[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (i686), since 2013-05-28 * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (x86_64), since 2013-05-28 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 6 signoffs 2. allan - 4 signoffs 3. eric - 2 signoffs
[aur-general] delete llvm-amdgpu-svn lib32-llvm-amdgpu-svn
llvm-amdgpu-svn (1) lib32-llvm-amdgpu-svn (2) were needed to build mesa-git master versions. llvm 3.3 is now in the official repos and built with amdgpu / R600 enabled and mesa-git master builds fine against that version, so these 2 packages are no longer needed. Please delete (1) and (2) . (1) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/llvm-amdgpu-svn/ (2) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-llvm-amdgpu-svn/
Re: [aur-general] delete llvm-amdgpu-svn lib32-llvm-amdgpu-svn
On 17 June 2013 15:36, Lone_Wolf lonew...@xs4all.nl wrote: llvm-amdgpu-svn (1) lib32-llvm-amdgpu-svn (2) were needed to build mesa-git master versions. llvm 3.3 is now in the official repos and built with amdgpu / R600 enabled and mesa-git master builds fine against that version, so these 2 packages are no longer needed. Please delete (1) and (2) . (1) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/llvm-amdgpu-svn/ (2) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-llvm-amdgpu-svn/ Removed, thanks.
[aur-general] Please remove stuntrally-bin
Stuntrally-bin (1) is orphaned, outdated and the [community] repo has an uptodate version (2) . Please delete stuntrally-bin Lone_Wolf (1) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/stuntrally-bin/ (2) https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/stuntrally/
Re: [aur-general] Please remove stuntrally-bin
On Monday, June 17, 2013 16:42:52 Lone_Wolf wrote: Stuntrally-bin (1) is orphaned, outdated and the [community] repo has an uptodate version (2) . Please delete stuntrally-bin Lone_Wolf (1) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/stuntrally-bin/ (2) https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/stuntrally/ Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] Merging of comp-scale-svn with comp-scale-git and engage-svn with engage-git
Dear TU(s), the recent move of these packages' VCS from svn to git means that - as the maintainer - I had to create two new packages for them (as per https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/VCS_PKGBUILD_Guidelines). I would like to request for the new two packages (*-git) to be merged with their old packages (*-svn), respectively. Sincerely, Moritz Maxeiner
[aur-general] rtmpdump-svn vs. rtmpdump-git
We have these packages https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rtmpdump-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rtmpdump-svn/ and both giving the same upstream url: http://rtmpdump.mplayerhq.hu/ where it says: Download the source: *git clone git://git.ffmpeg.org/rtmpdump * but both are fairly recently updated... Do they differ or providing different features?
[aur-general] clementine-rc
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/clementine-rc/ has been superseded by the final release in community I suggest removal from the AUR
Re: [aur-general] Merging of comp-scale-svn with comp-scale-git and engage-svn with engage-git
On 17/06/13 10:01 AM, Moritz Maxeiner wrote: Dear TU(s), the recent move of these packages' VCS from svn to git means that - as the maintainer - I had to create two new packages for them (as per https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/VCS_PKGBUILD_Guidelines). I would like to request for the new two packages (*-git) to be merged with their old packages (*-svn), respectively. Sincerely, Moritz Maxeiner Merged. I think one is supposed to provide links in this situation but I just use the search bar for merges anyway. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [aur-general] rtmpdump-svn vs. rtmpdump-git
On 17/06/13 11:29 AM, Rob Til Freedmen wrote: We have these packages https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rtmpdump-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rtmpdump-svn/ and both giving the same upstream url: http://rtmpdump.mplayerhq.hu/ where it says: Download the source: *git clone git://git.ffmpeg.org/rtmpdump * but both are fairly recently updated... Do they differ or providing different features? They moved from svn to git awhile ago. The recent update of the svn package was probably just to use a pkgver() function. There's probably no point in keeping it around. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [aur-general] clementine-rc
On 17/06/13 12:05 PM, Rob Til Freedmen wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/clementine-rc/ has been superseded by the final release in community I suggest removal from the AUR Removed, thanks! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[aur-general] Merge libefivar-git into efivar-git
Hi, PLease merge libefivar-git [1] into efivar-git [2]. The packagewas renamed since upstream was renamed from libefivar to efivar. Thanks in advance. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libefivar-git/ [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/efivar-git/ Best Regards. Keshav Padram
Re: [aur-general] Merge libefivar-git into efivar-git
On 17/06/13 01:14 PM, Keshav Padram wrote: Hi, PLease merge libefivar-git [1] into efivar-git [2]. The packagewas renamed since upstream was renamed from libefivar to efivar. Thanks in advance. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libefivar-git/ [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/efivar-git/ Best Regards. Keshav Padram Merged, thx. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[aur-general] xmppflask deletion
Hello, I had previously released a package named xmppflask, but according to they installation guide -http://xmppflask.org/intro.html#installation- I have made a second one based on mercurial, and according to AUR's standards I have renamed it xmppflask-hg so, as the first one -xmppflask- is now useless, could you please remove it? thanks in advance Mo0O
Re: [aur-general] xmppflask deletion
On 18 June 2013 03:07, Mo0O mo0ofier mo0of...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I had previously released a package named xmppflask, but according to they installation guide -http://xmppflask.org/intro.html#installation- I have made a second one based on mercurial, and according to AUR's standards I have renamed it xmppflask-hg so, as the first one -xmppflask- is now useless, could you please remove it? thanks in advance Mo0O Done, thanks. Please include a link to the package in future requests.
[aur-general] deletion of package g95-cocon
Hello guys, I'd like to request the deletion of g95-cocon from AUR (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/g95-cocon/). The original developer deprecated the network console (the software of this package alongside a custom g95 binnary) and therefore, this package is no longer usefull. Thanks in advance, -- Eduardo Martins Lopes
Re: [aur-general] deletion of package g95-cocon
On Monday, June 17, 2013 18:51:01 Eduardo Martins Lopes wrote: Hello guys, I'd like to request the deletion of g95-cocon from AUR (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/g95-cocon/). The original developer deprecated the network console (the software of this package alongside a custom g95 binnary) and therefore, this package is no longer usefull. Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
