Re: [aur-general] Removal requests

2013-07-01 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski
On 2013-07-02 01:39, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> Source gone
> * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dcp130c/
> * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/abook-call/ - the diff is gone,,
> the regular abook is in the repos
> https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?sort=&q=abook
> * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eclipse-i18n-packbidi/
> * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/emesene-smilies/
> * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/aircrack-ng-unstable-svn/
> * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/arcemu-svn/
> * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/autoscan/
> * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/awesome-wm-themes-collection/
> * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bochs-dbg/ - no source available
> for this version
> * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bdf2psf/
> * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cardapio/
> * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/clamav-devel/
> * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/clamav-git/
> * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/flashplugin_src/
> * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fortune-mod-ferengi_rules_of_acquisition/
> * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gimp-plugin-apng/
> * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-activity-journal-bzr/
> 
> 
> Source unavailable - not necessarily gone, I simply may be too dumb to
> figure it out:
> * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ffgtk-svn/ - I get stuck at
> Authentication realm:  Suberversion Repository
> Password for 'root':
> 
> * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/flightgear-aircrafts/ - I get stuck at
> Connecting to ftp.de.flightgear.org
> (ftp.de.flightgear.org)|134.91.82.67|:21... connected.
> Logging in as anonymous ...
> Login incorrect.
> 
> * 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-extension-activities-button-git/
> - I get stuck at
> ==> Connecting to the GIT server...
> Cloning into 'GNOME-3.2-Shell-extensions'...
> Username for 'https://github.com':
> 

All deleted, thanks.

-- 
Bartłomiej Piotrowski
http://bpiotrowski.pl/



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [aur-general] Merge request

2013-07-01 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski
On 2013-06-29 10:26, Edoardo Maria Elidoro wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I created a package with the right name for:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-sugarlike-theme/
> 
> Please merge it with:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-sugarlike/
> 
> Thanks,
> have a nice day.
> 
> Edoardo
> 

Someone merged them already.

-- 
Bartłomiej Piotrowski
http://bpiotrowski.pl/



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [aur-general] [AUR] man-pages-*fr

2013-07-01 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski
On 2013-06-29 11:34, Xorg wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> I think many packages about man-pages in French are outdated. List of
> packages :
> - man-pages-fr : v3.03.0 ; last update : 2008-07-18 19:35 ==> the
> 2013-05-20 at 15:15, I had written a comment to say the package created
> is empty.
> - man-pages-extras-fr : v0.8.1 ; last update : 2008-07-18 19:36 ==> the
> 2013-05-20 at 15:19, I had written a comment to say the package created
> is empty, too.
> - man-pages-sup-fr : v20080606 ; last update : 2008-08-19 22:11 ==>
> PKGBUILD don't have a function package(), so package will be empty too.
> 
> I have found this (in French, in perkamon-fr directory, README.fr file) :
> - Christophe Blaess http://www.blaess.fr/christophe/> : 1996-2005
> - Alain Portal http://manpagesfr.free.fr/> : 2005
> - Thomas Huriaux et Denis Barbier http://po4a.alioth.debian.org/> :
> 2006-2009
> They used po4a for Debian.
> - Denis Barbier http://perkamon.alioth.debian.org/> : 2010
> Perkamon project, to be not only for Debian.
> - Denis Barbier http://www.traduc.org/perkamon/> : since 2011
> 
> I think only *man-pages-fr *is useful today, but it need to be based on
> Perkamon project.
> Now, man-pages-fr can be found here :
> https://alioth.debian.org/frs/?group_id=100455&release_id=1879#man-pages-fr-_3.51-1-title-content
> 
> The latest version is man-pages-fr-3.51-1
> 
> So I think man-pages-extras-fr and man-pages-sup-fr are very obsolete
> and deprecated today, but man-pages-fr need an upgrade.
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> X0rg

Merged, thanks.

-- 
Bartłomiej Piotrowski
http://bpiotrowski.pl/



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [aur-general] Removal (or merge) request

2013-07-01 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski
On 2013-07-01 09:51, Edoardo Maria Elidoro wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I don't see the point of having a -devel package when there's already
> a -git package that fit better the purpose.
> 
> Here's some (IMHO) packages that need to be deleted (or merged into
> the -git version) since there's their -git counterpart mainteined
> (while these are orphaned).
> 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libxfce4ui-devel/
> -> git version: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libxfce4ui-git/
> 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/exo-devel/
> (and there's even a: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/exo-dev/, but
> it's not orphaned)
> ->git version: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/exo-git/
> 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/garcon-devel/
> -> git version: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/garcon-git/
> 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libxfce4ui-devel/
> -> git version: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libxfce4ui-git/
> 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libxfce4util-devel/
> -> git version: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libxfce4util-git/
> 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-mixer-devel/
> -> git version: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-mixer-git/
> 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-panel-devel/
> -> git version: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-panel-git/
> 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-session-devel/
> -> git version: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-session-git/
> 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-settings-devel/
> -> git version: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-settings-git/
> 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfconf-devel/
> -> git version: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfconf-git/
> 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfdesktop-devel/
> -> git version: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfdesktop-git/
> 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfwm4-devel/
> -> git version: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfwm4-git/
> 
> Have a nice day,
> Edoardo
> 

Removed, thank you.

-- 
Bartłomiej Piotrowski
http://bpiotrowski.pl/



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2013-07-01 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski
On 2013-07-01 10:06, Edoardo Maria Elidoro wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I can't see the point of this package since it just install a plain 
> Xfce-mixer:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-mixer-oss4/
> 
> Also: it's orphaned. I think it need to be deleted.
> 
> Have a nice day,
> Edoardo
> 

Done.

-- 
Bartłomiej Piotrowski
http://bpiotrowski.pl/



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [aur-general] Merge request

2013-07-01 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski
On 2013-07-01 11:10, Edoardo Maria Elidoro wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> this package[1] is an orphaned version of
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/elegant-gnome/ therefore I think it
> should be merged into the latter one.
> 
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-elegant-gtk/
> 

If I understand correctly, the packages aren't the same. I would leave
them alone.

-- 
Bartłomiej Piotrowski
http://bpiotrowski.pl/



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [aur-general] Delete request: clerwaita theme

2013-07-01 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski
On 2013-07-01 14:53, Diego Principe wrote:
> Now is abandoned project... read the comment
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/clearwaita-light-gtk-theme/
> Diego
> 

Removed.

-- 
Bartłomiej Piotrowski
http://bpiotrowski.pl/



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2013-07-01 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski
On 2013-07-01 14:23, Edoardo Maria Elidoro wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> the upstream link don't work anymore, I don't think there's a reason
> to keep this package:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/somatic-icon-theme/
> 
> Thanks,
> Edoardo
> 

I mirrored the tarball on pkgbuild.com and updated download link. Thanks!

-- 
Bartłomiej Piotrowski
http://bpiotrowski.pl/



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [aur-general] Merge yukon/seom-svn -> -git

2013-07-01 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski
On 2013-07-01 13:48, Frederik "Freso" S. Olesen wrote:
> The upstream Subversion repositories of yukon and seom have disappeared,
> but seems to be more or less semi-officially continued on GitHub. The
> -svn packages in AUR were orphaned, so I have adopted those as well as
> uploaded new -git ones:
> 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/yukon-svn/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/yukon-git/
> 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/seom-svn/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/seom-git/
> 

Done, thanks.

-- 
Bartłomiej Piotrowski
http://bpiotrowski.pl/



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [aur-general] Merge request

2013-07-01 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski
On 2013-07-01 13:00, Edoardo Maria Elidoro wrote:
> Hi,
> I created a right-named package for:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk2-clearlooks-clearlux-theme/
> 
> Here it is:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-clearlooks-clearlux/
> 
> Please merge the former into the latter.
> Thanks,
> Edoardo
> 

Do we have naming scheme for themes? Actually I prefer "gtk2-theme-*" if
package provides only GTK2 theme (and similarly for GTK1 and GTK3).
"gtk-theme-*" should be used if theme supports more than one version of GTK.

Cheers!

-- 
Bartłomiej Piotrowski
http://bpiotrowski.pl/



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2013-07-01 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski
On 2013-07-01 11:58, Edoardo Maria Elidoro wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> Opera-Beta exists no more so I think this package needs to be removed:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opera-beta/

But will be back sooner or later, so in my opinion it should stay.

> Also, I don't get the reason to keep these two packages:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opera-11.62-x86_64/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opera-11.62/

Someone merged or removed those.

Thanks.

-- 
Bartłomiej Piotrowski
http://bpiotrowski.pl/



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[aur-general] Removal requests

2013-07-01 Thread Karol Blazewicz
Source gone
* https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dcp130c/
* https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/abook-call/ - the diff is gone,,
the regular abook is in the repos
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?sort=&q=abook
* https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eclipse-i18n-packbidi/
* https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/emesene-smilies/
* https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/aircrack-ng-unstable-svn/
* https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/arcemu-svn/
* https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/autoscan/
* https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/awesome-wm-themes-collection/
* https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bochs-dbg/ - no source available
for this version
* https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bdf2psf/
* https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cardapio/
* https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/clamav-devel/
* https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/clamav-git/
* https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/flashplugin_src/
* https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fortune-mod-ferengi_rules_of_acquisition/
* https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gimp-plugin-apng/
* https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-activity-journal-bzr/


Source unavailable - not necessarily gone, I simply may be too dumb to
figure it out:
* https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ffgtk-svn/ - I get stuck at
Authentication realm:  Suberversion Repository
Password for 'root':

* https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/flightgear-aircrafts/ - I get stuck at
Connecting to ftp.de.flightgear.org
(ftp.de.flightgear.org)|134.91.82.67|:21... connected.
Logging in as anonymous ...
Login incorrect.

* 
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-extension-activities-button-git/
- I get stuck at
==> Connecting to the GIT server...
Cloning into 'GNOME-3.2-Shell-extensions'...
Username for 'https://github.com':


Re: [aur-general] (no subject)

2013-07-01 Thread Jonathan Steel
On Mon 01 Jul 2013 at 11:57, Edoardo Maria Elidoro wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> Opera-Beta exists no more so I think this package needs to be removed:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opera-beta/

The URL of the source does some magic the AUR doesn't like, but the source is
still available.

> Also, I don't get the reason to keep these two packages:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opera-11.62-x86_64/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opera-11.62/

Deleted.

> since we have this:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opera-116/
> 
> Thanks,
> Edoardo

-- 
Jonathan Steel


pgpwoUpBRRFYp.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [aur-general] Merge request

2013-07-01 Thread Jonathan Steel
On Mon 01 Jul 2013 at 11:14, Edoardo Maria Elidoro wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I fixed the name, the category and adopted this package:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk2-theme-mira/
> 
> It should be merged into the new and correct one here:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-mira/
> 
> Have a nice day,
> Edoardo

Merged, thanks.

-- 
Jonathan Steel


pgpunT1QsmKuy.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[aur-general] Delete request: clerwaita theme

2013-07-01 Thread Diego Principe
Now is abandoned project... read the comment
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/clearwaita-light-gtk-theme/
Diego


[aur-general] Removal request

2013-07-01 Thread Edoardo Maria Elidoro
Hi everyone,
the upstream link don't work anymore, I don't think there's a reason
to keep this package:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/somatic-icon-theme/

Thanks,
Edoardo


[aur-general] Merge yukon/seom-svn -> -git

2013-07-01 Thread Frederik "Freso" S. Olesen
The upstream Subversion repositories of yukon and seom have disappeared, 
but seems to be more or less semi-officially continued on GitHub. The 
-svn packages in AUR were orphaned, so I have adopted those as well as 
uploaded new -git ones:


https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/yukon-svn/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/yukon-git/

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/seom-svn/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/seom-git/

--
Namasté,
Frederik "Freso" S. Olesen 


[aur-general] Merge request

2013-07-01 Thread Edoardo Maria Elidoro
Hi,
I created a right-named package for:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk2-clearlooks-clearlux-theme/

Here it is:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-clearlooks-clearlux/

Please merge the former into the latter.
Thanks,
Edoardo


Re: [aur-general] Removal requests

2013-07-01 Thread Karol Blazewicz
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Maxime Gauduin  wrote:
> All gone, except imwheel, upstream is still there and package is not an
> orphan.
>
> --
> Maxime

imwheel wan not meant to be removed, I included the link for
convenience. No Idea why there's a newline after the colon:

>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/imwheel-enchanced/ - the diff is
>> gone, w/o it it's a plain imwheel:
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/imwheel/

In my next e-mails I'll use bulletpoints to avoid confusion and will
try not to include urls of packages that are not meant to be merged or
removed:

* https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/foobar - the diff is gone, w/o it
it's a plain foo


Thanks,
Karol


[aur-general] Removal request

2013-07-01 Thread Edoardo Maria Elidoro
Hi everyone,
Opera-Beta exists no more so I think this package needs to be removed:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opera-beta/

Also, I don't get the reason to keep these two packages:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opera-11.62-x86_64/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opera-11.62/
since we have this:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opera-116/

Thanks,
Edoardo


[aur-general] (no subject)

2013-07-01 Thread Edoardo Maria Elidoro
Hi everyone,
Opera-Beta exists no more so I think this package needs to be removed:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opera-beta/

Also, I don't get the reason to keep these two packages:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opera-11.62-x86_64/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opera-11.62/
since we have this:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opera-116/

Thanks,
Edoardo


[aur-general] Merge request

2013-07-01 Thread Edoardo Maria Elidoro
Hi everyone,
I fixed the name, the category and adopted this package:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk2-theme-mira/

It should be merged into the new and correct one here:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-mira/

Have a nice day,
Edoardo


[aur-general] Merge request

2013-07-01 Thread Edoardo Maria Elidoro
Hi everyone,
this package[1] is an orphaned version of
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/elegant-gnome/ therefore I think it
should be merged into the latter one.

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-elegant-gtk/


[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2013-07-01 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 12 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 14 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)


== New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (12 total) ==

* fcitx-4.2.8-1 (i686)
* fcitx-anthy-0.2.0-1 (i686)
* fcitx-cloudpinyin-0.3.2-1 (i686)
* fcitx-configtool-0.4.7-1 (i686)
* fcitx-hangul-0.3.0-1 (i686)
* fcitx-4.2.8-1 (x86_64)
* fcitx-anthy-0.2.0-1 (x86_64)
* fcitx-cloudpinyin-0.3.2-1 (x86_64)
* fcitx-configtool-0.4.7-1 (x86_64)
* fcitx-hangul-0.3.0-1 (x86_64)
* fcitx-sayura-0.1.1-1 (i686)
* fcitx-sayura-0.1.1-1 (x86_64)


== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (12 total) ==

* fcitx-4.2.8-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* fcitx-anthy-0.2.0-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* fcitx-cloudpinyin-0.3.2-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* fcitx-configtool-0.4.7-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* fcitx-hangul-0.3.0-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* opensmtpd-5.3.3p1-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* fcitx-4.2.8-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* fcitx-anthy-0.2.0-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* fcitx-cloudpinyin-0.3.2-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* fcitx-configtool-0.4.7-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* fcitx-hangul-0.3.0-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* opensmtpd-5.3.3p1-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs

== Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) ==

* fcitx-sayura-0.1.1-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* fcitx-sayura-0.1.1-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. angvp - 4 signoffs
2. jsteel - 2 signoffs



[aur-general] Removal request

2013-07-01 Thread Edoardo Maria Elidoro
Hi everyone,
I can't see the point of this package since it just install a plain Xfce-mixer:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-mixer-oss4/

Also: it's orphaned. I think it need to be deleted.

Have a nice day,
Edoardo


[aur-general] Removal (or merge) request

2013-07-01 Thread Edoardo Maria Elidoro
Hi everyone,
I don't see the point of having a -devel package when there's already
a -git package that fit better the purpose.

Here's some (IMHO) packages that need to be deleted (or merged into
the -git version) since there's their -git counterpart mainteined
(while these are orphaned).

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libxfce4ui-devel/
-> git version: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libxfce4ui-git/

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/exo-devel/
(and there's even a: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/exo-dev/, but
it's not orphaned)
->git version: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/exo-git/

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/garcon-devel/
-> git version: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/garcon-git/

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libxfce4ui-devel/
-> git version: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libxfce4ui-git/

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libxfce4util-devel/
-> git version: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libxfce4util-git/

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-mixer-devel/
-> git version: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-mixer-git/

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-panel-devel/
-> git version: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-panel-git/

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-session-devel/
-> git version: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-session-git/

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-settings-devel/
-> git version: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-settings-git/

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfconf-devel/
-> git version: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfconf-git/

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfdesktop-devel/
-> git version: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfdesktop-git/

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfwm4-devel/
-> git version: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfwm4-git/

Have a nice day,
Edoardo


Re: [aur-general] Merge request : php-gtk

2013-07-01 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Sun, 2013-06-30 at 16:29 +0200, Xorg wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Please merge php-gtk (package is old, orphan, dependencies are bad and 
> package can't compile) into php-gtk-git.
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/php-gtk/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/php-gtk-git/
> 
>   Best Regards
> X0rg
> 

I'd leave it like this for the moment, project seems to be active still,
there might be a new release at some point.

Cheers,

--
Maxime


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2013-07-01 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Sun, 2013-06-30 at 12:45 -0400, Evan Teitelman wrote:
> Could you please merge 'xsser'
> (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xsser/) into 'xsser-svn'
> (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xsser-svn/)?
> 
> The original 'xsser' package should have been named 'xsser-svn'. The
> original uploader made a new package called 'xsser-svn' and disowned
> 'xsser'.

Merged, thx.

--
Maxime


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [aur-general] move split2flac-git to split2flac

2013-07-01 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Sun, 2013-06-30 at 06:55 -0500, William Giokas wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 07:44:14AM -0400, graysky wrote:
> > Upstream has finally started tagging releases. Please replace the git
> > package with the standard one I just uploaded.  Thanks!
> 
> I see no reason to do this. Set up a good pkgver function using git
> describe and have it conflict with the non-git package, then they can
> coexist just fine.
> 
> Thanks,

As William said, people might want to keep using git version, there is
no reason to delete it yet. Also please include a link to your package
next time.

Cheers,

--
Maxime


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [aur-general] Removal requests

2013-07-01 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 02:36 +0200, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> Source gone
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/indicator-lookit/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/imwheel-enchanced/ - the diff is
> gone, w/o it it's a plain imwheel:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/imwheel/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ispell-czech/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ispell-da/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ipwraw-ng/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ipkg-utils/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/joomla-ru/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/jpegpixi/ - it's a dep for
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mapivi/ ...
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/jpgraph/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/jre5/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/jetty8/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/jdeveloper-studio/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/javafx-sdk/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kaid/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kaconnect/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kdeplasma-addons-applets-rosapanel/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kdeplasma-themes-panels-collection/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kdeutils-tweakkde-svn/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kdm-theme-lucid/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kopete-cryptography/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kicad-doc/

All gone, except imwheel, upstream is still there and package is not an
orphan.

--
Maxime


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [aur-general] Merge/Removal request: thunar

2013-07-01 Thread Felix Yan
On Sunday, June 30, 2013 08:35:17 Diego Principe wrote:
> I believe that is not useful to have a non-maintained and old
> development version
> for thunar... I think that they should be merged keeping the git version
> 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thunar-devel/
> into
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thunar-git

Merged.

> And these are very old and patched version, the second one have a patch
> that now is upstream
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thunar-notrash/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thunar-smallicons/
> Delete it

Both removed.

> I have also to add the deletion of a patched package:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thunar-dnd-popup/
> 
> because from Thunar 1.6.2 that patch is upstream:
> http://git.xfce.org/xfce/thunar/commit/?id=bb96457d8cf1a83052197b1e722eda3c5
> 9eb7433

Removed.

Thanks!

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [aur-general] Icons pack naming guidelines

2013-07-01 Thread Edoardo Maria Elidoro
2013/7/1 Hugo Osvaldo Barrera :
> What do you mean by "sort better"? What difference is there between
> "icon-theme-*" and "*-icon-theme"?
> AUR has search, so it's pretty much the same, and the same applies
> to pacman.

When you search something the output is usually in alphabetical order.
Having all the icon packages with the same prefix helps to group them,
just like the gtk themes.

It's nothing big, I understand, but it's neater than now.


Re: [aur-general] Deletion package stegano-git

2013-07-01 Thread Felix Yan
On Sunday, June 30, 2013 09:42:35 Simone Solinas wrote:
> Hi, I ask the deletion of the package *Stegano-git* due to the change of
> name.

It seems someone else did it.

Please provide a link to package next time, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [aur-general] Orphan request: dfu-util

2013-07-01 Thread Felix Yan
On Sunday, June 30, 2013 14:15:54 Øyvind Heggstad wrote:
> dfu-util[1] needs updating and the current maintainer is not responding
> to comments nor email (email sent 20130618)
> 
> [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dfu-util/

Disowned, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [aur-general] Merge request: win7-8 theme

2013-07-01 Thread Felix Yan
On Sunday, June 30, 2013 14:39:44 Diego Principe wrote:
> Please merge
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/win7-8-theme/
> in
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-win7-8/

Removed since no votes/comments present, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.