Re: [aur-general] TU Resignation
On 22 November 2011 00:24, Karol Blazewicz karol.blazew...@gmail.com wrote: What's even more baffling is that the next 2 messages: http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-November/016544.html http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-November/016546.html look identical too (the sender and date looks OK). Strange, I've never sent such email. In fact I don't recall I've seen any of these duplicate emails, only the original one from Thomas.
Re: [aur-general] TU Resignation
2011/11/22 Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkov...@gmail.com: On 22 November 2011 00:24, Karol Blazewicz karol.blazew...@gmail.com wrote: What's even more baffling is that the next 2 messages: http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-November/016544.html http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-November/016546.html look identical too (the sender and date looks OK). Strange, I've never sent such email. In fact I don't recall I've seen any of these duplicate emails, only the original one from Thomas. Yup, my mailbox has only the e-mails you did sent, but when I went to the ML archives to bookmark some messages .. I got pretty confused :-)
[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 1 fully signed off package * 11 packages missing signoffs * 8 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (9 total) == * fail2ban-0.8.4-3 (any) 1/2 signoffs * pacman-contrib-4.0.0-2 (any) 1/1000 signoffs * expac-0.07-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ogre-1.8.0RC1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * packagekit-0.6.19-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.4.0rc-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ogre-1.8.0RC1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * packagekit-0.6.19-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.4.0rc-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * percona-server-5.5.16_rel22.0-1 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * percona-server-5.5.16_rel22.0-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (1 total) == * expac-0.07-1 (x86_64) == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (8 total) == * fail2ban-0.8.4-3 (any), since 2011-04-10 * expac-0.07-1 (i686), since 2011-10-13 * expac-0.07-1 (x86_64), since 2011-10-13 * pacman-contrib-4.0.0-2 (any), since 2011-10-15 * percona-server-5.5.16_rel22.0-1 (i686), since 2011-10-26 * percona-server-5.5.16_rel22.0-1 (x86_64), since 2011-10-26 * packagekit-0.6.19-2 (i686), since 2011-10-31 * packagekit-0.6.19-2 (x86_64), since 2011-10-31 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dan - 4 signoffs
[aur-general] Dropping tango-icon-theme{,-extras}
Hi! All sources hosted at tango.freedesktop.org became inaccessible [1] a couple of days ago, probably due to some software upgrade on freedesktop.org. I contacted upstream yesterday and was told that tango-icon-theme, tango-icon-theme-extras and icon-naming-utils are dead and that we shouldn't rely on upstream sources being available (they even mentioned they probably won't care about the 404). It has been suggested to use gnome-icon-theme and gnome-icon-theme-extras instead. Given that xfce4-settings seems to be the only package depending on tango-icon-theme, I'd suggest to: * Remove the tango-icon-theme dependency from xfce4-settings (this shouldn't break anything, does it?) * Move both tango-icon-theme and tango-icon-theme-extras to [unsupported]. * Think about what to do with icon-naming-utils. We seem to need those for gnome-icon-theme and gnome-icon-theme-symbolic, so putting the source tarball on our source mirror might be the best thing to do (unless there's a proper alternative, of course). Objections and other suggestions welcome. Cheers, Lukas [1] http://tango.freedesktop.org/Tango_Icon_Library#Download
Re: [aur-general] TU Resignation
On 22.11.2011 09:57, Karol Blazewicz wrote: 2011/11/22 Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkov...@gmail.com: On 22 November 2011 00:24, Karol Blazewicz karol.blazew...@gmail.com wrote: What's even more baffling is that the next 2 messages: http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-November/016544.html http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-November/016546.html look identical too (the sender and date looks OK). Strange, I've never sent such email. In fact I don't recall I've seen any of these duplicate emails, only the original one from Thomas. Yup, my mailbox has only the e-mails you did sent, but when I went to the ML archives to bookmark some messages .. I got pretty confused :-) gmail filters duplicated mails based on the Message-Id header, which in this case is identical. -- Florian Pritz signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Sébastien Luttringer
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com wrote: Congrats and welcome! - Alexander Thank you for your trust. It's going to be awesome! -- Sébastien Luttringer www.seblu.net
Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Sébastien Luttringer
On 11/22/2011 01:05 PM, Seblu wrote: On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com wrote: Congrats and welcome! - Alexander Thank you for your trust. It's going to be awesome! no it won't :) -- Ionuț signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Sébastien Luttringer
Ionut Biru ib...@archlinux.org wrote: On 11/22/2011 01:05 PM, Seblu wrote: On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com wrote: Congrats and welcome! - Alexander Thank you for your trust. It's going to be awesome! no it won't :) -- Ionuț Don't listen to ioni. He's our black sheep. -- Sven-Hendrik
Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Sébastien Luttringer
Le mardi 22 novembre 2011 12:23:26, Sven-Hendrik Haase a écrit : Ionut Biru ib...@archlinux.org wrote: On 11/22/2011 01:05 PM, Seblu wrote: On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com wrote: Congrats and welcome! - Alexander Thank you for your trust. It's going to be awesome! no it won't :) Don't listen to ioni. He's our black sheep. -- Sven-Hendrik Because of 'awesome' package that isn't awesome :-) ++
[aur-general] Deletion request: kimpanel-plasmoid-svn
The upstream has migrated to git, and the upcoming KDE SC 4.8 will contain a rewritten version. So there is no reason to keep kimpanel-plasmoid-svn[1] . [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24652
Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: kimpanel-plasmoid-svn
On 22.11.2011 14:03, Jekyll Wu wrote: The upstream has migrated to git, and the upcoming KDE SC 4.8 will contain a rewritten version. So there is no reason to keep kimpanel-plasmoid-svn[1] . [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24652 Done. Bartłomiej Piotrowski signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[aur-general] Merge Request derive - haskell-derive
Hello, please merge derive (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20739) into haskell-derive (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51130) Both are basically the same, but the second one has a better name and newer version number. Regards Stefan
[aur-general] Deletion request
Hello, please remove haskell-pango (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37483) and haskell-gtk (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37484). All are in [community]. Reards Stefan
[aur-general] Please remove polytranslator
Hi, thanks to remove polytranslator, since google stops the API, it's a dead project. Thanks, sputnick aka gilles Quenot
Re: [aur-general] Merge Request derive - haskell-derive
On 22.11.2011 23:21, Stefan Husmann wrote: Hello, please merge derive (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20739) into haskell-derive (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51130) Both are basically the same, but the second one has a better name and newer version number. Regards Stefan Done. -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski Arch Linux Trusted User signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [aur-general] Deletion request
On 23.11.2011 01:46, Stefan Husmann wrote: Hello, please remove haskell-pango (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37483) and haskell-gtk (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37484). All are in [community]. Reards Stefan Done. -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski Arch Linux Trusted User signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [aur-general] Please remove polytranslator
On 23.11.2011 02:02, sputnick wrote: Hi, thanks to remove polytranslator, since google stops the API, it's a dead project. Thanks, sputnick aka gilles Quenot Please include URL to package next time. Done. -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski Arch Linux Trusted User signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [aur-general] Please remove polytranslator
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 06:24:24 +0100 Bartłomiej Piotrowski barthal...@gmail.com wrote: On 23.11.2011 02:02, sputnick wrote: Hi, thanks to remove polytranslator, since google stops the API, it's a dead project. Thanks, sputnick aka gilles Quenot Please include URL to package next time. Done. -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski Arch Linux Trusted User
Re: [aur-general] Deletion request
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 06:22:39 +0100 Bartłomiej Piotrowski barthal...@gmail.com wrote: On 23.11.2011 01:46, Stefan Husmann wrote: Hello, please remove haskell-pango (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37483) and haskell-gtk (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37484). All are in [community]. Reards Stefan Done. -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski Arch Linux Trusted User
