Re: [aur-general] Package merge request: kernel26/linux-ice and kernel26/linux-rt-ice
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Evangelos Foutras evange...@foutrelis.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, please remove kernel26-ice [1] and merge comments/votes with linux-ice [2]. Also, I would prefer that kernel26-rt-ice [3] be removed and comments/votes merged with linux-rt-ice [4]. Both done. Thanks much
Re: [aur-general] Disown request
2011/8/22 Evangelos Foutras evange...@foutrelis.com On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:17 AM, rafael ff1 rafael.f...@gmail.com wrote: The packages lib32-libsexy [1] and lib32-libsexymm [2] have PKGBUILD set to build from binary and install libs in the invalid directory '/opt/lib32/usr/lib'. Disowned, please adopt. Thanks! Adopted fixed; Thanks.
[aur-general] Merge of virtualbox_bin into virtualbox-bin
Hello,
Can you merge virtualbox_bin into virtualbox-bin ?
The reason are those requested by josephgbr in
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9753
quote
The reason I'm asking this is that every time I update my packages
with yaourt -Syua, the package virtualbox-ext-oracle is listed
first than this package ('-' come first than '_') and I always have to
reinstall again after virtualbox_bin in order to work.
Thanks in advance.
/quote
Regards,
--
Sébastien Luttringer
www.seblu.net
Re: [aur-general] Merge of virtualbox_bin into virtualbox-bin
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:35:34AM +0200, Seblu wrote:
Hello,
Can you merge virtualbox_bin into virtualbox-bin ?
The reason are those requested by josephgbr in
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9753
quote
The reason I'm asking this is that every time I update my packages
with yaourt -Syua, the package virtualbox-ext-oracle is listed
first than this package ('-' come first than '_') and I always have to
reinstall again after virtualbox_bin in order to work.
Thanks in advance.
/quote
That reason is a bit ridiculous... Anyway, I renamed the package.
virtualbox-bin seems to be a better name.
Re: [aur-general] Merge of virtualbox_bin into virtualbox-bin
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 14:10, Lukas Fleischer archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:35:34AM +0200, Seblu wrote:
Hello,
Can you merge virtualbox_bin into virtualbox-bin ?
The reason are those requested by josephgbr in
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9753
quote
The reason I'm asking this is that every time I update my packages
with yaourt -Syua, the package virtualbox-ext-oracle is listed
first than this package ('-' come first than '_') and I always have to
reinstall again after virtualbox_bin in order to work.
Thanks in advance.
/quote
That reason is a bit ridiculous... Anyway, I renamed the package.
virtualbox-bin seems to be a better name.
I don't know if this has been discussed before, but along with moving
votes and comments, how about moving notify lists of the old package
to the new one, along with maybe a package comment in the old package
mentioning that the old package has been renamed to new one (not
manually by the user but automatically by the AUR software, before
deleting the old one?
Regards.
Keshav
Re: [aur-general] Merge of virtualbox_bin into virtualbox-bin
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Lukas Fleischer
archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:35:34AM +0200, Seblu wrote:
Hello,
Can you merge virtualbox_bin into virtualbox-bin ?
The reason are those requested by josephgbr in
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9753
quote
The reason I'm asking this is that every time I update my packages
with yaourt -Syua, the package virtualbox-ext-oracle is listed
first than this package ('-' come first than '_') and I always have to
reinstall again after virtualbox_bin in order to work.
Thanks in advance.
/quote
That reason is a bit ridiculous... Anyway, I renamed the package.
virtualbox-bin seems to be a better name.
I understand.
It should be more fair if submitter would be moved too no ?
--
Sébastien Luttringer
www.seblu.net
Re: [aur-general] Merge of virtualbox_bin into virtualbox-bin
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 02:15:23PM +0530, KESHAV P.R. wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 14:10, Lukas Fleischer archli...@cryptocrack.de
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:35:34AM +0200, Seblu wrote:
Hello,
Can you merge virtualbox_bin into virtualbox-bin ?
The reason are those requested by josephgbr in
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9753
quote
The reason I'm asking this is that every time I update my packages
with yaourt -Syua, the package virtualbox-ext-oracle is listed
first than this package ('-' come first than '_') and I always have to
reinstall again after virtualbox_bin in order to work.
Thanks in advance.
/quote
That reason is a bit ridiculous... Anyway, I renamed the package.
virtualbox-bin seems to be a better name.
I don't know if this has been discussed before, but along with moving
votes and comments, how about moving notify lists of the old package
to the new one, along with maybe a package comment in the old package
mentioning that the old package has been renamed to new one (not
manually by the user but automatically by the AUR software, before
deleting the old one?
* Moving comment notifications sounds like a good idea.
* Not sure about the automatic comment on package deletion. Sending
notifications on various events is a controversial issue, although I
personally think that it might make sense here. I usually always add a
comment before deleting a package to make sure users on the
notification list are aware of the package being removed.
* This should be discussed on aur-dev, not on aur-general.
Re: [aur-general] Merge of virtualbox_bin into virtualbox-bin
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:50:34AM +0200, Seblu wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Lukas Fleischer
archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:35:34AM +0200, Seblu wrote:
Hello,
Can you merge virtualbox_bin into virtualbox-bin ?
The reason are those requested by josephgbr in
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9753
quote
The reason I'm asking this is that every time I update my packages
with yaourt -Syua, the package virtualbox-ext-oracle is listed
first than this package ('-' come first than '_') and I always have to
reinstall again after virtualbox_bin in order to work.
Thanks in advance.
/quote
That reason is a bit ridiculous... Anyway, I renamed the package.
virtualbox-bin seems to be a better name.
I understand.
It should be more fair if submitter would be moved too no ?
The submitter field isn't that significant anyway. While there are a few
cases where it might be quite useful, it isn't supposed to credit the
original submitter (keep in mind that it also contains false
information if a package is moved to the binary repositories and moved
back to the AUR later). The header comments should be used to credit any
contributors, instead.
Re: [aur-general] Orphaning out-of-date packages
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 02:51:33AM +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote: Andrea suggested this about two months ago [1] - it's time to take the gloves off. I just created a list of packages that have been flagged out-of-date for almost 6 months now and still have a maintainer [2]. If you maintain any of these packages, feel free to update it. I will re-generate that list and mass orphan affected packages in a week's time. Done. Check [1] for a list of orphaned packages. [1] http://sprunge.us/jHWe
[aur-general] gwibber duplicates
Hi, please delete the following duplicates of gwibber and gwibber-dev: gwibber-dev-updated - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47745 gwibber-light - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47233 gwibber-new - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48086 gwibber3 - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49306 Thanks
Re: [aur-general] gwibber duplicates
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:48 AM, Balló György ballog...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, please delete the following duplicates of gwibber and gwibber-dev: gwibber-dev-updated - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47745 gwibber-light - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47233 gwibber-new - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48086 gwibber3 - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49306 Thanks Annihilated, thank you!
[aur-general] Python packaging newbie
Hi! I'm new to arch his packaging techniques and I have some questions on how things should be for python2/3 and build() vs package() things as well... Is this the good place to ask ? Thanks, Fabien Devaux.
Re: [aur-general] Python packaging newbie
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Fabien Devaux fde...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! I'm new to arch his packaging techniques and I have some questions on how things should be for python2/3 and build() vs package() things as well... Is this the good place to ask ? Thanks, Fabien Devaux. you could also try arch-general, but it's fine if you ask here... Just ask!
Re: [aur-general] Python packaging newbie
On 23 August 2011 07:03, Fabien Devaux fde...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! I'm new to arch his packaging techniques and I have some questions on how things should be for python2/3 and build() vs package() things as well... Is this the good place to ask ? If that is all your questions then this is the wrong place to ask. In fact, it would then be wrong to even ask. It is only correct to read: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Python_Package_Guidelines -- GPG/PGP ID: 8AADBB10
