[aur-general] aws-cli AUR package
Currently flagged out of date, https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/aws-cli I would like to update it/take it over but its not orphaned yet. cc the packager - perhaps you can update it saving the need? regards, flaccid
[aur-general] Merge request for [xen-4.3].
Please merge xen-4.3[1] into xen-4.3-git[2]. Reasoning: - There are only minor differences between the two PKGBUILD files. - Both packages retrieve their sources with Git. - Both packages were submitted by the same user, suggesting that the uploading of xen-4.3-git was a rename attempt. - xen-4.3 is unmaintained. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xen-4.3 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xen-4.3-git/
[aur-general] Merge nicotine-plus-svn under *git
Hello I am nicotine-plus-svn[1] and it's git version[2], because the source has changed from svn to git, so, could you please merge the first on the second one? thanks
Re: [aur-general] spark vs. spark
On Wed 14 Aug 2013 at 19:32, Jerome Leclanche wrote: > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/spark/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/spark-git/ > > Conflict is avoided here because [1] has a -svn package, but it's still > very confusing and should probably be renamed. Any suggestions? Ask the maintainer to change it, either in the comments or send them an email. -- Jonathan Steel pgpIfE4ifSiwa.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Tuxtype or tuxtyping
On Tue 13 Aug 2013 at 03:26, Storm Dragon wrote: > Hi, > These packages are in the AUR, unfortunately they are both failing to > build because, I assume, they aren't being maintained. I was wondering > if someone would be willing to go fix them? I was hoping to use one or > the other to teach my kids how to type. They have about a 2 second > attention span if there's not flashing lights and colors/points/coin > sounds involved lol. > Thanks ant32 shared an updated PKGBUILD in the comments that works. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tuxtype I've deleted tuxtyping as it was just a duplicate of tuxtype. -- Jonathan Steel pgpepKqA5RkPV.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] [100% off-topic] What happened to the arch general mailing list?
On 17/08/13 03:00 AM, Vitor Eiji Justus Sakaguti wrote: > On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 6:11 AM, Magnus Therning > wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 03:26:09AM -0500, Doug Newgard wrote: >>> It's a moderated list and the normal moderator is on >>> vacation:https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2013-July/025270.html >> Continuing the 100% off-topic thread ;) >> >> Well, that email just confirmed my feeling that the moderation on >> arch-general does more harm than good. I think it did more good than harm during the systemd protesting. >> Is there some other place >> where I can reach a group equally, or maybe more, knowledgeable in >> Linux and Arch where I can ask general questions, but without the >> seemingly arbitrary moderation? > Yes. > https://bbs.archlinux.org/ > > It's a little bit noisier, though. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[aur-general] AUR upgraded to 2.2.1
The official Arch Linux AUR setup has been upgraded to 2.2.1. For a short list of changes, read [1]. Please report any further issues to the AUR bug tracker [2]. [1] https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-dev/2013-August/002533.html [2] https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?project=2
Re: [aur-general] Delete package
On 11 August 2013 18:37, Muflone wrote: > Please delete the package archlinux-special-wallpapers > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/archlinux-special-wallpapers/ > > The sources are gone and its PKGBUILD is trivial, just copies a bunch of > files somewhere without any symlink or indication on what to do with them > > Regards > > Muflone I've removed the package, because the sources are no longer available.
Re: [aur-general] aur upload problems
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 05:37:30PM +0200, Rob Til Freedmen wrote: > Hi, > I've tried uploading to the aur (via web) but got an error: > Error - source tarball may not contain nested subdirectories. > > aurploader just returns with an unspecified error. > > I've looked at the source package and everything looks ok. > I've tried an older source package uploaded long time ago > and got the same error. The Archive_Tar package seems to be broken -- probably due to a PHP update. I applied a quick and dirty fix on alderaan, so this should work again. Please use the bug tracker (FS#36576) for any further discussion.
Re: [aur-general] aur upload problems
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Doug Newgard wrote: > > > > > > > Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 11:41:22 -0400 > > From: d...@falconindy.com > > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > > Subject: Re: [aur-general] aur upload problems > > > > On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 05:37:30PM +0200, Rob Til Freedmen wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I've tried uploading to the aur (via web) but got an error: > > > Error - source tarball may not contain nested subdirectories. > > > > > > aurploader just returns with an unspecified error. > > > > > > I've looked at the source package and everything looks ok. > > > I've tried an older source package uploaded long time ago > > > and got the same error. > > > > If you create your tarballs using 'makepkg -S', you shouldn't run into > > such problems. > > It's being reported on the bbs, too, including with a tarball made > withmakepkg -S. I just tried it myself with a very simple > PKGBUILD-onlypackage and makepkg -S, won't let me upload with the same > error.Seems to be an AUR bug. > Thanks for confirming it's not me ;) Will follow the forum, try it later.
Re: [aur-general] aur upload problems
> Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 11:41:22 -0400 > From: d...@falconindy.com > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > Subject: Re: [aur-general] aur upload problems > > On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 05:37:30PM +0200, Rob Til Freedmen wrote: > > Hi, > > I've tried uploading to the aur (via web) but got an error: > > Error - source tarball may not contain nested subdirectories. > > > > aurploader just returns with an unspecified error. > > > > I've looked at the source package and everything looks ok. > > I've tried an older source package uploaded long time ago > > and got the same error. > > If you create your tarballs using 'makepkg -S', you shouldn't run into > such problems. It's being reported on the bbs, too, including with a tarball made withmakepkg -S. I just tried it myself with a very simple PKGBUILD-onlypackage and makepkg -S, won't let me upload with the same error.Seems to be an AUR bug.
Re: [aur-general] aur upload problems
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Dave Reisner wrote: > On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 05:37:30PM +0200, Rob Til Freedmen wrote: > > Hi, > > I've tried uploading to the aur (via web) but got an error: > > Error - source tarball may not contain nested subdirectories. > > > > aurploader just returns with an unspecified error. > > > > I've looked at the source package and everything looks ok. > > I've tried an older source package uploaded long time ago > > and got the same error. > > If you create your tarballs using 'makepkg -S', you shouldn't run into > such problems. > This isn't news for me... I've done it before, I've done it today. As I said, this error comes with old src packages as well with newly created.
Re: [aur-general] aur upload problems
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 05:37:30PM +0200, Rob Til Freedmen wrote: > Hi, > I've tried uploading to the aur (via web) but got an error: > Error - source tarball may not contain nested subdirectories. > > aurploader just returns with an unspecified error. > > I've looked at the source package and everything looks ok. > I've tried an older source package uploaded long time ago > and got the same error. If you create your tarballs using 'makepkg -S', you shouldn't run into such problems.
[aur-general] aur upload problems
Hi, I've tried uploading to the aur (via web) but got an error: Error - source tarball may not contain nested subdirectories. aurploader just returns with an unspecified error. I've looked at the source package and everything looks ok. I've tried an older source package uploaded long time ago and got the same error.
Re: [aur-general] Different PKGBUILD
It wasn't cache in browser, but now it's ok Thanks On Sat, 17 Aug 2013 09:22:38 +0200 Lukas Jirkovsky wrote: > On 17 August 2013 09:11, podhorsky.ksj wrote: > > Please look at my package avidemux-2.6. > > Today I updated it. > > > > When I try "View PKGBUILD" action it gives me old package. > > When I download tarball it gives me new package. > > > > Where is problem? > > > > Thanks > > It's likely that the old PKGBUILD is in your browser cache. Try to > refresh the page when viewing the PKGBUILD.. > > Lukas
Re: [aur-general] [100% off-topic] What happened to the arch general mailing list?
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 6:11 AM, Magnus Therning wrote: > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 03:26:09AM -0500, Doug Newgard wrote: >> It's a moderated list and the normal moderator is on >> vacation:https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2013-July/025270.html > > Continuing the 100% off-topic thread ;) > > Well, that email just confirmed my feeling that the moderation on > arch-general does more harm than good. Is there some other place > where I can reach a group equally, or maybe more, knowledgeable in > Linux and Arch where I can ask general questions, but without the > seemingly arbitrary moderation? Yes. https://bbs.archlinux.org/ It's a little bit noisier, though.
Re: [aur-general] [100% off-topic] What happened to the arch general mailing list?
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 03:26:09AM -0500, Doug Newgard wrote: > It's a moderated list and the normal moderator is on > vacation:https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2013-July/025270.html Continuing the 100% off-topic thread ;) Well, that email just confirmed my feeling that the moderation on arch-general does more harm than good. Is there some other place where I can reach a group equally, or maybe more, knowledgeable in Linux and Arch where I can ask general questions, but without the seemingly arbitrary moderation? /M -- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: mag...@therning.org jabber: mag...@therning.org twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus I invented the term Object-Oriented, and I can tell you I did not have C++ in mind. -- Alan Kay pgpoS_bejtJtv.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] MSN Messenger and Google Reader
On 17 August 2013 11:08, Connor Behan wrote: > On 16/08/13 07:17 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote: >> Windows Live Messenger (formerly MSN Messenger) has been deprecated. >> Is it OK to remove the various MSN clients from the AUR? >> What about programs relying on the discontinued Google Reader? > > Google Reader yes, MSN no. The servers are supposed to still work for a > year. > For some dates, look here: http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/live/en-US/44ad3195-6e7e-4192-95e5-bf5f282eab01/support-for-xmpp-ends-in-october-2013 -- GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1
[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 28 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 40 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (28 total) == * aegisub-3.0.4-2 (i686) * bbswitch-0.7-10 (i686) * dolphin-emu-1:3.5-7 (i686) * electricsheep-2.7b33-11 (i686) * poedit-1.5.7-3 (i686) * r8168-8.036.00-7 (i686) * r8168-lts-8.035.00-4 (i686) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-40 (i686) * tp_smapi-0.41-31 (i686) * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-12 (i686) * vhba-module-20130607-10 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-7 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.16-2 (i686) * wxgtk2.9-2.9.5-1 (i686) * aegisub-3.0.4-2 (x86_64) * bbswitch-0.7-10 (x86_64) * dolphin-emu-1:3.5-7 (x86_64) * electricsheep-2.7b33-11 (x86_64) * poedit-1.5.7-3 (x86_64) * r8168-8.036.00-7 (x86_64) * r8168-lts-8.035.00-4 (x86_64) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-40 (x86_64) * tp_smapi-0.41-31 (x86_64) * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-12 (x86_64) * vhba-module-20130607-10 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-7 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.16-2 (x86_64) * wxgtk2.9-2.9.5-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (40 total) == * aegisub-3.0.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * dolphin-emu-1:3.5-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * electricsheep-2.7b33-11 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * kphotoalbum-4.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * php-geoip-1.0.8-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * php-memcache-3.0.8-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * php-memcached-2.1.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * php-mongo-1.4.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * poedit-1.5.7-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.035.00-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-40 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-31 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-12 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.16-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * wxgtk2.9-2.9.5-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * xdebug-2.2.3-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * aegisub-3.0.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dolphin-emu-1:3.5-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * electricsheep-2.7b33-11 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * kphotoalbum-4.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * php-geoip-1.0.8-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcache-3.0.8-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcached-2.1.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * php-mongo-1.4.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * poedit-1.5.7-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.035.00-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-40 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-31 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.16-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wxgtk2.9-2.9.5-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xdebug-2.2.3-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 10 signoffs 2. eric - 4 signoffs 3. dreisner - 3 signoffs 4. allan - 2 signoffs
Re: [aur-general] Different PKGBUILD
On 17 August 2013 09:11, podhorsky.ksj wrote: > Please look at my package avidemux-2.6. > Today I updated it. > > When I try "View PKGBUILD" action it gives me old package. > When I download tarball it gives me new package. > > Where is problem? > > Thanks It's likely that the old PKGBUILD is in your browser cache. Try to refresh the page when viewing the PKGBUILD.. Lukas
[aur-general] Different PKGBUILD
Please look at my package avidemux-2.6. Today I updated it. When I try "View PKGBUILD" action it gives me old package. When I download tarball it gives me new package. Where is problem? Thanks
