[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

[Arch Website Notification]

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 20 packages missing signoffs
* 12 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)



== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (18 total) ==

* acpi_call-1.1.0-37 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* bbswitch-0.8-39 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* r8168-8.040.00-9 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* roxterm-3.3.1-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r3-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* tp_smapi-0.41-76 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* vagrant-1.8.0-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* vhba-module-20140928-20 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* virtualbox-modules-5.0.12-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* acpi_call-1.1.0-37 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* bbswitch-0.8-39 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* r8168-8.040.00-9 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* roxterm-3.3.1-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r3-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* tp_smapi-0.41-76 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* vagrant-1.8.0-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* vhba-module-20140928-20 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* virtualbox-modules-5.0.12-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs

== Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) ==

* vagrant-substrate-524.64c5261-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* vagrant-substrate-524.64c5261-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs


== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (12 total) ==

* r8168-8.040.00-9 (i686), since 2015-11-04
* r8168-8.040.00-9 (x86_64), since 2015-11-04
* vhba-module-20140928-20 (i686), since 2015-11-04
* vhba-module-20140928-20 (x86_64), since 2015-11-04
* acpi_call-1.1.0-37 (i686), since 2015-11-04
* acpi_call-1.1.0-37 (x86_64), since 2015-11-04
* rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r3-2 (i686), since 2015-11-04
* rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r3-2 (x86_64), since 2015-11-04
* bbswitch-0.8-39 (i686), since 2015-11-04
* bbswitch-0.8-39 (x86_64), since 2015-11-04
* tp_smapi-0.41-76 (i686), since 2015-11-04
* tp_smapi-0.41-76 (x86_64), since 2015-11-04


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. foutrelis - 10 signoffs
2. bisson - 5 signoffs
3. andyrtr - 4 signoffs

[aur-general] Dell 2155cdn driver PKGBUILD quality check

[Peter Tobler]

Hi all, and happy holidays,

I am about to upload the PKGBUILD for the Dell 2155cn/cdn printer
driver and thought someone should take a look at it before I submit.
Please let me know if you spot any mistakes or find there are
improvements that should be made.

Here is the mentioned PKGBUILD:
http://pastie.org/pastes/10652982/text?key=23xhgip17gp9tvriuiyma

Kind regards,
Peter

Re: [aur-general] Dell 2155cdn driver PKGBUILD quality check

[Doug Newgard]

On Sat, 26 Dec 2015 01:13:39 +0100
Peter Tobler  wrote:

> Hi all, and happy holidays,
> 
> I am about to upload the PKGBUILD for the Dell 2155cn/cdn printer
> driver and thought someone should take a look at it before I submit.
> Please let me know if you spot any mistakes or find there are
> improvements that should be made.
> 
> Here is the mentioned PKGBUILD:
> http://pastie.org/pastes/10652982/text?key=23xhgip17gp9tvriuiyma
> 
> Kind regards,
> Peter

There's no reason to use the conditionals with the depends array anymore,
pacman supports architecture specific arrays now (depends_i686, etc).

bsdtar will extract rpm files, no reason to pull in rpmextract.

Make sure you quote any paths that include any variables that you don't
control, like ${pkgdir} and ${srcdir}.