Re: [aur-general] Anonymous comments in the AUR

2014-06-27 Thread Karol Blazewicz
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 1:20 AM, WorMzy Tykashi
 wrote:
> On 27 June 2014 22:38, Karol Blazewicz  wrote:
>> Are anonymous comments something new?
>>
>> Usually they're pretty old https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lpairs/
>> , the newest I stumbled upon is
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hydrogen-drumkits/
>>
>> Were some users removed from the AUR db?
>
> Yep, a while ago [1]. Although the initial email suggest ste comments
> would be removed, this was revised later in the thread.
>
> [1a] 
> https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2014-January/027030.html
> [1b] 
> https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2014-February/027039.html

Thank you :-)


Re: [aur-general] Anonymous comments in the AUR

2014-06-27 Thread WorMzy Tykashi
On 27 June 2014 22:38, Karol Blazewicz  wrote:
> Are anonymous comments something new?
>
> Usually they're pretty old https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lpairs/
> , the newest I stumbled upon is
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hydrogen-drumkits/
>
> Were some users removed from the AUR db?

Yep, a while ago [1]. Although the initial email suggest ste comments
would be removed, this was revised later in the thread.

[1a] 
https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2014-January/027030.html
[1b] 
https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2014-February/027039.html


[aur-general] Anonymous comments in the AUR

2014-06-27 Thread Karol Blazewicz
Are anonymous comments something new?

Usually they're pretty old https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lpairs/
, the newest I stumbled upon is
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hydrogen-drumkits/

Were some users removed from the AUR db?


Re: [aur-general] New mailing list for AUR requests (delete, merge, orphan, ..)

2014-06-27 Thread Stefan Husmann

Am 25.06.2014 22:02, schrieb Florian Pritz:

Hi,

As requested by Lukas, I've created a new mailing list for AUR related
requests such as deletion, merge or orphan requests.

The AUR will soon feature a web interface to create such requests and
for history and discussion purposes mails will be sent to this new list.

Please start using it for new requests already (maybe wait a couple
hours so TUs can subscribe). Discussion about anything apart from such
requests should stay on aur-general.

You can subscribe here[1].

[1]: https://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-requests

I expect traffic on aur-general to go down quite a lot due to this
change, so if you aren't subscribed because of this request traffic feel
free to give it another try now.


Hello,

I think this is worth an announcement on the news page on archlinux.org.

I felt free to do so on archlinux.de already.

https://bbs.archlinux.de/viewtopic.php?pid=325120#p325120

Best Regards

Stefan


Re: [aur-general] python-rst2beamer

2014-06-27 Thread Jeremy Audet
Ack. That [1] should have led to https://pypi.python.org/pypi/rst2beamer


Re: [aur-general] python-rst2beamer

2014-06-27 Thread Jeremy Audet
sinma,

rst2beamer appears to be intended for use by end users on the command line.
[1] Thus, the package should be called "rst2beamer", not
python{,2}-rst2beamer. The package should also install a simple wrapper
script at /usr/bin/rst2beamer. There's a couple other issues with the
package, too: variables are not properly quoted, "|| return 1" is included
in the script, and an md5sums array is used instead of a sha256sums array.

Have you contacted the maintainer about this? They may be happy to upload a
new package named rst2beamer with the appropriate fixes. If that is done, a
merge request can be made to the new aur-requests mailing list.

— Jeremy "Ichimonji10" Audet


[aur-general] python-rst2beamer

2014-06-27 Thread sinma
I guess the package name needs to be edited to python2-rst2beamer to
conform to Arch package naming convention.

-- 
mon site web: hack-libre.org