[aur-general] Could not create directory /home/aur/unsupported/nvidia-utils-beta
Can't update my package nvidia-utils-beta, could someone fix it? Thanks Dan Vratil
Re: [aur-general] Could not create directory /home/aur/unsupported/nvidia-utils-beta
Still not working, same error message. On Saturday 16 August 2008 19:23:28 Abhishek Dasgupta wrote: > It seems that this is being caused by the missing PKGBUILD > in the AUR directory. I've deleted the package. Try uploading again.
[aur-general] ACPI problem with latest kernel
Hi there, I have MSI laptop. I know, MSI does not have the best ACPI tables (this one should have "Windows Vista Compatible" tables), but with previous versions of the linux kernel (2.6.25.x) it worked pretty well. After updating to 2.6.26.2, it really sucks...after few minutes ACPI just "shuts down" with no reports in dmesg or logs and does not start (in previous version it was shutting down to, but after about half a minute it has started again, running for following hour or more with no problems). Does someone has any little experiences about this? Do you think it is -ARCH problem, or it's bug from vanilla kernel? Thank you for any ideas. With regars Dan Vratil
Re: [aur-general] Could not create directory /home/aur/unsupported/nvidia-utils-beta
Ehm, sorry, could some take a look on it? Without -utils package the drivers won't work. On Saturday 16 August 2008 19:33:21 Dan Vratil wrote: > Still not working, same error message. > > On Saturday 16 August 2008 19:23:28 Abhishek Dasgupta wrote: > > It seems that this is being caused by the missing PKGBUILD > > in the AUR directory. I've deleted the package. Try uploading again. -- - Dan Vrátil [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ 249163429 Jabber [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel. +420 732 326 870
Re: [aur-general] Could not create directory /home/aur/unsupported/nvidia-utils-beta
On Tuesday 19 August 2008 23:31:58 Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Loui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 06:21:18PM +0200, Dan Vratil wrote: > >> Can't update my package nvidia-utils-beta, could someone fix it? > > > > I think this may be caused by a ownership/permissions conflict. > > > > It might make sense to set the AUR directories permissions and ownership > > recursively to the correct values if that's the case because there are > > many reports of this bug. My hunch is that httpd is running as the http > > user but the existing AUR directories are owned by nobody since that was > > how the arch apache package configs changed. I can't really track it down > > because I don't have shell access to the Arch server. > > > > Can you admins look into it? Or I could look into it if you give me > > proper shell access. > > The directory was wonky and broken. > nvidia-utils-beta/nvidia-utils-beta/supported-cards.txt was all that > existed > > I deleted it. Please try again It works. Thank you. Dan -- - Dan Vrátil [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ 249163429 Jabber [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel. +420 732 326 870
Re: [aur-general] Could not create directory /home/aur/unsupported/nvidia-utils-beta
On Thursday 21 August 2008 23:36:45 Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Vitaliy Berdinskikh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Aaron. > > > > 2008/8/21 Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >> >> Same here with hal-policykit > >> > > >> > tomcat6 & jedit-devel, please > >> > >> Can you guys test again? I think this is a reoccuring permissions > >> issue and want to add a "chown -R nobody:aur" to the unsupported dir > >> if that just fixed it all. > > > > Don't work :( > > http://img232.imageshack.us/my.php?image=aurbugos8.jpg > > Are you guys updating an existing package? Or adding a new one that was > deleted? I was updating existing one (nvidia-utils-beta)...content of folder was removed, so the /home/aur/unsupported/nvidia-utils-beta is empty now (if there are no hidden files), but new tarball is not uploaded and extracted. > > Would any of the aur devs mind creating some sort of cleanup script > that will delete directories that do not exist in the AUR? -- - Dan Vrátil [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ 249163429 Jabber [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel. +420 732 326 870
[aur-general] Makepkg does not include one file
Hi, that's me again... I have a problem with makepkg...when making tarball for the nvidia-utils-beta package, I just enter the folder and run 'makepkg --source', which packs all files from 'source' +PKGBUILD into the tarball In nvidia-utils-beta, there is 'supported-cards.txt' file. When I use 'makepkg --source', it says -> Adding supported-cards.txt... But when I unpack the created tarball, there is just a symlink, which probably links itself. When I make the tarball manually using tar and gzip, everything works...this is extremely strange - it was always working, I don't understand what has happend. Please, any ideas? Thanks, Dan -- - Dan Vrátil [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ 249163429 Jabber [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel. +420 732 326 870
Re: [aur-general] "Can't create directory" bug
Please could someone fix /home/aur/unsupported/nvidia-utils-beta ? I need to upload new version. Thanks Dan -- - Dan Vrátil [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ 249163429 Jabber [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel. +420 732 326 870
[aur-general] Removal request
Hi, please remove my package libosip (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=473) because of it's redundancy. Reasons are given in comment at this package. Thank you. Dan -- - Dan Vrátil [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ 249163429 Jabber [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel. +420 732 326 870
Re: [aur-general] How to submit manpage, *.desktop-files and corresponging icon to AUR?
Hi, just enter the folder with you PKGBUILD and type makepkg --source which creates tarball with all files listed in sources=() array. Than upload this tarball to AUR. Dan V. On Friday 14 November 2008 16:10:24 Rorschach wrote: > Hi, > I took over the work on the orphaned package jondo > (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17965). Because I already > packaged jondo for debian and ubuntu I also want to package it for > ArchLinux. Because upstream is just offering the JAP.jar I had to create > the man-page, *.desktop file for the menu-entry and the corresponding image > by myself. > > If I create the package on my system with makepkg everything seems to work > fine. All files are installed correctly, everything works as it should,.. > > But the problem is if I upload the PKGBUILD to AUR just the PKGBUILD-File > is uploaded but how do I get the other files uploaded to AUR? I've seen a > lot of packages which had other files uploaded like patch-files and so on.. > but how do I do it? I can't find anything in the AUR-webinterface about it. > > greetings -- - Dan Vrátil [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ 249163429 Jabber [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel. +420 732 326 870 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] Dependency conflicts in nvidia-utils-beta
Hi, I'm maintaining nvidia-utils-beta [1] in AUR and tomorrow someone had again problem with the following conflict: nvidia-utils-beta requires xorg-server which requires libgl, but nvidia-utils- beta conflicts with libgl as it provides it's own libgl library. I added ligbl to provides=() array, but if you are installing nvidia-utils- beta on system with installed libgl, pacman does not solve that. I also tried to put 'libgl=180.11' to provides=() in hope, pacman will consider it as update of standart libgl (7.2 currently) but it is also not a solution. The only way is to pacman -Rd libgl and then to install nvidia-utils-beta, but I'd like to make it work without need of manually uninstalling libgl. I don't have any more ideas of solution so I'd like to ask you for some ideas. Thank you Dan [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19224 -- - Dan Vrátil prog...@progdansoft.com ICQ 249163429 Jabber prog...@jabber.cz Tel. +420 732 326 870 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] Broken [community] browser in AUR?
Hi, I just wanted to build some lib32 packages from [community], but I can't see them in AUR. But many other packages from [community] I can see. Is that somehow related to the that thing about moving of [community] or is something wrong with me / AUR ? Cheers, Dan -- - Dan Vrátil prog...@progdansoft.com ICQ 249163429 Jabber prog...@jabber.cz Tel. +420 732 326 870
Re: [aur-general] Broken [community] browser in AUR?
On Saturday 31 January 2009 17:46:57 Abhishek Dasgupta wrote: > 2009/1/31 Dan Vratil : > > Hi, > > I just wanted to build some lib32 packages from [community], but I can't > > see them in AUR. But many other packages from [community] I can see. Is > > that somehow related to the that thing about moving of [community] or is > > something wrong with me / AUR ? > > This is a known problem in the AUR, which shows only those community > packages which are packaged for i686. You can get the PKGBUILDs using > abs. OK, thanks. -- - Dan Vrátil prog...@progdansoft.com ICQ 249163429 Jabber prog...@jabber.cz Tel. +420 732 326 870
[aur-general] Package removal request
Hi, please could you delete package http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17815 (flashcam). I think this package is already not needed anymore as his function is provided by current stable version of flash. Thanks -- - Dan Vrátil prog...@progdansoft.com ICQ 249163429 Jabber prog...@jabber.cz Tel. +420 732 326 870 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Use of sudo in pkgbuild
You don't need to use SUDO for `make install` as you have write privileges
into $pkgdir folder.
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 21:55:38 Laurie Clark-Michalek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been working on the splashy-creator package (updating it to 2.2), and
> had got it working, when I realised I had a potential problem. I needed to
> use sudo in the pkgbuild, and so far, I have never seen it used in a
> package. Is this OK, and/or is there away to avoid it? Here is my package
> build for inspection:
>
> # Contributor: Laurie Clark-Michalek
>
> pkgname=splashy-creator
> pkgver=2.2
> pkgrel=1
> pkgdesc="A tool for creating Splashy themes."
> arch=('i686' 'x86_64')
> url="http://www.nanolx.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=34";
> license=('GPL3')
> depends=('sed' 'pygtk>=2.4' 'python>=2.4' 'splashy')
> makedepends=('sudo' 'patch')
> source=(http://nanolx.org/free/$pkgname-$pkgver.tar.bz2 $pkgname.patch)
> md5sums=('615033a2cabab0b132ecc9aff2c07a7b'
> 'b8095120f36b5f2cc3b1704a7b2e32a6')
>
> build() {
> cd $srcdir/$pkgname
> ./configure
> patch ./Makefile $srcdir/splashy-creator.patch
> sudo make DESTDIR=$pkgdir install || return 1
> }
>
>
> The patch is just a small one:
>
> 23c23
> < @mkdir -p $(DESTDIR)/usr/usr/bin/
> ---
>
> > @mkdir -p $(DESTDIR)/usr/bin/
>
> Thanks,
>
> Laurie
>
> P.S. This is the first time I've used patch, so is the .patch file alright?
--
-
Dan Vrátil
prog...@progdansoft.com
ICQ 249163429
Jabber prog...@jabber.cz
Tel. +420 732 326 870
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Use of sudo in pkgbuild
According to the Makefile it seems, the cache can be disabled:
@if test ! $(CACHE_DISABLE) ; then \
echo -e "$(MAGENTA)updating:$(SMOOTHBLUE)icon cache" ;\
gtk-update-icon-cache -f /usr/share/icons/hicolor;\
fi
Try
make DESTDIR=$pkgdir CACHE_DISABLE install
or
make DESTDIR=$pkgdir CACHE_DISABLE=true install
I don't know how exactly 'test' works, so I don't know which value is expected
in $(CACHE_DISABLE)
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 22:06:14 Laurie Clark-Michalek wrote:
> The pkg will not build if I don't have sudo enabled. It's because
> gtk-update-icon-cache is used during the make install, regardless of
> directory. See the error message below.
>
> gtk-update-icon-cache: Failed to open file
> /usr/share/icons/hicolor/.icon-theme.cache : Permission denied
> make: *** [install] Error 1
> ==> ERROR: Build Failed.
>
>
> 2009/4/8 Dan Vratil
>
> > You don't need to use SUDO for `make install` as you have write
> > privileges into $pkgdir folder.
> >
> > On Tuesday 07 April 2009 21:55:38 Laurie Clark-Michalek wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I've been working on the splashy-creator package (updating it to 2.2),
> >
> > and
> >
> > > had got it working, when I realised I had a potential problem. I needed
> >
> > to
> >
> > > use sudo in the pkgbuild, and so far, I have never seen it used in a
> > > package. Is this OK, and/or is there away to avoid it? Here is my
> > > package build for inspection:
> > >
> > > # Contributor: Laurie Clark-Michalek >
> > us>
> >
> > > pkgname=splashy-creator
> > > pkgver=2.2
> > > pkgrel=1
> > > pkgdesc="A tool for creating Splashy themes."
> > > arch=('i686' 'x86_64')
> > > url="http://www.nanolx.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=34
> > >" license=('GPL3')
> > > depends=('sed' 'pygtk>=2.4' 'python>=2.4' 'splashy')
> > > makedepends=('sudo' 'patch')
> > > source=(http://nanolx.org/free/$pkgname-$pkgver.tar.bz2 $pkgname.patch)
> > > md5sums=('615033a2cabab0b132ecc9aff2c07a7b'
> > > 'b8095120f36b5f2cc3b1704a7b2e32a6')
> > >
> > > build() {
> > > cd $srcdir/$pkgname
> > > ./configure
> > > patch ./Makefile $srcdir/splashy-creator.patch
> > > sudo make DESTDIR=$pkgdir install || return 1
> > > }
> > >
> > >
> > > The patch is just a small one:
> > >
> > > 23c23
> > > < @mkdir -p $(DESTDIR)/usr/usr/bin/
> > > ---
> > >
> > > > @mkdir -p $(DESTDIR)/usr/bin/
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Laurie
> > >
> > > P.S. This is the first time I've used patch, so is the .patch file
> >
> > alright?
> >
> > --
> > -
> > Dan Vrátil
> > prog...@progdansoft.com
> > ICQ 249163429
> > Jabber prog...@jabber.cz
> > Tel. +420 732 326 870
--
-
Dan Vrátil
prog...@progdansoft.com
ICQ 249163429
Jabber prog...@jabber.cz
Tel. +420 732 326 870
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Use of sudo in pkgbuild
Did you upload the right PKGBUILD? I don't see there the CACHE_DISABLE in make
install neither the Makefile patch :-)
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 22:35:19 Laurie Clark-Michalek wrote:
> Ok, it's working, and I've uploaded it to the aur:
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16781
>
> Thanks for your help
>
> 2009/4/7 Laurie Clark-Michalek
>
> > I was planning to use a little .install file:
> >
> > post_install() {
> > gtk-update-icon-cache -f /usr/share/icons/hicolor
> > }
> >
> >
> > 2009/4/8 Dan Vratil
> >
> >> According to the Makefile it seems, the cache can be disabled:
> >>
> >>@if test ! $(CACHE_DISABLE) ; then \
> >>echo -e "$(MAGENTA)updating:$(SMOOTHBLUE)icon cache"
> >> ;\ gtk-update-icon-cache -f /usr/share/icons/hicolor;\ fi
> >>
> >>
> >> Try
> >> make DESTDIR=$pkgdir CACHE_DISABLE install
> >> or
> >> make DESTDIR=$pkgdir CACHE_DISABLE=true install
> >>
> >> I don't know how exactly 'test' works, so I don't know which value is
> >> expected
> >> in $(CACHE_DISABLE)
> >>
> >> On Tuesday 07 April 2009 22:06:14 Laurie Clark-Michalek wrote:
> >> > The pkg will not build if I don't have sudo enabled. It's because
> >> > gtk-update-icon-cache is used during the make install, regardless of
> >> > directory. See the error message below.
> >> >
> >> > gtk-update-icon-cache: Failed to open file
> >> > /usr/share/icons/hicolor/.icon-theme.cache : Permission denied
> >> > make: *** [install] Error 1
> >> > ==> ERROR: Build Failed.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 2009/4/8 Dan Vratil
> >> >
> >> > > You don't need to use SUDO for `make install` as you have write
> >> > > privileges into $pkgdir folder.
> >> > >
> >> > > On Tuesday 07 April 2009 21:55:38 Laurie Clark-Michalek wrote:
> >> > > > Hi,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I've been working on the splashy-creator package (updating it to
> >>
> >> 2.2),
> >>
> >> > > and
> >> > >
> >> > > > had got it working, when I realised I had a potential problem. I
> >>
> >> needed
> >>
> >> > > to
> >> > >
> >> > > > use sudo in the pkgbuild, and so far, I have never seen it used in
> >> > > > a package. Is this OK, and/or is there away to avoid it? Here is
> >> > > > my package build for inspection:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > # Contributor: Laurie Clark-Michalek >>
> >> (dot)
> >>
> >> > > us>
> >> > >
> >> > > > pkgname=splashy-creator
> >> > > > pkgver=2.2
> >> > > > pkgrel=1
> >> > > > pkgdesc="A tool for creating Splashy themes."
> >> > > > arch=('i686' 'x86_64')
> >> > > > url="
> >>
> >> http://www.nanolx.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=34
> >>
> >> > > >" license=('GPL3')
> >> > > > depends=('sed' 'pygtk>=2.4' 'python>=2.4' 'splashy')
> >> > > > makedepends=('sudo' 'patch')
> >> > > > source=(http://nanolx.org/free/$pkgname-$pkgver.tar.bz2$pkgname.pa
> >> > > >tch) md5sums=('615033a2cabab0b132ecc9aff2c07a7b'
> >> > > > 'b8095120f36b5f2cc3b1704a7b2e32a6')
> >> > > >
> >> > > > build() {
> >> > > > cd $srcdir/$pkgname
> >> > > > ./configure
> >> > > > patch ./Makefile $srcdir/splashy-creator.patch
> >> > > > sudo make DESTDIR=$pkgdir install || return 1
> >> > > > }
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > The patch is just a small one:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > 23c23
> >> > > > < @mkdir -p $(DESTDIR)/usr/usr/bin/
> >> > > > ---
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > @mkdir -p $(DESTDIR)/usr/bin/
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Thanks,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Laurie
> >> > > >
> >> > > > P.S. This is the first time I've used patch, so is the .patch file
> >> > >
> >> > > alright?
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > -
> >> > > Dan Vrátil
> >> > > prog...@progdansoft.com
> >> > > ICQ 249163429
> >> > > Jabber prog...@jabber.cz
> >> > > Tel. +420 732 326 870
> >>
> >> --
> >> -
> >> Dan Vrátil
> >> prog...@progdansoft.com
> >> ICQ 249163429
> >> Jabber prog...@jabber.cz
> >> Tel. +420 732 326 870
--
-
Dan Vrátil
prog...@progdansoft.com
ICQ 249163429
Jabber prog...@jabber.cz
Tel. +420 732 326 870
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Use of sudo in pkgbuild
Oh rock me - I should take better look next time, of course it's there. I'm
sorry Laurie.
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 22:35:19 Laurie Clark-Michalek wrote:
> Ok, it's working, and I've uploaded it to the aur:
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16781
>
> Thanks for your help
>
> 2009/4/7 Laurie Clark-Michalek
>
> > I was planning to use a little .install file:
> >
> > post_install() {
> > gtk-update-icon-cache -f /usr/share/icons/hicolor
> > }
> >
> >
> > 2009/4/8 Dan Vratil
> >
> >> According to the Makefile it seems, the cache can be disabled:
> >>
> >>@if test ! $(CACHE_DISABLE) ; then \
> >>echo -e "$(MAGENTA)updating:$(SMOOTHBLUE)icon cache"
> >> ;\ gtk-update-icon-cache -f /usr/share/icons/hicolor;\ fi
> >>
> >>
> >> Try
> >> make DESTDIR=$pkgdir CACHE_DISABLE install
> >> or
> >> make DESTDIR=$pkgdir CACHE_DISABLE=true install
> >>
> >> I don't know how exactly 'test' works, so I don't know which value is
> >> expected
> >> in $(CACHE_DISABLE)
> >>
> >> On Tuesday 07 April 2009 22:06:14 Laurie Clark-Michalek wrote:
> >> > The pkg will not build if I don't have sudo enabled. It's because
> >> > gtk-update-icon-cache is used during the make install, regardless of
> >> > directory. See the error message below.
> >> >
> >> > gtk-update-icon-cache: Failed to open file
> >> > /usr/share/icons/hicolor/.icon-theme.cache : Permission denied
> >> > make: *** [install] Error 1
> >> > ==> ERROR: Build Failed.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 2009/4/8 Dan Vratil
> >> >
> >> > > You don't need to use SUDO for `make install` as you have write
> >> > > privileges into $pkgdir folder.
> >> > >
> >> > > On Tuesday 07 April 2009 21:55:38 Laurie Clark-Michalek wrote:
> >> > > > Hi,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I've been working on the splashy-creator package (updating it to
> >>
> >> 2.2),
> >>
> >> > > and
> >> > >
> >> > > > had got it working, when I realised I had a potential problem. I
> >>
> >> needed
> >>
> >> > > to
> >> > >
> >> > > > use sudo in the pkgbuild, and so far, I have never seen it used in
> >> > > > a package. Is this OK, and/or is there away to avoid it? Here is
> >> > > > my package build for inspection:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > # Contributor: Laurie Clark-Michalek >>
> >> (dot)
> >>
> >> > > us>
> >> > >
> >> > > > pkgname=splashy-creator
> >> > > > pkgver=2.2
> >> > > > pkgrel=1
> >> > > > pkgdesc="A tool for creating Splashy themes."
> >> > > > arch=('i686' 'x86_64')
> >> > > > url="
> >>
> >> http://www.nanolx.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=34
> >>
> >> > > >" license=('GPL3')
> >> > > > depends=('sed' 'pygtk>=2.4' 'python>=2.4' 'splashy')
> >> > > > makedepends=('sudo' 'patch')
> >> > > > source=(http://nanolx.org/free/$pkgname-$pkgver.tar.bz2$pkgname.pa
> >> > > >tch) md5sums=('615033a2cabab0b132ecc9aff2c07a7b'
> >> > > > 'b8095120f36b5f2cc3b1704a7b2e32a6')
> >> > > >
> >> > > > build() {
> >> > > > cd $srcdir/$pkgname
> >> > > > ./configure
> >> > > > patch ./Makefile $srcdir/splashy-creator.patch
> >> > > > sudo make DESTDIR=$pkgdir install || return 1
> >> > > > }
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > The patch is just a small one:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > 23c23
> >> > > > < @mkdir -p $(DESTDIR)/usr/usr/bin/
> >> > > > ---
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > @mkdir -p $(DESTDIR)/usr/bin/
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Thanks,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Laurie
> >> > > >
> >> > > > P.S. This is the first time I've used patch, so is the .patch file
> >> > >
> >> > > alright?
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > -
> >> > > Dan Vrátil
> >> > > prog...@progdansoft.com
> >> > > ICQ 249163429
> >> > > Jabber prog...@jabber.cz
> >> > > Tel. +420 732 326 870
> >>
> >> --
> >> -
> >> Dan Vrátil
> >> prog...@progdansoft.com
> >> ICQ 249163429
> >> Jabber prog...@jabber.cz
> >> Tel. +420 732 326 870
--
-
Dan Vrátil
prog...@progdansoft.com
ICQ 249163429
Jabber prog...@jabber.cz
Tel. +420 732 326 870
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] Dupliacte packages
Hello, I found two duplicate packages plasma-todolist [1] and plasma-todo-plasmoid [2]. They are both the same version, but the later contains patch for building on KDE 4.2 and was submitted first. I suppose the first package could be removed. Dan [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22246 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20646 -- - Dan Vrátil prog...@progdansoft.com ICQ 249163429 Jabber prog...@jabber.cz Tel. +420 732 326 870 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] Duplicate packages
I found two package in AUR both providing the same software: opera-dev-qt4 [1] and opera-devel-qt4 [2]. Opera-dev-qt4 was first submitted few days before opera-devel-qt4, but it's not being updated and does not support x86_64 arch therefor I suggest to delete opera-dev-qt4. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23865 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15228 Cheers Dan -- - Dan Vrátil vra...@progdansoft.com ICQ 249163429 Jabber prog...@jabber.cz Tel. +420 732 326 870 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] Package removal
Hi, I suggest removing php-qt [1]. I adopted it as very outdated package (ver 0.1) and tried to rebuild the new version (0.9), but according to developers, the version 0.9 has problems with building against the new Qt (found on mailinglists from November 2008) and they recommend using sources from SVN. Therefore I created package php-qt-svn which builds against the latest software without problems. Cheers, Dan [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12560 -- - Dan Vrátil vra...@progdansoft.com ICQ 249163429 Jabber prog...@jabber.cz Tel. +420 732 326 870 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] does aur have a defined api?
On Sunday 02 May 2010 14:59:31 Caleb Cushing wrote: > just wondering if there's any sort of specification for aur anywhere No, currently not. API is planned for AUR2: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_2#API -- - Dan Vrátil vra...@progdansoft.com ICQ 249163429 Jabber prog...@jabber.cz Tel. +420 732 326 870 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] gnome-subtitles
On Saturday 31 July 2010 16:17:38 Rafael Beraldo wrote: > 2010/7/31 Evangelos Foutras > > > On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Rafael Beraldo > > > > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > gnome-subtitles AUR package [1] has been out-of-date for a long time. I > > > > have > > > > > just created a PKGBUILD for the last version of this package. In order > > > to upload my PKGBUILD, gnome-subtitles has to be orphaned. Could > > > please a TU > > > > do > > > > > that for me? gnome-subtitles is a great application and I would learn a > > > > lot > > > > > of things by maintaining this package. > > > > > > Thank you! > > > > > > -- > > > Rafael Beraldo > > > http://cabaladada.org > > > > Done. > > Thank you! > > Anyway, I have a problem. I run makepkg --source to create the tarball to > send but rather than a file that includes my PKGBUILD, that's what I get: > http://pastebin.com/9wqbdn6F > > My PKGBUILD: http://pastebin.com/CyNxVwjV You are listing a wrong package, gnome-subtitles-1.0.tar.gz is the source tarball, the one generated by makepkg --source is called gnome- subtitles-1.0-1.src.tar.xz Dan -- - Dan Vrátil vra...@progdansoft.com ICQ 249163429 Jabber prog...@jabber.cz Tel. +420 732 326 870 Tento email neobsahuje žádné viry, protože odesílatel nepoužívá Windows. / This email does not contain any viruses because the sender does not use Windows. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] Orphanin request
Hi, please orphan package libmusicbrainz2. I emailed maintainer and he has no interest in maintaining it since he's no longer using Arch. Thanks! Dan URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18081 -- - Dan Vrátil vra...@progdansoft.com ICQ 249163429 Jabber prog...@jabber.cz Tel. +420 732 326 870 Tento email neobsahuje žádné viry, protože odesílatel nepoužívá Windows. / This email does not contain any viruses because the sender does not use Windows. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Wine Gecko
On Sunday 05 September 2010 14:06:13 Jan Steffens wrote:
> I would like to move wine_gecko into [community] (for 32-bit) and
> [multilib] (for 64-bit).
>
> Attached the proposed PKGBUILD.
Hi,
Is it neccessary to download sources for both architectures?
Something like
[ "$CARCH" = "i686" ] && ARCH=x86
[ "$CARCH" = "x86_64" ] && ARCH=x86_64
source=(http://downloads.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/wine/$pkgname-$pkgver-${ARCH}.cab)
would save some bandwith when building just for one arch.
Dan
--
-
Dan Vrátil
vra...@progdansoft.com
ICQ 249163429
Jabber prog...@jabber.cz
Tel. +420 732 326 870
Tento email neobsahuje žádné viry, protože odesílatel nepoužívá Windows. /
This email does not contain any viruses because the sender does not use
Windows.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Package review : gPlanarity
On Thursday, January 13, 2011 17:54:19 Sebastien Duthil wrote: > Le 13/01/2011 17:53, Sebastien Duthil a écrit : > > Here it is : > > > > http://dl.free.fr/poeSUbf0M > > Here is better > > http://dl.free.fr/poeSUbf0M/gplanarity-16723-1.src.tar.gz > > Sorry for the spam :-) Just being pedantic, but you should use "$srcdir" in case there were spaces in the path. And thanks for bringing this in, it's really fun to play! Dan -- --- Dan Vrátil vra...@progdansoft.com Tel.: +420732326870 Jabber: prog...@jabber.cz Tento email neobsahuje žádné viry, protože odesílatel nepoužívá Windows. / This email does not contain any viruses because the sender does not use Windows. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] Deletion request
Hi, please delete my package akonadi-facebook-git [1], I didn't notice that there's already kfacebook-git [2] in AUR. Thanks! [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?IDG550 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?IDF980 -- --- Dan Vrátil d...@progdan.cz Tel.: +420732326870 Jabber: prog...@jabber.cz Tento email neobsahuje žádné viry, protože odesílatel nepoužívá Windows. / This email does not contain any viruses because the sender does not use Windows. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] Deletion request
And one more package to delete please (although not mine this time) wt-c++ [1] is a duplicate of wt [2]. Thanks [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?IDB244 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID049 -- --- Dan Vrátil d...@progdan.cz Tel.: +420732326870 Jabber: prog...@jabber.cz Tento email neobsahuje žádné viry, protože odesílatel nepoužívá Windows. / This email does not contain any viruses because the sender does not use Windows. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Should nvidia(-beta)-all replace all the other nvidia-* packages in the AUR?
On Saturday, March 19, 2011 20:19:41 Det wrote: > Hell, > > So I've been thinking about this for some time now and I finally > decided to ask the ones who know the best: would it be enough to only > have 'nvidia-beta-all' and 'nvidia-all' in the AUR to replace all > those nvidia-ice, nvidia-bfs, eg. packages? (Decluding nvidia-utils*, > of course.) > > As far as I can think of, I can't see any downside(s) (whatsoever) of > using those *-all packages instead of those 'specifc-kernel' packages, > since they do in fact auto-detect all the kernels on the system. > > Now to the important part: what do you think? > > Det Hi, nvidia-beta-all may be suitable for multikernel installation, but prevents you from having installed various versions of nvidia driver in each kernel (when a regression is introduced in some kernel for example) or having none driver installed for a particular kernel at all. I myself use the dual-kernel setup, one with nvidia-beta and one with nouveau drivers. This option would be lost If only nvidia-beta-all would be available, since it would install nvidia kernel module everywhere. And I believe that nvidia/nouveau is one of the most common reasons for people to have multiple kernels installed. I'd suggest to keep nvidia-beta-all and nvidia-beta packages, (because nvidia- beta uses uname -r to detect current running kernel) and get rid of all those nvidia-beta-whateverkernelhaveeverbeeninaur packages. Regards, Dan PS: I'm maintainer of nvidia-beta, but I'm not lobbying for keeping it because I don't want to lose a package, but as a result of my reasoning and expectations of user comfort. -- --- Dan Vrátil d...@progdan.cz Tel.: +420732326870 Jabber: prog...@jabber.cz Tento email neobsahuje žádné viry, protože odesílatel nepoužívá Windows. / This email does not contain any viruses because the sender does not use Windows. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] Deletion request
Hi, gqclient [1] seems to be duplicate of gq from community. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?IDE362 Regards Dan Vratil -- --- Dan Vrátil d...@progdan.cz Tel.: +420732326870 Jabber: prog...@jabber.cz Tento email neobsahuje žádné viry, protože odesílatel nepoužívá Windows. / This email does not contain any viruses because the sender does not use Windows. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Please remove 100% duplicate
On Friday, August 26, 2011 01:00:51 Jesse Jaara wrote: > So someone uploaded a copy of my PKGBUILD > for [1]libpng12 with the only changes being > a name change (to get it into AUR) and > marked himself as maintainer and made me > a contributor. Then he tells people to > try his 100% copy PKGBUILD on the comments > O_o. Please kill [2]libpng12-working > > [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33795 > [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51855 I believe the other package of his is the same case. He uploaded google- musicmanager-current [1] as a duplicate of google-musicmanager [2], only fixed md5 sums. Also the versioning is incorrect. - Dan [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51811 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50891 -- --- Dan Vrátil d...@progdan.cz Jabber: prog...@jabber.cz Tento email neobsahuje žádné viry, protože odesílatel nepoužívá Windows. / This email does not contain any viruses because the sender does not use Windows.
[aur-general] Orphan request
Hi, please orphan texworks [1] and xfce4-linelight-plugin [2]. They are both out- dated for very long time. Maintainer's email address from his AUR profile does not work anymore and he last updated the packages more then one year ago. Thanks - Dan [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34716 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18622 -- --- Dan Vrátil www.progdan.cz d...@progdan.cz Jabber: prog...@jabber.cz Tento email neobsahuje žádné viry, protože odesílatel nepoužívá Windows. / This email does not contain any viruses because the sender does not use Windows.
Re: [aur-general] Dynamically evaluating md5sum value in PKGBUILD
On Thursday 27 October 2011 15:36:57 Maciej Sitarz wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm maintaining hunspell-pl AUR package > (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?IDD331). > The problem with the package is that the maintainer of the source > provides only the latest(daily) tarball snapshot. The md5sum of the > tarball changes daily and the old files are removed. > > The packages is very often marked as 'outdated' and I'm asked to update > it, both via comments and email. > Some users propose to use dynamic values for pkgver= and md5sum=, but I > think it's not a good way. > > Current PKGBUILD is: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hu/hunspell-pl/PKGBUILD > Proposed PKGBUILD: > http://pastebin.com/bQCafYGt > > What would you suggest to do? I think the best way would be to include > the package in extra, but I'm not sure if it has enough votes. > > Thanks > > Best regards Hi, What about contacting the maintainer if he would be willing to provide md5 checksums together with the tarball? You would be able to wget the file and it's checksum from the build() function then. I know it's not the best solution, but it would solve your problems and it does not require any external hosting or further automation Regards Dan -- --- Dan Vrátil www.progdan.cz d...@progdan.cz Jabber: prog...@jabber.cz Tento email neobsahuje žádné viry, protože odesílatel nepoužívá Windows. / This email does not contain any viruses because the sender does not use Windows. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] Merge Request
Hi, could you please merge krunner-kopete-contacts [0] to kdeplasma-runners- kopete-contacts [1] ? I updated the package according to KDE Package Guidlines. Thanks, Dan [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45857 [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60817 -- Dan Vratil www.progdan.cz | d...@progdan.cz | Jabber: prog...@jabber.cz Fingerprint: 76C9 2F08 5D0D 6F9E 5AD4 2BFD 3A85 0307 F506 5B61 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] Merge request
Hi, please merge following packages. I updated them to conform the KDE package policy. google-translate-runner [0] => kdeplasma-runners-google-translate [1] plasma-idos-search [2] => kdeplasma-applets-idos-search [3]. [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26685 [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61075 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33299 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61074 Thanks Dan -- Dan Vratil www.progdan.cz | d...@progdan.cz | Jabber: prog...@jabber.cz Fingerprint: 76C9 2F08 5D0D 6F9E 5AD4 2BFD 3A85 0307 F506 5B61 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
