[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

[Arch Website Notification]

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 14 packages missing signoffs
* 2 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)



== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (12 total) ==

* php-geoip-1.1.0-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* php-memcache-3.0.8-4 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* php-memcached-2.2.0-3 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* roxterm-3.3.1-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* uwsgi-2.0.12-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* xdebug-2.4.0RC4dev-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* php-geoip-1.1.0-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* php-memcache-3.0.8-4 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* php-memcached-2.2.0-3 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* roxterm-3.3.1-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* uwsgi-2.0.12-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* xdebug-2.4.0RC4dev-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs

== Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) ==

* php-mongodb-1.1.1-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* php-mongodb-1.1.1-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs


== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) ==

* roxterm-3.3.1-1 (i686), since 2015-12-14
* roxterm-3.3.1-1 (x86_64), since 2015-12-14


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

Re: [aur-general] Firefox without signature

[Doug Newgard]

On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 00:12:40 -0300
Pablo Lezaeta Reyes  wrote:

> What gona happend with all the AddOns for Firefox on Arch, as far for
> example the official arch-firefox-search [1]
> 
> Also this mean now Devs need to take from the Firefox webpage the plusings
> due to the signing instead of build them by theyself? so now
> firefox-adblockplus [2] [3] and so far checking and all the other addons on
> the official repo are signed but only available from Firefox page.
> 
> Should do I submit bugs to all those about take the signed package from
> Firefox page instead the one not signed like raismth [4]?
> 
> [1] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/arch-firefox-search/
> [2] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/firefox-adblock-plus/
> [3] https://adblockplus.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1=40464
> [4]
> https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=packages/firefox-raismth
> 

https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/47395

Re: [aur-general] Firefox without signature

[Pablo Lezaeta Reyes]

What gona happend with all the AddOns for Firefox on Arch, as far for
example the official arch-firefox-search [1]

Also this mean now Devs need to take from the Firefox webpage the plusings
due to the signing instead of build them by theyself? so now
firefox-adblockplus [2] [3] and so far checking and all the other addons on
the official repo are signed but only available from Firefox page.

Should do I submit bugs to all those about take the signed package from
Firefox page instead the one not signed like raismth [4]?

[1] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/arch-firefox-search/
[2] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/firefox-adblock-plus/
[3] https://adblockplus.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1=40464
[4]
https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=packages/firefox-raismth

-- 
*Pablo Lezaeta*