[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2013-02-21 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 20 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 27 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)


== New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (20 total) ==

* boinc-7.0.53-1 (i686)
* cdfs-2.6.27-38 (i686)
* ndiswrapper-1.58-2 (i686)
* open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-6 (i686)
* r8168-8.035.00-5 (i686)
* rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-24 (i686)
* tp_smapi-0.41-15 (i686)
* vhba-module-20120422-18 (i686)
* virtualbox-4.2.6-3 (i686)
* virtualbox-modules-4.2.6-7 (i686)
* boinc-7.0.53-1 (x86_64)
* cdfs-2.6.27-38 (x86_64)
* ndiswrapper-1.58-2 (x86_64)
* open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-6 (x86_64)
* r8168-8.035.00-5 (x86_64)
* rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-24 (x86_64)
* tp_smapi-0.41-15 (x86_64)
* vhba-module-20120422-18 (x86_64)
* virtualbox-4.2.6-3 (x86_64)
* virtualbox-modules-4.2.6-7 (x86_64)


== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (24 total) ==

* boinc-7.0.53-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* cdfs-2.6.27-38 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* llvm-amdgpu-snapshot-20130219-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* ndiswrapper-1.58-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-6 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* r8168-8.035.00-5 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-24 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* tp_smapi-0.41-15 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* vhba-module-20120422-18 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* virtualbox-4.2.6-3 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* virtualbox-modules-4.2.6-7 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* xvba-video-open-0.8.0-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* boinc-7.0.53-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* cdfs-2.6.27-38 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* llvm-amdgpu-snapshot-20130219-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* ndiswrapper-1.58-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-6 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* r8168-8.035.00-5 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-24 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* tp_smapi-0.41-15 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* vhba-module-20120422-18 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* virtualbox-4.2.6-3 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* virtualbox-modules-4.2.6-7 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* xvba-video-open-0.8.0-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs

== Incomplete signoffs for [multilib] (1 total) ==

* steam-1.0.0.28-3 (i686)
0/2 signoffs

== Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) ==

* weston-1.0.5-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* weston-1.0.5-1 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. bisson - 1 signoffs
2. eric - 1 signoffs



Re: [aur-general] Packages need to be deleted

2013-02-21 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 21:49 +0200, atilla ontas wrote:
 Hi, i'm maintainer of most zemberek related packages. I have decided to
 rename some packages and old ones should be deleted:
 zemberek-server-nolibs, zemberek-nolibs, enchant-zemberek
 
 Also, mozzemberek and mozzemberek-svn won't work firefox-4.0 and above
 versions. Development stopped upstream. Also, zpspell package won't needed
 anymore to zemberek run. Please delete those as well. Thank you.

Please provide a list of the old packages to be merged/deleted and the
new packages in which they must be merged, with links to the
corresponding AUR pages.

--
Maxime


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [aur-general] Packages need to be deleted

2013-02-21 Thread atilla ontas
Packages need to be deleted:
zemberek-nolibs https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zemberek-nolibs/
zemberek-server-nolibs
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zemberek-server-nolibs/
mozzemberek https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mozzemberek/
mozzemberek-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mozzemberek-svn/
zpspell https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zpspell/


2013/2/21 Maxime Gauduin aluc...@gmail.com

 On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 21:49 +0200, atilla ontas wrote:
  Hi, i'm maintainer of most zemberek related packages. I have decided to
  rename some packages and old ones should be deleted:
  zemberek-server-nolibs, zemberek-nolibs, enchant-zemberek
 
  Also, mozzemberek and mozzemberek-svn won't work firefox-4.0 and above
  versions. Development stopped upstream. Also, zpspell package won't
 needed
  anymore to zemberek run. Please delete those as well. Thank you.

 Please provide a list of the old packages to be merged/deleted and the
 new packages in which they must be merged, with links to the
 corresponding AUR pages.

 --
 Maxime



Re: [aur-general] Packages need to be deleted

2013-02-21 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 19:51 +0200, atilla ontas wrote:
 Packages need to be deleted:
 zemberek-nolibs https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zemberek-nolibs/
 zemberek-server-nolibs
 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zemberek-server-nolibs/
 mozzemberek https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mozzemberek/
 mozzemberek-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mozzemberek-svn/
 zpspell https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zpspell/
 
 
 2013/2/21 Maxime Gauduin aluc...@gmail.com
 
  On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 21:49 +0200, atilla ontas wrote:
   Hi, i'm maintainer of most zemberek related packages. I have decided to
   rename some packages and old ones should be deleted:
   zemberek-server-nolibs, zemberek-nolibs, enchant-zemberek
  
   Also, mozzemberek and mozzemberek-svn won't work firefox-4.0 and above
   versions. Development stopped upstream. Also, zpspell package won't
  needed
   anymore to zemberek run. Please delete those as well. Thank you.
 
  Please provide a list of the old packages to be merged/deleted and the
  new packages in which they must be merged, with links to the
  corresponding AUR pages.
 
  --
  Maxime
 

Deleted/Merged all except zpspell. That one depends on zemberek-server,
not the other way around, unless it is not compatible with it or not
wanted anymore, I'd leave it there. Asked the maintainer for more
information.

Thx.

--
Maxime


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[aur-general] Disown Request for ec2-ami-tools

2013-02-21 Thread Don deJuan

ec2-ami-tools was originally marked out of date on 11-28-2012

I emailed the package owner well over 2 weeks ago now (1-31-2013). I 
would like to take over the package and have a working PKGBUILD already. 
I am the maintainer for ec2-api-tools already so would be nice to start 
getting the ami package back to being updated and useable on the AUR 
again. I have attached the PKGBUILD of what I am running locally on my 
system, in case the PKGBUILD needs to be reviewed.


Thank you for your time,
vwyodajl
# Contributor: Antoine Martin (antoine AT openance DOT com)
# Contributor: Yejun Yang (yejunx AT gmail DOT com)
# Contributor: Oleg Smirnov (oleg.smir...@gmail.com)
# Contributor: Nikolay Bryskin (devel.n...@gmail.com)
# Contributor: Hebitchov (vincent.d...@gmail.com)
# Maintainer:  Ernie Brodeur (ebrod...@ujami.net)

pkgname=ec2-ami-tools
pkgver=1.4.0.9
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc=The Amazon EC2 AMI Tools are command-line utilities to help manage 
machine instances for Amazon S3.
arch=('any')
url=http://developer.amazonwebservices.com/;
# this is idiotic, completely and I blame amazon.  You can nolonger download
# per version of these files.  Sooo for now, till I learn a better method
# we will grab the .zip and use the md5 sum failure to make sure this is upto 
#date 
source=(http://ec2-downloads.s3.amazonaws.com/$pkgname.zip)
depends=(ruby rsync)
license=('custom')
build() {
  if [ -e $pkgname.zip ];then
rm -rf $pkgname.zip
  fi
  # I know, lets prevent people from downloading our 
  # $pkgname-$pkgver-$_pkgbuild.zip file directly, 
  # but then when they uncompress it lets label it!
  # Shames on amazon!
  cd $srcdir/$pkgname-$pkgver
  mkdir -p $pkgdir/usr
  cp -r lib $pkgdir/usr
  cp -r etc $pkgdir
  find $pkgdir -type f | xargs chmod 644
  sed -i 's#^home=.*$#home=/usr#' bin/*
  sed -i 's#^ruby #ruby-1.8 #' bin/*
  cp -r bin $pkgdir/usr
  mkdir -p $pkgdir/usr/share/licenses/$pkgname/
  install -m 644 license.txt $pkgdir/usr/share/licenses/$pkgname/
}

#=
md5sums=('949c945b47abc2056d620940f9fa9f66')


Re: [aur-general] iceweasel rename request

2013-02-21 Thread Alexander Rødseth
Hi,

Re-uploaded as iceweasel-bin and merged+deleted iceweasel into it.
Disowned iceweasel-bin, please adopt.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/iceweasel-bin/

-- 
Sincerely,
  Alexander Rødseth
  xyproto / TU


Re: [aur-general] iceweasel rename request

2013-02-21 Thread Jorge Barroso
2013/2/21 Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com

 Hi,

 Re-uploaded as iceweasel-bin and merged+deleted iceweasel into it.
 Disowned iceweasel-bin, please adopt.
 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/iceweasel-bin/

 --
 Sincerely,
   Alexander Rødseth
   xyproto / TU


Done, thanks :)


[aur-general] Please delete minitunes

2013-02-21 Thread Kevin Vesga
Please delete minitunes [1] as the project's name has changed and a new
package [2] has been made for it.

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/minitunes/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/musique/


[aur-general] Please orphan all of tebo's packages

2013-02-21 Thread Kevin Vesga
He or she hasn't really been active since 2008, and his or her listed email
address results in a delivery failure.

https://aur.archlinux.org/account/tebo


Re: [aur-general] Please delete minitunes

2013-02-21 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski
On 02/22/2013 06:57 AM, Kevin Vesga wrote:
 Please delete minitunes [1] as the project's name has changed and a new
 package [2] has been made for it.
 
 [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/minitunes/
 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/musique/
 

Done.

-- 
Bartłomiej Piotrowski
Arch Linux Trusted User
http://archlinux.org/



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [aur-general] Please orphan all of tebo's packages

2013-02-21 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski
On 02/22/2013 07:20 AM, Kevin Vesga wrote:
 He or she hasn't really been active since 2008, and his or her listed email
 address results in a delivery failure.
 
 https://aur.archlinux.org/account/tebo
 

Done, thank you.

-- 
Bartłomiej Piotrowski
Arch Linux Trusted User
http://archlinux.org/



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[aur-general] Disown request

2013-02-21 Thread OmeGa
Could you please disown ruby-jist [1]. I flagged it as out of date on
Dec 02. I sent an email to the maintainer over two weeks ago, and
still no response.

Thanks.

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-jist/


signature.asc
Description: GnuPG Digital signature


Re: [aur-general] Disown request

2013-02-21 Thread Daniel Wallace
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

OmeGa om...@mailoo.org wrote:

Could you please disown ruby-jist [1]. I flagged it as out of date on
Dec 02. I sent an email to the maintainer over two weeks ago, and
still no response.

Thanks.

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-jist/

Done, thanks
- --
Sent from my Android Phone.
Daniel Wallace
Arch Linux Trusted User
GTManfred
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: APG v1.0.8

iQFUBAEBCAA+BQJRJxXwNxxEYW5pZWwgV2FsbGFjZSAoZ3RtYW5mcmVkKSA8ZGFu
aWVsLndhbGxhY2VAZ2F0ZWNoLmVkdT4ACgkQX6XlVE8BDUgyKwgAia7VK5rk08+p
H2SkcW3Uui92YL8Vtc4ri8e24VqbaY2I+tBjbNFZzLQ/AqK8E09vYCFrfNYCzu8S
DPOMH+y4DpIc5CZukLx4C0sHELztRndi2e1RX1xPXs1+HYI3Z4yjBSqIkaYRT2+p
KuUjPMNh9VXwqsNXbfKdVmoo8isbPizbBFxG0ANyURbux5CVWBEiW0O7vWyYZ2Px
RW81Z4+F7cUmQmmwZXvpWqsG5AwEXOGatyUYUFHC7NnKcGsuvDovdf8pWX3N6V3c
asWw7CxZQDDh2vYEAf11oAhOSwhXjz2eZUX0X2LVNK0pgYHKlE4fkbN51PWrKhiC
GvJJfy/7lg==
=4+XV
-END PGP SIGNATURE-