[aur-general] package deletion
Hi guys, Please delete the following packages owned by me: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gromacs-mpi-3/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gromacs-407/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tcl84/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tk84/ Both gromacs packages were needed at the lab i used to work, but now they were phased out and no interest appeared on them from the community. The last two were required by pymol-svn for some time, but not anymore. Although they have some votes, i honestly cant recall when they were cast. Thanks. -- Eduardo Martins Lopes Laboratory of Theoretical Chemistry Federal University of São Carlos
[aur-general] deletion of package g95-cocon
Hello guys, I'd like to request the deletion of g95-cocon from AUR (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/g95-cocon/). The original developer deprecated the network console (the software of this package alongside a custom g95 binnary) and therefore, this package is no longer usefull. Thanks in advance, -- Eduardo Martins Lopes
Re: [aur-general] orphaned community packages (intel-tbb, arpack, libmatio, xml-rpc and aspell-pt)
Hello Ray and thanks for your reply! On 3 January 2012 07:39, Eduardo Martins Lopes edumlo...@yahoo.com.br wrote: Hello guys, I have an aur package (opencv-tbb https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42121) that depends on intel-tbb, but this one is an orphaned community package and i would like to maintain it. Can i upload a pkbuild to the AUR (perhaps with the same name) ? There a few other orphans that would like to adopt, if it's possible: * libmatio - http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/libmatio/ * arpack - http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/arpack/ * xmlrpc-c - http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/xmlrpc-c/ * aspell-pt - http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/aspell-pt/ Although i do not use the last ones (except for the dictionary), they fall within the scope of my interests. Hello I was supposed to bring intel-tbb to extra and build opencv against it. I will do that soon, so you don't have to worry about that one anymore and opencv from repos will have intel-tbb improvement. These are great news! As for the others, it depends on the maintainer, the package popularity, whether it is in use as a make or optional dependency etc. Actually the question regarding the names is about creating an aur package with the same name of the orphaned ones since the aur is where i can maintain those packages.
[aur-general] orphaned community packages (intel-tbb, arpack, libmatio, xml-rpc and aspell-pt)
Hello guys, I have an aur package (opencv-tbb https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42121) that depends on intel-tbb, but this one is an orphaned community package and i would like to maintain it. Can i upload a pkbuild to the AUR (perhaps with the same name) ? There a few other orphans that would like to adopt, if it's possible: * libmatio - http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/libmatio/ * arpack - http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/arpack/ * xmlrpc-c - http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/xmlrpc-c/ * aspell-pt - http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/aspell-pt/ Although i do not use the last ones (except for the dictionary), they fall within the scope of my interests. Kind regards, -- Eduardo Martins Lopes - duca
[aur-general] Package Deletion - gtk2.18
Hello guys, I would like to ask for the deletion of this package http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36204 It was required by another program but it's useless right now. I would also ask for deletion of another two, but i cant exactly tell if they are still used or not by someone else because they got a few votes awhile ago. Thanks in advance, -- Eduardo Martins Lopes Laboratory of Theoretical Chemistry Federal University of São Carlos
[aur-general] DELETION REQUEST: g95-stable
Hello all, I would like to request the deletion of the g95-stable package ( http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31466 ) for the author of the program has been not releasing non-stable packages for quite some time. Thanks in advance -- Eduardo Martins Lopes Laboratory of Theoretical Chemistry Federal University of São Carlos
[aur-general] Package deletion: upc (or rename to gccupc)
Hello all, I uploaded a package with the wrong name, the package upc should be named gccupc for UPC is a programming language for which there are several compilers (gccupc is only one of it). I already corrected in my pkgbuild and therefore would like to ask for the deletion of the previous one or to have it renamed to gccupc. Thanks in advance,-- Eduardo Martins Lopes
[aur-general] Removal Request
Greetings, i would like request the removal of the following aur packages: g95-x86 :: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27013 g95-x86_64 :: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26268 for i merged them into a single package which i plan to name g95-stable. The current maintainer of g95 is somewhat inactive, is that true? If so, i would like to request the permission to update that package. Thanks in advance, /*/ Eduardo Martins Lopes Laboratory of Theoretical Chemistry Federal University of São Carlos Rodovia Washington Luiz, Km 235 - P.O. Box : 676 CEP 13565-905 - São Carlos - SP - Brazil +55 16 33518063 - Lab. /*/ --- Em sex, 23/10/09, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com escreveu: De: Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com Assunto: Re: [aur-general] Removal request Para: Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR) aur-general@archlinux.org Data: Sexta-feira, 23 de Outubro de 2009, 5:41 2009/10/23 Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkov...@gmail.com: Please remove package autopano-sift-c (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31424). I've forgot that it was moved to extra. Lukas done Veja quais são os assuntos do momento no Yahoo! +Buscados http://br.maisbuscados.yahoo.com
Re: [aur-general] Removal Request
Thanks for the quick answer, since you said that the maintainer is responding to the comments, i assume you are referring to the first two i asked for deletion because they are maintained by me (duca). Sorry for my confusing previous email, the one i asked to assume is this one: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7587 the others i asked for deletion because i merged the two packages into one (although i didnt upload the pkgbuild yet) best regards, /*/ Eduardo Martins Lopes /*/ --- Em sex, 23/10/09, Chris Brannon cmbranno...@gmail.com escreveu: De: Chris Brannon cmbranno...@gmail.com Assunto: Re: [aur-general] Removal Request Para: edumlo...@yahoo.com.br, Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR) aur-general@archlinux.org Data: Sexta-feira, 23 de Outubro de 2009, 11:20 Greetings, i would like request the removal of the following aur packages: g95-x86 :: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27013 g95-x86_64 :: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26268 for i merged them into a single package which i plan to name g95-stable. The current maintainer of g95 is somewhat inactive, is that true? If so, i would like to request the permission to update that package. Well, he / she is responding to comments on the pages for the packages. That doesn't fit my definition of inactive or unable to be contacted. Please ask the current maintainer about disowning them. Regards, -- Chris Veja quais são os assuntos do momento no Yahoo! +Buscados http://br.maisbuscados.yahoo.com
