[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 3 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 183 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (3 total) == * python-pyx-0.13-3 (any) * python-redis-2.9.1-4 (any) * youtube-dl-2014.03.25-1 (any) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (183 total) == * archey3-0.5-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * bpython-0.12-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cxxtest-4.3-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * d-feet-0.3.8-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * docutils-0.11-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * firewalld-0.3.9.3-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * gaupol-0.25-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * goagent-3.1.6-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * gramps-2:4.0.3-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * httpie-0.8.0-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * ipython-1.2.1-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * isodate-0.4.9-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * livestreamer-1.7.5-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs * nfoview-1.13-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * nuitka-0.5.1.1-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * pep8-1.4.6-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs * pssh-2.3.1-5 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-ansi2html-1.0.6-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-anyjson-0.3.3-6 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-babel-1.3-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-beautifulsoup4-4.3.2-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-bottle-0.12.5-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-cherrypy-3.2.5-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-configobj-5.0.2-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-cssutils-1.0-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-dateutil-2.2-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-decorator-3.4.0-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-distutils-extra-2.38-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-dnspython-1.10.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-ecdsa-0.11-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-flask-0.10.1-5 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-gtkspellcheck-4.0.2-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-html5lib-0.999-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-irc-8.5.4-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-iso8601-0.1.10-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-itsdangerous-0.23-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-jedi-0.7.0-5 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-jinja-2.7.2-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-markdown-2.4-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-mock-1.0.1-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-oauthlib-0.6.1-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-paramiko-1.13.0-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-passlib-1.6.2-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-pexpect-3.1-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-pretend-1.0.8-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-progressbar-2.3-5 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-py-1.4.20-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-pyenchant-1.6.5-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-pygments-1.6-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-pyinotify-0.9.4-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-pyparsing-2.0.1-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-pyquery-1.2.8-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-pyro-4.22-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-pyserial-2.7-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-pytest-2.5.2-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-pytools-2014.1.2-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-pytz-2014.1-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-pyx-0.13-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-redis-2.9.1-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-requests-2.2.1-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-rsa-3.1.4-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-sh-1.09-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-six-1.6.1-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-slip-0.6.0-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-south-0.8.4-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-sphinx-1.2.2-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-stevedore-0.14.1-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-sympy-0.7.5-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-termcolor-1.1.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-unidecode-0.04.14-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-virtualenv-clone-0.2.4-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-virtualenvwrapper-4.2-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-werkzeug-0.9.4-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python2-httplib2-0.8-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * pyudev-0.16.1-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * ranger-1.6.1-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * reflector-2014-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * youtube-dl-2014.03.25-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avrdude-6.0.1-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * blender-13:2.70-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cairo-dock-plugins-3.3.2-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * calibre-1.29.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cython-0.20.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * hexchat-2.9.6.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * intel-gpu-tools-1.6-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * ktoblzcheck-1.43-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libftdi-1.1-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.7.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libnewt-0.52.17-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * luxrender-1.3.1-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * lxc-1:1.0.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mldonkey-3.1.5-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs *
Re: [aur-general] Merge request: qtermwidget - qtermwidget-git
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:27 AM, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qtermwidget/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qtermwidget-git/ Former has had no releases in a while and is no longer on sourceforge. Only available on git currently. J. Leclanche I see a 0.4.0 tarball on GitHub so I'd rather have qtermwidget stay and be updated to 0.4.0. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] [luakit-gtk3-git] Deletion request
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 8:14 PM, tuftedoce...@fastmail.fm wrote: I forked this from upstream, but no longer have the time/knowledge to continue and I've abandoned further work on it. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/luakit-gtk3-git/ Deleted, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Delete request: qterminal-suite-git
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:25 AM, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qterminal-suite-git/ No longer exists. Can merge with qterminal-git really. J. Leclanche Merged, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Delete requests: php-zendopcache etc.
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Yardena Cohen yarden...@gmail.com wrote: These all do the same thing, and the functionality was merged into extra/php last year: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/php-zendopcache https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/php-zendoptimizerplus https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zend-optimizer https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zend-optimizer-old It seems 3 out of the 4 were deleted. To whomever took care of this, any reason why zend-optimizer was left out? -- Maxime
[aur-general] Removal request
Can the following package be removed: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compiz-pure/ It's supposed to provide Compiz 0.8 plus the gtk-window-decorator. The package is orphaned, hasn't been updated in nearly 4 years, is several versions out of date and doesn't build successfully. Nothing will be lost here because there is a new package which provides exactly the same things as this package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compiz-gtk-standalone/
[aur-general] [Removal Request] libebur128 related
The following Packages should be removed: 1: loudness-cli-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/loudness-cli-git/ 2: libebur128-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libebur128-git/ 3: libebur128-nu774-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libebur128-nu774-git/ 1 and 2 are orphaned, I am the maintainer of 3. None of these packages build due to git repo changes and the functionality has been replaced by: loudness-scanner-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/loudness-scanner-git/
[aur-general] [Removal Request] hubicfuse
Hi, My bad, package hubicfuse has to be removed (correct package is hubicfuse-git). Feel free to test the package, but I think I added all deps
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] libebur128 related
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Robert Mackanics schnoo...@gmail.comwrote: The following Packages should be removed: 1: loudness-cli-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/loudness-cli-git/ 2: libebur128-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libebur128-git/ 3: libebur128-nu774-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libebur128-nu774-git/ 1 and 2 are orphaned, I am the maintainer of 3. None of these packages build due to git repo changes and the functionality has been replaced by: loudness-scanner-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/loudness-scanner-git/ All merged into loudness-scanner-git, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] hubicfuse
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Mitsu archli...@suumitsu.eu wrote: Hi, My bad, package hubicfuse has to be removed (correct package is hubicfuse-git). Feel free to test the package, but I think I added all deps Removed, please include a link to the package next time. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Removal request
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Charles Bos charlesb...@gmail.com wrote: Can the following package be removed: https://aur.archlinux.org/ packages/compiz-pure/ It's supposed to provide Compiz 0.8 plus the gtk-window-decorator. The package is orphaned, hasn't been updated in nearly 4 years, is several versions out of date and doesn't build successfully. Nothing will be lost here because there is a new package which provides exactly the same things as this package: https://aur.archlinux.org/ packages/compiz-gtk-standalone/ Merged into the latter, thx. -- Maxime
[aur-general] Delete proposal: asus-screen-brightness
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/asus-screen-brightness/ - The entirety code is stored in the source package - It's just a bash file and a system service file (which is not useful) - xorg-xbacklight provides the same functionality without requiring root. That said it's referenced in the wiki as an alternative to xorg-xbacklight which I... don't quite get. J. Leclanche
[aur-general] Compiz 0.9 packages cleanup, mergers?
There are a great deal of orphaned Compiz 0.9 packages in the AUR, some for the stable releases and some for bazaar. They are all on around 0.9.5 or 0.9.7. These are the packages I'm referring to: for stable release: * ccsm-dev -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ccsm-dev/ * compiz-plugins-extra-dev -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/comp ... extra-dev/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compiz-plugins-extra-dev/ * compiz-plugins-main-dev -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/comp ... -main-dev/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compiz-plugins-main-dev/ * compizconfig-backend-gconf-dev -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/comp ... gconf-dev/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compizconfig-backend-gconf-dev/ * compizconfig-backend-gsettings-dev -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/comp ... tings-dev/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compizconfig-backend-gsettings-dev/ * compizconfig-python-dev -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/comp ... ython-dev/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compizconfig-python-dev/ * libcompizconfig-dev -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libcompizconfig-dev/ for development release: * ccsm-bzr -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ccsm-bzr/ * compiz-core-bzr -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compiz-core-bzr/ * compiz-plugins-extra-bzr -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/comp ... extra-bzr/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compiz-plugins-extra-bzr/ * compiz-plugins-main-bzr -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/comp ... -main-bzr/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compiz-plugins-main-bzr/ * compizconfig-backend-gconf-bzr -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/comp ... gconf-bzr/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compizconfig-backend-gconf-bzr/ * compizconfig-backend-gsettings-bzr -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/comp ... tings-bzr/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compizconfig-backend-gsettings-bzr/ * compizconfig-python-bzr -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/comp ... ython-bzr/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compizconfig-python-bzr/ * libcompizconfig-bzr -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libcompizconfig-bzr/ As I understand it, Compiz upstream no longer packages all these components separately. They are all developed and packaged together in one launchpad project. That is why we have two main packages in the AUR for installing Compiz 0.9, compiz-dev and compiz-bzr. I've had a look on launchpad and this seems to be the case. For instance: The compiz-ccsm page (https://launchpad.net/compiz-ccsm) lists 0.9.5.92 as the latest version when it's actually 0.9.10. Therefore (unless I am much mistaken) all the packages above are obsolete and can never be updated to their latest upstream versions. I propose that all the dev packages above be merged with compiz-dev (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compiz-dev/) and all the bazaar packages be merged with compiz-bzr (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compiz-bzr/)
[aur-general] What's with F# and mono?
I'm just starting to dip my toes in the mono waters. Slightly prompted by my current situation at work. In particular I'm interested in F#, but I'm finding the whole situation around mono/monodevelop + F# a bit confusing. 1. There are indications online that mono ships with F# [^1][^2]. But the mono package in Arch doesn't include F#. Looking at the sources used to build the mono package there is no F# in sight. Was it ever there? 2. The package on AUR[^3] for fsharp is rather outdated. Not such a big problem, the building received a lot of TLC so the package is extremely simple to bring up-to-date. 3. Is there an F# add-in for monodevelop? There seems to have been one back in 2010, but it's not distributed any more, [^4]. However, other places say there is an add-in available, [^5] (however, downloading fails). So, can anyone help me get a clearer picture of F# on mono (and ArchLinux)? /M [^1]: http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2010/Nov-11.html - talking of plans to include F# in mono. [^2]: http://is.gd/cNC5xb- - F# is included in the standard Mono release, but it's still missing from the MonoDevelop IDE. [^3]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fsharp/ [^4]: http://is.gd/YndnsA- - bug on F# add-in missing, closed for MD 2.4, the last comment suggests it'd be re-opened [^5]: http://is.gd/YndnsA- which links to http://addins.monodevelop.com/Project/Index/48 -- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: mag...@therning.org jabber: mag...@therning.org twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus The results point out the fragility of programmer expertise: advanced programmers have strong expectations about what programs should look like, and when those expectations are violated--in seemingly innocuous ways--their performance drops drastically. -- Elliot Soloway and Kate Ehrlich pgpOHUVNhwhJJ.pgp Description: PGP signature
[aur-general] Disownment Request: kdeplasma-applets-redshift
Hi, the package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kdeplasma-applets-redshift/ is outdated since more than a month. Send an email over a week ago with no response to the following addresses: a...@wall-dev.org 4k1r4.ru...@gmail.com Could you disown the package? As soon as it is available, I adopt and update. Thanks and regards.
