Re: [aur-general] Temporary Inactivity
On 29 January 2011 23:53, Ray Rashif wrote: > On 29 January 2011 06:36, Jonathan Conder > > > wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I'm off to the beach again and won't be back until Monday. This time > there > > is something on my todo list, which is to move the mythplugins-* packages > > from community-testing into community once libmysqlclient is updated. If > > this happens while I'm away it would be great if someone could do that > for > > me. If not, it doesn't matter that much because the only package it will > > break is mythplugins-mythzoneminder, which I doubt is used by many > people. > > OK, we'll keep tabs on that. > Thanks. I'm back now so I can do it myself, and just in time by the looks of the todo list :). Jonathan
[aur-general] Please delete lib32-printproto
Unless you all see a better reason, I think it should be deleted. It would be pulling the same files as the x86_64 version (as they're both from "any"), so any package in reference to this one should use printproto instead, even if the package is a 32-bit binary blob on a 64-bit system. -Max
Re: [aur-general] Delete AUR Package Request
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 01:14:36AM -0200, Bernardo Barros wrote: > Also this one: > > acoustica-font-ttf 1-1 > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44855 also deleted!
Re: [aur-general] Delete AUR Package Request
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 01:13:05AM -0200, Bernardo Barros wrote: > Please delete the following packages. > Reason: I changed their pkgnames to more appropriate. > > I wasn't aware of fonts convention at the time. > For the supercollider plugin I omitted "ugen", since all 'plugins' > in supercollider parlance are 'UGens'. > > supercollider-dfm1ugen > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45930 > > concreta-font-ttf > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44856 > > controla-font-ttf > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44854 > > electronica-font-ttf > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44857 > Deleted, thanks. dave
Re: [aur-general] Delete AUR Package Request
Also this one: acoustica-font-ttf 1-1 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44855
[aur-general] Delete AUR Package Request
Please delete the following packages. Reason: I changed their pkgnames to more appropriate. I wasn't aware of fonts convention at the time. For the supercollider plugin I omitted "ugen", since all 'plugins' in supercollider parlance are 'UGens'. supercollider-dfm1ugen http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45930 concreta-font-ttf http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44856 controla-font-ttf http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44854 electronica-font-ttf http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44857 -- The New Ones (do not delete!): supercollider-dfm1 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45931 ttf-acoustica http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44905 ttf-concreta http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44906 ttf-controla http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44907 ttf-electronica http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44908
Re: [aur-general] Request removal: ffmpeg-amr, ffmpeg-amr-svn
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 14:49 -0900, Lou wrote: > ffmpeg-amr > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18501 > > ffmpeg-amr-svn > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15908 > > Both are recently orphaned and not required by any other package. > Obsoleted by ffmpeg in Extra. Done -- Jelle van der Waa signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[aur-general] Request removal: ffmpeg-amr, ffmpeg-amr-svn
ffmpeg-amr http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18501 ffmpeg-amr-svn http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15908 Both are recently orphaned and not required by any other package. Obsoleted by ffmpeg in Extra.
Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Seblu - Results.
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote: > On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Seblu wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Peter Lewis > wrote: > >> On Sunday 23 January 2011 16:15:41 Peter Lewis wrote: > >>> On Sunday 16 January 2011 21:07:28 Peter Lewis wrote: > >>> > On Sunday 16 January 2011 20:37:13 Seblu wrote: > >>> > > Tonight I decided to propose me as TU. My sponsor is Peter Lewis. > >>> > > >>> > I am indeed. Let the discussion period begin! > >>> > >>> The discussion period has now ended and voting can begin. Please pop > >> along > >>> to the AUR to do so: > >>> > >>> http://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=47 > >> > >> Voting is now closed and the results are in: > >> > >> Yes - 7 > >> No - 11 > >> Abstain - 5 > >> > >> Quoracy was reached (74%) with a total of 23 / 31 active+voting TUs > >> casting their votes. > >> > >> Sorry Sébastien, on this occasion I'm afraid you were unsuccessful. > >> > >> According to the bylaws, you're welcome to apply again after a minimum > >> period of three months. > >> > >> I wonder if it might be useful at this stage for some of the TUs to give > >> Sébastien some advice on improving his application in case he decides to > >> reapply in the future. > >> > > Thanks for your support Peter and thoses we vote for me. > > > > > > Hey Seblu, I would just like to thank you for your application, even > if it didn't go the way you had hoped for. > It seems like your intentions are good, but you somewhat lacking in > experience. > That said, I would welcome you to apply again once you started getting > more involved with the community. > One suggestion is to become really good with packages and maintain a > lot more of them, but other skills would also be nice, fix bugs etc. > > Cheers! > I just saw this Sebula, I hope that you consider re-applying once you have a few more packages under your belt, you are very close to becoming a TU and we would love to have you! -Thomas S Hatch
Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Seblu - Results.
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Seblu wrote: > On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Peter Lewis wrote: >> On Sunday 23 January 2011 16:15:41 Peter Lewis wrote: >>> On Sunday 16 January 2011 21:07:28 Peter Lewis wrote: >>> > On Sunday 16 January 2011 20:37:13 Seblu wrote: >>> > > Tonight I decided to propose me as TU. My sponsor is Peter Lewis. >>> > >>> > I am indeed. Let the discussion period begin! >>> >>> The discussion period has now ended and voting can begin. Please pop >> along >>> to the AUR to do so: >>> >>> http://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=47 >> >> Voting is now closed and the results are in: >> >> Yes - 7 >> No - 11 >> Abstain - 5 >> >> Quoracy was reached (74%) with a total of 23 / 31 active+voting TUs >> casting their votes. >> >> Sorry Sébastien, on this occasion I'm afraid you were unsuccessful. >> >> According to the bylaws, you're welcome to apply again after a minimum >> period of three months. >> >> I wonder if it might be useful at this stage for some of the TUs to give >> Sébastien some advice on improving his application in case he decides to >> reapply in the future. >> > Thanks for your support Peter and thoses we vote for me. > > Hey Seblu, I would just like to thank you for your application, even if it didn't go the way you had hoped for. It seems like your intentions are good, but you somewhat lacking in experience. That said, I would welcome you to apply again once you started getting more involved with the community. One suggestion is to become really good with packages and maintain a lot more of them, but other skills would also be nice, fix bugs etc. Cheers!
Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Seblu - Results.
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Peter Lewis wrote: > On Sunday 23 January 2011 16:15:41 Peter Lewis wrote: >> On Sunday 16 January 2011 21:07:28 Peter Lewis wrote: >> > On Sunday 16 January 2011 20:37:13 Seblu wrote: >> > > Tonight I decided to propose me as TU. My sponsor is Peter Lewis. >> > >> > I am indeed. Let the discussion period begin! >> >> The discussion period has now ended and voting can begin. Please pop > along >> to the AUR to do so: >> >> http://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=47 > > Voting is now closed and the results are in: > > Yes - 7 > No - 11 > Abstain - 5 > > Quoracy was reached (74%) with a total of 23 / 31 active+voting TUs > casting their votes. > > Sorry Sébastien, on this occasion I'm afraid you were unsuccessful. > > According to the bylaws, you're welcome to apply again after a minimum > period of three months. > > I wonder if it might be useful at this stage for some of the TUs to give > Sébastien some advice on improving his application in case he decides to > reapply in the future. > Thanks for your support Peter and thoses we vote for me. -- Sébastien Luttringer www.seblu.net
Re: [aur-general] orphan request: cdu
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Evangelos Foutras wrote: > On 30/01/11 19:48, masutu wrote: > > Hi, > > > > can you please orphan the package cdu ( > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34752). As you can see > (forwarded > > message), the current maintainer does no longer want to maintain this > > packages, I'd like to adopt it. > > Done. > Thanks, adopted and updated.
Re: [aur-general] orphan request: cdu
On 30/01/11 19:48, masutu wrote: > Hi, > > can you please orphan the package cdu ( > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34752). As you can see (forwarded > message), the current maintainer does no longer want to maintain this > packages, I'd like to adopt it. Done.
[aur-general] orphan request: cdu
Hi, can you please orphan the package cdu ( http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34752). As you can see (forwarded message), the current maintainer does no longer want to maintain this packages, I'd like to adopt it. masutu -- Forwarded message -- From: Igor Hlina Date: Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 6:27 PM Subject: Re: update request: arch aur cdu package To: masutu Hi masutu, I'll be very appreciated if you adopt package. I don't have energy/time to maitain package. THX and regards, srigi alias Igor Hlina :) On 01/30/2011 06:12 PM, masutu wrote: > Hi srigi, > > could you please update this package: > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34752. It's out of date, the > current version is 0.37. If you don't want to maintain this package any > more, let me know, i'd adopt it. > > Best regards, > > masutu >
Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Seblu - Results.
On Sunday 23 January 2011 16:15:41 Peter Lewis wrote: > On Sunday 16 January 2011 21:07:28 Peter Lewis wrote: > > On Sunday 16 January 2011 20:37:13 Seblu wrote: > > > Tonight I decided to propose me as TU. My sponsor is Peter Lewis. > > > > I am indeed. Let the discussion period begin! > > The discussion period has now ended and voting can begin. Please pop along > to the AUR to do so: > > http://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=47 Voting is now closed and the results are in: Yes - 7 No - 11 Abstain - 5 Quoracy was reached (74%) with a total of 23 / 31 active+voting TUs casting their votes. Sorry Sébastien, on this occasion I'm afraid you were unsuccessful. According to the bylaws, you're welcome to apply again after a minimum period of three months. I wonder if it might be useful at this stage for some of the TUs to give Sébastien some advice on improving his application in case he decides to reapply in the future. Cheers, Peter.
