[aur-general] Orphan, deletion requests
These are orphan requests and deletions for a MIA maintainer. The orphan requests are only for packages that I am interested in picking up. Orphan: mwlib: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20147 quark: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11243 python-geniusql-svn: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12652 Delete: nitrogen-git: Project no longer exists, much less a git repo https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12588 summon: I will resubmit as python2-summon https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15383 pisa: I will resubmit as python2-pisa https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14176 -Aaron DeVore
[aur-general] orphan request
Hi TUs, please orphan python-bitstring (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36002) The package is out of date and currently broken. Last updated: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:41:44 +. The maintainer did not respond to my e-mail since 3 days. I want to provide python 2 and 3 package for bitstring. thx, -- bbs: nblock aur: notizblock
Re: [aur-general] Orphan, deletion requests
On Wednesday, April 13, 2011 09:59:52 AM Aaron DeVore wrote: > These are orphan requests and deletions for a MIA maintainer. The > orphan requests are only for packages that I am interested in picking > up. > > Orphan: > mwlib: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20147 > quark: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11243 > python-geniusql-svn: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12652 > > Delete: > > nitrogen-git: Project no longer exists, much less a git repo > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12588 > summon: I will resubmit as python2-summon > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15383 > pisa: I will resubmit as python2-pisa > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14176 > > > -Aaron DeVore Ok i removed the packages, did you email the maintainer of those packages you want to get orphaned? -- Jelle van der Waa
[aur-general] Orphan Request
Hi, Please can you orphan offlineimap-git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24202 I suggested changes to the PKGBUILD (see comments) and contacted the maintainer directly by email but no reply in two weeks. Thanks, Mark (fastfret79) pgpmO7W0T8ohc.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Orphan Request
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Mark Foxwell wrote: > Hi, > > Please can you orphan offlineimap-git: > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24202 > > I suggested changes to the PKGBUILD (see comments) and contacted the > maintainer directly by email but no reply in two weeks. > > Thanks, > > Mark (fastfret79) > Would be grateful if that was updated =). The offlineimap developments currently in git are really interesting.
Re: [aur-general] Orphan Request
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Mark Foxwell wrote: > Hi, > > Please can you orphan offlineimap-git: > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24202 > > I suggested changes to the PKGBUILD (see comments) and contacted the > maintainer directly by email but no reply in two weeks. > > Thanks, > > Mark (fastfret79) > Disowned.
Re: [aur-general] Orphan Request
On 13/04/11 13:25, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: > Would be grateful if that was updated =). The offlineimap developments > currently in git are really interesting. Indeed - I joined their mailing list about a month ago and I'm quite impressed with the amount of activity in the project and the communication with upstream. pgpEyQ6JKQBXj.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] orphan request
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 1:04 PM, notizblock wrote: > Hi TUs, > please orphan python-bitstring > (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36002) > > The package is out of date and currently broken. Last updated: Thu, 30 > Sep 2010 14:41:44 +. > The maintainer did not respond to my e-mail since 3 days. I want to > provide python 2 and 3 package for bitstring. > > thx, > -- > bbs: nblock > aur: notizblock > Orphaned.
Re: [aur-general] Orphan Request
On 13/04/11 13:40, Jan Steffens wrote: > Disowned. Thanks Jan :) pgpb4g81HWQlB.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Orphan, deletion requests
No, I haven't yet. His packages are far out of date, so I assume that he is no longer interested in them. Should I contact him anyway? -Aaron DeVore On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 4:29 AM, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > On Wednesday, April 13, 2011 09:59:52 AM Aaron DeVore wrote: > Ok i removed the packages, did you email the maintainer of those packages you > want to get orphaned? > > -- > Jelle van der Waa
Re: [aur-general] VCS dupes in the AUR
On 04/12/11 at 10:00pm, Stefan Husmann wrote: > On 12.04.2011 08:58, Peter Lewis wrote: > >Done a bit of research... > > > >On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Stefan Husmann wrote: > >> irssi (VCS) > >> * irssi-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6163 > >> * irssi-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25781 > > > >These both seem "official", though the main website points to the SVN repo > >and > >not the git one. However, it seems many contributors are using git since it's > >easier to send in patches etc. I couldn't find out how often they're synced, > >but > >I assume it's pretty regular. So, it's probably worth either keeping both, or > >just going with git only. > > > > > I prefer maintaining svn-versions over git-versions in AUR, because the have > revision numbers as $pkgver, not just a date. > > Regards Stefan I maintain irssi-svn, but only picked it up some time ago because it needed fix/updating. So no big deal if y'all decide it should go. I suppose as the discussion on this has grown cold I'll assume we're going to keep both? Seem no real conscience was reached. I'll drop/delete it if needed. JB pgpjvEvIR9I6S.pgp Description: PGP signature
[aur-general] Deletion request
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, please delete my package jaolt [1], as jaolt-svn is the same package but more up-to-date. Thanks, Max [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46194 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk2mj9MACgkQ3izE/HNrNdrAVwCfauFR/6Io6e9La5hzgwqjwHHS f2MAnAoH1xocZBFFWYOWkLAgGFO0IEW1 =PK4I -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [aur-general] Deletion request
On 14 April 2011 09:10, Max Roder wrote: > Hi, > > please delete my package jaolt [1], as jaolt-svn is the same package but > more up-to-date. Done, thanks.
