[aur-general] Packages with update-desktop-database issues

2011-02-14 Thread Matthias Dienstbier
Hi,

I recently found that wine doesn't run update-desktop-database
(FS#22882) but that's not the only package with this issue.

I tested all my installed packages with this command:
for i in $(grep -Rl 'MimeType=.*/.*' /usr/share/applications/*); do pkg=
$(LANG=C pacman -Qo "$i"); grep -L
update-desktop-database /var/lib/pacman/local/$(echo $pkg | cut -d\
-f5)-$(echo $pkg | cut -d\  -f&)/install; done

The result was that at least these packages don't run
update-desktop-database although they install Mime associations:
extra/chromium
extra/evolution
extra/mplayer
extra/openjdk6
extra/qt
extra/sound-juicer
community/mplayer-vaapi
community/shotwell
community/virtualbox
community/wine

There are probably many more broken packages which I don't have
installed. I tried to get these via pkgfile but didn't succeed.

I really wonder why namcap doesn't do any checks on this.

-- 
Matthias Dienstbier



Re: [aur-general] Packages with update-desktop-database issues

2011-02-14 Thread Matthias Dienstbier
Sorry command had a typo, this is correct:

for i in $(grep -Rl 'MimeType=.*/.*' /usr/share/applications/*); do pkg=
$(LANG=C pacman -Qo "$i"); grep -L
update-desktop-database /var/lib/pacman/local/$(echo $pkg | cut -d\
-f5)-$(echo $pkg | cut -d\  -f6)/install; done



Re: [aur-general] Sorry wrong list

2011-02-14 Thread Matthias Dienstbier
Sorry again, I should have sent this to arch-general.

That's really not my day. -.-



Re: [aur-general] Sorry wrong list

2011-02-14 Thread Sven-Hendrik Haase
On 14.02.2011 14:33, Matthias Dienstbier wrote:
> Sorry again, I should have sent this to arch-general.
>
> That's really not my day. -.-
>
Actually since this is about [community] it also fits this list. I will
fix wine in a bit.


[aur-general] Cleanup request

2011-02-14 Thread D. Can Celasun
I've been going through Firefox stuff on AUR and noticed there are a lot of
ancient/obsolete/orphaned/etc. packages. I think the following should be
deleted, just to keep AUR clean.

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24912
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24958
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31785 (see the comment)
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24630 (obsolete, as FF beta is now
4.x, not 3.5.x)
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18090
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32162 (rendered obsolete by
firefox-beta-* packages)
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32484 (rendered obsolete by
firefox-beta-* packages)
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19004
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17566
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12311 (ancient)
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15695 (ancient)
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20759 (ancient)
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16075 (ancient)

I have more, but I'll save them for another time :)

Regards,
Can


Re: [aur-general] [arch-general] Package deletion request

2011-02-14 Thread Peter Lewis
On Monday 14 February 2011 13:02:54 Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
> On 14 February 2011 13:43, D. Can Celasun  wrote:
> > I've adopted, updated and reuploaded the "ejecter"[1] package as
> > "indicator-ejecter"[2] to follow the general naming convention regarding
> > Ayatana packages [3] . Can someone please delete the original "ejecter"
> > package?
> > 
> > [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20493
> > [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46497
> > [3] https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=99746&p=1
> > 
> > Thanks.
> 
> Deleted ejecter.

So were we both able to delete these simultaneously and the interface let us? 
Is this totally safe?

Just a thought...

Pete.


Re: [aur-general] Cleanup request

2011-02-14 Thread Lou
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 16:07:07 +0200
"D. Can Celasun"  wrote:

> I've been going through Firefox stuff on AUR and noticed there are a
> lot of ancient/obsolete/orphaned/etc. packages. I think the following
> should be deleted, just to keep AUR clean.  

Adding names for future reference.

firefox-china
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24912  

firefox-china-addons
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24958  

firefox-complete-pl
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31785 (see the comment)  

firefox-i18n-beta
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24630 (obsolete, as FF beta
> is now 4.x, not 3.5.x)  

firefox-optimized
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18090  

firefox-testing
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32162 (rendered obsolete by
> firefox-beta-* packages)  

firefox-testing-src
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32484 (rendered obsolete by
> firefox-beta-* packages)  

icecat-zemberek
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19004  

kde-adblock-improvement
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17566  

swiftweasel-prescott
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12311 (ancient)  

swiftweasel3-prescott
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15695 (ancient)  

swiftweasel-nocona-es
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20759 (ancient)  

swiftweasel-nocona
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16075 (ancient)
> 
> I have more, but I'll save them for another time :)
> 
> Regards,
> Can  

All orphans and not required by anything else.


Re: [aur-general] Cleanup request

2011-02-14 Thread Jakob Gruber

On 02/14/2011 07:31 PM, Lou wrote:

On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 16:07:07 +0200
"D. Can Celasun"  wrote:


I've been going through Firefox stuff on AUR and noticed there are a
lot of ancient/obsolete/orphaned/etc. packages. I think the following
should be deleted, just to keep AUR clean.

Adding names for future reference.

firefox-china

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24912

firefox-china-addons

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24958

firefox-complete-pl

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31785 (see the comment)

firefox-i18n-beta

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24630 (obsolete, as FF beta
is now 4.x, not 3.5.x)

firefox-optimized

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18090

firefox-testing

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32162 (rendered obsolete by
firefox-beta-* packages)

firefox-testing-src

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32484 (rendered obsolete by
firefox-beta-* packages)

icecat-zemberek

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19004

kde-adblock-improvement

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17566

swiftweasel-prescott

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12311 (ancient)

swiftweasel3-prescott

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15695 (ancient)

swiftweasel-nocona-es

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20759 (ancient)

swiftweasel-nocona

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16075 (ancient)

I have more, but I'll save them for another time :)

Regards,
Can

All orphans and not required by anything else.


All deleted, thanks for reporting


[aur-general] gsettings-desktop-schemas moved to gnome-unstable

2011-02-14 Thread Ionuț Bîru

Hi,
i just moved that and i would like to ask you not to update the package 
in community to 0.1.5.


I would delete it once the gnome-unstable packages are moved to public 
repository.


Also to inform all the other trusted users about this, i'm going to CC 
this to aur-general.


--
Ionuț