[aur-general] New Trusted User: Lukas Fleischer
Hello TUs With 21 yes, 0 no, and 4 abstains out of 27 active members, we have a 92.5% quorum and a new Trusted User! Lukas please follow the steps described in the Trusted User Guidelines for new members. http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_Trusted_User_Guidelines#TODO_list_for_new_Trusted_Users Congrats and welcome!
Re: [aur-general] New Trusted User: Lukas Fleischer
On 24.10.2010 16:04, Loui Chang wrote:
Congrats and welcome!
I hope your enthusiasm on fixing the AUR doesn't wear off ;)
--
Florian Pritz -- {flo,bluewi...@server-speed.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[aur-general] Please Remove: geography-countries, ip-country
These package do not follow the perl module naming guidelines for the AUR. They are also duplicates of existing packages perl-geography-countries and perl-ip-country. The maintainer has agreed they should be removed. * ip-country (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2822) * geography-countries (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2821) Thanks -- -Justin
Re: [aur-general] Please Remove: geography-countries, ip-country
On 10/24/2010 05:31 PM, Justin Davis wrote: These package do not follow the perl module naming guidelines for the AUR. They are also duplicates of existing packages perl-geography-countries and perl-ip-country. The maintainer has agreed they should be removed. * ip-country (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2822) * geography-countries (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2821) Thanks Done thanks
[aur-general] Please delete aptana-studio
Hello, Today I noticed that in AUR there are two packages which seem to do the same thing, one named Aptana[1] and the other Aptana-Studio[2]. Looks like Aptana-Studio is much newer than Aptana with fewer votes, and was created initially instead of ophraning Aptana. Therefore, I propose Aptana-Studio to be deleted. Thanks, Smartboy [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7147 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31634
Re: [aur-general] Please delete aptana-studio
On 24 October 2010 17:42, Smartboy smartboyath...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Today I noticed that in AUR there are two packages which seem to do the same thing, one named Aptana[1] and the other Aptana-Studio[2]. Looks like Aptana-Studio is much newer than Aptana with fewer votes, and was created initially instead of ophraning Aptana. Therefore, I propose Aptana-Studio to be deleted. Thanks, Smartboy [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7147 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31634 Aptana-Studio has much better PKGBUILD.
Re: [aur-general] New Trusted User: Lukas Fleischer
On Sunday 24 October 2010 at 15:04 Loui Chang wrote: With 21 yes, 0 no, and 4 abstains out of 27 active members, we have a 92.5% quorum and a new Trusted User! Wooo! Congratulations Lukas!
Re: [aur-general] New Trusted User: Lukas Fleischer
On 10/24/2010 05:53 PM, Peter Lewis wrote: On Sunday 24 October 2010 at 15:04 Loui Chang wrote: With 21 yes, 0 no, and 4 abstains out of 27 active members, we have a 92.5% quorum and a new Trusted User! Wooo! Congratulations Lukas! My condolences Lukas :D
Re: [aur-general] New Trusted User: Lukas Fleischer
On 24 October 2010 16:04, Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote: Hello TUs With 21 yes, 0 no, and 4 abstains out of 27 active members, we have a 92.5% quorum and a new Trusted User! Lukas please follow the steps described in the Trusted User Guidelines for new members. http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_Trusted_User_Guidelines#TODO_list_for_new_Trusted_Users Congrats and welcome! Congratulations!
Re: [aur-general] New Trusted User: Lukas Fleischer
On 24.10.2010 18:04, Jakob Gruber wrote: On 10/24/2010 05:53 PM, Peter Lewis wrote: On Sunday 24 October 2010 at 15:04 Loui Chang wrote: With 21 yes, 0 no, and 4 abstains out of 27 active members, we have a 92.5% quorum and a new Trusted User! Wooo! Congratulations Lukas! My condolences Lukas :D I actually wanted to put a witty response here but instead I decided to indirectly congratulate Lukas. I also wanted to indirectly state that he may sit right next to me on my TU-couch.
Re: [aur-general] Please delete aptana-studio
2010/10/24 Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkov...@gmail.com: On 24 October 2010 17:42, Smartboy smartboyath...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Today I noticed that in AUR there are two packages which seem to do the same thing, one named Aptana[1] and the other Aptana-Studio[2]. Looks like Aptana-Studio is much newer than Aptana with fewer votes, and was created initially instead of ophraning Aptana. Therefore, I propose Aptana-Studio to be deleted. Thanks, Smartboy [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7147 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31634 Aptana-Studio has much better PKGBUILD. And it's got the right name. Aptana is the company.
Re: [aur-general] Please delete aptana-studio
On 10/24/2010 10:06 AM, Ray Rashif wrote: 2010/10/24 Lukáš Jirkovskýl.jirkov...@gmail.com: On 24 October 2010 17:42, Smartboysmartboyath...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Today I noticed that in AUR there are two packages which seem to do the same thing, one named Aptana[1] and the other Aptana-Studio[2]. Looks like Aptana-Studio is much newer than Aptana with fewer votes, and was created initially instead of ophraning Aptana. Therefore, I propose Aptana-Studio to be deleted. Thanks, Smartboy [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7147 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31634 Aptana-Studio has much better PKGBUILD. And it's got the right name. Aptana is the company. Then should Aptana be deleted? Seems confusing to me to have both Aptana and Aptana-Studio which do the same thing. Smartboy
[aur-general] utorrent-server deletion request
utorrent-server [1] is a duplicate of utserver [2]. It has no maintainer, is outdated and has a bad PKGBUILD. Thanks, [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40600 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40602 -- Cédric Girard
Re: [aur-general] utorrent-server deletion request
Am 24.10.2010 20:11, schrieb Cédric Girard: utorrent-server [1] is a duplicate of utserver [2]. It has no maintainer, is outdated and has a bad PKGBUILD. Thanks, [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40600 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40602 Done, thank you.
Re: [aur-general] New Trusted User: Lukas Fleischer
On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 20:01 +0200, Xyne wrote: Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: On 24.10.2010 18:04, Jakob Gruber wrote: On 10/24/2010 05:53 PM, Peter Lewis wrote: On Sunday 24 October 2010 at 15:04 Loui Chang wrote: With 21 yes, 0 no, and 4 abstains out of 27 active members, we have a 92.5% quorum and a new Trusted User! Wooo! Congratulations Lukas! My condolences Lukas :D I actually wanted to put a witty response here but instead I decided to indirectly congratulate Lukas. I also wanted to indirectly state that he may sit right next to me on my TU-couch. *Congratulates Lukas and quietly advises him to lay down some plastic before sitting on Sven-Hendrik's TU-couch. Congratulation Lucas ! -- http://groups.fsf.org/wiki/User:Aurelien Freedom is not just a word, it's a duty.
Re: [aur-general] utorrent-server deletion request
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Stefan Husmann stefan-husm...@t-online.dewrote: Am 24.10.2010 20:11, schrieb Cédric Girard: utorrent-server [1] is a duplicate of utserver [2]. It has no maintainer, is outdated and has a bad PKGBUILD. Thanks, [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40600 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40602 Done, thank you. Thank you. -- Cédric Girard
