Re: [aur-general] changing a PKG's name and retaining votes/comments
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:45 AM, Daenyth Blank wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 17:07, D. Can Celasun wrote: > > If this is not technically possible (which is kinda hard to believe), it > > should be implemented. > > You should send in a patch that would allow TUs to do it. > As requested, patch attached. This should allow TUs to change the package name.
Re: [aur-general] changing a PKG's name and retaining votes/comments
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 17:07, D. Can Celasun wrote: > If this is not technically possible (which is kinda hard to believe), it > should be implemented. You should send in a patch that would allow TUs to do it.
Re: [aur-general] changing a PKG's name and retaining votes/comments
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:53 PM, member graysky > wrote: > > I maintain the kernel26-ck in the AUR. Once the devs decide on a new > > name for the kernel package based on the upcoming "3.0" release, > > either "linux" or "kernel" or "kernel30" or whatever, is it possible > > to change the name of my "kernel26-ck" PKG and retain all of the > > comments/votes it has under the current name? > > > > Thanks! > > > > It's not possible. You'll need to submit the new package to AUR, then > send a note on this ML to have the old one removed. > If this is not technically possible (which is kinda hard to believe), it should be implemented. I don't care about the votes, but comments are usually extremely relevant to the package (and very much useful) and they shouldn't be lost just because changing a single string in a db is "not possible". We already lost countless useful comments on AUR before, let's not do it again.
Re: [aur-general] changing a PKG's name and retaining votes/comments
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:53 PM, member graysky wrote: > I maintain the kernel26-ck in the AUR. Once the devs decide on a new > name for the kernel package based on the upcoming "3.0" release, > either "linux" or "kernel" or "kernel30" or whatever, is it possible > to change the name of my "kernel26-ck" PKG and retain all of the > comments/votes it has under the current name? > > Thanks! > It's not possible. You'll need to submit the new package to AUR, then send a note on this ML to have the old one removed.
[aur-general] changing a PKG's name and retaining votes/comments
I maintain the kernel26-ck in the AUR. Once the devs decide on a new name for the kernel package based on the upcoming "3.0" release, either "linux" or "kernel" or "kernel30" or whatever, is it possible to change the name of my "kernel26-ck" PKG and retain all of the comments/votes it has under the current name? Thanks!
Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] Integrity Check x86_64: core, extra, community, multilib 27-05-2011
> extra/libreoffice depends on community/cppunit (0 extra (make)deps to > pull) extra/libreoffice-extension-ct2n depends on community/cppunit (0 > extra (make)deps to pull) extra/libreoffice-extension-diagram depends on > community/cppunit (0 extra (make)deps to pull) > extra/libreoffice-extension-hunart depends on community/cppunit (0 extra > (make)deps to pull) extra/libreoffice-extension-nlpsolver depends on > community/cppunit (0 extra (make)deps to pull) > extra/libreoffice-extension-numbertext depends on community/cppunit (0 > extra (make)deps to pull) extra/libreoffice-extension-oooblogger depends > on community/cppunit (0 extra (make)deps to pull) > extra/libreoffice-extension-pdfimport depends on community/cppunit (0 > extra (make)deps to pull) > extra/libreoffice-extension-presentation-minimizer depends on > community/cppunit (0 extra (make)deps to pull) > extra/libreoffice-extension-presenter-screen depends on community/cppunit > (0 extra (make)deps to pull) extra/libreoffice-extension-report-builder > depends on community/cppunit (0 extra (make)deps to pull) > extra/libreoffice-extension-typo depends on community/cppunit (0 extra > (make)deps to pull) extra/libreoffice-extension-watch-window depends on > community/cppunit (0 extra (make)deps to pull) > extra/libreoffice-extension-wiki-publisher depends on community/cppunit (0 > extra (make)deps to pull) extra/libreoffice-sdk depends on > community/cppunit (0 extra (make)deps to pull) If there is no objection, I will move (and adopt) cppunit into [extra] before rebuiding for hunspell 1.3.x / icu 4.8. Stéphane
Re: [aur-general] Deletion Request
2011/5/31 speps : > Hi, > > mpd in extra provides jack support since version 0.16.2-2 > > please delete mpd-jack > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44610 > if jack support for mpd in extra is definitive Nuked, And yes, jack support is definitive, btw, next time you will fork a package to add some feature, please keep the original contributor / maintainer tag on them. Thanks. > > - speps - > -- Angel Velásquez angvp @ irc.freenode.net Arch Linux Developer / Trusted User Linux Counter: #359909 http://www.angvp.com
[aur-general] PCSX2 for Archlinux thread
Hi all! Just to let you know that there is a sticky thread in PCSX2 forum specifically for Archlinux users. The intention is to put issues, patches and other things in the same thread, which might make easier for arch users have their answer or to contribute. Y'all are welcome! http://forums.pcsx2.net/Thread-PCSX2-for-Archlinux Cheers, Rafael
[aur-general] Deletion Request
Hi, mpd in extra provides jack support since version 0.16.2-2 please delete mpd-jack > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44610 if jack support for mpd in extra is definitive - speps -
Re: [aur-general] Deletion request
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Thomas Jost wrote: > Hi all, > > Please delete nvidia-cuda from the AUR: > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41380 > (I'm the maintainer) > > It's an old and terribly buggy version of the nvidia driver that was > bundled with CUDA 3.2; it doesn't even work with recent kernels or > recent xorg versions. > > Thanks! > > Regards, > -- > Thomas/Schnouki > done
[aur-general] Deletion request
Hi all, Please delete nvidia-cuda from the AUR: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41380 (I'm the maintainer) It's an old and terribly buggy version of the nvidia driver that was bundled with CUDA 3.2; it doesn't even work with recent kernels or recent xorg versions. Thanks! Regards, -- Thomas/Schnouki pgp5L5xYFB1Fe.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] request: remove 2 entries from AUR (my pkgs)
On 31 May 2011 08:36, member graysky wrote: > This pkg is of no value and should be removed. > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40544 > > This pkg duplicates something that is contained in a pkg in > [community] and should be removed. > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48905 > > I am the author of each PKG. > Done. Thank you, Lukas
Re: [aur-general] Package Removal Request (openvas-server, openvas-libnasl)
> > I see somebody deleted openvas-libnasl and openvas-plugins => that's > good. But openvas-server should be deleted as well (as it depends on > openvas-libnasl) and it is superseeded by openvas-scanner. Actually, > openvas-scanner is new name for openvas-server. > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22946 > > Thanks in advance, > > Kost > Done, thank you Lukas
