Re: [aur-general] TU Resignation
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Ionuț Bîru ib...@archlinux.org wrote: Hi, i don't have too much time left for myself and i want to cut down some duties in arch. See you guys in devland :) http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?sort=repo=Communityq=maintainer=ibirulast_update=flagged=limit=50 From all packages that i maintain in community i only want to keep virtualbox. All the others are up for adoption. Oh no! We'll miss you ioni. --Kaiting. -- Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/
[aur-general] Deletion request: spoonwep2
Please delete spoonwep2[1] as following reasons: 1. The spoonwep2 seems hasn't been supported by BT4[2]. 2. There is no home page or link for spoonwep2 and the link originally provided by PKGBUILD is seems like to be for BT. 3. The package installed into /usr/local,and are not compatitable with newest aircrack-ng. 4. The src package contain an binary file. so,please delete it. [1]:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31306 [2]:http://www.backtrack-linux.org/
Re: [aur-general] How should *-devel packages generally be handled?
2011/3/16 Ng Oon-Ee ngoo...@gmail.com: So let's say foo is at version 4.0 (stable), should foo-devel stay at 3.9 (the last beta/rc/unstable release) or update to 4.0? Stay at the last unstable release.
[aur-general] Deletion requests: libiconv and nepomuk-playground-svn
Hi, Please delete libiconv and nepomuk-playground-svn entried from the AUR. Regarding libiconv: the files and functionalities it provided are now part of glibc. Having a package that conflicts with glibc does not make sense. Regarding nepomuk-playground-svn: the code moved to KDE's new git repository and was renamed at the same time. A new PKGBUILD could easily be created, but this fulfills no purpose any more. Cheers, mutlu
Re: [aur-general] How should *-devel packages generally be handled?
On 3/16/11, Ng Oon-Ee ngoo...@gmail.com wrote: Package foo exists in [extra], and foo-devel in the AUR. foo-devel is obviously based off unstable tarball releases (otherwise it would be foo-git, foo-svn, foo-hg or similar). So let's say foo is at version 4.0 (stable), should foo-devel stay at 3.9 (the last beta/rc/unstable release) or update to 4.0? Just a general question. My gnucash-devel package is currently pretty much identical to the one in [extra], and it does seem a bit unnecessary because the project itself does not currently have unstable releases. At least when I'm using -dev(el) packages I do so to get the most bleeding edge releases of that specific software (decluding svn/hg/git versions - unless recommended by upstream). I don't even understand how could anybody cope with just having unstable releases :). I myself quickly get annoyed by the crashes/lagginess/whatever. But as Jan said, it's a preference question decided by the maintainer (you). Det
Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: spoonwep2
Am 16.03.2011 16:36, schrieb 郑文辉: Please delete spoonwep2[1] as following reasons: 1. The spoonwep2 seems hasn't been supported by BT4[2]. 2. There is no home page or link for spoonwep2 and the link originally provided by PKGBUILD is seems like to be for BT. 3. The package installed into /usr/local,and are not compatitable with newest aircrack-ng. 4. The src package contain an binary file. so,please delete it. [1]:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31306 [2]:http://www.backtrack-linux.org/ Done thank you.
Re: [aur-general] Deletion requests: libiconv and nepomuk-playground-svn
Am 16.03.2011 18:50, schrieb mutlu_inek: Hi, Please delete libiconv and nepomuk-playground-svn entried from the AUR. Regarding libiconv: the files and functionalities it provided are now part of glibc. Having a package that conflicts with glibc does not make sense. Regarding nepomuk-playground-svn: the code moved to KDE's new git repository and was renamed at the same time. A new PKGBUILD could easily be created, but this fulfills no purpose any more. Cheers, mutlu Done, thank you.
[aur-general] Deletion request: svgalib-devel, n-queens-svn
Hi, svgalib-devel - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9501 1. It doesn't compile. 2. My package (svgalib) is acually a devel version and it's compiling fine with the newest kernel (2.6.38). n-queens-svn - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39619 1. It doesn't compile neither with metslib nor metslib-newest. Regards Krzysztof Grygiencz - Nowa Interia ma nowe funkcje! Sprawdz http://linkint.pl/f294b
Re: [aur-general] TU application (Kyle Keen) - Voting Period Results
On 3/16/11, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote: Congratulations, Kyle, and welcome to the team! I have updated your AUR status. Please make your way through the TODO list: Thank you. I'll get started on moving Pacgraph and Zeromq tonight. -Kyle http://kmkeen.com
Re: [aur-general] TU application (Kyle Keen) - Voting Period Results
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote: The voting period has ended with the following results: Yes: 19 No: 1 Abstain: 5 With 28 active TUs, quorum has been reached and the application has been accepted. Congratulations, Kyle, and welcome to the team! I have updated your AUR status. Please make your way through the TODO list: Congratulation! -- Sébastien Luttringer www.seblu.net
