Re: [aur-general] Orphan request: freenet

[Mike Swanson]

Sorry, it seems it's a bit of a false alarm; the package maintainer just
contacted me saying he'll abandon it himself.


On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Mike Swanson wrote:

> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/freenet/
>
> The maintainer has not for many months about bad checksums and a user's
> request for a systemd service (which was provided in one of the comments
> too!).  In addition, he has another package flagged out-of-date since July.
>

[aur-general] Orphan request: freenet

[Mike Swanson]

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/freenet/

The maintainer has not for many months about bad checksums and a user's
request for a systemd service (which was provided in one of the comments
too!).  In addition, he has another package flagged out-of-date since July.

Re: [aur-general] Some Doublettes

[Connor Behan]

On 06/11/12 02:22 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote:
>
> ocaml-typerex https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56919
> typerexhttps://aur.archlinux.org/packages/typerex/ Better
> name, typerex is not a library
> Both packages right now do not build under ocaml 4.0, but that may
> change.
If neither of them work, I'd rather wait for one maintainer to respond
before I merge one into the other.
>
> ndn   https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ndn/
> ndn2  https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ndn2/ Orphaned, dupe
> of ndn
> ndn-beta https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ndn-beta/ Orphaned,
> upstream obviously only provides stable releases
Merged ndn2 and ndn-beta into ndn. Thanks!



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[aur-general] Some Doublettes

[Stefan Husmann]

Hello,

these packages provide the same.

ocaml-typerex   https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56919
typerex https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/typerex/ Better name, 
typerex is not a library
Both packages right now do not build under ocaml 4.0, but that may change.

ndn  https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ndn/
ndn2 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ndn2/   Orphaned, dupe of ndn
ndn-beta https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ndn-beta/   Orphaned, upstream 
obviously only provides stable releases

Best Regards
Stefan

Re: [aur-general] Merge request: sm-ssc into stepmania

[Lukas Jirkovsky]

On 6 November 2012 16:56, Devin J. Pohly  wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Could you merge the sm-ssc package [1] into the stepmania package [2]?
>
> [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sm-ssc/
> [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/stepmania/
>
> The sm-ssc fork is now the official code for StepMania [3], and the
> sm-ssc package itself is both orphaned and outdated.  The previous
> maintainer (Artefact2) posted a comment there directing users to use
> stepmania instead.
>
> [3]: http://www.stepmania.com/wiki/Download_StepMania_Source_Code
>
> Thanks,
> *dp
>

Thanks, merged.

Re: [aur-general] Cleanup of beagle related packages

[Balló György]

All of them deleted. Thanks for the report!


2012/11/6 Jekyll Wu 

> The beagle[1] upstream is effectively dead. I don't think any major
> distribution still provides it.
>
> All beagle related packages on AUR are orphaned, and none of them can
> build (for various reasons).  So I would propose removing these packages:
>
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages/beagle-no-gnome/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages/kerry/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages/kerry-no-gnome-svn/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages/kio-beagle/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages/libbeagle-no-gnome/
>
>
> [1] 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**Beagle_(software)
>

Re: [aur-general] Merge request: sm-ssc into stepmania

[Devin J. Pohly]

Hi there,

Could you merge the sm-ssc package [1] into the stepmania package [2]?

[1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sm-ssc/
[2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/stepmania/

The sm-ssc fork is now the official code for StepMania [3], and the
sm-ssc package itself is both orphaned and outdated.  The previous
maintainer (Artefact2) posted a comment there directing users to use
stepmania instead.

[3]: http://www.stepmania.com/wiki/Download_StepMania_Source_Code

Thanks,
*dp

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] Avidemux-2.6-svn

[Felix Yan]

On 11/06/2012 11:08 PM, SpinFlo wrote:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/avidemux-2.6-svn/ no longer needs repo
> move to git
> 
> greetings
> 
Removed, thanks!

Felix Yan



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[aur-general] [Removal Request] Avidemux-2.6-svn

[SpinFlo]

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/avidemux-2.6-svn/ no longer needs repo
move to git

greetings

[aur-general] Deletion request : trinity related packages

[Jekyll Wu]

All the following trinity packages are orphaned and unable to build. I 
propose removing them all. Also, the recomonded way of installing 
trinity is through binary packages provided by 3rd party repo[1]



https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qt3-trinity/ (fail when 
applying patch)

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tqtinterface-svn/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/trinity-arts/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/trinity-dbus-1-qt3/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/trinity-dbus-tqt/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/trinity-dbus-tqt-1/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/trinity-gtk-qt-engine/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/trinity-kdebase/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/trinity-kdegraphics/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/trinity-kdelibs/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/trinity-pyqt3/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/trinity-qt3/ (fail when 
applying patch)

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/trinity-tqtinterface/


[1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Trinity#Installation

[aur-general] [Removal Request] tyrs and tyrs-git

[Alexandre Ferrando]

Hello,

I was wondering if you could please remove this two packages, tyrs [ 0 ]
and tyrs-git [ 1 ] as upstream is kind of dead ( last commit is 8 months
old) and the developer has stepped out and even recommended the use of
another software instead of his own [ 2 ]

Thank you in advance.

[ 0 ] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tyrs/

[ 1 ] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tyrs-git/

[ 2 ] https://github.com/Nic0/tyrs/issues/123#issuecomment-9757444

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] Packages Cleanup

[Felix Yan]

On 11/06/2012 07:01 PM, Maxime Gauduin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Could you please remove those packages of mine, they are all GNOME themes
> which will most likely not be updated for 3.6, most are from an artist who
> has quit maintaining his themes, one is mine and I don't see myself
> updating it in the near future, if ever, and the other two haven't been
> updated since 3.2.
> 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-adwaita/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-anewstart/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-atolm/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-gnomarch/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-google%2B/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-tron-legacy/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/greyness-blue-gtk-theme/
> 
> Thx in advance!
> 
Thanks, all deleted.

Felix Yan



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[aur-general] [Removal Request] Packages Cleanup

[Maxime Gauduin]

Hi,

Could you please remove those packages of mine, they are all GNOME themes
which will most likely not be updated for 3.6, most are from an artist who
has quit maintaining his themes, one is mine and I don't see myself
updating it in the near future, if ever, and the other two haven't been
updated since 3.2.

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-adwaita/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-anewstart/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-atolm/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-gnomarch/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-google%2B/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-tron-legacy/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/greyness-blue-gtk-theme/

Thx in advance!

-- 
Alucryd

"In the name of God, impure souls of the living dead shall be banished into
eternal damnation. Amen."

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

[Arch Website Notification]

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 12 packages missing signoffs
* 2 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)



== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (12 total) ==

* catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* mcabber-0.10.1-4 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* pidgin-otr-4.0.0-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* qtcreator-2.6.0rc-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* mcabber-0.10.1-4 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* pidgin-otr-4.0.0-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* qtcreator-2.6.0rc-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs


== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) ==

* qtcreator-2.6.0rc-1 (i686), since 2012-10-18
* qtcreator-2.6.0rc-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-18


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. eric - 3 signoffs
2. andyrtr - 3 signoffs
3. stephane - 2 signoffs
4. foutrelis - 2 signoffs
5. dan - 2 signoffs