[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 41 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (41 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fbv-1.0b-9 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.11.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gimp-plugin-mathmap-1.3.5-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.24.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * kmess-2.0.6.2-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * leptonica-1.70-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * metapixel-1.0.2-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mtpaint-3.40-14 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * openscenegraph-3.2.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.038.00-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * swftools-0.9.2-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * sxiv-1.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-48 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-28 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.12-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * xplanet-1.3.0-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * ziproxy-3.3.0-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fbv-1.0b-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-1.11.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gimp-plugin-mathmap-1.3.5-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.24.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * kmess-2.0.6.2-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * leptonica-1.70-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * metapixel-1.0.2-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mtpaint-3.40-14 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openscenegraph-3.2.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.038.00-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * swftools-0.9.2-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sxiv-1.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-48 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-28 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.12-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xplanet-1.3.0-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ziproxy-3.3.0-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any), since 2014-03-21 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 12 signoffs 2. allan - 6 signoffs 3. anatolik - 4 signoffs
Re: [aur-general] Deletion request
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 3:16 AM, John D Jones III wrote: > Please delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-cpan-meta- > requirements/ the module it provides is now in core perl > -- > Thanks, > John D Jones III > UNIX Zealot; Perl Lover > unixgeek1...@gmail.com > jnbek1...@gmail.com > http://zoelife4u.org/ > Deleted, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] More Perl Delete request
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 4:23 AM, John D Jones III wrote: > please delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-io-socket-ip/ the > module it provides is now provided in core_perl > -- > Thanks, > John D Jones III > UNIX Zealot; Perl Lover > unixgeek1...@gmail.com > jnbek1...@gmail.com > http://zoelife4u.org/ > Gone, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Deletion requests
On Thursday, June 12, 2014 21:15:29 kevku wrote: > Requesting deletion of the following: > > 1. Old ESTeID software packages that now have been surpassed by the official > version. > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/esteid-browser-plugin-svn/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/java-pkcs11wrapper/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libdigidoc-svn/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libdigidocpp-svn/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qesteidutil-svn/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qdigidoc-svn/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/smartcardpp-svn/ > > 2. F1LT, developer decided to quit due to pressure from FOM... > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/f1lt-git/ > > 3. Project Zomboid Demo as Project Zomboid is now on Steam. > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zomboid-demo/ All removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] pkg deletion request
On Thursday 12 June 2014 14:23:51 artux wrote: > I would like to ask for a package deletion. > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eudev-openrc/ > > Reason: will merge with eudev, feasible with mkaurball to do it It has no any votes or comments, so I don't think that merge into eudev (as it was suggested by Rafael Ferreira) is necessary. Removed, thank you. -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru ICQ: 407-398-235 Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Merges
On Thursday 12 June 2014 23:11:18 Justin Dray wrote: > I've recently cleaned up the big pile of skype4pidgin packages in the AUR. > > Of the previous maintainers I could contact, they have orphaned the > packages and I have taken them up prior to deletion/merging or have agreed > to the merge. The maintainer for skype4pidgin-svn-dbus has not responded to > my any attempts to sort out these packages so far (this was only around 10 > days ago however. I'm not sure if that means this will still need to wait > the full 14 days to be able to merge these or not though) > > Anyway, as a result, can someone please merge the following: > > skype4empathy-svn [1] -> skype4pidgin-svn [3] > skype4pidgin-svn-dbus [2] -> skype4pidgin-svn [3] > skype4empathy [4] -> skype4pidgin [6] > skype4finch [5] -> skype4pidgin [6] All done, thank you. -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru ICQ: 407-398-235 Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Merges
On Thursday 12 June 2014 23:11:18 Justin Dray wrote: > Hey, > I've recently cleaned up the big pile of skype4pidgin packages in the AUR. > > Of the previous maintainers I could contact, they have orphaned the > packages and I have taken them up prior to deletion/merging or have agreed > to the merge. The maintainer for skype4pidgin-svn-dbus has not responded to > my any attempts to sort out these packages so far (this was only around 10 > days ago however. I'm not sure if that means this will still need to wait > the full 14 days to be able to merge these or not though) > > Anyway, as a result, can someone please merge the following: > > skype4empathy-svn [1] -> skype4pidgin-svn [3] > skype4pidgin-svn-dbus [2] -> skype4pidgin-svn [3] > skype4empathy [4] -> skype4pidgin [6] > skype4finch [5] -> skype4pidgin [6] I'm the maintainer of skype4pidgin-svn-dbus, you last mail was from 3 days ago and you wrote: "Hi again everyone, If there is no response in the next 14 days regarding this stuff, I'll ask for orphanage on the packages in question so that I can fix it up." 3 days are NOT 14 days... -- Timothy M. Redaelli Arch Linux Trusted User
[aur-general] Delete request: nc
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nc Dupe of gnu-netcat J. Leclanche
Re: [aur-general] Merges
No, but the original email asking about cleaning them up was 10 days ago. Which the other maintainers responded to. I also said this in my original email to the AUR mailing list: " (this was only around 10 days ago however. I'm not sure if that means this will still need to wait the full 14 days to be able to merge these or not though)". I thought leaving it up to a TU to decide would be enough? If you want the packages you can have ownership of them, I just found it frustrating to have to read 7 pkgbuilds to figure out which one actually worked, when it should have been 2 packages. Regards, Justin Dray E: jus...@dray.be M: 0433348284 On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 11:41 PM, Timothy Redaelli wrote: > On Thursday 12 June 2014 23:11:18 Justin Dray wrote: > > Hey, > > I've recently cleaned up the big pile of skype4pidgin packages in the > AUR. > > > > Of the previous maintainers I could contact, they have orphaned the > > packages and I have taken them up prior to deletion/merging or have > agreed > > to the merge. The maintainer for skype4pidgin-svn-dbus has not responded > to > > my any attempts to sort out these packages so far (this was only around > 10 > > days ago however. I'm not sure if that means this will still need to wait > > the full 14 days to be able to merge these or not though) > > > > Anyway, as a result, can someone please merge the following: > > > > skype4empathy-svn [1] -> skype4pidgin-svn [3] > > skype4pidgin-svn-dbus [2] -> skype4pidgin-svn [3] > > skype4empathy [4] -> skype4pidgin [6] > > skype4finch [5] -> skype4pidgin [6] > > I'm the maintainer of skype4pidgin-svn-dbus, you last mail was from 3 days > ago > and you wrote: "Hi again everyone, > > If there is no response in the next 14 days regarding this stuff, I'll ask > for > orphanage on the packages in question so that I can fix it up." > > 3 days are NOT 14 days... > > -- > Timothy M. Redaelli > Arch Linux Trusted User >
[aur-general] Delete requests for abandoned packages
Maintainer renamed package, but did not request removal: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rename-git/ Maintainer said it needed removed and abandoned it instead of requesting that it be deleted: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/raspyplayer-git/ Maintainer renamed package, but did not request removal: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qhttpserver/ Upstream switched to git, maintainer just abandoned it instead of requesting removal: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rssproc-hg/ Thanks Doug
[aur-general] Delete request: gtkpacman
This one might be a bit controversial. gtkpacman hadn't been updated in over 6 years and hasn't functioned since pacman 4.1 at least, possibly before. I think it's safe at this point to say that it's dead. Dead + non-functional = should be removed IMO. Yes, it was a popular package with over 300 votes, but it's time is passed. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtkpacman/
Re: [aur-general] Delete request: gtkpacman
I wonder if anyone's interested in getting it working again? If nobody else is willing, I'll adopt it. On 14/06/2014, Doug Newgard wrote: > This one might be a bit controversial. > > gtkpacman hadn't been updated in over 6 years and hasn't functioned > since pacman 4.1 at least, possibly before. I think it's safe at this > point to say that it's dead. Dead + non-functional = should be removed > IMO. Yes, it was a popular package with over 300 votes, but it's time is > passed. > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtkpacman/ > > -- David Phillips GPG Key 0x7BF3D17D0884BF5B Fingerprint 2426 235A 7831 AA2F 56AF 4BC0 7BF3 D17D 0884 BF5B
Re: [aur-general] Delete request: gtkpacman
Actually, in light of the information present at https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Pacman_GUI_Frontends I will retract my previous comment. Too many existing, working Gtk front-ends for me to bother with gtkpacman. On 14/06/2014, David Phillips wrote: > I wonder if anyone's interested in getting it working again? If nobody > else is willing, I'll adopt it. > > On 14/06/2014, Doug Newgard wrote: >> This one might be a bit controversial. >> >> gtkpacman hadn't been updated in over 6 years and hasn't functioned >> since pacman 4.1 at least, possibly before. I think it's safe at this >> point to say that it's dead. Dead + non-functional = should be removed >> IMO. Yes, it was a popular package with over 300 votes, but it's time is >> passed. >> >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtkpacman/ >> >> > > > -- > David Phillips > GPG Key 0x7BF3D17D0884BF5B > Fingerprint 2426 235A 7831 AA2F 56AF 4BC0 7BF3 D17D 0884 BF5B > -- David Phillips GPG Key 0x7BF3D17D0884BF5B Fingerprint 2426 235A 7831 AA2F 56AF 4BC0 7BF3 D17D 0884 BF5B
Re: [aur-general] Delete request: gtkpacman
On 2014-06-14 01:27, David Phillips wrote: I wonder if anyone's interested in getting it working again? If nobody else is willing, I'll adopt it. You're pretty much talking about forking it to do that. There are tarballs on Sourceforge, so it should be doable. You'd probably need to rename the software unless you could get permission from the original author to just take over as-is. I know there was one fork, wakka, that was also abandoned. Doug
