time. While reviewing the request, I noticed that Sacro hasn't been active in at least a year. I've orphaned those packages which had comments requesting an update (usually with specific suggestions). The others had no comments and were not flagged out-of-date. so I've left them for now.
Re: [aur-general] nini package
Am 14.09.2010 20:39, schrieb Gonzalo Seguel: hi, i have a little problem with nini package this package is a makedepend of a package that i adopted, smuxi, but the nini package actually be broken, this subject was notificated to the pkgbuild mantainter, directly in the aur page, marked this package as not up to date, and your personal e-mail, without any response. a user provided in the coments of nini package, a src.tar.gz that works fine can you mark as orphaned the nini package, for adopt it and update the pkgbuild thanks Someone did so already. Thanks.
Re: [aur-general] nini package
Stefan Husmann wrote: Someone did so already. Hehe, beat you by 20 seconds :P
Re: [aur-general] gimp-devel-source
Am 08.09.2010 10:26, schrieb Nathan O: gimp-devel-source http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31926 looks almost the same as http://repos.archlinux.org/wsvn/packages/gimp-devel/repos/extra-i686/PKGBUILDone difference I seen was in gimp-devel-source at the ./configure line --disable-devel-docs seems to be about the same in my opinion. I agree, removed. Thank you.
[aur-general] Naming: qtscrob vs. qtscrobbler
Hi all, I'd like to hear your opinion on the naming of the AUR packages [1] of the QTScrobbler application [2]. The oldest package is qtscrob referring to the URL of the sourceforge page and the source code archive name. Although the name of the application stated on the homepage is QTScrobbler. When I wanted to install the application in March 2010, I searched for qtscrobbler on AUR and obviously didn't find the package qtscrob. Therefore I packaged myself and submitted the packages qtscrobbler and qtscrobbler-cli. When I noticed the duplication I wrote a removal request to the mailing list [3], which was forgotten after a short discussion. (I submitted qtscrob-cli as a copy of qtscrobbler-cli for conformance having the removal of qtscrobbler* in mind.) The current situation is of course dissatisfying. I'd like to know whether the application name should be preferred over the short name. I don't mind about the maintainership of the packages. Regards, Simon (simon04) [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?O=0K=qtscrobdo_Search=Go [2] http://qtscrob.sourceforge.net/ [3] http://www.mail-archive.com/aur-general@archlinux.org/msg07211.html
Re: [aur-general] Naming: qtscrob vs. qtscrobbler
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 15:51, Simon Legner simon.leg...@gmail.com wrote: [...] the name of the application stated on the homepage is QTScrobbler. Name it qtscrobbler.
[aur-general] Spux-svn should be removed
The Spux (ventrilo client) project is dead and another project, Mangler (also on aur already), has taken its place. The pkgbuild for spux-svn naturally has been long since dead, and should be removed.
Re: [aur-general] Spux-svn should be removed
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Final Crisis finalcrisi...@hotmail.com wrote: The Spux (ventrilo client) project is dead and another project, Mangler (also on aur already), has taken its place. The pkgbuild for spux-svn naturally has been long since dead, and should be removed. Done.
[aur-general] Delete Request
Can somebody delete pidgin-toolbar: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38546 I am currently working on it, and in my opinion, the package should be named pidgin-toobars since that is what the author of the plugin calls it. My package will be called pidgin-toobars Thanks
Re: [aur-general] Delete Request
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Nathan O ndowens@gmail.com wrote: Can somebody delete pidgin-toolbar: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38546 I am currently working on it, and in my opinion, the package should be named pidgin-toobars since that is what the author of the plugin calls it. My package will be called pidgin-toobars Thanks done
