Re: [aur-general] Looking for a TU to get gamemode into community repo
On Tue, 2020-09-22 at 09:46 +0200, Minze Zwerver via aur-general wrote: > Hello, > > I am the current maintainer of the gamemode AUR, > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gamemode/ ,and I would like to > submit > it for the community repository. > > Currently it has libinih among its dependencies which is also in > AUR, > however it can be removed if so needed because meson will then fetch > it > and use a static variant of the library. > > Thank you for your time, > > Minze/Ysblokje Hi Minze, I'll probably handle it as I've been using it actively these days. Cheers, -- Maxime signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [aur-general] TU resignation - Lukas Jirkovsky (stativ)
On Fri, 2019-10-11 at 18:06 +0200, Lukas Jirkovsky via aur-general wrote: > Hello everyone, > > after much time I've finally came to admit to myself that I can no > longer fulfill my duties as a trusted user the way Arch Linux > deserves. > While I still manage to update the packages I actively use, such as > rawtherapee, I can no longer keep up with other packages and updates > often come late. I've given up on other duties such as keeping AUR > clean > already. I'm very sorry for that, but time has come for me to pack. > > Arch Linux community is one of the best communities out there and it > was > a great pleasure to be part of the team. I still love Arch Linux very > much and it's surely going to be my distro of choice for time to > come. > > Lot of you were very helpful with keeping the more complicated > packages > up to date already. A stellar example is > intellij-idea-community-edition, which is now thanks to Maxime built > from sources. > > The packages left that I'm still listed as a sole maintainer doesn't > get > updates too often and are fairly trivial to update. Though I guess > some > of them can be safely dropped without anyone noticing (I'm looking at > you, gimp plugin packages). > > So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish, > Lukas > > Hi Lukas, Sad to see you leave, but there's only so much a person can do, sometimes we have to let go. Hope you'll keep enjoying Arch Linux, and that we'll hear from you again. Safe travels! Cheers, -- Maxime signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Bruno Pagani
January 10, 2017 10:31 PM, "Bruno Pagani via aur-general" <aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > Le 08/01/2017 à 19:19, Maxime Gauduin a écrit : > >> You piqued my interest with bs1770gain, any idea how it fares speed-wise >> against the default >> gstreamer backend? I kept using wine + foobar2000 to compute my replaygain >> values even after >> transitioning to beets because it's infinitely faster than using gstreamer. > > Hi again, > > So, after a little bug fix[0], I ran `time beet replaygain -a` (so Album > mode, which I expected to be your use case) command on my newly imported > (with `-A`and into a new library for this test purpose) incoming folder, > which has the following stats: > Tracks: 2556 > Total time: 1.1 weeks > Approximate total size: 102.0 GiB > Artists: 150 > Albums: 176 > Album artists: 56 > > And here is the output of the `time` command: > beet replaygain -a 2775,24s user 32,68s system 80% cpu 58:00,41 total > > Note this is on a HDD, which I heard spinning a lot during all the > process. So results on a SSD might differ, I could test that this WE if > you want, but here we can say roughly 1s per track. > > How does it compare to your workflow? > Thanks for doing the testing, I too did some tests on my server over a sample of 373 representative files (flac, m4a, mp3). HDD as well but I only had 15MB/s of disk I/O so it's definitely CPU bound. Here are the results: gstreamer -> roughly 4s per track bs1770gain -> roughly 3s per track bs1770gain is definitely faster, but right now I'm using fb2k over the network where it takes 0.4s per track. Mind you, my desktop has a much more powerful CPU, and fb2k actually uses several threads which afaict beets does not. I'm quite sure I can divide the time it takes on my server by 4 using threads as well which would make beets a viable alternative, I'll look into it when I'm more familiar with ayncio. Also found out about the volumedetect filter of ffmpeg, but I'd need to document myself more about replaygain and its variants to make good use of the output. > Cheers, > Bruno > > [0] https://github.com/beetbox/beets/issues/2382 Cheers, -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Bruno Pagani
Hi Bruno, Nice to see a fellow beets lover apply! Your PKGBUILDs look nice and tidy, you'll most likely fit right in :) You piqued my interest with bs1770gain, any idea how it fares speed-wise against the default gstreamer backend? I kept using wine + foobar2000 to compute my replaygain values even after transitioning to beets because it's infinitely faster than using gstreamer. Cheers, -- Maxime January 8, 2017 4:42 PM, "Bruno Pagani via aur-general"wrote: > Le 07/01/2017 à 16:05, NicoHood a écrit : > >> Hey Bruno, >> nice to hear that you want to join the great ArchLinux project as TU. I >> am aware the discussion period has not started yet, but I think its fine >> if I already give some feedback. > > Hi Nico, > > You’ve been very fast indeed, but the discussion period started right > after anyway. ;) > >> I've checked your PKGBUILDs and I've noted a few thinks (which I also >> did wrong or sometimes forget). Those are mostly only concerning >> security aspects which I find important. If you followed the recent >> discussion you might have noticed that some people differ from this >> opinion. Please take it as a kind notice for you, use it if you wish :) >> >> * For github download .tar.gz is preferred over .zip in general if i am >> not wrong. > > Assuming you refer to audiothumbs-frameworks and ring-kde, I wasn’t > aware GitHub was providing .tar.gz downloads for snapshots tarballs > (they are not provided in the UI), but I admit not having tried a simple > substitution of file extension, which indeed works. Strange lack of > curiosity from my part. I’ve fixed both of them, thanks! > >> * Prefix your source download with: ${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tar.xz:: if you >> have a common SRCDIR. I also recently change to a common src dir, as too >> many packages blow my directories. > > Can you please specify which package(s) you have in mind here? I’ve just > checked again and didn’t found any package where I don’t do this and > upstream tarball doesn’t follow this either. > >> * You can use https for sourceforge downloads soon/now[1] (bs1770gain) > > Yes, and that is already what I do. Maybe you’ve overlooked or are > talking of “Upstream URL” (in which case this doesn’t work). > >> * Thanks for using sha256sums. You may want to use the even stronger >> sha512sums, as it does not hurt to use stronger hashes *duck* > > Stronger is relative (they’re mathematically the sames, breaking one in > an applicable way probably means breaking both). Does not hurt too. > Everything has been said around this in this list some months ago, I’ll > not start that debate again. I’ll only provide sha512 if this is what > upstream provides or a new policy going that way is adopted by > ArchLinux, which currently isn’t the case AFAIK. > >> * certbot-user: the gpg keys should have a comment with the owner of the >> trusted keys (as you did with exfalso, but with email) > > Sure, fixed. :) I’ve also fixed it in scribus-devel where it has > apparently escaped your review. ;) > >> * mpd-{sserver,}minimal uses a sha1sum. If its an upstream hash please >> contact them to use stronger hashes and include a stronger one as well. >> You can use multiple hashes in the PKGBUILD (as in weboob-headless). > > Like most of my -light or -minimal packages, hashes are from the repo > package. When they are upstream ones too (KDE packages notably), I > verify them, but here it’s not the case AFAIK. Those packages also use a > PGP key, so I could remove the sum altogether as the wiki proposes. But > actually this is one almost valid use case where I agree on switching to > stronger checksum: packages being on AUR, and AUR being full of people > that don’t understand PGP and its support in makepkg, the use of > --skippgpcheck is probably frequent. Then, even if this is not a > behaviour to be encouraged, having a strong verified checksum here is > probably better for those users. I’ve thus switched them to sha256sums. > That way, people relying on PGP still get the full verification, while > people skipping it get a checksum that I’ve computed after PGP > verification of the same tarball. > >> * powerdevil/spectacle-light uses http downloads. Even though gpg >> signatures are used, it would be nice to have https available anyways. >> It seems kde missconfigured their download subdomain for https, so you >> might want to contact them about that? > > Yes, KDE doesn’t provides https at the moment. I’ve reported a bug > upstream[0] (failed to find any open or close one relating to this). > >> * What I also do is to put my own GPG ID inside my PKGBUILDs, so people >> can simpler verify/find my key. Just as an idea. > > What purpose does that serve (outside of cluttering the PKGBUILD)? My > fingerprint is already in my AUR account profile[1] for that matter. > >> * For those projects who dont use GPG signatures yet, you might want to >> kindly contact them. I've written a script + instructions for
Re: [aur-general] TU Application NicoHood
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Voting period is over, looks like your application was accepted. Congratulations and welcome to the team! You will find the TODO list for new TUs on the wiki [1]. I just gave you TU status on AUR and will take care of filing a bug report to get your PGP key signed as soon as I can. Feel free to pîng me on IRC so I can give you the password to #archlinux-tu. [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_Trusted_User_Guidelines Cheers, - - - -- Maxime -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: OpenPGP.js v2.3.2 Comment: http://openpgpjs.org wsBcBAEBCAAQBQJX2tw2CRCv9dlQmLxv9QAAF9gIAKkeHA+E8yPi74NYM+7T MszpT+qqr3TXQftWkXJ3QhfaADHAjYVplJQKMt2sutOLmq+OkQzctWepb4XF LQo50IYF30X/F2iSqcb50U8/3T3DTVyPPToJMSwSksks95XsuVeqNtEdtM4R YIIWao0sjA2dqDACeAGGdkbsSC0TfMlVmMS14CUcastoIE08QV3GCqwYzSxR ljpk1AzM2YRWigp3HmvsV6jnrSU/G5SkB3IoWdyYJJcoqvK8xfxohAhwkmz3 /Y8v2SOEuS9WUZBOTW1c3oxDyatKLVNL7+e6PJiptXvEmw93gt6zCo+Kopq3 pw0x4N5BZcAINioqI3Y3vmw= =sCOd -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [aur-general] TU Application NicoHood
The discussion period is now over, please cast your votes over on AUR. Cheers, September 3 2016 9:19 PM, "Maxime Gauduin" <aluc...@archlinux.org> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi all, > > I confirm my sponsorship of this guy. > > @Doug: I agree that lying about this is unacceptable, I believe Nico got the > message and won't > suggest anything like this again. > > That said, let the discussion period continue. > > Cheers, > - -- > Maxime > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: OpenPGP.js v2.3.2 > Comment: http://openpgpjs.org > > wsBcBAEBCAAQBQJXyyHSCRCv9dlQmLxv9QAA5QEIALR3FGEckEzK9z5b27tf > 41mj93BMvUoOx6SxKfrBBXTtBNj88YMVa2jvzFbxgNqf6r2X9chH6z85pQQt > 4LfgtFBJlx0/ne/MIFhOHJECLNtenhXZB7KTg0LegrnXDrio2XWSlODJQFIe > 6fAU2Gy/GhtdXEAt3KoPJDwhcHddv0vw8e0pGaoCSV3shRhoayKLsFM+becI > QtfiFVCV9DlKTqJV5j8NX1wLhyXBMYztKaFsHQmIGpk+VkOWG8wU+AxxakOj > kK2rpBykaZoSVRFfl1eswNafz8U2BXWA/gK0hCUhGuYoAZyvIhd4tx8vXuXk > 2/ZVR1Mi4P/6bU1mkBOO1ZY= > =rdOA > -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] TU Application NicoHood
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, I confirm my sponsorship of this guy. @Doug: I agree that lying about this is unacceptable, I believe Nico got the message and won't suggest anything like this again. That said, let the discussion period continue. Cheers, - -- Maxime -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: OpenPGP.js v2.3.2 Comment: http://openpgpjs.org wsBcBAEBCAAQBQJXyyHSCRCv9dlQmLxv9QAA5QEIALR3FGEckEzK9z5b27tf 41mj93BMvUoOx6SxKfrBBXTtBNj88YMVa2jvzFbxgNqf6r2X9chH6z85pQQt 4LfgtFBJlx0/ne/MIFhOHJECLNtenhXZB7KTg0LegrnXDrio2XWSlODJQFIe 6fAU2Gy/GhtdXEAt3KoPJDwhcHddv0vw8e0pGaoCSV3shRhoayKLsFM+becI QtfiFVCV9DlKTqJV5j8NX1wLhyXBMYztKaFsHQmIGpk+VkOWG8wU+AxxakOj kK2rpBykaZoSVRFfl1eswNafz8U2BXWA/gK0hCUhGuYoAZyvIhd4tx8vXuXk 2/ZVR1Mi4P/6bU1mkBOO1ZY= =rdOA -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [aur-general] question about community packages vs aur
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Johnathan Jenkinswrote: > It seems the anonymous-pro font is now available in the community repos > (has > been for sometime actually). > https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/ttf-anonymous-pro/ > > And I have the package > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ttf-anonymous-pro-minus/ > that just provides the minus version of the font. > > > So the qestion is, should it be deleted in favor of the community version? > Or is > it ok to keep the package as it provides a specific version of the font(s)? > -- > John "ShaggyTwoDope" Jenkins > If the [community] package was much larger, I'd keep the AUR package. But saving a few KB of bandwidth and half an MB or so of storage doesn't really justify the existence of 2 packages. Cheers, -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] [AUR4] Single binary package for different architectures
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Doug Newgard scim...@archlinux.info wrote: On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 12:15:01 -0300 Hugo Osvaldo Barrera h...@barrera.io wrote: Why not just name them the same locally? source_i686=($pkgname-$pkgver:: http://example.com/release-${pkgver}-i386.tar.gz;) md5sums_i686=('ffeeddccbbaa99887766554433221100') source_x86_64=($pkgname-$pkgver:: http://example.com/release-${pkgver}-x86_64.tar.gz;) md5sums_x86_64=('00112233445566778899aabbccddeeff') package() { tar xf $pkgname-$pkgver ... } That creates problems verifying the checksums. Exactly, read a couple emails back. Also why would you want to decompress the source tarball in the package function? The source for your particular arch, and only that one, is already decompressed by bsdtar, no need for that extra step. See [1] for instance. [1] https://aur4.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=plex-media-server Cheers, -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] [AUR4] Single binary package for different architectures
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 11:46 PM, Bruno Pagani bruno.pag...@ens-lyon.org wrote: Le 14/06/2015 16:31, Johannes Löthberg a écrit : On 14/06, Johannes Löthberg wrote: On 14/06, Reventlov wrote: In which way is it cleaner and more structured? It's a bash hack instead of actually using properly structured and supported features. Please take this not-a-bug https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/43714 in consideration, too. It's why i'm not using this structure, personnally: if I did, i'd have to use unique names for each architecture dependant source, and change my package function and/or my build function to take thoses unique names into account. A bash hack inside a bash script is not this bad. I don't see how that is relevant anymore since the AUR doesn't use sourceballs anymore. And it will also make it not show up in the AUR properly since the sources won't be parsed properly. I’m not sure to understand you. How would you package this one for instance: https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/chromium-pepper-flash-standalone/ ? Bruno source_i686=(libpepflashplayer-i686-${pkgver}.so::http://docs.volcanis.me/.pepper-flash/i686/libpepflashplayer.so; manifest-i686-${pkgver}.json::http://docs.volcanis.me/.pepper-flash/i686/manifest.json;) sha1sums_i686=('hash1' 'hash2') source_x86_64=(libpepflashplayer-i686-${pkgver}.so::http://docs.volcanis.me/.pepper-flash/x86_64/libpepflashplayer.so; manifest-x86_64-${pkgver}.json::http://docs.volcanis.me/.pepper-flash/x86_64/manifest.json;) sha1sums_x86_64=('hash3' 'hash4') package() { ... install -m 644 libpepflashplayer-$CARCH-${pkgver}.so ${pkgdir}/usr/lib/PepperFlash/libpepflashplayer.so install -m 644 manifest-$CARCH-${pkgver}.json ${pkgdir}/usr/lib/PepperFlash/manifest.json ... }
Re: [aur-general] Arch Linux Trusted User application Christian Hesse
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Christian Hesse l...@eworm.de wrote: Ike Devolder ike.devol...@gmail.com on Wed, 2015/01/14 09:27: On behalf of Bartłomiej: Congratulations Eworm, you got accepted as TU. 28 yes and 3 no votes makes that you are welcome to the team :). Christian, I changed your AUR account access level. Thanks a lot! I feel honored. Please read [1] and [2]. I am about to prepare step by step. For access to #archlinux-tu query Bartłomiej or me. Just opened the query. Thanks again! -- main(a){char*c=/*Schoene Gruesse */B?IJj;MEH CX:;,b;for(a/*Chris get my mail address:*/=0;b=c[a++];) putchar(b-1/(/* gcc -o sig sig.c ./sig */b/42*2-3)*42);} Congrats and welcome to you as well Christian! -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Trusted User application
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase s...@lutzhaase.com wrote: On 05.01.2015 17:52, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: On 31.12.2014 21:29, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: On December 31, 2014 7:20:02 PM CET, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com wrote: [reposted to the correct list, oops] Hi list My name is Jerome Leclanche and this is my application for becoming an Arch Linux TU. Both Balló György and Sven-Hendrik Haase have encouraged me to apply, and Sven-Hendrik has agreed to sponsor me for the occasion. I am a French Python developer living in Stockholm. I work on FOSS both for my full-time job and in my free time, with my focus being on the LXQt project of which I am one of the lead developers (http://lxqt.org/). All my contributions are available on Github: https://github.com/jleclanche My main goal is of course to bring LXQt to [community]. I emailed Antonio Rojas about that a while back as he was also interested in this. I'm on my third year with Arch Linux and absolutely love the distro; been hanging around IRC and the community as jleclanche. This is my package list: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?SeB=mK=jleclanche I have started the release process to get LXQt 0.9 out some time in January. I would really like to see it become available on Arch Linux at the same time =) Other than LXQt, I also maintain ruby-sass and its dependencies, which I would also like to move to [community] - although it is something I'd like to bring up with Anatol Pomozov first as he maintains a large array of Ruby packages himself already. I also saw that libfm and libfm-extra are currently orphaned there and since they are LXDE projects, I will happily pick them up. If any of you are going to FOSDEM, I will also be able to meet you there - I'd love to get to know the Arch community in person as well. Thanks for the great distribution and happy 2015 to everyone. I've kept this as terse as possible but I'll be happy to answer any questions. J. Leclanche I'm at my parents and don't have my gpg key with me so I can't sign this mail so for now you'll have to believe my identity. I do indeed sponsor Jerome. Let the discussion begin. Sven Looks like voting is over! Please cast your vote here: https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=79 Sven Alright so now it looks like it's actually over. With 28 yes and 2 no votes, I'm glad to be able to welcome Jerome Leclanche to the team! Congratulations! Jerome, I changed your account access level. Be sure to read [0] and [1]. Please query me on IRC for channel access. Sven [0] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:HOWTO_Be_A_Packager [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_Trusted_User_ Guidelines#TODO_list_for_new_Trusted_Users Congratulations! Welcome to the team :) -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Rbspeex PKGBUILD Continued
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Maxime Gauduin aluc...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Storm Dragon stormdragon2...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Err... I forgot to attach the PKGBUILD... lol Storm -- Powered by Arch Linux! I am registered Linux user number 508465: https://linuxcounter.net/user/508465.html My blog, Thoughts of a Dragon: http://www.stormdragon.tk/ get my public PGP key: gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 43DDC193 Follow me on Pump.io: http://microca.st/stormdragon2976 Yeah my whole family done give up on me, and it makes me feel oh so bad. The only one who'll hang out with me is my dear ol' grand dad, and we drink alone. George Thorogood - I Drink Alone The rbspeex encoder is built into the RockboxUtility binary, there is no need to create a separate package for it, it's working out of the box. -- Maxime And I just realized you might want to use it outside of RockboxUtility and create your own voice files by external means. In any case, your deps and makedeps are wrong, the provides line is useless, you're installing ghost files (the rbspeex{enc,dec} are placed one directory above) and you need to create bin beforehand or add -D to install. Anyway, I submitted a split PKGBUILD which builds rbutil-git and rbspeex-git to AUR. Cheers, -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] ArchLinux TU Application: Fabio Castelli (Muflone)
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 5:25 AM, Balló György ballog...@gmail.com wrote: 2014. 07. 31, csütörtök keltezéssel 01.06-kor Muflone ezt írta: Hi everyone My name's Fabio Castelli (aka Muflone) from Italy and I wish to apply to become a TU for ArchLinux to maintain some packages in the community repository. My TU sponsor is György Balló. I actually work as a software developer in a local private company and I use GNU/Linux since the 1998, having started with Slackware 2.0. Many years have passed through Fedora, Debian, Ubuntu and finally ArchLinux that actually I use daily at home and at my job place since a couple of years. Debian is still often used for software packaging, to deploy services in my network and for less experienced colleagues that needs some GNU/Linux environment in my job place. My experience in development is long term, starting in '80s with C=64 Basic, actually I work daily in Python (under Windows, GNU/Linux and i5/OS, both desktop, server and web platforms), Delphi and VB (under Windows), RPG/400 and CL (under i5/OS) and many other things which I use less often, like C or J2EE. My open source contributions are a really long list but let's try to not be boring: - maintainer for over 160 packages in the AUR, most of them updated often: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?SeB=mK=Muflone https://github.com/muflone/pkgbuilds/ - maintainer for some Debian packages: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mufl...@vbsimple.net https://alioth.debian.org/projects/python-apps/ - author of various open source softwares: http://www.muflone.com/english.html https://github.com/muflone/ https://code.google.com/u/102825094329389897213/ https://www.openhub.net/accounts/Muflone - written hundreds of articles for an Italian website around VB6 development through the 1998 and 2004: http://www.vbsimple.net/ - written hundreds of articles for an Italian website around Ubuntu through the 2009 and the 2011: http://ubuntrucchi.wordpress.com/ - support in the Italian Ubuntu forum, I was the second most active member of the forum through the 2009 and the 2012: http://forum.ubuntu-it.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofileu=73229 - support and founder of LQH (Linux Quality Help), an Italian GNU/Linux forum where normal users could ask their questions and only the experts group could offer support, resulting in higher quality service, ran only from highly experienced users through the 2009 and the 2012: https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.linuxqualityhelp.it/supporto - written tenth of Italian video guides around PyGTK development through the 2008 and the 2010: http://pygtk.wordpress.com/ - written a couple of articles around GNOME Shell in the 2011: http://gnomeshell.wordpress.com/ - could continue but better stopping here.. too boring. I'm sorry! ArchLinux is actually my favorite GNU/Linux distributions and I think I could do a lot of work in enhancing this great distribution. What I love about ArchLinux is the perfect control it gives to me and it needs from me. Every time I need some software, I package it and then I publish it under AUR. I try to apply an old Microsoft rule: Never ever write the same thing twice, so if the software resulted useful to me then it could be useful for other users and AUR is a perfect place where to find stuff. There are a lot of packages that I wish to move in the community repository: hfsprogs, kompozer, sweethome3d, gmtp, arista, spyder/spyder3, sbackup, gwakeonlan, gespeaker, remmina-plugin-*, python-ptrace. There are also packages maintained from other users that I wish to see in community repository: dex2jar, dmg2img, firefox-theme-adwaita and thunderbird-theme-adwaita, gigolo, gscan2pdf, httrack, linkchecker, loggedfs, netactview, pacmanlogviewer, parallel-python, pyrenamer. I read daily the AUR general and AUR requests mailing lists but I never participate in the discussions, after many years of discussions in other ML and forums I lost the pleasure in writing stuff inside the communities. The same applies to IRC, too much time spent in helping others (I was also HelpOp in #irchelp) forced me to away even from IRC. My job coincided with my favorite hobby so, apart my personal projects (see GitHub) I love reading heavy books (technical, development, sysadmin, networking but also theater or classic novels) and watching films when the TV is not owned by my gf. Thank you for reading up to here. Best regards Fabio Castelli / Muflone I'm confirming my sponsorship. I think that Fabio has great experience, and has excellent packages in AUR. A discussion period of 5 days has been started now. -- György Balló Trusted User Hey, I can only agree with György here. Your packages are neat and have enough votes, and you got plenty of experience. I'm sure you'll be a great addtion to the team. Not much to ask you apart from the usual:
Re: [aur-general] merge request
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Jeremy Audet ichimonj...@gmail.com wrote: Please merge ruby-nanoc [1] into nanoc [2]. Nanoc is primarily intended for use by end users, not as a library. Thus, according to the packaging guidelines, the language-specific prefix should be stripped. I maintain both packages. — Jeremy Ichimonji10 Audet [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-nanoc/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nanoc/ Merged, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Merge request: lensfun-svn - lensfun-git
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Rikard Falkeborn rikard.falkeb...@gmail.com wrote: Please merge lensfun-svn [1] into lensfun-git. The project has moved to git. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lensfun-svn/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lensfun-git/ Merged, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Delete requests for abandoned packages
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Doug Newgard scim...@archlinux.info wrote: Maintainer renamed package, but did not request removal: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rename-git/ Maintainer said it needed removed and abandoned it instead of requesting that it be deleted: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/raspyplayer-git/ Maintainer renamed package, but did not request removal: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qhttpserver/ Upstream switched to git, maintainer just abandoned it instead of requesting removal: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rssproc-hg/ Thanks Doug All gone, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Delete request: gtkpacman
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 9:02 AM, David Phillips dbphillip...@gmail.com wrote: Oh, so Wakka was abandoned. I had assumed it was still running. I might have a look at forking Wakka or something... anyway, that's outside the scope of this thread, I'm no longer opposing deletion. On 14/06/2014, Doug Newgard scim...@archlinux.info wrote: On 2014-06-14 01:27, David Phillips wrote: I wonder if anyone's interested in getting it working again? If nobody else is willing, I'll adopt it. You're pretty much talking about forking it to do that. There are tarballs on Sourceforge, so it should be doable. You'd probably need to rename the software unless you could get permission from the original author to just take over as-is. I know there was one fork, wakka, that was also abandoned. Doug -- David Phillips GPG Key 0x7BF3D17D0884BF5B Fingerprint 2426 235A 7831 AA2F 56AF 4BC0 7BF3 D17D 0884 BF5B +1 for me. I'll delete it a week from now if no one shows up to save it. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Deletion request
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 3:16 AM, John D Jones III unixgeek1...@gmail.com wrote: Please delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-cpan-meta- requirements/ the module it provides is now in core perl -- Thanks, John D Jones III UNIX Zealot; Perl Lover unixgeek1...@gmail.com jnbek1...@gmail.com http://zoelife4u.org/ Deleted, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] More Perl Delete request
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 4:23 AM, John D Jones III unixgeek1...@gmail.com wrote: please delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-io-socket-ip/ the module it provides is now provided in core_perl -- Thanks, John D Jones III UNIX Zealot; Perl Lover unixgeek1...@gmail.com jnbek1...@gmail.com http://zoelife4u.org/ Gone, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Package Deletion
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 8:12 AM, John D Jones III unixgeek1...@gmail.com wrote: Please delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-cpan-meta-yaml the module it provides is provided as a CORE Perl module now. -- Thanks, John D Jones III UNIX Zealot; Perl Lover unixgeek1...@gmail.com jnbek1...@gmail.com\ http://zoelife4u.org/ Deleted, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Deletion request
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 6:21 AM, John D Jones III unixgeek1...@gmail.com wrote: Please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-parse-cpan-meta/ the module it provides is now part of CORE perl. -- Thanks, John D Jones III UNIX Zealot; Perl Lover unixgeek1...@gmail.com jnbek1...@gmail.com http://zoelife4u.org/ Deleted as well, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Merge request: cmusfm - cmusfm-git
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:35 PM, ok...@archlinux.info wrote: Please merge cmusfm into cmusfm-git. Thanks, OK100 Why would you want to proceed with that merge? There are stable releases of cmusfm, it just needs to be updated to 0.2.0. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Disown request + Delete request
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Rafael Ferreira rafael.f...@gmail.com wrote: Hi there. lib32-libwbclient[1] and lib32-smbclient[2] are out-of-date for sometime now, some users commented that and also flagged them, and after I sent an email one week ago, the maintainer didn't reply nor update them... Considering that the maintainer has only these two package (sort of unmaintained), I suppose he is not interessed anymore. Also, another user created lib32-libwbclient-updated [3] which IMHO doesn't make sense and it is already out-of-date. I intended to adopt and maintain [1] and [2]. So please disown [1] and [2] and delete [3]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-libwbclient/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-smbclient/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-libwbclient-updated Cheers, Rafael (josephgbr) Disowned both of them, go grab'em. Also deleted lib32-libwbclient-updated. Thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Merge request: lib32-libwbclient-old - lib32-libwbclient
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Rafael Ferreira rafael.f...@gmail.com wrote: Hi there. I uploaded a split PKGBUILD providing lib32-smbclient and lib32-libwbclient [1]. In order to succeed, I had to rename lib32-libwbclient to lib32-libwbclient-old [2] before uploading the split PKGBUILD. Please merge lib32-libwbclient-old [2] into lib32-libwbclient [1]. If not possible, at least delete it [2] [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-libwbclient/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-libwbclient-old Cheers, Rafael (josephgbr) Merged, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Remove package: rosinstall_generator
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:16 AM, Ralf Mardorf info.mard...@rocketmail.com wrote: On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 00:57 +0200, Benjamin Chrétien wrote: Could you please remove the newly created rosinstall_generator package? This was a mistake while updating several packages, the real one being python2-rosinstall-generator. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rosinstall_generator/ ;) Deleted, thx. As Ralf pointed out, please include a link to the package next time. Cheers, -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] AUR merge request
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Xinkai yeled.n...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I own two AUR packages xware_desktop and xware_desktop-git. xware-desktop is the new name I want to use. I want to replace the underscore with dash, and I find -git package doesn't suit in my case. I already uploaded the package under the new name, can you help me merge the old ones into this new one? I added 'replaces=(xware_desktop xware_desktop-git) conflicts=(xware_desktop-git xware_desktop)', is there anything else should I do in order to make the renaming process work? Thanks in advance, Xinkai Merged, thx. Please include links next time. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Redundant package for deletion
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Steven Honeyman stevenhoney...@gmail.com wrote: Tintwizard is provided by the Arch package 'tint2' [1], so this separate package [2] is now redundant and can be removed. Thanks, Steven. [1] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?name=tint2 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tintwizard/ Someone argued that tintwizard may not be included in a future tint2. However I don't see a future tint2 coming soon, if at all, and even then there would be no reason to not include tintwizard in it. However, it seems there are a few commits ahead of the last release of tintwizard on Google Code, so I merged tintwizard into tintwizard-svn. Cheers, -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Another two for deletion!
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 3:08 AM, Steven Honeyman stevenhoney...@gmail.com wrote: These AUR packages are duplicates of packages alreadu in the main repositories: Busybox: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/busybox-static/ https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/busybox/ Wine Gecko: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wine-stable_gecko/ https://www.archlinux.org/packages/multilib/x86_64/wine_gecko/ Thanks, Steven Removed, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Orphan request: l3afpad
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Steven Honeyman stevenhoney...@gmail.com wrote: The AUR package l3afpad is in need of an update as the source file has changed URL and it will soon stop working when the author takes his old page down. I'm willing to take over as maintainer for this package if possible. I already emailed the current maintainer, but he hasn't replied. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/l3afpad Thanks, Steven When did you email him? He last logged in last month so you will need to wait 2 weeks before I can disown the package. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Another two for deletion!
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Maxime Gauduin aluc...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 3:08 AM, Steven Honeyman stevenhoney...@gmail.com wrote: These AUR packages are duplicates of packages alreadu in the main repositories: Busybox: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/busybox-static/ https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/busybox/ Wine Gecko: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wine-stable_gecko/ https://www.archlinux.org/packages/multilib/x86_64/wine_gecko/ Thanks, Steven Removed, thx. -- Maxime Apologies, wine-stable_gecko shouldn't have been deleted. I've reuploaded the PKGBUILD. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Deletion request
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Justin Dray jus...@dray.be wrote: Please remove the following pkgbuild: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xf86-input-evtouch/ Upstream is dead, package hasn't been able to be built in *years* and the maintainer has said as much on the package comments, and someone has also put this on the archwiki touchscreen page. Regards, Justin Dray E: jus...@dray.be M: 0433348284 Gone, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Package Delete requests.
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Yichao Yu yyc1...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Please delete my pypy3-* packages. They were there only because the old AUR recognized the last pkgname in the array as the package name and they were always provided by their pypy-* counterpart. Yichao Yu [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pypy3-tornado/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pypy3-pyzmq/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pypy3-markupsafe/ All gone, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Delete request: python2-ethumb
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Doug Newgard scim...@archlinux.info wrote: Python bindings for ethumb were finally merged into the python-efl tree. This package has no more reason to exist. Nothing worth merging, so it just needs deleted. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-ethumb/ Thanks Doug (Scimmia) Done, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Delete/merge request
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Νῖκος Θεοδώρου ntheo1...@gmail.com wrote: Hello. Could you please delete (or merge) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-gstreamer0.10-good-plugins/ and https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-gstreamer0.10-ugly-plugins/ , so I can update the split packages https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-gstreamer0.10-good/ and https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-gstreamer0.10-ugly/ respectively? Thank you in advance. -- Νῖκος Θεοδώρου «Ἀγεωμέτρητος μηδεὶς εἰσίτω!» Merged, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Merge gvim-python with gvim-python3 in [extra]
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Allen Li cyberdup...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I'm the maintainer for gvim-python. Can someone merge/delete it as there is now a package in [extra], gvim-python3? Thanks! [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gvim-python/ [2]: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/gvim-python3/ [3]: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/gvim-python3/ Deleted, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Please disown faustworks and faust-lv2
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:23 AM, Rob Til Freedmen rob.til.freed...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Maxime Gauduin aluc...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Rob Til Freedmen rob.til.freed...@gmail.com wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/faustworks/ Flagged out-of-date (2013-05-05) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/faust-lv2/ Flagged out-of-date (2013-11-12) Outdated by two releases, look at the comments ... I've updated PKGBUILD's for both packages. Did you try emailing speps about these 2 and invada-studio-plugins-lv2 ? Not specific to these packages - but ask some month ago If I may help him with his long outdated packages - but never got a reply. more than 650 aur packages (with 10% outdated) seems a bit to much to give every package the attention it deserves. Cheers, -- Maxime I've disowned the three mentioned packages, you can go ahead and update them. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Removal request
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 1:14 AM, Nuno Araujo nuno.ara...@russo79.comwrote: Hi Could a TU please remove glade3-gtk2 [1]? It's a duplicate of glade-gtk2 [2]. Both packages were orphaned and I took ownership and updated the glade-gtk2 [2] to the latest release. Thank you [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/glade3-gtk2/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/glade-gtk2/ -- Nuno Araujo nuno.ara...@russo79.com http://www.russo79.com Merged, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Disownment request for package ejtagproxy-svn
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Taylor Lookabaugh jesus.christ.i.l...@gmail.com wrote: On May 17, 2014 6:29 PM, David Manouchehri d...@32t.ca wrote: Maxime, I sent him an email on May 3rd, so it's been two weeks. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ejtagproxy-svn Just an FYI, please do not start a new thread. Package is your to maintain. Cheers, -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Merge request python2-pycha
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Stefan Husmann stefan-husm...@t-online.de wrote: Hello, please merge python2-pycha into python2-pycha-hg. The PKGBUILD pulls from a mercurial repo at bitbucket and therefore should be named accordingly. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pycha/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pycha-hg/ Best Regards Stefan Merged, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] 0ad merge?
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Taylor Lookabaugh jesus.christ.i.l...@gmail.com wrote: I've noticed that both 0ad-git[0] and 0ad-svn[1] use the same source(github repository). I have CC'ed both maintainers to this mail. Could both parties work out a solution and then merge the packages? Thank you. [0]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/0ad-git/ [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/0ad-svn/ Taylor Lookabaugh Merged 0ad-svn into 0ad-git because git is the correct VCS, and the PKGBUILD uses the new source array while the other doesn't. However the 0ad-svn package has been lying around for a longer time, so if its maintainer wants to maintain 0ad-git I can disown it now. It would be nice if both maintainers could agree on whoever will be maintaining it from now on. Cheers, -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Removal request - talesofmajeyal
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 9:30 AM, WorMzy Tykashi wormzy.tyka...@gmail.comwrote: Hi TUs, Please remove my package talesofmajeyal [1]. It is a duplicate of tome4[2], a package that I didn't notice until just now. Thanks, WorMzy [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/talesofmajeyal/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tome4/ Removed. Thx, -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Delete request for skype-mid
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 6:06 AM, Aliaksandr Stelmachonak m...@ava1ar.infowrote: Please remove skype-mid package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/skype-mid/ Long time ago it was separate experimental version of skype for MID devices, but it is orphaned by Skype for a long time and is not working on current Arch. I don't think there is any sense to keep it in AUR. Thanks, Alex Gone. Thx, -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Disownment request for package ejtagproxy-svn
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 4:33 AM, David Manouchehri d...@32t.ca wrote: I sent Paul (paulburton89) an updated PKGBUILD for ejtagproxy-svn with a proper pkgver on May 3rd (at the moment it fails to build the newest version without manual intervention). I haven't heard back from him or seen the package updated since, therefore I am requesting to adopt it myself. David Manouchehri (Chehri) Did you try to shoot him an email? Our policy requires that you send an email and wait for 2 weeks before we can disown a package. Also, please include a link to the package in your request. Cheers, -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Merge/delete requests
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.comwrote: Merge requests https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/aafigure-bzr/ - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/aafigure/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/a4-bzr/ - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/a4/ Doesn't build. No point in a -bzr package when the upstream is dead. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/codeblocks-svn-noplugins/ - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/codeblocks-svn/ The former no longer builds https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/coq-8.3-svn/ - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/coq/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/doctorjs/ - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/doctorjs-git/ They're the same Merged. Delete requests https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/albumthing-hg/ Doesn't build, 404, etc. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/apache13/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/apache13-mod_accounting/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/apache13-mod_bandwidth/ Ships binaries, really old and no longer supported etc. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bing-konqueror-search/ Really now? XD https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/django-gravatar-svn/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/django-diario/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/django-shpaml-template-loader-hg/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/django-sane-testing/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/django-profiles/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/django-photologue/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/django-media-bundler-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/django-mailer-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/django-mailer2-git/ Outdated/Doesn't build/Not required by anything/Shouldn't be there anyway Deleted. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cedega/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bin32-cedega/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gametree/ This one may be controversial. Cedega is a very, very old fork of Wine (back when they had a different license) which hasn't been updated in a long time - today it operates through mostly GameTree and has gone a completely different route. These packages don't even build anymore. Merged both cedega pkgs into gametree. J. Leclanche Thx! -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Please disown faustworks and faust-lv2
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Rob Til Freedmen rob.til.freed...@gmail.com wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/faustworks/ Flagged out-of-date (2013-05-05) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/faust-lv2/ Flagged out-of-date (2013-11-12) Outdated by two releases, look at the comments ... I've updated PKGBUILD's for both packages. Did you try emailing speps about these 2 and invada-studio-plugins-lv2 ? Cheers, -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Removal request: firefox-stable
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 1:36 AM, Doug Newgard scim...@archlinux.infowrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/firefox-stable/ This is simply a duplicate of firefox in [extra]. Done, thx -- Maxime
[aur-general] Fwd: firefox-stable deleted
Forwarding this to AUR General so that the world can see how nice a guy you are. Insults, racism, what else have you got in store? I've taken the liberty to suspend your AUR account, because, yeah, us higher ranks motherfuckers can do that. Now please reflect upon your behavior and realize what an hypocrit you are saying _we_ are the one who destroy the community, there is no destroying people who behave like _you_ do. Now, if you don't want to depend on us doing the work for you, for free, be my guest, make your own distro, alone, see how you fare. But stop creating duplicates out of sheer lunacy because you couldn't bear waiting a single day. That's right, _a_ day. FYI, Firefox 29 was released on 2014-04-29 [1] and according to our SVN our package was updated 10 days ago [2], so that makes a 1 day delay, not a week. Please get your facts straight before assaulting people. BTW, that bit about grammar was quite funny, there isn't a single error in mine, however I'd really not vouch for yours. [1] https://wiki.mozilla.org/RapidRelease/Calendar [2] https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/log/trunk?h=packages/firefox Have a nice day, -- Forwarded message -- From: Aaron Caffrey aaron_caff...@hotmail.com Date: Sat, May 10, 2014 at 11:22 AM Subject: firefox-stable deleted To: aluc...@gmail.com aluc...@gmail.com Wow just wow. What a ignorance. As I said, me and my friends do NOT want to rely on someone else to update the packages with a delay of whole week. I do have plenty of free time and your grammar isn't much different than the average African American. Fuck yourself and wish you all the worse, that's why motherfuckers with higher rank like are killing the archlinux community and partly the forum users. Burn in Hell, Aaron -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Merge Request
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 8:44 AM, Rick runn...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, The packages are still no merged, can review it. Thanks. El 07/05/2014 23:49, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca escribió: On 2014-05-07 23:15 +0200 Rick wrote: Hi, Can I please get [1] 'dkms-8192cu https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dkms-8192cu/' merged in to [2] '8192cu-dkms https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/8192cu-dkms/'. Upstream changed names, just following suit. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dkms-8192cu/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/8192cu-dkms/ Regards, Rick merged, thanks Done, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Disownment request: eclipse-aptana
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Miodrag Tokić m...@loonies.io wrote: Hi, I would like to request disownment of the package eclipse-aptana [1] with intetion of taking over maintenance. Current maintainer did not respond to flagging the package out of date since 2013-07-22 and is not reachable by email (Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender). I belive you can also disown all the other packages by michael.manley [2]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eclipse-aptana [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?K=michael.manleySeB=m Thanks, -- Miodrag Tokić | loonies.io Disownd. I won't touch the others until there is a specific request here as he is still marked as active. Cheers, -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Delete Request
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Lara Maia laramaia...@gmail.com wrote: Delete xdg-settings [1]. The package is not usefull anymore, this is now provided by xdg-utils. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xdg-settings/ -- ~ *Lara* ~ Gone, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Delete requests: django-dajax*
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 6:54 AM, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/django-dajaxice-git-python2/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/django-dajax-git-python2/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/django-dajaxice/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/django-dajax/ django-dajax is no longer maintained by its original author. Although it is still supported for a few more months, none of these libs are required by anything. Makes no sense to keep them J. Leclanche All gone, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Merge request: phpredis/php-redis
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:30 AM, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/php-redis/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/phpredis/ One needs to be merged into the other. I don't know which into which as I don't deal with php packages. J. Leclanche Merged the later into the former, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Disown request: alsamixer-qt4
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 3:26 AM, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com wrote: Disregard the previous message. Please instead merge the package into qastools: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qastools/ J. Leclanche On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 2:21 AM, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/alsamixer-qt4/ Out of date for years. J. Leclanche Done, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Delete request: gns3-unofficial
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 2:36 AM, Nowaker enwuk...@gmail.com wrote: Please remove gns3-unofficial. It was beta/rc channel for gns3. There is no beta/rc now, and won't be for a long time. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gns3-unofficial/ -- Kind regards, Damian Nowak StratusHost www.AtlasHost.eu Deleted, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Delete requests: libgcj12, libgcj13
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 9:17 PM, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libgcj12/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libgcj13/ Merge into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libgcj/ J. Leclanche Merged, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Remove linux-lts310
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Alan Orth alan.o...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Please remove linux-lts310. I had created it last year sometime before noticing that [core] had switched linux-lts to 3.10.x. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-lts310 Thanks, -- Alan Orth alan.o...@gmail.com http://alaninkenya.org http://mjanja.co.ke I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as my telephone; my wish has come true because I can no longer figure out how to use my telephone. -Bjarne Stroustrup, inventor of C++ GPG public key ID: 0x8cb0d0acb5cd81ec209c6cdfbd1a0e09c2f836c0 Gone, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: openspades-data
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Shohei Kusakata sho...@kusakata.com wrote: Hello, Please delete this package: openspades-data https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openspades-data/ because I intergrated the package into openspades (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openspades/). Thank you. Merged, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Delete request: lxqt-power-git
On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 05:43 +0100, Jerome Leclanche wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lxqt-power-git/ Can safely delete or merge into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lxqt-powermanagement-git/ - functionality has been merged into the one app. J. Leclanche Merged, thx. -- Maxime signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [aur-general] [Rename Request] bitcoind to bitcoin-core
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 6:16 AM, Andy Weidenbaum archb...@gmail.com wrote: I think bitcoin-core is more descriptive than bitcoind. The package provides a headless P2P node without wallet functionality (core). A growing number of Bitcoin server applications depend on Bitcoin core running as a service. Package includes systemd service file. You need to upload a new package with the new name. As there is nothing to merge, I already deleted bitcoind. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] [Merge Request] trayfreq - trayfreq-archlinux
On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 16:02 +1300, David Phillips wrote: I hate to look like I'm being pushy, but I'd just like to kindly bump this request as I've seen numerous other merges occur since I requested this one :) Cheers! On 28/03/2014, David Phillips dbphillip...@gmail.com wrote: I maintain [1] and have decided to move it to follow my fork as the original source isn't compatible with Archlinux any more. Could I please have [1] merged into [2]? [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/trayfreq/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/trayfreq-archlinux/ Cheers, all the best. -- David Phillips GPG Key 0x7BF3D17D0884BF5B Fingerprint 2426 235A 7831 AA2F 56AF 4BC0 7BF3 D17D 0884 BF5B Merged, thx. Sorry about the delay. -- Maxime signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [aur-general] Delete request: fontmatrix-svn
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fontmatrix-svn/ - they are available on github.com/fontmatrix/fontmatrix now. J. Leclanche I've submitted a fixed/updated fontmatrix-git and merged fontmatrix-svn into it. fontmatrix-git is available for adoption. Thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Delete request: gnome-terminal-dark
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Gary van der Merwe gary...@gmail.comwrote: Please delete gnome-terminal-dark. There is now a preference to do this. Done, please include a link next time. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Delete request
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xf86-input-synaptics-jumpycursor/ No longer needed (cf comments) J. Leclanche Deleted, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] [compiz] Merge request
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Florian Dejonckheere flor...@floriandejonckheere.be wrote: Hi Please merge compiz [1] into compiz-core [2]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compiz/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compiz-core/ Thanks Florian Merged, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] pkg deletion request
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:54 AM, flower_of_l...@gmx.net flower_of_l...@gmx.net wrote: Hello AUR maintainers, I would like to get the following packages removed from AUR. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/colord-eudev/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cups-eudev/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dbus-eudev/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/syslog-ng-eudev/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/udisks2-eudev/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/upower-eudev/ These are redundant packages I found out. I talked to TZ86, the maintainer of the similar packages(*-nosystemd) to merge our builds. Thank you artoo Done, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Delete proposal: asus-screen-brightness
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/asus-screen-brightness/ - The entirety code is stored in the source package - It's just a bash file and a system service file (which is not useful) - xorg-xbacklight provides the same functionality without requiring root. That said it's referenced in the wiki as an alternative to xorg-xbacklight which I... don't quite get. J. Leclanche Nuked, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Compiz 0.9 packages cleanup, mergers?
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Charles Bos charlesb...@gmail.com wrote: There are a great deal of orphaned Compiz 0.9 packages in the AUR, some for the stable releases and some for bazaar. They are all on around 0.9.5 or 0.9.7. These are the packages I'm referring to: for stable release: * ccsm-dev -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ccsm-dev/ * compiz-plugins-extra-dev -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/comp ... extra-dev/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compiz-plugins-extra-dev/ * compiz-plugins-main-dev -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/comp ... -main-dev/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compiz-plugins-main-dev/ * compizconfig-backend-gconf-dev -- https://aur.archlinux.org/ packages/comp ... gconf-dev/ https://aur.archlinux.org/ packages/compizconfig-backend-gconf-dev/ * compizconfig-backend-gsettings-dev -- https://aur.archlinux.org/ packages/comp ... tings-dev/ https://aur.archlinux.org/ packages/compizconfig-backend-gsettings-dev/ * compizconfig-python-dev -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/comp ... ython-dev/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compizconfig-python-dev/ * libcompizconfig-dev -- https://aur.archlinux.org/ packages/libcompizconfig-dev/ for development release: * ccsm-bzr -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ccsm-bzr/ * compiz-core-bzr -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compiz-core-bzr/ * compiz-plugins-extra-bzr -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/comp ... extra-bzr/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compiz-plugins-extra-bzr/ * compiz-plugins-main-bzr -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/comp ... -main-bzr/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compiz-plugins-main-bzr/ * compizconfig-backend-gconf-bzr -- https://aur.archlinux.org/ packages/comp ... gconf-bzr/ https://aur.archlinux.org/ packages/compizconfig-backend-gconf-bzr/ * compizconfig-backend-gsettings-bzr -- https://aur.archlinux.org/ packages/comp ... tings-bzr/ https://aur.archlinux.org/ packages/compizconfig-backend-gsettings-bzr/ * compizconfig-python-bzr -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/comp ... ython-bzr/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compizconfig-python-bzr/ * libcompizconfig-bzr -- https://aur.archlinux.org/ packages/libcompizconfig-bzr/ As I understand it, Compiz upstream no longer packages all these components separately. They are all developed and packaged together in one launchpad project. That is why we have two main packages in the AUR for installing Compiz 0.9, compiz-dev and compiz-bzr. I've had a look on launchpad and this seems to be the case. For instance: The compiz-ccsm page (https://launchpad.net/compiz-ccsm) lists 0.9.5.92 as the latest version when it's actually 0.9.10. Therefore (unless I am much mistaken) all the packages above are obsolete and can never be updated to their latest upstream versions. I propose that all the dev packages above be merged with compiz-dev ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compiz-dev/) and all the bazaar packages be merged with compiz-bzr ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compiz-bzr/) All done, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Merge request: qtermwidget - qtermwidget-git
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:27 AM, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qtermwidget/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qtermwidget-git/ Former has had no releases in a while and is no longer on sourceforge. Only available on git currently. J. Leclanche I see a 0.4.0 tarball on GitHub so I'd rather have qtermwidget stay and be updated to 0.4.0. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] [luakit-gtk3-git] Deletion request
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 8:14 PM, tuftedoce...@fastmail.fm wrote: I forked this from upstream, but no longer have the time/knowledge to continue and I've abandoned further work on it. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/luakit-gtk3-git/ Deleted, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Delete request: qterminal-suite-git
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:25 AM, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qterminal-suite-git/ No longer exists. Can merge with qterminal-git really. J. Leclanche Merged, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Delete requests: php-zendopcache etc.
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Yardena Cohen yarden...@gmail.com wrote: These all do the same thing, and the functionality was merged into extra/php last year: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/php-zendopcache https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/php-zendoptimizerplus https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zend-optimizer https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zend-optimizer-old It seems 3 out of the 4 were deleted. To whomever took care of this, any reason why zend-optimizer was left out? -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] libebur128 related
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Robert Mackanics schnoo...@gmail.comwrote: The following Packages should be removed: 1: loudness-cli-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/loudness-cli-git/ 2: libebur128-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libebur128-git/ 3: libebur128-nu774-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libebur128-nu774-git/ 1 and 2 are orphaned, I am the maintainer of 3. None of these packages build due to git repo changes and the functionality has been replaced by: loudness-scanner-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/loudness-scanner-git/ All merged into loudness-scanner-git, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] hubicfuse
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Mitsu archli...@suumitsu.eu wrote: Hi, My bad, package hubicfuse has to be removed (correct package is hubicfuse-git). Feel free to test the package, but I think I added all deps Removed, please include a link to the package next time. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Removal request
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Charles Bos charlesb...@gmail.com wrote: Can the following package be removed: https://aur.archlinux.org/ packages/compiz-pure/ It's supposed to provide Compiz 0.8 plus the gtk-window-decorator. The package is orphaned, hasn't been updated in nearly 4 years, is several versions out of date and doesn't build successfully. Nothing will be lost here because there is a new package which provides exactly the same things as this package: https://aur.archlinux.org/ packages/compiz-gtk-standalone/ Merged into the latter, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Merge request: please merge danbooru-git into danbooru-client-git
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 12:09 AM, SpinFlo sl1pk...@gmail.com wrote: hi please merge: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/danbooru-git/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/danbooru-client-git/ package orphan and don't have a real name greetings Merged, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Merge request
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 2:06 PM, G. Schlisio g.schli...@dukun.de wrote: please merge [0] into [1], as it is a python2 package and thus does not follow the naming scheme. both are orphan, while i just created [1] and disowned it. thanks [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-osmgpsmap/ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-osmgpsmap/ Merged, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] delete request mesa-r600-r700
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:54 PM, LoneVVolf lonew...@xs4all.nl wrote: Hi, please delete mesa-r600-r700-git package [1]. reasons : orphan last updated in dec 2011 flagged out-of-date since june 10, 2013 There are several maintained alternatives, like aur mesa-git package [2], Lordheavy's unofficial mesa-git repo [3] and my own mesa-r300-r600-radeonsi-git package [4] Lone_Wolf [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mesa-r600-r700-git/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mesa-git/ [3] http://pkgbuild.com/~lcarlier/mesa-git/ [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mesa-r300-r600-radeonsi-git/ Done, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Disown requests
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 3:18 PM, carstene1ns a...@carsten-teibes.de wrote: Hello, please disown ta3d[1], libclaw[2] and plee-the-bear[3]. I contacted maintainer darkbaboon with a patch for ta3d (2014-01-19) and received no response. The other two packages are out of date and can be updated easily. Also, please disown opensonic[4]. It does not build against recent libpng and needs a fix. I tried to contact the maintainer luceo (2014-02-13), but received no response. Apparently he disappeared from the internet by the end of 2012. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ta3d/ [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libclaw/ [3]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/plee-the-bear/ [4]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opensonic/ best regards, carstene1ns All yours. Cheers, -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Request remove: openhevc
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 7:30 PM, SpinFlo sl1pk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi ppl please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openhevc/ i've upload package with wrong name (is openhevc-git, now uploaded) greetings Deleted, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] [Orphanage Request] electrum-server-git
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 4:31 AM, Andy Weidenbaum archb...@gmail.com wrote: Requesting orphanage of electrum-server-githttps://aur.archlinux.org/packages/electrum-server-git ; the maintainer of this package has not been responsive to inquiries. I have an updated PKGBUILD prepared: https://github.com/atweiden/pkgbuilds/tree/master/electrum-server-git What sort of inquiries? Did you try shooting him an email? That and 2 weeks without an answer are required for us to disown a package. Cheers, -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Package removal request
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Simon Lipp sloonz+...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python3-imaging/ Upstream (myself) abandoned the project in favor of python-pillow which is already in community. Regards, Simon Lipp Deleted, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] weston-rbp
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Srki srki...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/weston-rbp is now obsolete since Raspberry Pi patched version is already included in ArchLinuxARM repositories: http://archlinuxarm.org/packages?search=weston Deleted, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Delete proposal: amsn-*
On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 14:04 +1100, Phillip Smith wrote: On 3 March 2014 10:46, WorMzy Tykashi wormzy.tyka...@gmail.com wrote: The amsn2-git package is, itself, orphaned, and the last development on the amsn2-git repo appears to be almost 3 years ago. Does it still build? The whole project will be redundant soon anyway since Microsoft are planning to shutdown the servers soon [1] and I don't see anything on their website [2] suggesting the package supports any other protocols? No release for nearly 2 years as well. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Messenger_service#Closure [2] http://www.amsn-project.net/ I've deleted all amsn-* and amsn2-git packages since it's only a matter of days before msn servers are shut down (if anyone feels the urge to use msn one last time before it's killed, pidgin is their friend anyway :P) Cheers, -- Maxime signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [aur-general] dzen2-* cleanup
On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 07:17 +0100, Florian Bruhin wrote: Hi, there's a bit of a chaos with dzen2-* packages. dzen2-gadgets-svn[1]: Gadgets are also in the normal packages, upstream switched to git, should be merged into dzen2-git[2]. dzen2-parallel[3]: Old and weird pkgbuild, orphaned, and I'm not interested in maintaining it. Maybe should be dropped or merged into community/dzen2. dzen2-xft-xpm-xinerama-svn[4] and dzen2-xft-xpm-xinerama-fixed-svn[5]: Relying on outdated SVN source, should be merged into dzen2-xft-xpm-xinerama-git[6]. dzen2-bskv-git[7]: Just an updated dzen2-git package because the latter was really outdated before I adopted it. Should be merged into dzen2-git[2]. Florian [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dzen2-gadgets-svn/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dzen2-git/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dzen2-parallel/ [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dzen2-xft-xpm-xinerama-svn/ [5] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dzen2-xft-xpm-xinerama-fixed-svn/ [6] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dzen2-xft-xpm-xinerama-git/ [7] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dzen2-bskv-git/ All taken care of, thx. -- Maxime signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [aur-general] Rename request; {python-,}pyprof2calltree
On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 07:55 +0100, Florian Bruhin wrote: * Evgeniy Alekseev darkarca...@mail.ru [2014-03-01 14:14:09 +0400]: On Thursday 27 February 2014 06:19:05 Florian Bruhin wrote: I just picked up python-pyprof2calltree[1] which was orphaned. Since it's a tool and not a library, it shouldn't have the python- prefix. Can someone please rename it? You should upload a package with correct name first, as it was said by Doug earlier. Then we may merge old package into new one. * Doug Newgard scimmi...@outlook.com [2014-02-26 23:20:37 -0600]: You need to upload the new package, then a TU can merge them. Sorry for taking so long to reply, I was a bit busy. I now uploaded the package under the new name, so please merge python-pyprof2calltree[1] into pyprof2calltree[2]. Thanks! Florian [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-pyprof2calltree [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pyprof2calltree Done, thx. -- Maxime signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [aur-general] dzen2-* cleanup
On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 09:51 +0100, Florian Bruhin wrote: * Maxime Gauduin aluc...@gmail.com [2014-03-03 09:32:02 +0100]: On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 07:17 +0100, Florian Bruhin wrote: Hi, there's a bit of a chaos with dzen2-* packages. dzen2-gadgets-svn[1]: Gadgets are also in the normal packages, upstream switched to git, should be merged into dzen2-git[2]. dzen2-parallel[3]: Old and weird pkgbuild, orphaned, and I'm not interested in maintaining it. Maybe should be dropped or merged into community/dzen2. dzen2-xft-xpm-xinerama-svn[4] and dzen2-xft-xpm-xinerama-fixed-svn[5]: Relying on outdated SVN source, should be merged into dzen2-xft-xpm-xinerama-git[6]. dzen2-bskv-git[7]: Just an updated dzen2-git package because the latter was really outdated before I adopted it. Should be merged into dzen2-git[2]. Florian [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dzen2-gadgets-svn/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dzen2-git/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dzen2-parallel/ [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dzen2-xft-xpm-xinerama-svn/ [5] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dzen2-xft-xpm-xinerama-fixed-svn/ [6] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dzen2-xft-xpm-xinerama-git/ [7] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dzen2-bskv-git/ All taken care of, thx. Thanks. dzen2-bskv-git still is there though. Florian My bad, a checkbox not checked and here's what happens :) Fixed, thx for checking. -- Maxime signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [aur-general] Merge request: Various VCS-packages
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Rikard Falkeborn rikard.falkeb...@gmail.com wrote: Please merge the following VCS packages. Reason? Upstream switched to git. doxygen-svn [https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/doxygen-svn/] into doxygen-git [https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/doxygen-git/] flamerobin-svn [https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/flamerobin-svn/] into flamerobin-git [https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/flamerobin-git/] obnam-bzr [https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/obnam-bzr/] into obnam-git [ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/obnam-git] python2-cvxpy-svn [https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-cvxpy-svn/] into python2-cvxpy-git [ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-cvxpy-git/] subtitlecomposer-svn [ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/subtitlecomposer-svn/] into subtitlecomposer-git [ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/subtitlecomposer-git/]. supertuxkart-svn [https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/supertuxkart-svn/] into supertuxkart-git [ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/supertuxkart-git/ ]. tv-viewer-bzr [https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tv-viewer-bzr/] into tv-viewer-git [https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tv-viewer-git/] w3af-svn [https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/w3af-svn/] into w3af-git [ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/w3af-git/] wifite-svn [https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wifite-svn/] into wifite-git [https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wifite-git/]. Thanks, All merged, thank you. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Delete request: fluidr3
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Rashif Ray Rahman sc...@archlinux.orgwrote: On 23 February 2014 05:02, Maxime Gauduin aluc...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fluidr3/ Appears to be the same packaged data as https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/soundfont-fluid/ except it doesn't build properly. Note: I might be wrong on this, but I can't figure out how to make it build. J. Leclanche I haven't tried building the fluidr3 package recently, but that sfark format is a pain in the neck anyway. The fluidr3 soundfont from soundfont-fluid doesn't use that and comes with changes from the musescore guys, so it's actucally a more up-to-date version of the original fluidr3 by hammersound. I'll merge fluidr3 into soundfont-fluid. Thx. Sfark decompression became a non-issue early last year. [1][2] The upstream author made contact, and sfarkxtc is maintained by a known (at least to me) member of the Linux audio community. [3] A sfark-compressed soundfont is still helpful for people with slow Internet connections; 72 MB from 124 MB is a 42%, 52 MB reduction! That's an extra 13 minutes and a dollar (or even more) for some. Fair enough. In conclusion, soundfont-fluid is a better package name, but the original fluidr3 that existed in the AUR and depended on a decompressor is (since Feb 2013) not obsoleted by musescore's changes -- unless they're actually critical to be worth the extra megs. Here is the changelog from MuseScore (BlissSam: which BTW is shipped in the archive, along with the original ReadMe from Hammersound): Missing note (#94) added to Violin and range extended to G7 (MIDI#103) for compatibility with MuseScore 2 Anyone not using the Violin font or MuseScore may argue that the changes aren't critical enough. [1] http://melodymachine.com/sfark-linux-mac [2] http://www.linuxmusicians.com/viewtopic.php?f=24t=9854start=15#p35712 [3] https://github.com/raboof/sfarkxtc -- GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1 I'd rather stick with the version from MuseScore, but yeah, bandwitdth is not a problem here and as you pointed out, I understand if people would like to have separate packages. How about soundfont-fluid for the original soundfont from hammersound and soundfont-fluid-musescore for the modified soundfont? -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] deletion request: pylint-python3
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:31 AM, Jeremy Audet ichimonj...@gmail.com wrote: Please delete pylint-python3 [1]. It is out of date, incorrectly named and a duplicate of python-pylint [2]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pylint-python3/ [2] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/python-pylint/ --Jeremy Deleted, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Package with arch-depending source
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Ismael Bouya ismael.bo...@normalesup.orgwrote: Hi, I'm maintaining a package in the AUR whose source is arch-depending (anaconda) For the moment I deal with that by putting the x86_64 version in the source/md5 array and adding a if [ $CARCH == i686 ] (...) just after to modify it. Is that the usual way to do that? Or how should it be done? I see no information about that in the AUR guidelines. -- Ismael Yes it is, see the nvidia package for instance: https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=packages/nvidia Cheers, -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Package with arch-depending source
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Ismael Bouya ismael.bo...@normalesup.orgwrote: (Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:46:48AM +0100) Maxime Gauduin : Yes it is, see the nvidia package for instance: https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=packages/nvidia Of course... It is always when I try to find an example file that I cannot find one... Thanks! Should I maybe add a section for this kind of example on the wiki? -- Ismael Sure, it can't hurt having it documented, please do. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] (bump) Deletion/Rename request: pebble-sdk{-beta}
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Florian Bruhin m...@the-compiler.orgwrote: * Florian Bruhin m...@the-compiler.org [2014-02-13 11:27:38 +0100]: I'm the current maintainer of the pebble-sdk-beta[1] package. This now got final, so it should be renamed to pebble-sdk, replacing the current package[2] which doesn't build anymore. It doesn't build anymore since end of November, the beta got final on February 3rd. I mailed the maintainer (gianguido) on January 30th and never got an answer, so I'd like to overtake it, as I updated the -beta package to the final already. Not sure what's the best thing to do there -- delete -sdk and rename -sdk-beta to -sdk? Well, you sure know. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pebble-sdk-beta/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pebble-sdk/ Bump? This is still not resolved - pebble-sdk still doesn't build, and still no answer from the maintainer. I also sent a mail to the pebble guys asking what I should add as license. Florian -- () ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mailwww.asciiribbon.org /\ www.the-compiler.org | I love long mails http://email.is-not-s.ms/ I don't know why we're here, I say we all go home and free associate. Sorry about the delay. I've merged pebble-sdk-beta into pebble-sdk and disowned pebble-sdk so you can adopt it. Cheers, -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] delete libusbx packages
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:51 AM, xantares 09 xantare...@hotmail.comwrote: The following packages have been replaced by their libusb equivalent (like in the main repo see https://www.archlinux.org/packages/core/x86_64/libusb/) and are useless now since libusbx has been merged back to libusb: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-libusbx/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-libusbx/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw32-libusbx/ Regards, xan Taken care of, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Orphan request - gtk-theme-ambiance-crunchy
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 9:46 PM, Izumi Natsuka izumi.nats...@hotmail.comwrote: Hello, The package, gtk-theme-ambiance-crunchy has been flagged out-of-date since 2013-07-26 and I try to email the maintainer, seems that his/her email has been unavailable, so I request to orphan the package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-ambiance-crunchy/ Regards, Izumi Disowned, go get it :) -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] delete libftdi1
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 9:15 PM, xantares 09 xantare...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi, This package has been rendered useless as the same features have been added to the libftdi package from main repo: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libftdi1/ See bug report below. To: b...@archlinux.org Subject: FS#38526: [libftdi] enable python bindings Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:52:13 + From: b...@archlinux.org THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added: FS#38526 - [libftdi] enable python bindings User who did this - Kyle Keen (keenerd) -- At some point the makefile became really hard to split. The python bindings are only 200KB extra. So they will be bundled with python as an optdep. Also enabled tests. -- More information can be found at the following URL: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/38526#comment119573 You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above. Deleted, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Many vidyo packages
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Fernando G. Monticelli fernando.montice...@cern.ch wrote: Hi all, I wrote an updated PKGBUID of for the vidyo package in AUR ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vidyo/) and found that there are two orphans (vidyo-desktop and vidyo-desktop2) which are evidently earlier tries of a package for vidyo. Can they be removed? By the way, I contacted the current maintainer 'intrepid' of the vidyo package to ask him to update the PKGBUILD. I'll wait for his answer ~2 weeks and request to orphan it if I receive no reply. Cheers!, Fernando The 2 vidyo-desktop packages are gone. Saw your message in the vidyo comments, did you also send an email to intrepid? Some people disable notifications so it will have to be an email for us to disown the package in case it's not updated. Cheers, -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Many vidyo packages
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Fernando G. Monticelli fernando.montice...@cern.ch wrote: Hi Maxime, Thanks a lot for the super-fast response! I see the duplicates are gone!. I actually wrote intrepid a mail and I got an immediate reply. He will look at my proposed PKGBUILD and update current vidyo package in AUR. Cheers!, Fernando On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Fernando G. Monticelli Fernando.Monticelli at cern.ch wrote: Hi all, I wrote an updated PKGBUID of for the vidyo package in AUR ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vidyo/) and found that there are two orphans (vidyo-desktop and vidyo-desktop2) which are evidently earlier tries of a package for vidyo. Can they be removed? By the way, I contacted the current maintainer 'intrepid' of the vidyo package to ask him to update the PKGBUILD. I'll wait for his answer ~2 weeks and request to orphan it if I receive no reply. Cheers!, Fernando The 2 vidyo-desktop packages are gone. Saw your message in the vidyo comments, did you also send an email to intrepid? Some people disable notifications so it will have to be an email for us to disown the package in case it's not updated. Cheers, -- Maxime No problem, glad you worked it out! -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] request remove vapoursynth-plugins-ffms2
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 8:26 PM, SpinFlo sl1pk...@gmail.com wrote: please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vapoursynth-plugin-ffms2/ no need because the symlink is include in ffms2 [community] package greetings And done, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] feed the beast
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Justin Dray jus...@dray.be wrote: Hey everyone, [1] has been out of date for many years and provided the same application as [2]. Please merge [1] in to [2]. Please merge [3] in to [4] as I have renamed the package to be more accurate. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ftb-launcher/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/feedthebeast/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/feedthebeast-server/ [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ftb-ultimate-server/ Regards, Justin Dray E: jus...@dray.be M: 0433348284 All done, thx. -- Maxime