Re: [aur-general] AUR 3.4.0 released
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 at 21:49:56, Karol Blazewicz wrote: > [...] > https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?project=2&do=index&switch=1 says > > Note: The AUR is essentially in maintanence mode. No new features are > > planned. > > which in light of > https://projects.archlinux.org/aur.git/log/?id=v3.4.0 doesn't sound > right (and I don't mean the 'maintanence' typo). > Should we remove this line? > Done.
Re: [aur-general] owncloud-client: suggestion of moving to [community]
On 07/28/14 10:40, Nowaker wrote: If a TU decides to move the package to community, then they should contact you out of kindness, agreed. Trusted Users, can you elaborate if adding a new point to "Rules for Packages Entering the [community] Repo" [1] would be reasonable? "TUs should inform the maintainer of the package that their package is going to be moved to community, thus deleted from AUR." AUR is where Arch Linux fans grow, so it would be good to treat them well. ;) [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_Trusted_User_Guidelines#Rules_for_Packages_Entering_the_.5Bcommunity.5D_Repo The only problem I have with owncloud-client going Community is there is still outstanding bugs regarding the key based, a number of complaints are still actively commented about having to enter the password over and over and not being saved properly in the keyring. I have the issue on one of my laptops, on the rest of the machines, I've just refused to upgrade, since the version I have, doesn't pester for auth everytime the system starts. -- Thanks, John D Jones III UNIX Zealot; Perl Lover unixgeek1...@gmail.com jnbek1...@gmail.com http://zoelife4u.org/ Where Earth and Spirit Unite
Re: [aur-general] AUR 3.4.0 released
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > Hello, > > I am pleased to announce that AUR 3.4.0 has been released. The official > AUR setup [1] has already been updated. > > This release includes several improvements to the package request > feature and a couple of bug fixes. The PKGBUILD parser has been dropped, > you can no longer upload source packages without meta data. Also, a new > user group "Trusted User & Developer" was added. I already converted a > couple of accounts to the new group; please let me know if I missed > anyone. > > For a comprehensive list of changes, please consult the Git log [2]. As > usual, bugs should be reported to the AUR bug tracker [3]. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/ > [2] https://projects.archlinux.org/aur.git/log/?id=v3.4.0 > [3] https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?project=2 https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?project=2&do=index&switch=1 says > Note: The AUR is essentially in maintanence mode. No new features are planned. which in light of https://projects.archlinux.org/aur.git/log/?id=v3.4.0 doesn't sound right (and I don't mean the 'maintanence' typo). Should we remove this line?
Re: [aur-general] owncloud-client: suggestion of moving to [community]
>> I'd like to suggest owncloud-client as a potential candidate for >> [community]. It has 300+ votes. owncloud the webapp is already there. > How about CC'ing the maintainer at all (in this case me)? I've already had > one of my PKGBUILDs (kdeconnect) vanish just to reappear in the [community] > without a single word. > Didn't say anything then but people invest time into maintaining PKGBUILDs, > least you could do is notify the 'stakeholders'. If a TU decides to move the package to community, then they should contact you out of kindness, agreed. Trusted Users, can you elaborate if adding a new point to "Rules for Packages Entering the [community] Repo" [1] would be reasonable? "TUs should inform the maintainer of the package that their package is going to be moved to community, thus deleted from AUR." AUR is where Arch Linux fans grow, so it would be good to treat them well. ;) [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_Trusted_User_Guidelines#Rules_for_Packages_Entering_the_.5Bcommunity.5D_Repo -- Kind regards, Damian Nowak StratusHost www.AtlasHost.eu
Re: [aur-general] owncloud-client: suggestion of moving to [community]
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Nowaker wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to suggest owncloud-client as a potential candidate for > [community]. It has 300+ votes. owncloud the webapp is already there. > How about CC'ing the maintainer at all (in this case me)? I've already had one of my PKGBUILDs (kdeconnect) vanish just to reappear in the [community] without a single word. Didn't say anything then but people invest time into maintaining PKGBUILDs, least you could do is notify the 'stakeholders'. This kind of 'center-of-the-universe' attitude is pissing me off; no it's not OK to do whatever you desire. > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/owncloud-client/ > > -- > Kind regards, > Damian Nowak > StratusHost > www.AtlasHost.eu >
[aur-general] AUR 3.4.0 released
Hello, I am pleased to announce that AUR 3.4.0 has been released. The official AUR setup [1] has already been updated. This release includes several improvements to the package request feature and a couple of bug fixes. The PKGBUILD parser has been dropped, you can no longer upload source packages without meta data. Also, a new user group "Trusted User & Developer" was added. I already converted a couple of accounts to the new group; please let me know if I missed anyone. For a comprehensive list of changes, please consult the Git log [2]. As usual, bugs should be reported to the AUR bug tracker [3]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/ [2] https://projects.archlinux.org/aur.git/log/?id=v3.4.0 [3] https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?project=2
[aur-general] owncloud-client: suggestion of moving to [community]
Hi, I'd like to suggest owncloud-client as a potential candidate for [community]. It has 300+ votes. owncloud the webapp is already there. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/owncloud-client/ -- Kind regards, Damian Nowak StratusHost www.AtlasHost.eu
Re: [aur-general] Announcement Input
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > I would like to have something like an announcement input for AUR > packages. Just like comments, but the announcement should be > editable by the maintainer only and shown at the top all the time. > This could be handy for something like: +1 for it! I was about to suggest this feature this week... :) I would use this to announce the GitHub repository of all my packages, so anyone could submit a PR instead of pastebining a fixed or updated PKGBUILD. - -- Kind regards, Damian Nowak StratusHost www.AtlasHost.eu -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJT1itbAAoJENUJYSy7yByf/t0QAK/mItYleuazxvx7ihYHzYsw b+ggtgQhID46mJX3ga6SKY8BC7pQRg+lx/WTT54tbNAfeT5ykmbXnXIjzYHKZ+Df RdMUyB0gJybgf5ZpjHdhND0lpWrybQzTfiGWyLEW7qqFFrYLYI2Dtzy5UbURUPTy +ZNiBLwadcxPZw8Y9+C6scEAkzGdvY51HYqsfhIsDIHP0sPOyi5VN8A0QuBjyaL0 hFTowvgDpJW3OdN7nd6z4RsgErdP/1/IGq9EIKwHOyu544wm3T3+0dE0yA+IMVPs QrajOhT9nOSE6eFs5exbf55ENMyBeFrUnbYzc1tWqNOqJSxPfthyuUSYLGO7f0Op 8NVEQY9eJ85WA6A7W2I15aGip//FCBFw1d+Ml7r3LaSVbVTDtyaYlWinjcddcusv nA5BgbM+Edr4v5279IoPZF1rNvWiyFGiQFwbTqxtXcie6BfQGiwdGN5whMwXeSlA 6nfKBWAxZnpmrl0JN7QzQZ2IRu37OQ1tOuUyd2Hfiq2c1z1dj9k0LfZRDpxPMPH3 iewT5ViYUGXd/Y+hlNaw8vK4yE1lBnLfi9OSjZtvH5io0xP4chcdplYvRSvJ/Wic HRFvlvxMYXUf3+XNB68oli8S5KdVSLRhhFqNDthpbqN4NcNaMuPWXMSOz5tvBhWC nICgO9a53i/q2uaMWXIi =5JDG -END PGP SIGNATURE-
[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 19 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (19 total) == * acpi_call-1.1.0-9 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * lz4-120-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.038.00-8 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * radvd-2.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-51 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20140629-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-4.3.14-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.14-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * lz4-120-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.038.00-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * radvd-2.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-51 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20140629-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-4.3.14-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.14-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 6 signoffs 2. bpiotrowski - 2 signoffs 3. heftig - 2 signoffs
