Re: [aur-general] golangide duplicate
Hi, Thanks for noticing. I am considering renaming golangide in [community] to liteide or liteidex, but it's a bit unclear what the best name will be. The upstream developers have used all three at times. It's still a bit unclear to me if golangide and LiteIDE X are the same or not. Searching the web gives different top hits, where golangide and liteidex are often used in the same url. Suggestions are welcome. -- Sincerely, Alexander Rødseth xyproto / TU
[aur-general] golangide duplicate
There seems to be some duplication of effort between this package in AUR: liteide - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/liteide/ and this package in community : https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/golangide/ Ie, I think they are providing the same thing. -- Jonathan ArnoldWebstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io Talent wins games, but team work and intelligence wins championships. Michael Jordan
Re: [aur-general] Merge request for php-pdf
Thanks. Updated. David Roheim david.roh...@gmail.com -http://roheim.org/ +972 54 3516944 - Skype: david.roheim On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Felix Yan wrote: > On Tuesday, August 13, 2013 18:23:37 David Roheim wrote: > > I see your point Felix. Uploaded php-pdflib so it you could merge php-pdf > > and php-pecl-pdflib into it. > > > > Thanks. > > > > David Roheim > > david.roh...@gmail.com -http://roheim.org/ > > +972 54 3516944 - Skype: david.roheim > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Felix Yan > wrote: > > > > > On Tuesday, August 13, 2013 17:26:29 David Roheim wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Please merge php-pdf[1] into php-pecl-pdflib[2]. > > > > > > > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/php-pdf/ > > > > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/php-pecl-pdflib/ > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > Sorry I didn't get it - the name "php-pecl-pdflib" still looks > incorrect > > > to me. > > > > > > I would suggest "php-pdflib" as the name, so it follows the same naming > > > style as other php modules in our repos (like php-geoip, php-memcache, > > > php-mongo, etc). > > > > > > If you agree, please submit a new package under the name "php-pdflib", > and > > > reply here so I'll merge [1] into it, and remove [2]. Thanks! > > > > > > Regards, > > > Felix Yan > > Merged [1] into php-pdflib, removed [2], thanks! > > A little suggestion btw, the "|| return 1" thing is obsolete and can be > safely removed, and you should split the phpize and make steps into > build(), and leave installation stuff like "make install" and the last > install command in package(). > > Regards, > Felix Yan
Re: [aur-general] Merge request php-pecl-uploadprogress
On Tuesday, August 13, 2013 18:32:06 David Roheim wrote: > Hi, I saw now that my php-pecl-uploadprogress is a duplicate of > php-uploadprogress. Please merge. Thanks. Merged. Please include links to packages next time, thanks! Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Merge request for php-pdf
On Tuesday, August 13, 2013 18:23:37 David Roheim wrote: > I see your point Felix. Uploaded php-pdflib so it you could merge php-pdf > and php-pecl-pdflib into it. > > Thanks. > > David Roheim > david.roh...@gmail.com -http://roheim.org/ > +972 54 3516944 - Skype: david.roheim > > > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Felix Yan wrote: > > > On Tuesday, August 13, 2013 17:26:29 David Roheim wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Please merge php-pdf[1] into php-pecl-pdflib[2]. > > > > > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/php-pdf/ > > > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/php-pecl-pdflib/ > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > Sorry I didn't get it - the name "php-pecl-pdflib" still looks incorrect > > to me. > > > > I would suggest "php-pdflib" as the name, so it follows the same naming > > style as other php modules in our repos (like php-geoip, php-memcache, > > php-mongo, etc). > > > > If you agree, please submit a new package under the name "php-pdflib", and > > reply here so I'll merge [1] into it, and remove [2]. Thanks! > > > > Regards, > > Felix Yan Merged [1] into php-pdflib, removed [2], thanks! A little suggestion btw, the "|| return 1" thing is obsolete and can be safely removed, and you should split the phpize and make steps into build(), and leave installation stuff like "make install" and the last install command in package(). Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] Merge request php-pecl-uploadprogress
Hi, I saw now that my php-pecl-uploadprogress is a duplicate of php-uploadprogress. Please merge. Thanks.
Re: [aur-general] Merge request for php-pdf
I see your point Felix. Uploaded php-pdflib so it you could merge php-pdf and php-pecl-pdflib into it. Thanks. David Roheim david.roh...@gmail.com -http://roheim.org/ +972 54 3516944 - Skype: david.roheim On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Felix Yan wrote: > On Tuesday, August 13, 2013 17:26:29 David Roheim wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Please merge php-pdf[1] into php-pecl-pdflib[2]. > > > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/php-pdf/ > > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/php-pecl-pdflib/ > > > > Thanks. > > Sorry I didn't get it - the name "php-pecl-pdflib" still looks incorrect > to me. > > I would suggest "php-pdflib" as the name, so it follows the same naming > style as other php modules in our repos (like php-geoip, php-memcache, > php-mongo, etc). > > If you agree, please submit a new package under the name "php-pdflib", and > reply here so I'll merge [1] into it, and remove [2]. Thanks! > > Regards, > Felix Yan
Re: [aur-general] Merge request for php-pdf
On Tuesday, August 13, 2013 17:26:29 David Roheim wrote: > Hi, > > Please merge php-pdf[1] into php-pecl-pdflib[2]. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/php-pdf/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/php-pecl-pdflib/ > > Thanks. Sorry I didn't get it - the name "php-pecl-pdflib" still looks incorrect to me. I would suggest "php-pdflib" as the name, so it follows the same naming style as other php modules in our repos (like php-geoip, php-memcache, php-mongo, etc). If you agree, please submit a new package under the name "php-pdflib", and reply here so I'll merge [1] into it, and remove [2]. Thanks! Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] Merge request for php-pdf
Hi, Please merge php-pdf[1] into php-pecl-pdflib[2]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/php-pdf/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/php-pecl-pdflib/ Thanks.
Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: wl_lkm
On Tuesday, August 13, 2013 15:55:32 Jakub Klinkovský wrote: > As far as I know, the wlags49_h2_cs driver (Agere Hermes 2 chipsets) is > included > in current kernel (for a long time). For Hermes 1 chipsets, the orinoco driver > should be used. So I think the wl_lkm package [1] can be safely removed. > > [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wl_lkm/ Last updated in 2008, flagged out-of-date since 2011, and orphaned, so removed. Thanks! Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Removal request: bzr-grep, bzr-grep-bzr
On Tuesday, August 13, 2013 08:36:08 Vojtech Horky wrote: > Hello, TUs, > > please remove bzr-grep [1] and bzr-grep-bzr [2] as this plugin is now part > of the core bazaar package (since 2.6.0 [3]). > > Thanks! > > - Vojta > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bzr-grep/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bzr-grep-bzr/ > [3] > http://doc.bazaar.canonical.com/bzr.2.6/en/release-notes/bzr-2.6.html#new-features Both removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] Package removal request
Dear TUs, when adding a package to the repos, please check if there's one in the AUR with the same name. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/caps/ https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/caps/ Please remove caps from the AUR.
[aur-general] Deletion request: wl_lkm
As far as I know, the wlags49_h2_cs driver (Agere Hermes 2 chipsets) is included in current kernel (for a long time). For Hermes 1 chipsets, the orinoco driver should be used. So I think the wl_lkm package [1] can be safely removed. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wl_lkm/ pgpOnbjk0vXRB.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] [tu-bylaws][PATCH]
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 10:29:42AM +, Xyne wrote: > [...] > Patch follows: I put that patch on a separate branch (proposal-70) in the official TU bylaws repository [1], so that it is easier for people to extract the actual commit and review the changes in the way they prefer. I think it is a good idea to include both the discussion and a link to the proposal branch in the AUR proposal description. Xyne, could you please remember this when the voting period starts? I think we should also update the bylaws and complete the "Amendment of Bylaws" section with instructions on how to submit future proposals. Mention the Git repository, mention `git send-email`. Mention that every proposal will be merged into a separate branch so that TUs can easily review the latest version when voting. I will submit a proposal after the end of the voting period for this one. [1] https://projects.archlinux.org/tu-bylaws.git/?h=proposal-70
[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 22 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (22 total) == * bbswitch-0.7-9 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * php-geoip-1.0.8-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * php-memcache-3.0.8-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * php-memcached-2.1.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * php-mongo-1.4.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-39 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-30 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-9 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * xdebug-2.2.3-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * php-geoip-1.0.8-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcache-3.0.8-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcached-2.1.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * php-mongo-1.4.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-39 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-30 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xdebug-2.2.3-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 8 signoffs 2. foutrelis - 2 signoffs 3. heftig - 1 signoffs 4. dreisner - 1 signoffs
[aur-general] Tuxtype or tuxtyping
Hi, These packages are in the AUR, unfortunately they are both failing to build because, I assume, they aren't being maintained. I was wondering if someone would be willing to go fix them? I was hoping to use one or the other to teach my kids how to type. They have about a 2 second attention span if there's not flashing lights and colors/points/coin sounds involved lol. Thanks Storm -- Registered Linux user number 508465: https://linuxcounter.net/user/508465.html My blog, Thoughts of a Dragon: http://www.stormdragon.us/ How many Internet mail list subscribers does it take to change a lightbulb? http://goo.gl/eO4PJ "with a trunk big enough to fit three bodies in" Calabrese - Crizila
Re: [aur-general] Merge request: plover-bzr into plover-git
speps writes: > On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 23:39:46 +0200 > Joren Van Onder wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> There is an old plover-bzr package [1] in the AUR that I adopted >> today. Development for Plover has been migrated to GitHub in 2011 [2] >> [3]. I therefore created a new package called plover-git [4]. Could >> the votes and comments from plover-bzr be merged into plover-git? >> >> Footnotes: >> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/plover-bzr/ >> [2] https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~joshua-harlan-lifton/plover/trunk/files >> [3] https://github.com/plover/plover/commits/master >> [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/plover-git/ >> >> >> Regards, >> Joren > > Here you are, thanks. > FYI, you should update your PKGBUILD to the latest VCS PKGBUILD Guidelines [1] > > [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/VCS_PKGBUILD_Guidelines Thanks, the PKGBUILD has been updated. Regards, Joren signature.asc Description: PGP signature
