Re: [aur-general] Linux-mainline + related package cleanup
On Thursday, February 20, 2014 07:03:56 Duru Can Celasun wrote: > Hi, > > I'm the maintainer of linux-mainline-dellxps and I'm fine with > removing it. It stopped being useful long ago, hence the lack of > updates. > > Cheers, > Can. OK, removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Linux-mainline + related package cleanup
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:11 AM, Felix Yan wrote: > On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 21:39:02 WorMzy Tykashi wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I believe that the following packages should be removed: >> >> linux-mainline-ux31e [1] -- last updated in early 2012, orphaned, only >> three votes. >> broadcom-wl-mainline [2] -- last updated in late 2012, orphaned, zero >> votes, source gone, and apparently doesn't build anyway. >> >> There's a third package which appears to be semi-active: >> linux-mainline-dellxps [3], I've asked the maintainer whether the >> package still has any point, as she/he has said that the >> linux-mainline package works fine for them, so it may be worth keeping >> an eye on the comments. >> >> Cheers, >> >> >> WorMzy >> >> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-mainline-ux31e/ >> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/broadcom-wl-mainline/ >> [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-mainline-dellxps/ > > Removed the first two, thanks. > > Regards, > Felix Yan Hi, I'm the maintainer of linux-mainline-dellxps and I'm fine with removing it. It stopped being useful long ago, hence the lack of updates. Cheers, Can.
Re: [aur-general] Linux-mainline + related package cleanup
On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 21:39:02 WorMzy Tykashi wrote: > Hi, > > I believe that the following packages should be removed: > > linux-mainline-ux31e [1] -- last updated in early 2012, orphaned, only > three votes. > broadcom-wl-mainline [2] -- last updated in late 2012, orphaned, zero > votes, source gone, and apparently doesn't build anyway. > > There's a third package which appears to be semi-active: > linux-mainline-dellxps [3], I've asked the maintainer whether the > package still has any point, as she/he has said that the > linux-mainline package works fine for them, so it may be worth keeping > an eye on the comments. > > Cheers, > > > WorMzy > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-mainline-ux31e/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/broadcom-wl-mainline/ > [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-mainline-dellxps/ Removed the first two, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Removal request: minetestpp
On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 15:01:41 Arch Norrepli wrote: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/minetestpp/ > > I created the minetestpp package, but orphaned it after development was > given up. Most features of minetestpp have been merged into the current > minetest or are availabe through mods. As the repository of minetestpp has > been deleted, I request the removal of the package. Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] Linux-mainline + related package cleanup
Hi, I believe that the following packages should be removed: linux-mainline-ux31e [1] -- last updated in early 2012, orphaned, only three votes. broadcom-wl-mainline [2] -- last updated in late 2012, orphaned, zero votes, source gone, and apparently doesn't build anyway. There's a third package which appears to be semi-active: linux-mainline-dellxps [3], I've asked the maintainer whether the package still has any point, as she/he has said that the linux-mainline package works fine for them, so it may be worth keeping an eye on the comments. Cheers, WorMzy [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-mainline-ux31e/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/broadcom-wl-mainline/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-mainline-dellxps/
Re: [aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
from the wiki [0] we learn: "[…]core has fairly strict quality requirements. Developers/users need to signoff on updates before package updates are accepted.[…]" [0] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Official_Repositories
[aur-general] Removal request: minetestpp
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/minetestpp/ I created the minetestpp package, but orphaned it after development was given up. Most features of minetestpp have been merged into the current minetest or are availabe through mods. As the repository of minetestpp has been deleted, I request the removal of the package.
Re: [aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 09:07:04AM -, Arch Website Notification wrote: > === Signoff report for [community-testing] === > https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ > > There are currently: > * 0 new packages in last 24 hours > * 0 known bad packages > * 0 packages not accepting signoffs > * 0 fully signed off packages > * 20 packages missing signoffs > * 16 packages older than 14 days > > (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by > pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one > package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) [...] What are these signoff-reports about? I don't know what their purpose is... Ciao, Oliver
[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 20 packages missing signoffs * 16 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (16 total) == * acpi_call-1.1.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * exim-4.82-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.037.00-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-52 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-44 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-24 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.6-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * exim-4.82-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.037.00-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-52 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-44 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-24 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.6-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (4 total) == * libnftnl-1.0.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nftables-0.099-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libnftnl-1.0.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nftables-0.099-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (16 total) == * libnftnl-1.0.0-1 (i686), since 2014-01-20 * libnftnl-1.0.0-1 (x86_64), since 2014-01-20 * bbswitch-0.8-6 (i686), since 2014-01-26 * bbswitch-0.8-6 (x86_64), since 2014-01-26 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-52 (i686), since 2014-01-26 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-52 (x86_64), since 2014-01-26 * r8168-8.037.00-7 (i686), since 2014-01-26 * r8168-8.037.00-7 (x86_64), since 2014-01-26 * tp_smapi-0.41-44 (i686), since 2014-01-26 * tp_smapi-0.41-44 (x86_64), since 2014-01-26 * vhba-module-20130607-24 (i686), since 2014-01-26 * vhba-module-20130607-24 (x86_64), since 2014-01-26 * virtualbox-modules-4.3.6-5 (i686), since 2014-01-26 * virtualbox-modules-4.3.6-5 (x86_64), since 2014-01-26 * acpi_call-1.1.0-2 (i686), since 2014-01-27 * acpi_call-1.1.0-2 (x86_64), since 2014-01-27 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. djgera - 2 signoffs 2. allan - 2 signoffs
