[aur-general] Deletion request for otf-source-sans-pro ttf-source-sans-pro
Hi, I think my packages otf-source-sans-pro [1] and ttf-source-sans-pro [2] could be deleted as is is present now in the [extra] repo [3]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/otf-source-sans-pro/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ttf-source-sans-pro/ [3] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/adobe-source-sans-pro-fonts/ What do you think? I you agree, please go on and delete the packages. -- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 2:12 AM Subject: AUR Comment for otf-source-sans-pro To: from https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/otf-source-sans-pro/ CharlesAtum wrote: Package is already available on [extra] repository: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/adobe-source-sans-pro-fonts/ --- If you no longer wish to receive notifications about this package, please go the the above package page and click the UnNotify button.
[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 8 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 17 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (8 total) == * gambas3-3.5.1-2 (i686) * pdf2djvu-0.7.17-2 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-4.3.4-2 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.4-2 (i686) * gambas3-3.5.1-2 (x86_64) * pdf2djvu-0.7.17-2 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-4.3.4-2 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.4-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (17 total) == * goagent-3.0.8-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avrdude-6.0.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * flashrom-0.9.7-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gambas3-3.5.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * openocd-0.7.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pdf2djvu-0.7.17-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python2-gevent-1.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avrdude-6.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * flashrom-0.9.7-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gambas3-3.5.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openocd-0.7.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pdf2djvu-0.7.17-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python2-gevent-1.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. thomas - 8 signoffs 2. bisson - 4 signoffs 3. lcarlier - 1 signoffs
Re: [aur-general] Another couple to delete...
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 3:53 AM, Curtis Shimamoto wrote: > This is a module that is meant for Realtek RTS5229 Pcie SDCard readers. > The functionality was mainlined around 3.8 with the rtsx-pci module (I > know because my machine uses this). > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rts5229 > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rts5229-dkms/ And they are gone! Thanks, Lukas
Re: [aur-general] Deletion request for otf-source-sans-pro ttf-source-sans-pro
Hi, Removed, thanks. -- Sincerely, Alexander Rødseth xyproto / TU
[aur-general] removal request for rt-tests-git
rt-tests-git is no longer needed as when there are changes a new tarball is published and covered by the rt-tests buildscript. It was only created when kernel.org had been hacked and there was a problem getting the tarballs. No need to merge into rt-tests. Thanks in advance, -- Joakim
[aur-general] Review request for first AUR package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 - -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, I've made a package for sic. This is my first package. I've tested it and I haven't noticed any issues. Please review it in case I've missed something. sic: http://tools.suckless.org/sic Package: http://nyuszika7h.cadoth.net/assets/aur/sic-1.2-1.src.tar.gz - - -- nyuszika7h - -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Homepage: http://nyuszika7h.cadoth.net/ Comment: Public key: http://bit.ly/1aXbBEh iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJSm3L+AAoJEMrMWwlOwAIGGm8P/0AKwkdAxRKKaZMVJcaNi4YP N0qIyzV0jxn5iGE4Bmspm7c6N3l+UAJt2yzMBMGU/kVvraOb+zVN3hm1UB8/XpY5 CRlQHuDbsrRk1ljuJK79/LOiBjofMDdHp32G3cuVQLOzNYz0m0lpZfo2ZBVqagQL SM+I75ePLg5AbgAyJT+X7/W4k0AtEJ9Fk8y3/6HREBZ4oP/ny1Ui0J/VFtc+G4Ds TDJ1JfPRfyILkyPdoX180JO7na6BqxawKIJKr9RwMtIOlL/erMS9C3h0B4vuDmoc idBZRrMSBS3/yjkP+6xaSZ/cu3FaOew6/z2i4q8hKCNPhraVoVk1nQlFOoAkYXcu PLY2YS8HJ3JqppwRr/2hEEvd/ORoYvV23/Ox1lDqSwB6utU9XYmtYhnvC7HOsaVh 8V+yXShcLDXnlz++h0XosenOfC+sBKdioBc0R8OtTHAqzvJxH41b9LTOskELQ9Fu z5LXJIRo4hb1yzEKJVJ1Xmy6vfbE48HDYG9Qqo539sK86w6oToZ2BwD/R9W35IjU wuGAMlM/R7bfok5MeGw+ldliApBbVGT13OVWn3C79tH40/89K+5VEPYyjIj0imwL vTA7kOSfmYvu/joQCTwRgWLoydL+EuOGUtEnB09BaMes/Z8VPs2iqB8jTbm5MMHw e7/o7tZmfKOTLaKRJBrm =Bhxd - -END PGP SIGNATURE- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Homepage: http://nyuszika7h.cadoth.net/ Comment: Public key: http://bit.ly/1aXbBEh iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJSm3ZyAAoJEMrMWwlOwAIGCtAQAM1U48vtBPeb5rQZIph83Z/K ZlqsajDbUhKWcPIkvX/9PfNX50yohK3hqB/datqozSicwoKx6c9zsp/mhtwIvGVg aLF1NkZwDTHDGWBF3NAQeaNyiHGMADZMgA8VMY1AVWEzhqh9objNxUq7Asub5xG9 zhk6TxTCgNz3Un19D3NH8JrOmKITVYX5DUrPp3I1vQWP/V6Aysq+uh1WBVujM7Vq ao2Z9VsWNqMtYFgT0pdi0ik8viCBbudusJ3WwK+S+DDBfDBfk3fCU9jgZDAfbqBS j5ApJFcmuT61mHYvZoXVUV2ZDuwX+8zm76QW0FPiwAKDN44ApG6R9m1Qw7UwR68m gW7g6CXOUqBYXScX3342Fr9fqC61210fNOcMMDUw3yjUDV4K+FpxKYzRIomNFFsd 6/ql4H3YhiYkWgCrAKdubJ+fSnPl91TlSDCt9bdQ/C135xfUTSHjJDe5uGIcqkxQ 2wO5V6Wz3gZkOTF6VAZNibzXNzefIYWltbxIagrf6hO68+RdI/IArACUdnzp2fhi DKx3ndDbzd2yWg+vrvq/ZAjjyBiEW67aUQpl7D3hnKZeiOsN6HyCN1YYc49hvH8t UZ042uBnAEosHGfKa5E2N7FvsH9GqbMdfA6aTAW9+XfhF0Gu9I2Pb2o1C/9IvLe3 wgEq5BHiHU0yWRC2QXcV =jQ3j -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [aur-general] removal request for rt-tests-git
On 2 December 2013 00:31, Joakim Hernberg wrote: > rt-tests-git is no longer needed as when there are changes a new > tarball is published and covered by the rt-tests buildscript. It was > only created when kernel.org had been hacked and there was a problem > getting the tarballs. > > No need to merge into rt-tests. > > Thanks in advance, Gone :) -- GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1
Re: [aur-general] Review request for first AUR package
> Please review it in case I've missed something. You can drop the `pkgdir= #TODO` line completely. makepkg defines $pkgdir for you. [1] namcap emits several warnings. Run `namcap sic-1.2-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz` to see them. [1] https://www.archlinux.org/pacman/PKGBUILD.5.html#_build_function. --Jeremy
Re: [aur-general] Review request for first AUR package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 02:43:13PM -0500, Jeremy Audet wrote: > > Please review it in case I've missed something. > > You can drop the `pkgdir= #TODO` line completely. makepkg defines $pkgdir > for you. [1] > > namcap emits several warnings. Run `namcap sic-1.2-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz` to > see them. > > [1] https://www.archlinux.org/pacman/PKGBUILD.5.html#_build_function. > > --Jeremy It looks like I overlooked that, I accidentally left it in the PKGBUILD. I didn't even notice it was there, even though vim highlights "TODO". I'll check the namcap warnings soon. - -- nyuszika7h -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Homepage: http://nyuszika7h.cadoth.net/ Comment: Public key: http://bit.ly/1aXbBEh iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJSm5XCAAoJEMrMWwlOwAIGjN4P/R/2MX1/mj8d/xJey656H4fV 3A3eEYeypUvgSJTcBajVlW4Z1ao/0xvGZ28okmUx0d3HoD1FNvsiJEnZh8ZwSU3/ Xw7/EBxRPJyXC8rqSdLNkGSox+ey0+ONAfXfJt/quKe5H/0zFnfXInOkdUmick0y fOw3ux7C9fRhioSZQGIOUtV1j3pfsMYEqi9hPeYYPP0hhvXtUOeI0HTh892HWDZ+ c/1bfruRrRYCO6/ljJZBQ1ucxrsR6LGPRYOmK2MUXtiwixo+7L0wexSEggfn7Mt7 /OuCSZHF+mWiFhkzDDxgPNMDrvt5paNRMdoMI/GttSSK0O7YAIsPOzRS5g8TAe7g 4g3V6nyiTLw4iICixBz6sYX2qUweoLrKeJj8ds3GYfzkUJL2vYHOtE7HJLg86IPT V5FM0MPGDex8utQB9B5qv8eejM4vQWFSrM/WOYWH2Zgv0NHYbKRR/AVvjX1aj7/m owUxdh9JhIRsGUUR9E4NDOKb/FzryeYvrw0VRnCawG4MhYo7NKt1uCt7iPKokdEv zma++ZfT3YHr1MWFmOPSDGA4IuVDYd56lDr9w5WxZE0qIuqYw5mEPqcDmbn+AilW /7b/Kxh4OyFqK4RxumYgI6e6Jb8pPKQkeW5hwxkdp0O0fbiU22oBcG++1QRnTgTm eLcLCjKCDnCzc+TKQzm3 =qZyD -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [aur-general] Review request for first AUR package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 02:43:13PM -0500, Jeremy Audet wrote: > > Please review it in case I've missed something. > > You can drop the `pkgdir= #TODO` line completely. makepkg defines $pkgdir > for you. [1] > > namcap emits several warnings. Run `namcap sic-1.2-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz` to > see them. > > [1] https://www.archlinux.org/pacman/PKGBUILD.5.html#_build_function. > > --Jeremy Oh, of course, I got confused and forgot DESTDIR and PREFIX are two separate things. I've removed the pkgdir line, fixed the namcap warnings, and reuploaded the package now. Thanks for your help, is there anything else? - -- nyuszika7h -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Homepage: http://nyuszika7h.cadoth.net/ Comment: Public key: http://bit.ly/1aXbBEh iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJSm5gHAAoJEMrMWwlOwAIGa34QAKaYVNS4HDI0VNhL18x+M9LP Yh2TVxTwgyloacmWzx05YWAdL3Waf0SRgjKz4ULeaVVDWgpd8+v27hQ4Rn9dC/sI FOyBE9qNRZi9SKXTrr8g+nf1JgK/3rEC+dp4fzLrNWZI/4oGhva9TUjAN+aZMEOH KGA/tetmy+6UkWtfnBJ+mW2PujS6QJSJHLHOOokLUul0PTADDIeiypsO7gYPmuAh /3Mkmon0LMc0G1cLIHOx5UnPfoVC6A8GcngBNXIn0hmbBZtcYCWBMFqhJHndg9rY 04RwglPKFSJg5nhcnXJdGN1aiG91TfhAhj6wE4pd83AuQVcfFQNOVZj5/BU3XCi0 xx6iy4ApCUSMklEVYbptqx3HexUhYuvCBsMT/143P9fm/ev2F0E11ahID8F42htP DCio1f/hb5r3vhv+K4wvfzmtM1TYbfS3J5PLOwV3GUv9IrJRteOCENhbeUeFUPoA cAXIsTDKXS3MUBRLTpby40NGxVDRa2WGpqlj5SNJGjN6Yn9aowrLZBJVEVILiLez z7q3lDf11ONoFB32H1vmJMdv/3QlwFsgd5Lm510ef4USLoDpT7vYIqGBFy84eiWl DC1fMXW1KhSaZoFe9nicBCvp6l1f+eupU5H8GNRCX6hhF++i0WGmLQX6pvZTFE5t oufL2Io+QF/PORjIcNYp =XjNU -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [aur-general] Review request for first AUR package
> I've removed the pkgdir line, fixed the namcap warnings, Great! > and reuploaded the package now. Is the new .tar.gz file available at the same location? [1] I'm still getting the exact same set of files. > Thanks for your help, Thank *you* for taking the time to email this list. > is there anything else? Yes. The current PKGBUILD [2] lists a maintainer and two contributors. It's polite to list all three of them in the new PKGBUILD as contributors. [1] http://nyuszika7h.cadoth.net/assets/aur/sic-1.2-1.src.tar.gz [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/si/sic/PKGBUILD --Jeremy
Re: [aur-general] Review request for first AUR package
On Sunday 01 December 2013 22:17:28 nyuszika7h wrote: > On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 03:59:42PM -0500, Jeremy Audet wrote: > > Is the new .tar.gz file available at the same location? [1] I'm still > > getting the exact same set of files. > > I forgot to rebuild the source tarball. I've fixed that now. > > > Yes. The current PKGBUILD [2] lists a maintainer and two contributors. > > It's > > polite to list all three of them in the new PKGBUILD as contributors. > > Oh, I didn't notice there's a package for sic in the AUR already. The > wiki says not to create duplicate packages. Should I contact the current > maintainer about it? (I've updated the PKGBUILD to list them as > contributors.) The original package [1] is out-of-date. If you want to maintain the package you must contact with its current maintainer first via email and wait for a reply for a two week [1]. After this if he doens't reply you may send a disown request to this mailing list. However, if he reply that he will maintain this package you may suggest him your PKGBUILD. In this case YOU will be contributor. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sic [2] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR#Other_requests -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru ICQ: 407-398-235 Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] Deletion Request
Hi, Can I please get unrar4[1] removed? Unrar5 is in extra already; v4 was kept until pyunrar2 was updated to support the new version, which it was the other day. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/unrar4/ Regards, Justin Dray E: jus...@dray.be M: 0433348284
