Re: [aur-general] I can't upgrade my package

2016-10-08 Thread Frederik “Freso” S . Olesen via aur-general 
A bit late to the party (the last few weeks have been busy with moving -
just slowly catching up on everything). Sorry. :)

Den 01-10-2016 kl. 19:42 skrev Juan Martínez:
> I'm sorry because maybe you actually talked about this and i didn't
> looked at it because i'm lazy and deleted some e-mails without reading
> them.

In case you lose e-mails, the archives of the list are public:
https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/

(As it turns out, reading back would have probably not helped you this
time, as you would still have needed Lukas' attention for him to "fix"
the issue on AUR's side. :))

-- 
Namasté,
Frederik “Freso” S. Olesen 
AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Freso
Wiki: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Freso



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin unused shared libraries

2016-12-04 Thread Frederik “Freso” S . Olesen via aur-general 
Den 04-12-2016 kl. 14:03 skrev NicoHood:
> I am currently updating the xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin […]

(Please don't create new mails as replies to existing ones. Sane mail
clients will thread your mail in the existing thread and will make both
harder to follow.)

-- 
Namasté,
Frederik “Freso” S. Olesen 
AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Freso
Wiki: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Freso



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin unused shared libraries [done right]

2016-12-05 Thread Frederik “Freso” S . Olesen via aur-general 
Den 05-12-2016 kl. 09:10 skrev Eli Schwartz via aur-general:
> And to demonstrate that that is indeed how you do it, notice where my
> email ended up:
> https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2016-December/thread.html#33019

To be fair though, it looks like the web interface only threads on
subject name (see how "xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin unused shared libraries"
isn't part of the "TU Application: Baptiste Jonglez" thread), so this
would be due to you change of the subject (" [done right]").

-- 
Namasté,
Frederik “Freso” S. Olesen 
AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Freso
Wiki: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Freso



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Wrong username in disown notification

2016-12-21 Thread Frederik “Freso” S . Olesen via aur-general 
Den 21-12-2016 kl. 07:34 skrev Eli Schwartz via aur-general:
> Bugzilla is the new hotness,

For some definition of "new", I guess. 😏

(Bugzilla being 18 years old now (unknown version, 1998-08-26), and
Flyspray's earliest release (that I can find) is from 9 years ago
(0.9.9.3, 2007-08-23).)

-- 
Namasté,
Frederik “Freso” S. Olesen 
AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Freso
Wiki: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Freso



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Bruno Pagani

2017-01-10 Thread Frederik “Freso” S . Olesen via aur-general 
Den 09-01-2017 kl. 20:15 skrev Bruno Pagani via aur-general:
> Le 08/01/2017 à 19:19, Maxime Gauduin a écrit :
>> You piqued my interest with bs1770gain, any idea how it fares speed-wise 
>> against the default gstreamer backend? I kept using wine + foobar2000 to 
>> compute my replaygain values even after transitioning to beets because it's 
>> infinitely faster than using gstreamer.
> 
> I admit having never looked at it from a performance POV, I was mostly
> interested on avoiding the gstreamer dependency tree. I’ll test that
> tonight if I have time to do so or tomorrow if not, by removing values
> from my whole collection and adding them again through beets. However,
> quoting the beets doc[0], you should probably not expect miracles: “This
> can be a slow process”. But keep tuned. ;)

Veering slightly off-topic for a second, beets might actually be moving
somewhat away from bs1770gain at some point in the future:
https://botbot.me/freenode/beets/msg/79152052/
https://chatlogs.metabrainz.org/brainzbot/musicbrainz/msg/3784688/

-- 
Namasté,
Frederik “Freso” S. Olesen 
AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Freso
Wiki: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Freso



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] saving AUR history (Re: TU Application: Thore Bödecker)

2017-06-05 Thread Frederik “Freso” S . Olesen via aur-general 
Den 05-06-2017 kl. 20:41 skrev Yardena Cohen via aur-general:
> So, I just noticed that you took over my two packages: amavisd-new and
> perl-convert-uulib. Which is fine. But I also noticed that instead of
> preserving their git repo histories, you just started a new repo with
> the first commit called "import from AUR":
> 
> https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/log/trunk?h=packages/amavisd-new
> https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/log/trunk?h=packages/perl-convert-uulib
> 
> I'm curious, other than my local backup, is this history now gone for good?

Old AUR packages are preserved indefinitely. The history of the two
packages you mention are still in AUR's git:

https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/log/?h=amavisd-new
https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/log/?h=perl-convert-uulib

(That said, I really like keeping the history together, so I'd vote for
preserving AUR history when import to "real" Arch repositories, if at
all possible...)

-- 
Namasté,
Frederik “Freso” S. Olesen 
AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Freso
Wiki: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Freso



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Unfortunate Perceived Attitudes.

2018-11-04 Thread Frederik “Freso” S . Olesen via aur-general 
Den 04.11.2018 kl. 06.20 skrev hagar:
> I would like to point out that since these threads are in the public
> domain, that all words used need to be thought and read through twice.

IANAL, but I'd like to clarify one thing: e-mails sent to this list are
not "public domain", which is a term used to indicate status of
copyright: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_domain

The copyright of e-mails sent (by default) fall to their author, even
when sending to a public mailing list like this.

I think you meant to say that they are public (full stop!), and in that
regard you are correct – as are you with the rest of your statement
(ironically :)).

-- 
Namasté,
Frederik “Freso” S. Olesen 
AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Freso
Wiki: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Freso



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature