[aur-general] SLiM up for adoption
Hi devs, Hi TUs, I am orphaning SLiM (login manager): upstream is dead, patches keep piling up, and I actually stopped using that package a while ago. As far as I know, our current package has only one unfixed bug: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/26579 Anyhow, I will move that package to the AUR in a week or so unless a dev or a TU wishes to adopt it. Cheers. -- Gaetan
Re: [aur-general] outdated package: "jpegtran" flagged as outdated since 2011-08-02
Hello, sorry, what a strange typo ;) On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 09:37:23PM +0100, oliver wrote: > On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 09:26:39PM +0200, Evangelos Foutras wrote: > > On 30/10/11 20:15, oliver wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > the package "jpegtran" is flagged outdated since 2011-08-02 > > > and I want to use it. > > > > > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20176 > > > > > > Can the maintainer be triggered to update, or can the package maintainer > > > be changed? > > > if the maintainer don't want to update it, I could adopt it. > > > > > > > > > Ciao, > > >Oliver > > > > The maintainer seems active, so I've CC'ed him. > > > > Jozef, please either update the package in question, or disown it. :) > > > > Thanks. > > I also wonder, shy it is in category "X11". ^^^ \ why
Re: [aur-general] outdated package: "jpegtran" flagged as outdated since 2011-08-02
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 09:26:39PM +0200, Evangelos Foutras wrote: > On 30/10/11 20:15, oliver wrote: > > Hello, > > > > the package "jpegtran" is flagged outdated since 2011-08-02 > > and I want to use it. > > > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20176 > > > > Can the maintainer be triggered to update, or can the package maintainer > > be changed? > > if the maintainer don't want to update it, I could adopt it. > > > > > > Ciao, > >Oliver > > The maintainer seems active, so I've CC'ed him. > > Jozef, please either update the package in question, or disown it. :) Thanks. I also wonder, shy it is in category "X11". It's a tool that should not need any X11-related libraries, because libjpeg is, what it uses directly... Ciao, Oliver
Re: [aur-general] outdated package: "jpegtran" flagged as outdated since 2011-08-02
On 30/10/11 20:15, oliver wrote: > Hello, > > the package "jpegtran" is flagged outdated since 2011-08-02 > and I want to use it. > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20176 > > Can the maintainer be triggered to update, or can the package maintainer > be changed? > if the maintainer don't want to update it, I could adopt it. > > > Ciao, >Oliver The maintainer seems active, so I've CC'ed him. Jozef, please either update the package in question, or disown it. :)
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] rinse
On 30/10/11 20:35, Michael Manley wrote: > Although I'm not the maintainer or original submitter, I'd ask for rinse to > be removed. The package hasn't been maintained since 2009, flagged out of > date, and the comments are from 2011 asking for updates and the maintainer > or submitter has not responded (Comments coming from June). I actually want > to maintain it as I have created an updated PKGBUILD and want to submit it > but unable due to it already existing. So I ask for it to be removed so I > can submit the updated version. I have disowned the package; you can now adopt it if you want.
[aur-general] [Removal Request] rinse
Although I'm not the maintainer or original submitter, I'd ask for rinse to be removed. The package hasn't been maintained since 2009, flagged out of date, and the comments are from 2011 asking for updates and the maintainer or submitter has not responded (Comments coming from June). I actually want to maintain it as I have created an updated PKGBUILD and want to submit it but unable due to it already existing. So I ask for it to be removed so I can submit the updated version. Thanks, Michael
[aur-general] outdated package: "jpegtran" flagged as outdated since 2011-08-02
Hello, the package "jpegtran" is flagged outdated since 2011-08-02 and I want to use it. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20176 Can the maintainer be triggered to update, or can the package maintainer be changed? if the maintainer don't want to update it, I could adopt it. Ciao, Oliver
Re: [aur-general] deletion request: xf86-video-geode-latest
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Calimero wrote: > Hello, > > The package xf86-video-geode-latest[1] I submitted long ago is no longer > needed, as the one in [extra] is perfectly working and up to date. Deleted, thanks.
[aur-general] deletion request: xf86-video-geode-latest
Hello, The package xf86-video-geode-latest[1] I submitted long ago is no longer needed, as the one in [extra] is perfectly working and up to date. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29916 All the best
