Re: [aur-general] Git over HTTPS

2015-06-19 Thread David Kaylor

 Do you have permission from your employer to user their infrastructure (eg:
 computers, network) to work on contributions to ArchLinux?

 If not, they *may* own the IP related to the PKGBUILDs, or any extra
 scripts
 you include (in most jurisdictions, if you write a 15 line script, it's
 copyrighted automatically).
 I suggest that you carefully study this, and similar scenarios.

 So, if you have permission, asking for them to open SSH should be trivial.
 If
 not, then stop creating tainted contributions at work.


If you had bothered to read the entire thread, you should have noticed that
the OP has already answered this question.


Re: [aur-general] Git over HTTPS

2015-06-19 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
On 2015-06-15 11:57, Tom Swartz wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 The majority of my work happens behind corporate firewalls where ssh out
 via port 22 is not an option.
 
 Is there a way to configure GitHub-like SSH via HTTPS ports?
 https://help.github.com/articles/using-ssh-over-the-https-port/
 
 I'd be greatly appreciative if this was the case.
 
 Thanks!
 
 -- 
 Tom Swartz

Do you have permission from your employer to user their infrastructure (eg:
computers, network) to work on contributions to ArchLinux?

If not, they *may* own the IP related to the PKGBUILDs, or any extra scripts
you include (in most jurisdictions, if you write a 15 line script, it's
copyrighted automatically).
I suggest that you carefully study this, and similar scenarios.

So, if you have permission, asking for them to open SSH should be trivial. If
not, then stop creating tainted contributions at work.

Cheers,

-- 
Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right.
Q: Why should I start my reply below the quoted text?


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [aur-general] How the Popularity value is being calculated for a package in the AUR4?

2015-06-19 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
On 2015-06-12 10:01, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
 On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 at 09:43:00, G. Schlisio wrote:
   Lukas on aur-dev: Popularity is the sum of all votes with each vote
   being weighted with a factor of 0.98 per day since its creation.
  
  thats quite a fast wear-off, i think.
  after a year, there is virtually nothing left (6e-4 only).
  does this really meet the intention?
  
 
 Yes. The main purpose of the popularity field is to give very popular
 newcomers a chance to appear on the front page. Also, we don't care
 about packages that were very popular a year ago and are no longer used
 today. If a package is still interesting, it will continuously receive
 new votes such as is the case with yaourt.
 
 Regards,
 Lukas

Given how it's calculated, and the purpose it intends to serve, I believe the
proper word is trending, not popularity.

-- 
Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right.
Q: Why should I start my reply below the quoted text?


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [aur-general] password cracker program in AUR

2015-06-19 Thread Giancarlo Razzolini

Em 19-06-2015 08:43, LoneVVolf escreveu:

On 19-06-15 03:36, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:

Em 18-06-2015 19:27, LoneVVolf escreveu:
Should we allow such programs in AUR ? 
You're mistaking a tool for its uses. I have some packages on the AUR 
that could also help protect criminals. Should I also remove these 
packages from AUR? Let's ban criptography, because it also protect 
criminals. See where your reasoning is flawed?


Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini

For clarity :

PERSONALLY i have no problem with this program, and completely 
disagree with laws that forbid tools like this.
I wasn't clear about archlinux / AUR policy in this regard, and could 
find nothing relevant in wiki.
This thread was started to find out the feelings of other archers 
about this.


I guess next time i ask a question on aur-general i need to add a 
disclaimer.


LVV
I understood you the first time. But if you tought this a little bit 
longer, you wouldn't need to ask, don't you think?


Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini


Re: [aur-general] How the Popularity value is being calculated for a package in the AUR4?

2015-06-19 Thread carstene1ns
Am 18.06.2015 um 18:33 schrieb Connor Behan:
 [...]
 Does anyone know an easy way to hide Popularity with a userscript or
 userstyle? [...]

Given that the index of the column not changes, this works:

$('table.results  thead  tr  th:nth-child(5)').hide();
$('table.results  tbody  tr  td:nth-child(5)').hide();

First line removes the header, second line the values. It may not be the
best solution, but I did not find a better way than counting to get the
right column. It uses jQuery from the AUR page, if you want to use it
from a user script you may need a way to inject it.

best regards,
carstene1ns



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [aur-general] password cracker program in AUR

2015-06-19 Thread David Phillips
 PERSONALLY i have no problem with this program, and completely disagree with 
 laws that forbid tools like this.

Ah okay, that addresses the assumption I (and I'm sure others) have made

-- 
Four word witty remark


Re: [aur-general] password cracker program in AUR

2015-06-19 Thread LoneVVolf

On 19-06-15 03:36, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:

Em 18-06-2015 19:27, LoneVVolf escreveu:
Should we allow such programs in AUR ? 
You're mistaking a tool for its uses. I have some packages on the AUR 
that could also help protect criminals. Should I also remove these 
packages from AUR? Let's ban criptography, because it also protect 
criminals. See where your reasoning is flawed?


Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini

For clarity :

PERSONALLY i have no problem with this program, and completely disagree 
with laws that forbid tools like this.
I wasn't clear about archlinux / AUR policy in this regard, and could 
find nothing relevant in wiki.
This thread was started to find out the feelings of other archers about 
this.


I guess next time i ask a question on aur-general i need to add a 
disclaimer.


LVV


[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2015-06-19 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 154 packages missing signoffs
* 4 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)



== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (154 total) ==

* perl-graphviz-2.18-1 (any)
0/2 signoffs
* python-xcffib-0.3.2-1 (any)
0/2 signoffs
* clearsilver-0.10.5-18 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* collectd-5.5.0-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* dnssec-tools-2.1-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* freeradius-3.0.8-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* hexchat-2.10.2-3 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* inn-2.5.4-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* kvirc-4.2.0-5 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* liboping-1.8.0-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* linux-tools-4.0-4 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* mod_perl-2.0.8-5 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* obexftp-0.24-5 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* pcsc-perl-1.4.13-4 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-berkeleydb-0.54-3 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-class-methodmaker-2.24-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-crypt-blowfish-2.14-3 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-crypt-des-2.07-3 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-crypt-openssl-dsa-0.15-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-curses-1.32-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-data-dumper-2.154-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-data-structure-util-0.16-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-datetime-1.19-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-dbd-odbc-1.52-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-dbd-pg-3.5.1-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-dbd-sqlite2-0.36-4 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-dbd-sybase-1.15-4 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-devel-leak-0.03-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-device-serialport-1.04-7 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-file-rsyncp-0.74-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-fuse-0.16.1-3 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-gd-2.56-3 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-gnome2-wnck-0.16-10 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-goo-canvas-0.06-5 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-gssapi-0.28-9 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-gstreamer-0.20-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-gstreamer-interfaces-0.06-8 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-gtk2-imageview-0.05-5 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-gtk2-sexy-0.05-10 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-gtk2-trayicon-0.06-12 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-gtk2-unique-0.05-11 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-gtk2-webkit-0.09-6 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-html-strip-2.08-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-inline-java-0.53-7 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-io-dirent-0.05-5 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-io-tty-1.12-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-json-xs-3.01-4 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-lchown-1.01-4 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-libapreq2-2.13-8 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-linux-pid-0.04-5 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-mail-box-parser-c-3.007-3 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-mail-transport-dbx-0.07-11 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-mouse-2.4.2-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-net-dbus-1.1.0-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-net-libidn-0.12-9 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-package-stash-xs-0.28-3 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-params-classify-0.013-5 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-params-util-1.07-4 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-params-validate-1.18-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-proc-processtable-0.51-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-string-crc32-1.5-3 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-term-readline-gnu-1.26-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-test-leaktrace-0.15-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-text-charwidth-0.04-11 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-text-kakasi-2.04-12 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-tie-hash-indexed-0.05-11 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-tk-tablematrix-1.23-12 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-variable-magic-0.57-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-www-curl-4.17-3 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-xml-fast-0.11-6 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* perl-xml-libxslt-1.94-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* pork-0.99.8.1-9 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* python2-systemd-220-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* rxvt-unicode-9.21-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* uwsgi-2.0.10-3 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.28-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* xmms2-0.8DrO_o-35 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* znc-1.6.0-5 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* clearsilver-0.10.5-18 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* collectd-5.5.0-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* dnssec-tools-2.1-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* freeradius-3.0.8-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* hexchat-2.10.2-3 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* inn-2.5.4-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* kvirc-4.2.0-5 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* liboping-1.8.0-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* linux-tools-4.0-4 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* mod_perl-2.0.8-5 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* obexftp-0.24-5 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* pcsc-perl-1.4.13-4 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* perl-berkeleydb-0.54-3 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* perl-class-methodmaker-2.24-1 

Re: [aur-general] password cracker program in AUR

2015-06-19 Thread Martti Kühne
Let me just reiterate not to install such tools unless you know
whether in your local jurisdiction they are not somehow banned and
whether you should care about taking such risks.

cheers!
mar77i


Re: [aur-general] password cracker program in AUR

2015-06-19 Thread David Phillips
I'd like to drop a note that john is in [community], and nobody has an
issue with that

Thanks

-- 
Four word witty remark