[aur-general] deletion request
Hi, please delete rkhunter-archlinux (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rkhunter-archlinux/) Its not neccessary anymore, because rkhunter has fixed journald and iproute stuff upstream. Thanks and greetings Moritz Rudert
Re: [aur-general] Merge request: python2-liblzma -> python2-pyliblzma
On 30/06, Levente Polyak wrote: Please merge python2-liblzma [1] into python2-pyliblzma [2] because its a duplicate and pyliblzma [3] is the official name. Hey, Requests should now go to the new aur-requests mailinglist [1] [1]: https://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-requests -- Sincerely, Johannes Löthberg PGP Key ID: 3A9D0BB5 pgpNXzO0hwFNx.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] deletion request
On 01/07, Moritz Rudert wrote: Hi, please delete rkhunter-archlinux (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rkhunter-archlinux/) Hey, Requests should now go to the new aur-requests mailinglist [1] [1]: https://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-requests -- Sincerely, Johannes Löthberg PGP Key ID: 3A9D0BB5 pgpBOS109zv6d.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Merge request: python2-liblzma -> python2-pyliblzma
On Monday 30 June 2014 22:05:07 Levente Polyak wrote: > Please merge python2-liblzma [1] into python2-pyliblzma [2] because its > a duplicate and pyliblzma [3] is the official name. > > Description: > I contacted all old (hard and opt) dependencies of python2-liblzma [1] > (like bfsync [4], binwalk [5] etc.) and they all made the transition to > python2-pyliblzma [2] some time ago. I also helped a bit out by cleaning > up the PKGBUILD for python2-pyliblzma [2]. > However, the maintainer of python2-liblzma [1] did not yet respond to > any of my mails (but thats already more then a month ago). Done, thank you. Please use another mainling list [1] for the future requests. See also [2]. 1. https://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-requests 2. https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2014-June/028973.html -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru ICQ: 407-398-235 Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] deletion request
On Tuesday 01 July 2014 10:25:05 Moritz Rudert wrote: > please delete rkhunter-archlinux > (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rkhunter-archlinux/) > > Its not neccessary anymore, because rkhunter has fixed journald and > iproute stuff upstream. Done, thanks! And as it was said by Johannes please use another mailing list for future requests =) -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru ICQ: 407-398-235 Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] Wiki Community Day?!
Hi, How about an ArchLinux "Wiki Community Day" each month eg.? Where we come together to improve the readability of certain Wiki pages and delete old stuff? Raises awareness and improves Wiki regularly. What do you think?
Re: [aur-general] Wiki Community Day?!
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 2:51 PM, [AUR-ML] wrote: > Hi, > > How about an ArchLinux "Wiki Community Day" each month eg.? Where we > come together to improve the readability of certain Wiki pages and > delete old stuff? Raises awareness and improves Wiki regularly. > > What do you think? I think arch-general is the place for this. Also, I don't read the wiki much any longer, since I can read manpages well enough by now. I wouldn't promise myself too much from this kind of encouragement. Things get best done around here when they get done. cheers! mar77i
Re: [aur-general] Wiki Community Day?!
On 01/07, [AUR-ML] wrote: Hi, How about an ArchLinux "Wiki Community Day" each month eg.? Where we come together to improve the readability of certain Wiki pages and delete old stuff? Raises awareness and improves Wiki regularly. What do you think? Sounds fine, but belongs on arch-general, not aur-general. -- Sincerely, Johannes Löthberg PGP Key ID: 3A9D0BB5 pgpdLCq2L3LM0.pgp Description: PGP signature
[aur-general] deletion request mingw-w64-getrusage
Hello, Could someone delete mingw-w64-getrusage: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-getrusage/ I've renamed it to mingw-w64-resource. Regards, xan.
Re: [aur-general] deletion request mingw-w64-getrusage
On 01/07, xantares 09 wrote: Hello, Could someone delete mingw-w64-getrusage: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-getrusage/ Hey, Delete/merge/orphan requests should now go to the new aur-requests mailinglist [1]. [1]: https://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-requests -- Sincerely, Johannes Löthberg PGP Key ID: 3A9D0BB5 pgpZCBIiWKGV_.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] New mailing list for AUR requests (delete, merge, orphan, ..)
On 27.06.2014 20:58, Stefan Husmann wrote: > I think this is worth an announcement on the news page on archlinux.org. Lukas told me the next AUR release is only a couple weeks away so I guess we can hold off on a news until that's done and then tell people to just use the new system. Thanks for the idea though. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [aur-general] python-rst2beamer
On 06/27/2014 04:03 PM, Jeremy Audet wrote:
> sinma,
>
> rst2beamer appears to be intended for use by end users on the command line.
> [1] Thus, the package should be called "rst2beamer", not
> python{,2}-rst2beamer. The package should also install a simple wrapper
> script at /usr/bin/rst2beamer. There's a couple other issues with the
> package, too: variables are not properly quoted, "|| return 1" is included
> in the script, and an md5sums array is used instead of a sha256sums array.
>
> Have you contacted the maintainer about this? They may be happy to upload a
> new package named rst2beamer with the appropriate fixes. If that is done, a
> merge request can be made to the new aur-requests mailing list.
>
> — Jeremy "Ichimonji10" Audet
His/er e-mail seems invalid.
I don’t know about the other issues, I just wanted to report the package
naming issue, I’m not using the package nor I am going to.
--
mon site web: hack-libre.org
[aur-general] Split package for gradle/gradle-doc
Hi all, I would like to upload a split package for gradle/gradle-doc. However, uploading this split package fails: > AUR submission error: > • You are not allowed to overwrite the > • gradle-doc > • package. I assume this is due to gradle-doc currently not specifying `pkgbase=gradle` (as hinted in the "Merging packages into a split package" thread), right? Could someone please set the `pkgbase` for the package (merge gradle-doc into gradle -- if this is the right technical term for this operation)? Thank you in advance, Simon PS: Please CC replies.
Re: [aur-general] Split package for gradle/gradle-doc
On 01/07, Simon Legner wrote: Hi all, I would like to upload a split package for gradle/gradle-doc. However, uploading this split package fails: AUR submission error: • You are not allowed to overwrite the • gradle-doc • package. I assume this is due to gradle-doc currently not specifying `pkgbase=gradle` (as hinted in the "Merging packages into a split package" thread), right? No it is due to you trying to overwrite gradle-doc with another package. Could someone please set the `pkgbase` for the package (merge gradle-doc into gradle -- if this is the right technical term for this operation)? You want gradle-doc merged into gradle, *then* you can upload the new split pkgbuild. Requests should go to the new aur-requests mailinglist tho [1] [1]: https://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-requests -- Sincerely, Johannes Löthberg PGP Key ID: 3A9D0BB5 pgpe6HY9nnDtV.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] deletion request mingw-w64-getrusage
On 1 July 2014 14:17, xantares 09 wrote: > Hello, > > Could someone delete mingw-w64-getrusage: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-getrusage/ > > I've renamed it to mingw-w64-resource. > > Regards, > xan. > Removed
[aur-general] AUR 3.2.0 released
Hello, I am pleased to announce that AUR 3.2.0 has just been released. The official AUR setup [1] has already been updated. You can now send deletion, merge and orphan requests by using the "File Request" link in the package actions box. Please use the web interface instead of manually sending mails to aur-general or aur-requests from now on. Note to all AUR helper maintainers: There also is a new version of the RPC interface (v3) that makes the result values types a bit more consistent. See FS#40963 [2] for details. For a comprehensive list of changes, please consult the Git log [3]. As usual, bugs should be reported to the AUR bug tracker [4]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/ [2] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/40963 [3] https://projects.archlinux.org/aur.git/log/?id=v3.2.0 [4] https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?project=2
Re: [aur-general] AUR 3.2.0 released
Nice! Does the 14 day rule still apply for orphan requests? Thanks, Steven. On 1 July 2014 20:58, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > Hello, > > I am pleased to announce that AUR 3.2.0 has just been released. The > official AUR setup [1] has already been updated. > > You can now send deletion, merge and orphan requests by using the "File > Request" link in the package actions box. Please use the web interface > instead of manually sending mails to aur-general or aur-requests from > now on. > > Note to all AUR helper maintainers: There also is a new version of the > RPC interface (v3) that makes the result values types a bit more > consistent. See FS#40963 [2] for details. > > For a comprehensive list of changes, please consult the Git log [3]. As > usual, bugs should be reported to the AUR bug tracker [4]. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/ > [2] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/40963 > [3] https://projects.archlinux.org/aur.git/log/?id=v3.2.0 > [4] https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?project=2
Re: [aur-general] Wiki Community Day?!
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Johannes Löthberg wrote: > On 01/07, [AUR-ML] wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> How about an ArchLinux "Wiki Community Day" each month eg.? Where we >> come together to improve the readability of certain Wiki pages and >> delete old stuff? Raises awareness and improves Wiki regularly. >> >> What do you think? >> > > Sounds fine, but belongs on arch-general, not aur-general. > > -- > Sincerely, > Johannes Löthberg > PGP Key ID: 3A9D0BB5 See https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User_talk:Lahwaacz.bot/Report_2014-04-05 Not many people were involved in the second run: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=User:Lahwaacz.bot/Report_2014-05-11&action=history Maybe a monthly ML reminder would help.
Re: [aur-general] AUR 3.2.0 released
On Tue, 01 Jul 2014 at 22:03:28, Steven Honeyman wrote: > Nice! Does the 14 day rule still apply for orphan requests? > [...] Yes, however, there is no need to inform the maintainer manually any longer since maintainers get notified when a request is created. Also, note to Trusted Users: Package requests are highlighted after 14 days, so it is a good idea to only accept highlighted requests in most cases.
Re: [aur-general] Merge request: python2-liblzma -> python2-pyliblzma
On July 1, 2014 1:18:33 PM CEST, Evgeniy Alekseev wrote: >On Monday 30 June 2014 22:05:07 Levente Polyak wrote: >> Please merge python2-liblzma [1] into python2-pyliblzma [2] because >its >> a duplicate and pyliblzma [3] is the official name. >> >> Description: >> I contacted all old (hard and opt) dependencies of python2-liblzma >[1] >> (like bfsync [4], binwalk [5] etc.) and they all made the transition >to >> python2-pyliblzma [2] some time ago. I also helped a bit out by >cleaning >> up the PKGBUILD for python2-pyliblzma [2]. >> However, the maintainer of python2-liblzma [1] did not yet respond to >> any of my mails (but thats already more then a month ago). > >Done, thank you. > >Please use another mainling list [1] for the future requests. See also >[2]. > >1. https://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-requests >2. >https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2014-June/028973.html somehow I missed that new mailinglist, sorry! thanks for merging and pointing that out. cheers Levente
Re: [aur-general] AUR 3.2.0 released
On 07/01/2014 10:10 PM, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > On Tue, 01 Jul 2014 at 22:03:28, Steven Honeyman wrote: >> Nice! Does the 14 day rule still apply for orphan requests? >> [...] > Yes, however, there is no need to inform the maintainer manually any > longer since maintainers get notified when a request is created. > > Also, note to Trusted Users: Package requests are highlighted after 14 > days, so it is a good idea to only accept highlighted requests in most > cases. How may I inform a user (s)he must change her/his package name? Can I «cheat» with new AUR functionnalities? -- mon site web: hack-libre.org
