Re: [aur-general] removal request
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 26.5.2014 21:29, Alexej Magura wrote: This is more of should this be removed; if so, please remove it-request. package-name: epsxe-bios-scph1001 package-url: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/epsxe-bios-scph1001/ I know that the package *even* states that it is illegal to use said package without owning an actual playstation console, but still... isn't this kinda like telling people that it's illegal to steal your car, but then leaving the keys on the hood and going about your business? Peeps are gonna steal! Not sure if this is issue/concern is actually meaningful in the sense that the package *is very* useful, but... yeah. The maintainer here. If Arch Linux even so as *might* suffer from legal consequences because of it, by all means remove it immediately. If not, I don't see the harm in it being there. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJThDwRAAoJEB1x37R9kdwnlWsP/2SRx4HGTyenbUy4q4sbfzfT Z6YPXiH9kESjB30SkfxCzVzd3q3tGKlL4ipWsHLpVfyhl5oLmd9d2Os9ejKm7eHK UoPGkWs4rRzJrmPyeE2D1BW4Ge1EK5f7uqE/qPVtkygKLtHbolIZFLQ6FANhLuC1 WF1VCmHzcM9uAMq080/eQ20JAKnSXgpMKhZk/4topjlMvzr+iPoeKYijLZvUt0uD Ynff6sLdQRa/eMjbLFk7pU2+xPeIO+iHA694i7XB8E1xGpR6YeK61YmdHyXVlnkV ukfpL32MSt8X8kD5iru67nRNCxPxHrwj+l3N5IFgr2tpTSL8B1WAHwzpupD4yuxq YMSsjeq5KRBoMRfXO5FDJTqoxa0i5aT9sI2KLSQDPI4v7bFNoU9qMsZQ7eW2tRJ/ OaizfCdSvoYUkIpjE6YyixqeK/mIbZomSDF2v0o07WcQdSTTPTAAv4UyO0gw2OGG 1iVR3lFLnIZrQ7jZp90AMFL4picpO6GyAbJXBootCjlc/EcQ5jyhymb3y8LPYvtV U7/0R9iKCQBXGjblJdI/3xCaprIW1IQtfCwbddfk9U0m4dmDQOaXoPebnzUcn3Sh UvddldUqJf6lvuvebHVY4g82WHAGx8uK6AvL2N6fjWsSBwX69z04uRImdwUaKmUz qSZLjztTS8fBQRZJvOOS =33qa -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [aur-general] removal request
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 26.5.2014 21:47, Steven Honeyman wrote: Not only that - it's yet another pointless package! All it does is unzip 1 file... How does the number of files in a package relate to its usefulness? It's there for convenience, as are many other packages. Take for example packages that change only one compile flag. Guess we should remove those. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJThDwVAAoJEB1x37R9kdwnCiIP/1T3M/68ucqgwpA9EVpKGxB2 kkqHwR4iYB2Vxp7Lm9ImGeJryMePK+mp3Ad1RhuoqJ/l/WpJUnMMANIze6I2q89A +vIDNYDOvgm2axQgjZi8Hnq8XJTjAFP0VQx/+b0x2LMD1kLqi7IDiq389LDaI+4A xQpCYsoqLOc1lYVkGlXjYTJ9Z8k0EIjYzlqwpsP3Qa2uGzi7AFVGC8+dfMcqHhf9 c9CUD7Vs4KLD6D3hzcJb8F9IEwFBkFM0/dEjhE1MTrxnfjaNCYxxw8L2aZ/UfRSC 60ZQRTn0+mnh9DGfXilR3vsl3SWQdH+mGFKPvOF0pCyunfTnyciRdQiN7KijWlLh ZVfDn3flDLxMVw2JU7NrAStz3Fyiitrov5wik1U0GkLrPwxs4qGtWEOaG6tlujza z6Bx9ZsgEb1ga5vWcqo6PujXyYURzb1t3UIm909nklZfEW/+ACPaiir64pgblgaO BEPc437a20xoCG4EMiYda1/lYNS8JddfwmnP07TLbCA/qUu0Bsmy+GpixiFu8QWF /wZEoY9Cm0PYAue8O8YAz/bQLHUYZn+/2r/dU+h55f9paMMZynH5ln1KTR1m69od IY1sVeTDioPsVlj5n+GJjPU4r0TY/zTQ1Htwh49T79BMsS5WuWASL9SycE9lqCvH o6kqQdWPOJ+UP/QHzzsz =fbt0 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
[aur-general] Deletion request: python-errorhandler
I just adopted python2-errorhandler because it is an optdepends of a package that I maintain. python-errorhandler is a duplicate and upstream does not support Python 3 at this time. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-errorhandler -Aaron DeVore
[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 8 fully signed off packages * 21 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (21 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs * alltray-0.7.5.1dev-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bamf-0.5.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * electricsheep-2.7b33-16 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdesklets-0.36.3-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * metacity-2.34.13-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nautilus-actions-3.2.3-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * alltray-0.7.5.1dev-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bamf-0.5.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * caja-actions-1.7.0-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * electricsheep-2.7b33-16 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdesklets-0.36.3-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * marco-1.8.0-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * mate-applets-1.8.0-4 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * mate-netspeed-1.8.0-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * mate-nettool-1.8.1-8 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * mate-system-monitor-1.8.0-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * mate-utils-1.8.0-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * metacity-2.34.13-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nautilus-actions-3.2.3-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nemiver-0.9.5-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (8 total) == * caja-actions-1.7.0-3 (i686) * marco-1.8.0-2 (i686) * mate-applets-1.8.0-4 (i686) * mate-netspeed-1.8.0-2 (i686) * mate-nettool-1.8.1-8 (i686) * mate-system-monitor-1.8.0-2 (i686) * mate-utils-1.8.0-2 (i686) * nemiver-0.9.5-2 (i686) == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any), since 2014-03-21 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. flexiondotorg - 14 signoffs 2. eric - 3 signoffs 3. anatolik - 2 signoffs
Re: [aur-general] What stops more packages moving from AUR to Community?
On 26 May 2014 15:19, Steven Honeyman stevenhoney...@gmail.com wrote: Either way, perhaps the Wiki should be changed to say 1000 votes instead :D Popularity is not the only criterion involved. A package may have deficiencies elsewhere that are preventing it from being supported in [community]. For example, it may not be freely re-distributable. -- GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1
Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: python-errorhandler
On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 00:53:02 Aaron DeVore wrote: I just adopted python2-errorhandler because it is an optdepends of a package that I maintain. python-errorhandler is a duplicate and upstream does not support Python 3 at this time. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-errorhandler Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Delete request: elementary_test-git
On Monday, May 26, 2014 12:35:50 Doug Newgard wrote: This package was created when I uploaded a source package for elementary-git created with mkaurball. It should not exist, as it's created by elementary-git as a split package. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/elementary_test-git/ Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] AUR 3.0.0 released
Hello, I am pleased to announce that AUR 3.0.0 has just been released. The official AUR setup [1] has already been updated. Note that in order to build source packages for the AUR, you will now need to use a tool called mkaurball (instead of `makepkg --source`). It is included in the pkgbuild-introspection package [2]. For a comprehensive list of changes, please consult the Git log [3]. As usual, bugs should be reported to the AUR bug tracker [4]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/ [2] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/pkgbuild-introspection/ [3] https://projects.archlinux.org/aur.git/log/?id=v3.0.0 [4] https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?project=2
[aur-general] delete request - fwts-efi-runtime-dkms
Hi, please delete fwts-efi-runtime-dkms - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fwts-efi-runtime-dkms/ I'm maintainer of this package and I want to make it a split of fwts - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fwts/ Thanks, Mariusz Libera
Re: [aur-general] delete request - fwts-efi-runtime-dkms
On Tue, 27 May 2014 at 22:11:55, Mariusz Libera wrote: Hi, please delete fwts-efi-runtime-dkms - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fwts-efi-runtime-dkms/ I'm maintainer of this package and I want to make it a split of fwts - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fwts/ Deleted, thanks! Thanks, Mariusz Libera
[aur-general] Perl 5.20 Released to the Wild
Sometime this morning, the Perl Development Folks released Perl 5.20. I expect that the CORE Perl package will follow suite very shortly. All Perl PKGBUILD owners should be prepared for this, all the PKGBUILDs will need to be checked and verified on AUR once the new very is made available. If anyone out there owns Perl PKGBUILDs that are troublesome, please email me @ jnbek1...@gmail.com to let me know and what problems you're having and I will happily have a look to either assist or adopt said PKGBUILDs. -- Thanks, John D Jones III UNIX Zealot; Perl Lover unixgeek1...@gmail.com jnbek1...@gmail.com http://zoelife4u.org/
[aur-general] Out of date packages
Hi, I am the user luolimao in the AUR. To all of those that use outdated packages that I maintain, sorry. I haven't had access to a computer for the last few weeks, and I won't have my Arch Linux setup back until next week (due to a broken hard drive). If there are any packages that need to be updated urgently, shoot me an email and I'll gladly orphan it. Thanks, Limao Luo (luolimao)
