[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 7 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 2 fully signed off packages * 12 packages missing signoffs * 5 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (7 total) == * fpc-src-2.6.0-1 (any) * fpc-2.6.0-1 (i686) * gpac-3824-1 (i686) * lazarus-0.9.30.2-2 (i686) * fpc-2.6.0-1 (x86_64) * gpac-3824-1 (x86_64) * lazarus-0.9.30.2-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (10 total) == * fpc-src-2.6.0-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * expac-0.07-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fpc-2.6.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gpac-3824-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * lazarus-0.9.30.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * packagekit-0.6.19-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fpc-2.6.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gpac-3824-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * lazarus-0.9.30.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * packagekit-0.6.19-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (2 total) == * pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any) * expac-0.07-1 (x86_64) == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (5 total) == * expac-0.07-1 (i686), since 2011-10-13 * expac-0.07-1 (x86_64), since 2011-10-13 * pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any), since 2011-11-25 * packagekit-0.6.19-3 (i686), since 2011-11-30 * packagekit-0.6.19-3 (x86_64), since 2011-11-30 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dreisner - 2 signoffs
Re: [aur-general] orphaned community packages (intel-tbb, arpack, libmatio, xml-rpc and aspell-pt)
On 3 January 2012 07:39, Eduardo Martins Lopes edumlo...@yahoo.com.br wrote: Hello guys, I have an aur package (opencv-tbb https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42121) that depends on intel-tbb, but this one is an orphaned community package and i would like to maintain it. Can i upload a pkbuild to the AUR (perhaps with the same name) ? There a few other orphans that would like to adopt, if it's possible: * libmatio - http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/libmatio/ * arpack - http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/arpack/ * xmlrpc-c - http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/xmlrpc-c/ * aspell-pt - http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/aspell-pt/ Although i do not use the last ones (except for the dictionary), they fall within the scope of my interests. Hello I was supposed to bring intel-tbb to extra and build opencv against it. I will do that soon, so you don't have to worry about that one anymore and opencv from repos will have intel-tbb improvement. As for the others, it depends on the maintainer, the package popularity, whether it is in use as a make or optional dependency etc. -- GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1
[aur-general] Removal request: nfs-utils-ipv6
please remove this as it is no longer needed. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42300 Jonathan
Re: [aur-general] warez in the AUR
Hi, While I don't really think a PKGBUILD can count as warez (and believe the subject is misleading), I agree with the ioni-solution of not linking directly to copyrighted content in the source array. Adopting, modifying and disowning the four packages in question. -- Best regards, Alexander Rødseth Arch Linux Trusted User (xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)
[aur-general] Deletion request
lib32-nvidia-utils-71xx [1] is not updated since 2007, doesn't comply with multilib (installs libs in /opt/lib32/usr/lib), orphan, flagged as out-of-date since Feb 2011 and... no one seems to complain about it. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12008 Please delete
Re: [aur-general] warez in the AUR
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, While I don't really think a PKGBUILD can count as warez (and believe the subject is misleading) I'll try to be be more precise in the future :-) [...] Adopting, modifying and disowning the four packages in question. The links are still present in the PKGBUILDs. We still have no rules against this and I'm not sure I can invoke forum rules here: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Forum_Etiquette#Legality
[aur-general] Removal request
Hi, please remove html-mason [1], as it's just a (0-votes) copy of perl-html-mason (out of date, in addition). Max [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33124 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [aur-general] Removal request
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:45 PM, Max Roder maxro...@web.de wrote: Hi, please remove html-mason [1], as it's just a (0-votes) copy of perl-html-mason (out of date, in addition). Removed, thank you.
Re: [aur-general] Deletion request
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:00 PM, rafael ff1 rafael.f...@gmail.com wrote: lib32-nvidia-utils-71xx [1] is not updated since 2007, doesn't comply with multilib (installs libs in /opt/lib32/usr/lib), orphan, flagged as out-of-date since Feb 2011 and... no one seems to complain about it. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12008 Please delete removed
Re: [aur-general] orphaned community packages (intel-tbb, arpack, libmatio, xml-rpc and aspell-pt)
Hello Ray and thanks for your reply! On 3 January 2012 07:39, Eduardo Martins Lopes edumlo...@yahoo.com.br wrote: Hello guys, I have an aur package (opencv-tbb https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42121) that depends on intel-tbb, but this one is an orphaned community package and i would like to maintain it. Can i upload a pkbuild to the AUR (perhaps with the same name) ? There a few other orphans that would like to adopt, if it's possible: * libmatio - http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/libmatio/ * arpack - http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/arpack/ * xmlrpc-c - http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/xmlrpc-c/ * aspell-pt - http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/aspell-pt/ Although i do not use the last ones (except for the dictionary), they fall within the scope of my interests. Hello I was supposed to bring intel-tbb to extra and build opencv against it. I will do that soon, so you don't have to worry about that one anymore and opencv from repos will have intel-tbb improvement. These are great news! As for the others, it depends on the maintainer, the package popularity, whether it is in use as a make or optional dependency etc. Actually the question regarding the names is about creating an aur package with the same name of the orphaned ones since the aur is where i can maintain those packages.
[aur-general] Drop mplayer2 from [community]
Mplayer2 was very promising last year when they forked from the original mplayer project. One of the main goal of this project was to provide more frequent release and updates. Unfortunatly, they failled to provide something else after the initial release. This initial release no longer build with current tools/libs and contain several major bugs. A workaround was to update our pkg to a recent git snapshot. Since then, I do not see any reason to continue to update this package which is currently broken. If there is no objection, I will drop the package from [community]. Users should consider to follow mplayer2-git from AUR or the original mplayer from [extra]. Cheers, Stéphane
Re: [aur-general] Drop mplayer2 from [community]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/01/12 22:01, Stéphane Gaudreault wrote: Mplayer2 was very promising last year when they forked from the original mplayer project. One of the main goal of this project was to provide more frequent release and updates. Unfortunatly, they failled to provide something else after the initial release. This initial release no longer build with current tools/libs and contain several major bugs. A workaround was to update our pkg to a recent git snapshot. Since then, I do not see any reason to continue to update this package which is currently broken. If there is no objection, I will drop the package from [community]. Users should consider to follow mplayer2-git from AUR or the original mplayer from [extra]. Cheers, Stéphane If it's broken move it to AUR .. or ask if some tu wants to maintain on community. - -- Angel Velásquez angvp @ irc.freenode.net Arch Linux Developer / Trusted User Linux Counter: #359909 http://www.angvp.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPA6qaAAoJEEKh2xXsEzutg5YH/AsUvTTlxj6NPntsfNasrRwG U+0PYIXvGrx/AB+IVBsEvOGP9GBeRJVAM3TDQMrm6bqPszW5fH7B2jn/kix7PSlu pPWfhXmA2qbVWfFVgGpsYT2vFHwn20ezdxFYvGkfkrA9xU9NyzUNlraFe2aIdokF FeHM0BMUxiJCwariI0OCPOPSZ6LSmGQxIhTIDgelXpujFXVzYgl4Ykz3mNNP0iOp 5weFptJvDpMlm4uCyMpHRV2Cj9k5wPLjCik5J7FcTbUzzcLwb4pqogszFlkUw+83 PQgpuveSRbp/LrUIXkCaSe004+jyUTLTWG+6PhX9HTwDthlTHJWrsU8R1f6SuRI= =FRsy -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [aur-general] Drop mplayer2 from [community]
Am Tue, 03 Jan 2012 22:25:46 -0300 schrieb Angel Velásquez an...@archlinux.org: If it's broken move it to AUR .. or ask if some tu wants to maintain on community. If it's broken and doesn't compile anymore, why should it be moved to AUR? Just drop it. Heiko
Re: [aur-general] Drop mplayer2 from [community]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/01/12 22:35, Heiko Baums wrote: Am Tue, 03 Jan 2012 22:25:46 -0300 schrieb Angel Velásquez an...@archlinux.org: If it's broken move it to AUR .. or ask if some tu wants to maintain on community. If it's broken and doesn't compile anymore, why should it be moved to AUR? Just drop it. Heiko Because if maybe somebody find it orphan and lonely and knows how to fix it, can adopt it ;) instead to re-upload to AUR .. can be moved to AUR and with a comment that is broken. Usually our workflow is that .. going to AUR and if it's dead and unbuildable by some time.. then just drop it. - -- Angel Velásquez angvp @ irc.freenode.net Arch Linux Developer / Trusted User Linux Counter: #359909 http://www.angvp.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPA64OAAoJEEKh2xXsEzutccAH+wV1h4qOF5UAkmaBhNzoduLP 3lO7A0XvvvJAM9+CDSG3TMgbuI151/gvd/nUS02qdztxO3OP8E6zRSMS3AMCWJOX Fq1JRqYB0XAU6w8RmBYwR/Ey1ngfoR1CPVcJf0Xv1l181tMYsC5uYUo6b+SC8iCj u+Qml91/jdPWURroZoa/E4Jq+IzoiAhfQye2RwHMiKFZzagH5pnTDMOicAP3fHR/ Go6jENtU2vErlvdxKBOLt1CEunYZwJD2/BrMVRP8caJQX/UmW7q2dAvC/u1VfGWe oyiQvUblO1gZaAGNAqpD/jBal453610gd/goTVIqaMeAjWlyAsFykWjqrTGXgpw= =v33B -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [aur-general] Drop mplayer2 from [community]
Le 3 janvier 2012 22:40:30 Angel Velásquez a écrit : On 03/01/12 22:35, Heiko Baums wrote: Am Tue, 03 Jan 2012 22:25:46 -0300 schrieb Angel Velásquez an...@archlinux.org: If it's broken move it to AUR .. or ask if some tu wants to maintain on community. If it's broken and doesn't compile anymore, why should it be moved to AUR? Just drop it. Heiko Because if maybe somebody find it orphan and lonely and knows how to fix it, can adopt it ;) instead to re-upload to AUR .. can be moved to AUR and with a comment that is broken. Usually our workflow is that .. going to AUR and if it's dead and unbuildable by some time.. then just drop it. There is already an mplayer2-git pkg in AUR that is more up to date. Anyway, it cost nothing to drop it to AUR if someone else could find it useful. Stéphane
[aur-general] Forgotten AUR User Login Name
Hello. I'm at a loss as to logging into the AUR. I've forgotten the user-name tied to my account. Could someone please confirm my AUR user-name at the same email registered to this mailing list?
Re: [aur-general] Forgotten AUR User Login Name
Email sent. On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 10:54:54PM -0500, Java Script wrote: Hello. I'm at a loss as to logging into the AUR. I've forgotten the user-name tied to my account. Could someone please confirm my AUR user-name at the same email registered to this mailing list?
Re: [aur-general] Drop mplayer2 from [community]
9 months is not that much time.. mplayer2-git works fine here.
