Re: [aur-general] Looking for a TU to get gamemode into community repo

[Maxime Gauduin via aur-general]

On Tue, 2020-09-22 at 09:46 +0200, Minze Zwerver via aur-general wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I am the current maintainer of the gamemode AUR, 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gamemode/ ,and I would like to
> submit 
> it for the community  repository.
> 
> Currently it has libinih among its dependencies which is also in
> AUR,  
> however it can be removed if so needed because meson will then fetch
> it 
> and use a static variant of the library.
> 
> Thank you for your time,
> 
> Minze/Ysblokje

Hi Minze,

I'll probably handle it as I've been using it actively these days.

Cheers,
-- 
Maxime


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [aur-general] TU resignation - Lukas Jirkovsky (stativ)

[Maxime Gauduin via aur-general]

On Fri, 2019-10-11 at 18:06 +0200, Lukas Jirkovsky via aur-general
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> 
> after much time I've finally came to admit to myself that I can no
> longer fulfill my duties as a trusted user the way Arch Linux
> deserves.
> While I still manage to update the packages I actively use, such as
> rawtherapee, I can no longer keep up with other packages and updates
> often come late. I've given up on other duties such as keeping AUR
> clean
> already. I'm very sorry for that, but time has come for me to pack.
> 
> Arch Linux community is one of the best communities out there and it
> was
> a great pleasure to be part of the team. I still love Arch Linux very
> much and it's surely going to be my distro of choice for time to
> come.
> 
> Lot of you were very helpful with keeping the more complicated
> packages
> up to date already. A stellar example is
> intellij-idea-community-edition, which is now thanks to Maxime built
> from sources.
> 
> The packages left that I'm still listed as a sole maintainer doesn't
> get
> updates too often and are fairly trivial to update. Though I guess
> some
> of them can be safely dropped without anyone noticing (I'm looking at
> you, gimp plugin packages).
> 
> So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish,
> Lukas
> 
> 

Hi Lukas,

Sad to see you leave, but there's only so much a person can do,
sometimes we have to let go. Hope you'll keep enjoying Arch Linux, and
that we'll hear from you again. Safe travels!

Cheers,
-- 
Maxime


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Bruno Pagani

[Maxime Gauduin]

January 10, 2017 10:31 PM, "Bruno Pagani via aur-general" 
 wrote:

> Le 08/01/2017 à 19:19, Maxime Gauduin a écrit :
> 
>> You piqued my interest with bs1770gain, any idea how it fares speed-wise 
>> against the default
>> gstreamer backend? I kept using wine + foobar2000 to compute my replaygain 
>> values even after
>> transitioning to beets because it's infinitely faster than using gstreamer.
> 
> Hi again,
> 
> So, after a little bug fix[0], I ran `time beet replaygain -a` (so Album
> mode, which I expected to be your use case) command on my newly imported
> (with `-A`and into a new library for this test purpose) incoming folder,
> which has the following stats:
> Tracks: 2556
> Total time: 1.1 weeks
> Approximate total size: 102.0 GiB
> Artists: 150
> Albums: 176
> Album artists: 56
> 
> And here is the output of the `time` command:
> beet replaygain -a 2775,24s user 32,68s system 80% cpu 58:00,41 total
> 
> Note this is on a HDD, which I heard spinning a lot during all the
> process. So results on a SSD might differ, I could test that this WE if
> you want, but here we can say roughly 1s per track.
> 
> How does it compare to your workflow?
> 

Thanks for doing the testing, I too did some tests on my server over a sample 
of 373 representative files (flac, m4a, mp3). HDD as well but I only had 15MB/s 
of disk I/O so it's definitely CPU bound. Here are the results:

gstreamer -> roughly 4s per track
bs1770gain -> roughly 3s per track

bs1770gain is definitely faster, but right now I'm using fb2k over the network 
where it takes 0.4s per track. Mind you, my desktop has a much more powerful 
CPU, and fb2k actually uses several threads which afaict beets does not.

I'm quite sure I can divide the time it takes on my server by 4 using threads 
as well which would make beets a viable alternative, I'll look into it when I'm 
more familiar with ayncio. Also found out about the volumedetect filter of 
ffmpeg, but I'd need to document myself more about replaygain and its variants 
to make good use of the output.

> Cheers,
> Bruno
> 
> [0] https://github.com/beetbox/beets/issues/2382

Cheers,
-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Bruno Pagani

[Maxime Gauduin]

Hi Bruno,

Nice to see a fellow beets lover apply! Your PKGBUILDs look nice and tidy, 
you'll most likely fit right in :)

You piqued my interest with bs1770gain, any idea how it fares speed-wise 
against the default gstreamer backend? I kept using wine + foobar2000 to 
compute my replaygain values even after transitioning to beets because it's 
infinitely faster than using gstreamer.

Cheers,
--
Maxime

January 8, 2017 4:42 PM, "Bruno Pagani via aur-general" 
 wrote:

> Le 07/01/2017 à 16:05, NicoHood a écrit :
> 
>> Hey Bruno,
>> nice to hear that you want to join the great ArchLinux project as TU. I
>> am aware the discussion period has not started yet, but I think its fine
>> if I already give some feedback.
> 
> Hi Nico,
> 
> You’ve been very fast indeed, but the discussion period started right
> after anyway. ;)
> 
>> I've checked your PKGBUILDs and I've noted a few thinks (which I also
>> did wrong or sometimes forget). Those are mostly only concerning
>> security aspects which I find important. If you followed the recent
>> discussion you might have noticed that some people differ from this
>> opinion. Please take it as a kind notice for you, use it if you wish :)
>> 
>> * For github download .tar.gz is preferred over .zip in general if i am
>> not wrong.
> 
> Assuming you refer to audiothumbs-frameworks and ring-kde, I wasn’t
> aware GitHub was providing .tar.gz downloads for snapshots tarballs
> (they are not provided in the UI), but I admit not having tried a simple
> substitution of file extension, which indeed works. Strange lack of
> curiosity from my part. I’ve fixed both of them, thanks!
> 
>> * Prefix your source download with: ${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tar.xz:: if you
>> have a common SRCDIR. I also recently change to a common src dir, as too
>> many packages blow my directories.
> 
> Can you please specify which package(s) you have in mind here? I’ve just
> checked again and didn’t found any package where I don’t do this and
> upstream tarball doesn’t follow this either.
> 
>> * You can use https for sourceforge downloads soon/now[1] (bs1770gain)
> 
> Yes, and that is already what I do. Maybe you’ve overlooked or are
> talking of “Upstream URL” (in which case this doesn’t work).
> 
>> * Thanks for using sha256sums. You may want to use the even stronger
>> sha512sums, as it does not hurt to use stronger hashes *duck*
> 
> Stronger is relative (they’re mathematically the sames, breaking one in
> an applicable way probably means breaking both). Does not hurt too.
> Everything has been said around this in this list some months ago, I’ll
> not start that debate again. I’ll only provide sha512 if this is what
> upstream provides or a new policy going that way is adopted by
> ArchLinux, which currently isn’t the case AFAIK.
> 
>> * certbot-user: the gpg keys should have a comment with the owner of the
>> trusted keys (as you did with exfalso, but with email)
> 
> Sure, fixed. :) I’ve also fixed it in scribus-devel where it has
> apparently escaped your review. ;)
> 
>> * mpd-{sserver,}minimal uses a sha1sum. If its an upstream hash please
>> contact them to use stronger hashes and include a stronger one as well.
>> You can use multiple hashes in the PKGBUILD (as in weboob-headless).
> 
> Like most of my -light or -minimal packages, hashes are from the repo
> package. When they are upstream ones too (KDE packages notably), I
> verify them, but here it’s not the case AFAIK. Those packages also use a
> PGP key, so I could remove the sum altogether as the wiki proposes. But
> actually this is one almost valid use case where I agree on switching to
> stronger checksum: packages being on AUR, and AUR being full of people
> that don’t understand PGP and its support in makepkg, the use of
> --skippgpcheck is probably frequent. Then, even if this is not a
> behaviour to be encouraged, having a strong verified checksum here is
> probably better for those users. I’ve thus switched them to sha256sums.
> That way, people relying on PGP still get the full verification, while
> people skipping it get a checksum that I’ve computed after PGP
> verification of the same tarball.
> 
>> * powerdevil/spectacle-light uses http downloads. Even though gpg
>> signatures are used, it would be nice to have https available anyways.
>> It seems kde missconfigured their download subdomain for https, so you
>> might want to contact them about that?
> 
> Yes, KDE doesn’t provides https at the moment. I’ve reported a bug
> upstream[0] (failed to find any open or close one relating to this).
> 
>> * What I also do is to put my own GPG ID inside my PKGBUILDs, so people
>> can simpler verify/find my key. Just as an idea.
> 
> What purpose does that serve (outside of cluttering the PKGBUILD)? My
> fingerprint is already in my AUR account profile[1] for that matter.
> 
>> * For those projects who dont use GPG signatures yet, you might want to
>> kindly contact them. I've written a script + instructions for using gpg
>> along with a templ

Re: [aur-general] TU Application NicoHood

[Maxime Gauduin]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Voting period is over, looks like your application was accepted. 
Congratulations and welcome to the team!

You will find the TODO list for new TUs on the wiki [1].

I just gave you TU status on AUR and will take care of filing a bug report to 
get your PGP key signed as soon as I can. Feel free to pîng me on IRC so I can 
give you the password to #archlinux-tu.

[1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_Trusted_User_Guidelines

Cheers,
- - - --
Maxime
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: OpenPGP.js v2.3.2
Comment: http://openpgpjs.org

wsBcBAEBCAAQBQJX2tw2CRCv9dlQmLxv9QAAF9gIAKkeHA+E8yPi74NYM+7T
MszpT+qqr3TXQftWkXJ3QhfaADHAjYVplJQKMt2sutOLmq+OkQzctWepb4XF
LQo50IYF30X/F2iSqcb50U8/3T3DTVyPPToJMSwSksks95XsuVeqNtEdtM4R
YIIWao0sjA2dqDACeAGGdkbsSC0TfMlVmMS14CUcastoIE08QV3GCqwYzSxR
ljpk1AzM2YRWigp3HmvsV6jnrSU/G5SkB3IoWdyYJJcoqvK8xfxohAhwkmz3
/Y8v2SOEuS9WUZBOTW1c3oxDyatKLVNL7+e6PJiptXvEmw93gt6zCo+Kopq3
pw0x4N5BZcAINioqI3Y3vmw=
=sCOd
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [aur-general] TU Application NicoHood

[Maxime Gauduin]

The discussion period is now over, please cast your votes over on AUR.

Cheers,

September 3 2016 9:19 PM, "Maxime Gauduin"  wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I confirm my sponsorship of this guy.
> 
> @Doug: I agree that lying about this is unacceptable, I believe Nico got the 
> message and won't
> suggest anything like this again.
> 
> That said, let the discussion period continue.
> 
> Cheers,
> - --
> Maxime
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: OpenPGP.js v2.3.2
> Comment: http://openpgpjs.org
> 
> wsBcBAEBCAAQBQJXyyHSCRCv9dlQmLxv9QAA5QEIALR3FGEckEzK9z5b27tf
> 41mj93BMvUoOx6SxKfrBBXTtBNj88YMVa2jvzFbxgNqf6r2X9chH6z85pQQt
> 4LfgtFBJlx0/ne/MIFhOHJECLNtenhXZB7KTg0LegrnXDrio2XWSlODJQFIe
> 6fAU2Gy/GhtdXEAt3KoPJDwhcHddv0vw8e0pGaoCSV3shRhoayKLsFM+becI
> QtfiFVCV9DlKTqJV5j8NX1wLhyXBMYztKaFsHQmIGpk+VkOWG8wU+AxxakOj
> kK2rpBykaZoSVRFfl1eswNafz8U2BXWA/gK0hCUhGuYoAZyvIhd4tx8vXuXk
> 2/ZVR1Mi4P/6bU1mkBOO1ZY=
> =rdOA
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] TU Application NicoHood

[Maxime Gauduin]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Hi all,

I confirm my sponsorship of this guy.

@Doug: I agree that lying about this is unacceptable, I believe Nico got the 
message and won't suggest anything like this again.

That said, let the discussion period continue.

Cheers,
- --
Maxime
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: OpenPGP.js v2.3.2
Comment: http://openpgpjs.org

wsBcBAEBCAAQBQJXyyHSCRCv9dlQmLxv9QAA5QEIALR3FGEckEzK9z5b27tf
41mj93BMvUoOx6SxKfrBBXTtBNj88YMVa2jvzFbxgNqf6r2X9chH6z85pQQt
4LfgtFBJlx0/ne/MIFhOHJECLNtenhXZB7KTg0LegrnXDrio2XWSlODJQFIe
6fAU2Gy/GhtdXEAt3KoPJDwhcHddv0vw8e0pGaoCSV3shRhoayKLsFM+becI
QtfiFVCV9DlKTqJV5j8NX1wLhyXBMYztKaFsHQmIGpk+VkOWG8wU+AxxakOj
kK2rpBykaZoSVRFfl1eswNafz8U2BXWA/gK0hCUhGuYoAZyvIhd4tx8vXuXk
2/ZVR1Mi4P/6bU1mkBOO1ZY=
=rdOA
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [aur-general] question about community packages vs aur

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Johnathan Jenkins 
wrote:

> It seems the anonymous-pro font is now available in the community repos
> (has
> been for sometime actually).
> https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/ttf-anonymous-pro/
>
> And I have the package
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ttf-anonymous-pro-minus/
> that just provides the minus version of the font.
>
>
> So the qestion is, should it be deleted in favor of the community version?
> Or is
> it ok to keep the package as it provides a specific version of the font(s)?
> --
> John "ShaggyTwoDope" Jenkins
>

If the [community] package was much larger, I'd keep the AUR package. But
saving a few KB of bandwidth and half an MB or so of storage doesn't really
justify the existence of 2 packages.

Cheers,
--
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] [AUR4] Single binary package for different architectures

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 11:46 PM, Bruno Pagani 
wrote:

> Le 14/06/2015 16:31, Johannes Löthberg a écrit :
> > On 14/06, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
> >> On 14/06, Reventlov wrote:
>  In which way is it cleaner and more structured? It's a bash hack
>  instead of actually using properly structured and supported features.
> 
> >>>
> >>> Please take this not-a-bug https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/43714 in
> >>> consideration, too.
> >>>
> >>> It's why i'm not using this structure, personnally: if I did, i'd have
> >>> to use unique names for each architecture dependant source, and change
> >>> my package function and/or my build function to take thoses unique
> >>> names into account.
> >>>
> >>> A bash hack inside a bash script is not this bad.
> >>>
> >>
> >> I don't see how that is relevant anymore since the AUR doesn't use
> >> sourceballs anymore.
> >>
> >
> > And it will also make it not show up in the AUR properly since the
> > sources won't be parsed properly.
> >
>
> I’m not sure to understand you. How would you package this one for
> instance:
>
> https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/chromium-pepper-flash-standalone/
>
> ?
>
> Bruno
>
>
>
>
source_i686=("libpepflashplayer-i686-${pkgver}.so::http://docs.volcanis.me/.pepper-flash/i686/libpepflashplayer.so";
 
"manifest-i686-${pkgver}.json::http://docs.volcanis.me/.pepper-flash/i686/manifest.json";)
sha1sums_i686=('hash1'
   'hash2')
source_x86_64=("libpepflashplayer-i686-${pkgver}.so::http://docs.volcanis.me/.pepper-flash/x86_64/libpepflashplayer.so";
 
"manifest-x86_64-${pkgver}.json::http://docs.volcanis.me/.pepper-flash/x86_64/manifest.json";)
sha1sums_x86_64=('hash3'
 'hash4')

package() {
  ...
  install -m 644 libpepflashplayer-$CARCH-${pkgver}.so
"${pkgdir}"/usr/lib/PepperFlash/libpepflashplayer.so
  install -m 644 manifest-$CARCH-${pkgver}.json
"${pkgdir}"/usr/lib/PepperFlash/manifest.json
  ...
}

Re: [aur-general] [AUR4] Single binary package for different architectures

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Doug Newgard 
wrote:

> On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 12:15:01 -0300
> Hugo Osvaldo Barrera  wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Why not just name them the same locally?
> >
> > source_i686=("$pkgname-$pkgver::
> http://example.com/release-${pkgver}-i386.tar.gz";)
> > md5sums_i686=('ffeeddccbbaa99887766554433221100')
> > source_x86_64=("$pkgname-$pkgver::
> http://example.com/release-${pkgver}-x86_64.tar.gz";)
> > md5sums_x86_64=('00112233445566778899aabbccddeeff')
> >
> > package() {
> >   tar xf $pkgname-$pkgver
> >   ...
> > }
> >
>
> That creates problems verifying the checksums.
>

Exactly, read a couple emails back. Also why would you want to decompress
the source tarball in the package function? The source for your particular
arch, and only that one, is already decompressed by bsdtar, no need for
that extra step. See [1] for instance.

[1]
https://aur4.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=plex-media-server

Cheers,
--
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Arch Linux Trusted User application Christian Hesse

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Christian Hesse  wrote:

> Ike Devolder  on Wed, 2015/01/14 09:27:
> > On behalf of Bartłomiej:
> >
> > Congratulations Eworm, you got accepted as TU.
> >
> > 28 yes and 3 no votes makes that you are welcome to the team :).
> >
> > Christian, I changed your AUR account access level.
>
> Thanks a lot! I feel honored.
>
> > Please read [1] and [2].
>
> I am about to prepare step by step.
>
> > For access to #archlinux-tu query Bartłomiej or me.
>
> Just opened the query.
>
> Thanks again!
> --
> main(a){char*c=/*Schoene Gruesse */"B?IJj;MEH"
> "CX:;",b;for(a/*Chris   get my mail address:*/=0;b=c[a++];)
> putchar(b-1/(/*   gcc -o sig sig.c && ./sig
> */b/42*2-3)*42);}
>

Congrats and welcome to you as well Christian!
--
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Trusted User application

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase 
wrote:

> On 05.01.2015 17:52, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
>
>> On 31.12.2014 21:29, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
>>
>>> On December 31, 2014 7:20:02 PM CET, Jerome Leclanche 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 [reposted to the correct list, oops]

 Hi list

 My name is Jerome Leclanche and this is my application for becoming an
 Arch Linux TU. Both Balló György and Sven-Hendrik Haase have
 encouraged me to apply, and Sven-Hendrik has agreed to sponsor me for
 the occasion.

 I am a French Python developer living in Stockholm. I work on FOSS
 both for my full-time job and in my free time, with my focus being on
 the LXQt project of which I am one of the lead developers
 (http://lxqt.org/). All my contributions are available on Github:
 https://github.com/jleclanche

 My main goal is of course to bring LXQt to [community]. I emailed
 Antonio Rojas about that a while back as he was also interested in
 this.

 I'm on my third year with Arch Linux and absolutely love the distro;
 been hanging around IRC and the community as jleclanche. This is my
 package list:

 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?SeB=m&K=jleclanche

 I have started the release process to get LXQt 0.9 out some time in
 January. I would really like to see it become available on Arch Linux
 at the same time =)

 Other than LXQt, I also maintain ruby-sass and its dependencies, which
 I would also like to move to [community] - although it is something
 I'd like to bring up with Anatol Pomozov first as he maintains a large
 array of Ruby packages himself already.
 I also saw that libfm and libfm-extra are currently orphaned there and
 since they are LXDE projects, I will happily pick them up.

 If any of you are going to FOSDEM, I will also be able to meet you
 there - I'd love to get to know the Arch community in person as well.

 Thanks for the great distribution and happy 2015 to everyone. I've
 kept this as terse as possible but I'll be happy to answer any
 questions.

 J. Leclanche

>>> I'm at my parents and don't have my gpg key with me so I can't sign this
>>> mail so for now you'll have to believe my identity. I do indeed sponsor
>>> Jerome. Let the discussion begin.
>>>
>>> Sven
>>>
>> Looks like voting is over! Please cast your vote here:
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=79
>>
>> Sven
>>
>>
> Alright so now it looks like it's actually over. With 28 yes and 2 no
> votes, I'm glad to be able to welcome Jerome Leclanche to the team!
> Congratulations!
>
> Jerome, I changed your account access level.
>
> Be sure to read [0] and [1].
>
> Please query me on IRC for channel access.
>
> Sven
>
> [0] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:HOWTO_Be_A_Packager
> [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_Trusted_User_
> Guidelines#TODO_list_for_new_Trusted_Users
>

Congratulations! Welcome to the team :)
--
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Rbspeex PKGBUILD Continued

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Maxime Gauduin  wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Storm Dragon 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> Err... I forgot to attach the PKGBUILD... lol
>> Storm
>> --
>> Powered by Arch Linux! I am registered Linux user number 508465:
>> https://linuxcounter.net/user/508465.html
>> My blog, Thoughts of a Dragon: http://www.stormdragon.tk/
>> get my public PGP key: gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-key
>> 43DDC193
>> Follow me on Pump.io: http://microca.st/stormdragon2976
>> "Yeah my whole family done give up on me, and it makes me feel oh so bad.
>> The only one who'll hang out with me is my dear ol' grand dad, and we drink
>> alone."
>> George Thorogood - I Drink Alone
>>
>
> The rbspeex encoder is built into the RockboxUtility binary, there is no
> need to create a separate package for it, it's working out of the box.
>
> --
> Maxime
>

And I just realized you might want to use it outside of RockboxUtility and
create your own voice files by external means. In any case, your deps and
makedeps are wrong, the provides line is useless, you're installing ghost
files (the rbspeex{enc,dec} are placed one directory above) and you need to
create bin beforehand or add -D to install. Anyway, I submitted a split
PKGBUILD which builds rbutil-git and rbspeex-git to AUR.

Cheers,
-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Rbspeex PKGBUILD Continued

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Storm Dragon 
wrote:

> Hi,
> Err... I forgot to attach the PKGBUILD... lol
> Storm
> --
> Powered by Arch Linux! I am registered Linux user number 508465:
> https://linuxcounter.net/user/508465.html
> My blog, Thoughts of a Dragon: http://www.stormdragon.tk/
> get my public PGP key: gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 43DDC193
> Follow me on Pump.io: http://microca.st/stormdragon2976
> "Yeah my whole family done give up on me, and it makes me feel oh so bad.
> The only one who'll hang out with me is my dear ol' grand dad, and we drink
> alone."
> George Thorogood - I Drink Alone
>

The rbspeex encoder is built into the RockboxUtility binary, there is no
need to create a separate package for it, it's working out of the box.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] ArchLinux TU Application: Fabio Castelli (Muflone)

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 5:25 AM, Balló György  
wrote:

2014. 07. 31, csütörtök keltezéssel 01.06-kor Muflone ezt írta:

 Hi everyone

 My name's Fabio Castelli (aka Muflone) from Italy and I wish to 
apply to

 become a TU for ArchLinux to maintain some packages in the community
 repository. My TU sponsor is György Balló.

 I actually work as a software developer in a local private company 
and I

 use GNU/Linux since the 1998, having started with Slackware 2.0.
 Many years have passed through Fedora, Debian, Ubuntu and finally
 ArchLinux that actually I use daily at home and at my job place 
since a
 couple of years. Debian is still often used for software packaging, 
to
 deploy services in my network and for less experienced colleagues 
that

 needs some GNU/Linux environment in my job place.

 My experience in development is long term, starting in '80s with 
C=64

 Basic, actually I work daily in Python (under Windows, GNU/Linux and
 i5/OS, both desktop, server and web platforms), Delphi and VB (under
 Windows), RPG/400 and CL (under i5/OS) and many other things which 
I use

 less often, like C or J2EE.

 My open source contributions are a really long list but let's try 
to not

 be boring:

 - maintainer for over 160 packages in the AUR, most of them updated 
often:

 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?SeB=m&K=Muflone
 https://github.com/muflone/pkgbuilds/

 - maintainer for some Debian packages:
 https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mufl...@vbsimple.net
 https://alioth.debian.org/projects/python-apps/

 - author of various open source softwares:
 http://www.muflone.com/english.html
 https://github.com/muflone/
 https://code.google.com/u/102825094329389897213/
 https://www.openhub.net/accounts/Muflone

 - written hundreds of articles for an Italian website around VB6
 development through the 1998 and 2004: http://www.vbsimple.net/

 - written hundreds of articles for an Italian website around Ubuntu
 through the 2009 and the 2011: http://ubuntrucchi.wordpress.com/

 - support in the Italian Ubuntu forum, I was the second most active
 member of the forum through the 2009 and the 2012:
 http://forum.ubuntu-it.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=73229

 - support and founder of LQH (Linux Quality Help), an Italian 
GNU/Linux
 forum where normal users could ask their questions and only the 
experts
 group could offer support, resulting in higher quality service, ran 
only

 from highly experienced users through the 2009 and the 2012:
 
https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.linuxqualityhelp.it/supporto


 - written tenth of Italian video guides around PyGTK development 
through

 the 2008 and the 2010: http://pygtk.wordpress.com/

 - written a couple of articles around GNOME Shell in the 2011:
 http://gnomeshell.wordpress.com/

 - could continue but better stopping here.. too boring. I'm sorry!

 ArchLinux is actually my favorite GNU/Linux distributions and I 
think I

 could do a lot of work in enhancing this great distribution.
 What I love about ArchLinux is the perfect control it gives to me 
and it

 needs from me.

 Every time I need some software, I package it and then I publish it
 under AUR.
 I try to apply an old Microsoft rule: "Never ever write the same 
thing
 twice", so if the software resulted useful to me then it could be 
useful

 for other users and AUR is a perfect place where to find stuff.

 There are a lot of packages that I wish to move in the community
 repository: hfsprogs, kompozer, sweethome3d, gmtp, arista,
 spyder/spyder3, sbackup, gwakeonlan, gespeaker, remmina-plugin-*,
 python-ptrace.

 There are also packages maintained from other users that I wish to 
see

 in community repository: dex2jar, dmg2img, firefox-theme-adwaita and
 thunderbird-theme-adwaita, gigolo, gscan2pdf, httrack, linkchecker,
 loggedfs, netactview, pacmanlogviewer, parallel-python, pyrenamer.

 I read daily the AUR general and AUR requests mailing lists but I 
never
 participate in the discussions, after many years of discussions in 
other
 ML and forums I lost the pleasure in writing stuff inside the 
communities.
 The same applies to IRC, too much time spent in helping others (I 
was

 also HelpOp in #irchelp) forced me to away even from IRC.

 My job coincided with my favorite hobby so, apart my personal 
projects

 (see GitHub) I love reading heavy books (technical, development,
 sysadmin, networking but also theater or classic novels) and 
watching

 films when the TV is not owned by my gf.

 Thank you for reading up to here.
 Best regards

 Fabio Castelli / Muflone





I'm confirming my sponsorship. I think that Fabio has great 
experience,

and has excellent packages in AUR.

A discussion period of 5 days has been started now.

--
György Balló
Trusted User


Hey,

I can only agree with György here. Your packages are neat and have 
enough votes, and you got plenty of experience. I'm sure you'll be a 
great addtion to the team. Not much to ask you apart from the usual: 
are you maybe i

Re: [aur-general] merge request

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Jeremy Audet  wrote:

> Please merge ruby-nanoc [1] into nanoc [2]. Nanoc is primarily intended for
> use by end users, not as a library. Thus, according to the packaging
> guidelines, the language-specific prefix should be stripped. I maintain
> both packages.
>
> — Jeremy "Ichimonji10" Audet
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-nanoc/
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nanoc/
>

Merged, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: gtkpacman

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 9:02 AM, David Phillips 
wrote:

> Oh, so Wakka was abandoned. I had assumed it was still running. I
> might have a look at forking Wakka or something... anyway, that's
> outside the scope of this thread, I'm no longer opposing deletion.
>
> On 14/06/2014, Doug Newgard  wrote:
> > On 2014-06-14 01:27, David Phillips wrote:
> >> I wonder if anyone's interested in getting it working again? If nobody
> >> else is willing, I'll adopt it.
> >
> > You're pretty much talking about forking it to do that. There are
> > tarballs on Sourceforge, so it should be doable. You'd probably need to
> > rename the software unless you could get permission from the original
> > author to just take over as-is.
> >
> > I know there was one fork, wakka, that was also abandoned.
> >
> > Doug
> >
>
>
> --
> David Phillips
> GPG Key 0x7BF3D17D0884BF5B
> Fingerprint 2426 235A 7831 AA2F 56AF  4BC0 7BF3 D17D 0884 BF5B
>

+1 for me. I'll delete it a week from now if no one shows up to save it.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Delete requests for abandoned packages

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Doug Newgard 
wrote:

> Maintainer renamed package, but did not request removal:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rename-git/
>
> Maintainer said it needed removed and abandoned it instead of requesting
> that it be deleted:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/raspyplayer-git/
>
> Maintainer renamed package, but did not request removal:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qhttpserver/
>
> Upstream switched to git, maintainer just abandoned it instead of
> requesting removal:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rssproc-hg/
>
>
> Thanks
> Doug
>

All gone, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Merge request: lensfun-svn -> lensfun-git

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Rikard Falkeborn <
rikard.falkeb...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Please merge lensfun-svn [1] into lensfun-git. The project has moved to
> git.
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lensfun-svn/
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lensfun-git/
>

Merged, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] More Perl Delete request

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 4:23 AM, John D Jones III 
wrote:

> please delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-io-socket-ip/ the
> module it provides is now provided in core_perl
> --
> Thanks,
> John D Jones III
> UNIX Zealot; Perl Lover
> unixgeek1...@gmail.com
> jnbek1...@gmail.com
> http://zoelife4u.org/
>

Gone, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 3:16 AM, John D Jones III 
wrote:

> Please delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-cpan-meta-
> requirements/ the module it provides is now in core perl
> --
> Thanks,
> John D Jones III
> UNIX Zealot; Perl Lover
> unixgeek1...@gmail.com
> jnbek1...@gmail.com
> http://zoelife4u.org/
>

Deleted, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Merge request: cmusfm -> cmusfm-git

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:35 PM,  wrote:

> Please merge cmusfm into cmusfm-git.
>
> Thanks,
> OK100
>

Why would you want to proceed with that merge? There are stable releases of
cmusfm, it just needs to be updated to 0.2.0.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 6:21 AM, John D Jones III 
wrote:

> Please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-parse-cpan-meta/
> the module it provides is now part of CORE perl.
> --
> Thanks,
> John D Jones III
> UNIX Zealot; Perl Lover
> unixgeek1...@gmail.com
> jnbek1...@gmail.com
> http://zoelife4u.org/
>

Deleted as well, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Package Deletion

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 8:12 AM, John D Jones III 
wrote:

> Please delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-cpan-meta-yaml the
> module it provides is provided as a CORE Perl module now.
>
> --
> Thanks,
> John D Jones III
> UNIX Zealot; Perl Lover
> unixgeek1...@gmail.com
> jnbek1...@gmail.com\
> http://zoelife4u.org/
>

Deleted, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Merge request: lib32-libwbclient-old -> lib32-libwbclient

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Rafael Ferreira 
wrote:

> Hi there.
>
> I uploaded a split PKGBUILD providing lib32-smbclient and
> lib32-libwbclient [1]. In order to succeed, I had to rename
> lib32-libwbclient to lib32-libwbclient-old [2] before uploading the
> split PKGBUILD.
>
> Please merge lib32-libwbclient-old [2] into lib32-libwbclient [1].  If
> not possible, at least delete it [2]
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-libwbclient/
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-libwbclient-old
>
> Cheers,
>
> Rafael (josephgbr)
>

Merged, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Disown request + Delete request

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Rafael Ferreira 
wrote:

> Hi there.
>
> lib32-libwbclient[1] and lib32-smbclient[2] are out-of-date for
> sometime now, some users commented that and also flagged them, and
> after I sent an email one week ago, the maintainer didn't reply nor
> update them... Considering that the maintainer has only these two
> package (sort of unmaintained), I suppose he is not interessed
> anymore.
>
> Also, another user created lib32-libwbclient-updated [3] which IMHO
> doesn't make sense and it is already out-of-date.
>
> I intended to adopt and maintain [1] and [2].
>
> So please disown [1] and [2] and delete [3].
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-libwbclient/
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-smbclient/
> [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-libwbclient-updated
>
> Cheers,
>
> Rafael (josephgbr)
>

Disowned both of them, go grab'em. Also deleted lib32-libwbclient-updated.
Thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Redundant package for deletion

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Steven Honeyman 
wrote:

> Tintwizard is provided by the Arch package 'tint2' [1], so this
> separate package [2] is now redundant and can be removed.
>
> Thanks,
> Steven.
>
> [1] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?name=tint2
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tintwizard/
>

Someone argued that tintwizard may not be included in a future tint2.
However I don't see a future tint2 coming soon, if at all, and even then
there would be no reason to not include tintwizard in it. However, it seems
there are a few commits ahead of the last release of tintwizard on Google
Code, so I merged tintwizard into tintwizard-svn.

Cheers,
-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] AUR merge request

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Xinkai  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I own two AUR packages "xware_desktop" and "xware_desktop-git".
>
> "xware-desktop" is the new name I want to use. I want to replace the
> underscore with dash, and I find "-git" package doesn't suit in my case.
> I already uploaded the package under the new name, can you help me merge
> the old ones into this new one?
>
> I added 'replaces=("xware_desktop" "xware_desktop-git")
> conflicts=("xware_desktop-git" "xware_desktop")', is there anything else
> should I do in order to make the renaming process work?
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Xinkai
>

Merged, thx. Please include links next time.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Remove package: rosinstall_generator

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:16 AM, Ralf Mardorf 
wrote:

> On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 00:57 +0200, Benjamin Chrétien wrote:
> > Could you please remove the newly created rosinstall_generator package?
> > This was a mistake while updating several packages, the real one being
> > python2-rosinstall-generator.
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rosinstall_generator/
>
> ;)
>
>
>
Deleted, thx. As Ralf pointed out, please include a link to the package
next time.

Cheers,
-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Justin Dray  wrote:

> Please remove the following pkgbuild:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xf86-input-evtouch/
>
> Upstream is dead, package hasn't been able to be built in *years* and the
> maintainer has said as much on the package comments, and someone has also
> put this on the archwiki touchscreen page.
>
> Regards,
> Justin Dray
> E: jus...@dray.be
> M: 0433348284
>

Gone, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Another two for deletion!

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Maxime Gauduin  wrote:

>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 3:08 AM, Steven Honeyman 
> wrote:
>
>> These AUR packages are duplicates of packages alreadu in the main
>> repositories:
>>
>> Busybox:
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/busybox-static/
>> https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/busybox/
>>
>> Wine Gecko:
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wine-stable_gecko/
>> https://www.archlinux.org/packages/multilib/x86_64/wine_gecko/
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Steven
>>
>
> Removed, thx.
>
> --
> Maxime
>

Apologies, wine-stable_gecko shouldn't have been deleted. I've reuploaded
the PKGBUILD.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request: l3afpad

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Steven Honeyman 
wrote:

> The AUR package "l3afpad" is in need of an update as the source file
> has changed URL and it will soon stop working when the author takes
> his old page down. I'm willing to take over as maintainer for this
> package if possible.
>
> I already emailed the current maintainer, but he hasn't replied.
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/l3afpad
>
> Thanks,
> Steven
>

When did you email him? He last logged in last month so you will need to
wait 2 weeks before I can disown the package.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Another two for deletion!

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 3:08 AM, Steven Honeyman 
wrote:

> These AUR packages are duplicates of packages alreadu in the main
> repositories:
>
> Busybox:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/busybox-static/
> https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/busybox/
>
> Wine Gecko:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wine-stable_gecko/
> https://www.archlinux.org/packages/multilib/x86_64/wine_gecko/
>
>
> Thanks,
> Steven
>

Removed, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Package Delete requests.

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Yichao Yu  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Please delete my pypy3-* packages. They were there only because the
> old AUR recognized the last pkgname in the array as the package name
> and they were always provided by their pypy-* counterpart.
>
> Yichao Yu
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pypy3-tornado/
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pypy3-pyzmq/
> [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pypy3-markupsafe/
>

All gone, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Please disown faustworks and faust-lv2

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:23 AM, Rob Til Freedmen <
rob.til.freed...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Maxime Gauduin  wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Rob Til Freedmen <
> > rob.til.freed...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/faustworks/
> >> Flagged out-of-date (2013-05-05)
> >>
> >>
> >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/faust-lv2/
> >> Flagged out-of-date (2013-11-12)
> >> Outdated by two releases, look at the comments ...
> >>
> >>
> >> I've updated PKGBUILD's for both packages.
> >>
> >
> > Did you try emailing speps about these 2 and invada-studio-plugins-lv2 ?
>
> Not specific to these packages - but ask some month ago If I may help
> him with his long outdated packages - but never got a reply.
>
> more than 650 aur packages (with 10% outdated) seems a bit to much
> to give every package the attention it deserves.
>
> >
> > Cheers,
> > --
> > Maxime
>

I've disowned the three mentioned packages, you can go ahead and update
them.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Merge gvim-python with gvim-python3 in [extra]

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Allen Li  wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I'm the maintainer for gvim-python.  Can someone merge/delete it as
> there is now a package in [extra], gvim-python3?
>
> Thanks!
>
> [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gvim-python/
> [2]: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/gvim-python3/
> [3]: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/gvim-python3/
>

Deleted, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Delete/merge request

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Νῖκος Θεοδώρου  wrote:

> Hello.
>
> Could you please delete (or merge)
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-gstreamer0.10-good-plugins/
> and
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-gstreamer0.10-ugly-plugins/ ,
> so I can update the split packages
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-gstreamer0.10-good/
> and
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-gstreamer0.10-ugly/
> respectively?
>
> Thank you in advance.
>
> --
> Νῖκος Θεοδώρου
> «Ἀγεωμέτρητος μηδεὶς εἰσίτω!»
>
>
Merged, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: python2-ethumb

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Doug Newgard 
wrote:

> Python bindings for ethumb were finally merged into the python-efl tree.
> This package has no more reason to exist. Nothing worth merging, so it just
> needs deleted.
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-ethumb/
>
> Thanks
> Doug (Scimmia)
>

Done, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 1:14 AM, Nuno Araujo wrote:

> Hi
>
> Could a TU please remove glade3-gtk2 [1]?
> It's a duplicate of glade-gtk2 [2].
>
> Both packages were orphaned and I took ownership and updated the
> glade-gtk2 [2] to the latest release.
>
> Thank you
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/glade3-gtk2/
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/glade-gtk2/
>
> --
> Nuno Araujo 
> http://www.russo79.com
>

Merged, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] 0ad merge?

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Taylor Lookabaugh <
jesus.christ.i.l...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I've noticed that both 0ad-git[0] and 0ad-svn[1] use the same source(github
> repository). I have CC'ed both maintainers to this mail. Could both parties
> work out a solution and then merge the packages?
>
> Thank you.
>
> [0]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/0ad-git/
> [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/0ad-svn/
>
>
> Taylor Lookabaugh
>

Merged 0ad-svn into 0ad-git because git is the correct VCS, and the
PKGBUILD uses the new source array while the other doesn't. However the
0ad-svn package has been lying around for a longer time, so if its
maintainer wants to maintain 0ad-git I can disown it now. It would be nice
if both maintainers could agree on whoever will be maintaining it from now
on.


Cheers,
-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Merge request python2-pycha

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Stefan Husmann  wrote:

> Hello,
>
> please merge python2-pycha into python2-pycha-hg. The PKGBUILD pulls
> from a mercurial repo at bitbucket and therefore should be named
> accordingly.
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pycha/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pycha-hg/
>
> Best Regards Stefan
>

Merged, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Disownment request for package "ejtagproxy-svn"

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Taylor Lookabaugh <
jesus.christ.i.l...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On May 17, 2014 6:29 PM, "David Manouchehri"  wrote:
> >
> > Maxime,
> >
> > I sent him an email on May 3rd, so it's been two weeks.
> >
> > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ejtagproxy-svn
> Just an FYI, please do not start a new thread.
>

Package is your to maintain.

Cheers,
-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Disownment request for package "ejtagproxy-svn"

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 4:33 AM, David Manouchehri  wrote:

> I sent Paul (paulburton89) an updated PKGBUILD for ejtagproxy-svn with a
> proper pkgver on May 3rd (at the moment it fails to build the newest
> version without manual intervention). I haven't heard back from him or seen
> the package updated since, therefore I am requesting to adopt it myself.
>
> David Manouchehri (Chehri)
>

Did you try to shoot him an email? Our policy requires that you send an
email and wait for 2 weeks before we can disown a package. Also, please
include a link to the package in your request.

Cheers,
-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Delete request yaourt-abs

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 5:55 AM, Aliaksandr Stelmachonak
wrote:

> Please remove the yaourt-abs package:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/yaourt-abs/
>
> I forked original yaourt to use abs long time ago, when it had issues with
> accesing packages source code for rebuilding via yaourt -Sb. After yaourt
> fixed the issue, it is not under development anymore and do not have any
> advantages over original yaourt. So I think it can be deleted.
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>

Nuked, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Delete request for kde-servicemenus-dropbox-simple

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 6:00 AM, Aliaksandr Stelmachonak
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Can you please delete kde-servicemenus-dropbox-simple package:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kde-servicemenus-dropbox-simple/
>
> Reason for deletion: package is not updated for a long time and actually
> included into more functional package
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kde-servicemenus-dropbox/
>

Merged into the latter, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Delete request for skype-mid

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 6:06 AM, Aliaksandr Stelmachonak
wrote:

> Please remove  skype-mid package:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/skype-mid/
>
> Long time ago it was separate experimental version of skype for MID
> devices, but it is orphaned by Skype for a long time and is not working on
> current Arch. I don't think there is any sense to keep it in AUR.
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>

Gone.

Thx,
-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Removal request - talesofmajeyal

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 9:30 AM, WorMzy Tykashi wrote:

> Hi TUs,
>
> Please remove my package "talesofmajeyal" [1]. It is a duplicate of
> tome4[2], a package that I didn't notice until just now.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> WorMzy
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/talesofmajeyal/
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tome4/
>

Removed.

Thx,
-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Merge/delete requests

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Jerome Leclanche wrote:

> Merge requests
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/aafigure-bzr/ ->
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/aafigure/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/a4-bzr/ ->
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/a4/
> Doesn't build. No point in a -bzr package when the upstream is dead.
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/codeblocks-svn-noplugins/ ->
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/codeblocks-svn/
> The former no longer builds
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/coq-8.3-svn/ ->
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/coq/
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/doctorjs/ ->
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/doctorjs-git/
> They're the same
>
> Merged.

>
> Delete requests
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/albumthing-hg/
> Doesn't build, 404, etc.
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/apache13/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/apache13-mod_accounting/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/apache13-mod_bandwidth/
> Ships binaries, really old and no longer supported etc.
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bing-konqueror-search/
> Really now?
>
>  XD

> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/django-gravatar-svn/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/django-diario/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/django-shpaml-template-loader-hg/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/django-sane-testing/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/django-profiles/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/django-photologue/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/django-media-bundler-git/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/django-mailer-git/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/django-mailer2-git/
> Outdated/Doesn't build/Not required by anything/Shouldn't be there anyway
>
> Deleted.

>

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cedega/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bin32-cedega/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gametree/
> This one may be controversial. Cedega is a very, very old fork of Wine
> (back when they had a different license) which hasn't been updated in
> a long time - today it operates through mostly "GameTree" and has gone
> a completely different route. These packages don't even build anymore.
>
> Merged both cedega pkgs into gametree.

>
> J. Leclanche
>

Thx!

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Please disown faustworks and faust-lv2

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Rob Til Freedmen <
rob.til.freed...@gmail.com> wrote:

> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/faustworks/
> Flagged out-of-date (2013-05-05)
>
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/faust-lv2/
> Flagged out-of-date (2013-11-12)
> Outdated by two releases, look at the comments ...
>
>
> I've updated PKGBUILD's for both packages.
>

Did you try emailing speps about these 2 and invada-studio-plugins-lv2 ?

Cheers,
-- 
Maxime

[aur-general] Fwd: firefox-stable deleted

[Maxime Gauduin]

Forwarding this to AUR General so that the world can see how nice a guy you
are. Insults, racism, what else have you got in store? I've taken the
liberty to suspend your AUR account, because, yeah, us higher ranks
motherfuckers can do that. Now please reflect upon your behavior and
realize what an hypocrit you are saying _we_ are the one who destroy the
community, there is no destroying people who behave like _you_ do.

Now, if you don't want to depend on us doing the work for you, for free, be
my guest, make your own distro, alone, see how you fare. But stop creating
duplicates out of sheer lunacy because you couldn't bear waiting a single
day. That's right, _a_ day. FYI, Firefox 29 was released on 2014-04-29 [1]
and according to our SVN our package was updated 10 days ago [2], so that
makes a 1 day delay, not a week. Please get your facts straight before
assaulting people.

BTW, that bit about grammar was quite funny, there isn't a single error in
mine, however I'd really not vouch for yours.

[1] https://wiki.mozilla.org/RapidRelease/Calendar
[2]
https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/log/trunk?h=packages/firefox

Have a nice day,

-- Forwarded message --
From: Aaron Caffrey 
Date: Sat, May 10, 2014 at 11:22 AM
Subject: firefox-stable deleted
To: "aluc...@gmail.com" 


Wow just wow. What a ignorance. As I said, me and my friends do NOT want to
rely on someone else to update the packages with a delay of whole week. I
do have plenty of free time and your grammar isn't much different than the
average African American. Fuck yourself and wish you all the worse, that's
why motherfuckers with higher rank like are killing the archlinux community
and partly the forum users.

Burn in Hell,
Aaron

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: firefox-stable

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 1:36 AM, Doug Newgard wrote:

> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/firefox-stable/
>
> This is simply a duplicate of firefox in [extra].
>

Done, thx

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Merge Request

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 8:44 AM, Rick  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> The packages are still no merged, can review it.
>
> Thanks.
> El 07/05/2014 23:49, "Xyne"  escribió:
>
> > On 2014-05-07 23:15 +0200
> > Rick wrote:
> >
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > >Can I please get [1] 'dkms-8192cu
> > >' merged in to [2]
> > >
> > >'8192cu-dkms '.
> > >Upstream changed names, just following suit.
> > >
> > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dkms-8192cu/
> > >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/8192cu-dkms/
> > >
> > >Regards,
> > >Rick
> >
> > merged, thanks
> >
>

Done, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Disownment request: eclipse-aptana

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Miodrag Tokić  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I would like to request disownment of the package "eclipse-aptana" [1] with
> intetion of taking over maintenance.
>
> Current maintainer did not respond to flagging the package out of date
> since 2013-07-22 and is not reachable by email (Undelivered Mail
> Returned to Sender).
>
> I belive you can also disown all the other packages by "michael.manley"
> [2].
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eclipse-aptana
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?K=michael.manley&SeB=m
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Miodrag Tokić | loonies.io
>

Disownd. I won't touch the others until there is a specific request here as
he is still marked as active.

Cheers,
-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Delete Request

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Lara Maia  wrote:

> Delete xdg-settings [1]. The package is not usefull anymore, this is now
> provided by xdg-utils.
>
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xdg-settings/
>
> --
> ~ *Lara* ~
>

Gone, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: gns3-unofficial

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 2:36 AM, Nowaker  wrote:

> Please remove gns3-unofficial. It was beta/rc channel for gns3. There is
> no beta/rc now, and won't be for a long time.
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gns3-unofficial/
>
> --
> Kind regards,
> Damian Nowak
> StratusHost
> www.AtlasHost.eu
>

Deleted, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Disown request: alsamixer-qt4

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 3:26 AM, Jerome Leclanche  wrote:

> Disregard the previous message. Please instead merge the package into
> qastools:
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qastools/
> J. Leclanche
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 2:21 AM, Jerome Leclanche 
> wrote:
> > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/alsamixer-qt4/
> >
> > Out of date for years.
> >
> > J. Leclanche
>

Done, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Merge request: phpredis/php-redis

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:30 AM, Jerome Leclanche  wrote:

> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/php-redis/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/phpredis/
>
> One needs to be merged into the other. I don't know which into which
> as I don't deal with php packages.
>
> J. Leclanche
>

Merged the later into the former, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Delete requests: django-dajax*

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 6:54 AM, Jerome Leclanche  wrote:

> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/django-dajaxice-git-python2/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/django-dajax-git-python2/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/django-dajaxice/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/django-dajax/
>
> django-dajax is no longer maintained by its original author. Although
> it is still supported for a few more months, none of these libs are
> required by anything. Makes no sense to keep them
>
>
> J. Leclanche
>

All gone, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Delete requests: libgcj12, libgcj13

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 9:17 PM, Jerome Leclanche  wrote:

> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libgcj12/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libgcj13/
>
> Merge into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libgcj/
>
> J. Leclanche
>

Merged, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Remove linux-lts310

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Alan Orth  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Please remove linux-lts310.  I had created it last year sometime before
> noticing that [core] had switched linux-lts to 3.10.x.
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-lts310
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Alan Orth
> alan.o...@gmail.com
> http://alaninkenya.org
> http://mjanja.co.ke
> "I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as my
> telephone; my wish has come true because I can no longer figure out how to
> use my telephone." -Bjarne Stroustrup, inventor of C++
> GPG public key ID: 0x8cb0d0acb5cd81ec209c6cdfbd1a0e09c2f836c0
>
>
>
Gone, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: openspades-data

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Shohei Kusakata  wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Please delete this package: openspades-data
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openspades-data/
> because I intergrated the package into openspades
> (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openspades/).
>
> Thank you.
>

Merged, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Compiz 0.9 packages cleanup, mergers?

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Charles Bos  wrote:

> There are a great deal of orphaned Compiz 0.9 packages in the AUR, some
> for the stable releases and some for bazaar. They are all on around 0.9.5
> or 0.9.7. These are the packages I'm referring to:
>
> for stable release:
> * ccsm-dev -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ccsm-dev/
> * compiz-plugins-extra-dev -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/comp ...
> extra-dev/ 
> * compiz-plugins-main-dev -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/comp ...
> -main-dev/ 
> * compizconfig-backend-gconf-dev -- https://aur.archlinux.org/
> packages/comp ... gconf-dev/  packages/compizconfig-backend-gconf-dev/>
> * compizconfig-backend-gsettings-dev -- https://aur.archlinux.org/
> packages/comp ... tings-dev/  packages/compizconfig-backend-gsettings-dev/>
> * compizconfig-python-dev -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/comp ...
> ython-dev/ 
> * libcompizconfig-dev -- https://aur.archlinux.org/
> packages/libcompizconfig-dev/
>
> for development release:
> * ccsm-bzr -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ccsm-bzr/
> * compiz-core-bzr -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compiz-core-bzr/
> * compiz-plugins-extra-bzr -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/comp ...
> extra-bzr/ 
> * compiz-plugins-main-bzr -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/comp ...
> -main-bzr/ 
> * compizconfig-backend-gconf-bzr -- https://aur.archlinux.org/
> packages/comp ... gconf-bzr/  packages/compizconfig-backend-gconf-bzr/>
> * compizconfig-backend-gsettings-bzr -- https://aur.archlinux.org/
> packages/comp ... tings-bzr/  packages/compizconfig-backend-gsettings-bzr/>
> * compizconfig-python-bzr -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/comp ...
> ython-bzr/ 
> * libcompizconfig-bzr -- https://aur.archlinux.org/
> packages/libcompizconfig-bzr/
>
> As I understand it, Compiz upstream no longer packages all these
> components separately. They are all developed and packaged together in one
> launchpad project. That is why we have two main packages in the AUR for
> installing Compiz 0.9, compiz-dev and compiz-bzr. I've had a look on
> launchpad and this seems to be the case. For instance: The compiz-ccsm page
> (https://launchpad.net/compiz-ccsm) lists 0.9.5.92 as the latest version
> when it's actually 0.9.10. Therefore (unless I am much mistaken) all the
> packages above are obsolete and can never be updated to their latest
> upstream versions.
>
> I propose that all the dev packages above be merged with compiz-dev (
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compiz-dev/)
>
> and all the bazaar packages be merged with compiz-bzr (
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compiz-bzr/)
>

All done, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Delete proposal: asus-screen-brightness

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Jerome Leclanche  wrote:

> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/asus-screen-brightness/
>
> - The entirety code is stored in the source package
> - It's just a bash file and a system service file (which is not useful)
> - xorg-xbacklight provides the same functionality without requiring root.
>
> That said it's referenced in the wiki as an alternative to
> xorg-xbacklight which I... don't quite get.
>
> J. Leclanche
>

Nuked, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] pkg deletion request

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:54 AM, flower_of_l...@gmx.net <
flower_of_l...@gmx.net> wrote:

> Hello AUR maintainers,
>
> I would like to get the following packages removed from AUR.
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/colord-eudev/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cups-eudev/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dbus-eudev/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/syslog-ng-eudev/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/udisks2-eudev/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/upower-eudev/
>
> These are redundant packages I found out. I talked to TZ86, the maintainer
> of the similar packages(*-nosystemd)  to merge our builds.
>
>
> Thank you
> artoo
>

Done, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] [compiz] Merge request

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Florian Dejonckheere <
flor...@floriandejonckheere.be> wrote:

> Hi
>
> Please merge compiz [1] into compiz-core [2].
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compiz/
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compiz-core/
>
> Thanks
>
> Florian
>

Merged, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Delete request

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Jerome Leclanche  wrote:

> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xf86-input-synaptics-jumpycursor/
>
> No longer needed (cf comments)
>
> J. Leclanche
>

Deleted, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: gnome-terminal-dark

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Gary van der Merwe wrote:

> Please delete gnome-terminal-dark. There is now a preference to do this.
>

Done, please include a link next time.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: fontmatrix-svn

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Jerome Leclanche  wrote:

> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fontmatrix-svn/ - they are
> available on github.com/fontmatrix/fontmatrix now.
> J. Leclanche
>

I've submitted a fixed/updated fontmatrix-git and merged fontmatrix-svn
into it. fontmatrix-git is available for adoption. Thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] [Merge Request] trayfreq -> trayfreq-archlinux

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 16:02 +1300, David Phillips wrote:
> I hate to look like I'm being pushy, but I'd just like to kindly bump
> this request as I've seen numerous other merges occur since I
> requested this one :)
> 
> Cheers!
> 
> On 28/03/2014, David Phillips  wrote:
> > I maintain [1] and have decided to move it to follow my fork as the
> > original source isn't compatible with Archlinux any more. Could I
> > please have [1] merged into [2]?
> >
> > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/trayfreq/
> > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/trayfreq-archlinux/
> >
> >
> > Cheers, all the best.
> > --
> > David Phillips
> > GPG Key 0x7BF3D17D0884BF5B
> > Fingerprint 2426 235A 7831 AA2F 56AF  4BC0 7BF3 D17D 0884 BF5B
> >
> 
> 

Merged, thx. Sorry about the delay.
-- 
Maxime


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [aur-general] [Rename Request] bitcoind to bitcoin-core

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 6:16 AM, Andy Weidenbaum  wrote:

> I think bitcoin-core is more descriptive than bitcoind. The package
> provides a headless P2P node without wallet functionality (core). A growing
> number of Bitcoin server applications depend on Bitcoin core running as a
> service. Package includes systemd service file.
>


You need to upload a new package with the new name. As there is nothing to
merge, I already deleted bitcoind.
-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: lxqt-power-git

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 05:43 +0100, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lxqt-power-git/
> 
> Can safely delete or merge into
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lxqt-powermanagement-git/ -
> functionality has been merged into the one app.
> 
> J. Leclanche

Merged, thx.
-- 
Maxime


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Charles Bos  wrote:

> Can the following package be removed: https://aur.archlinux.org/
> packages/compiz-pure/
>
> It's supposed to provide Compiz 0.8 plus the gtk-window-decorator. The
> package is orphaned, hasn't been updated in nearly 4 years, is several
> versions out of date and doesn't build successfully.
>
> Nothing will be lost here because there is a new package which provides
> exactly the same things as this package: https://aur.archlinux.org/
> packages/compiz-gtk-standalone/
>

Merged into the latter, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] hubicfuse

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Mitsu  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> My bad, package "hubicfuse" has to be removed (correct package is
> "hubicfuse-git").  Feel free to test the package, but I think I added
> all deps
>
>
Removed, please include a link to the package next time.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] libebur128 related

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Robert Mackanics wrote:

> The following Packages should be removed:
>
> 1: loudness-cli-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/loudness-cli-git/
> 2: libebur128-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libebur128-git/
> 3: libebur128-nu774-git
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libebur128-nu774-git/
>
> 1 and 2 are orphaned, I am the maintainer of 3. None of these packages
> build due to git repo changes and the functionality has been replaced by:
>
> loudness-scanner-git
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/loudness-scanner-git/
>

All merged into loudness-scanner-git, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Delete requests: php-zendopcache etc.

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Yardena Cohen  wrote:

> These all do the same thing, and the functionality was merged into
> extra/php last year:
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/php-zendopcache
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/php-zendoptimizerplus
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zend-optimizer
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zend-optimizer-old
>

It seems 3 out of the 4 were deleted. To whomever took care of this, any
reason why zend-optimizer was left out?

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: qterminal-suite-git

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:25 AM, Jerome Leclanche  wrote:

> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qterminal-suite-git/
>
> No longer exists. Can merge with qterminal-git really.
>
> J. Leclanche
>

Merged, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] [luakit-gtk3-git] Deletion request

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 8:14 PM,  wrote:

> I forked this from upstream, but no longer have the time/knowledge to
> continue and I've abandoned further work on it.
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/luakit-gtk3-git/
>

Deleted, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Merge request: qtermwidget -> qtermwidget-git

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:27 AM, Jerome Leclanche  wrote:

> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qtermwidget/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qtermwidget-git/
>
> Former has had no releases in a while and is no longer on sourceforge.
> Only available on git currently.
>
> J. Leclanche
>

I see a 0.4.0 tarball on GitHub so I'd rather have qtermwidget stay and be
updated to 0.4.0.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Merge request: please merge danbooru-git into danbooru-client-git

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 12:09 AM, SpinFlo  wrote:

> hi
>
> please merge:
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/danbooru-git/
> into
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/danbooru-client-git/
>
> package orphan and don't have a real name
>
> greetings
>

Merged, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Merge request

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 2:06 PM, G. Schlisio  wrote:

> please merge [0] into [1], as it is a python2 package and thus does not
> follow the naming scheme. both are orphan, while i just created [1] and
> disowned it.
> thanks
>
> [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-osmgpsmap/
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-osmgpsmap/
>

Merged, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Disown requests

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 3:18 PM, carstene1ns  wrote:

> Hello,
> please disown ta3d[1], libclaw[2] and plee-the-bear[3].
> I contacted maintainer darkbaboon with a patch for ta3d (2014-01-19) and
> received no response. The other two packages are out of date and can be
> updated easily.
>
> Also, please disown opensonic[4]. It does not build against recent
> libpng and needs a fix. I tried to contact the maintainer luceo
> (2014-02-13), but received no response. Apparently he disappeared from
> the internet by the end of 2012.
>
> [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ta3d/
> [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libclaw/
> [3]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/plee-the-bear/
> [4]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opensonic/
>
> best regards,
> carstene1ns
>
>
>
>
All yours.

Cheers,
-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] delete request mesa-r600-r700

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:54 PM, LoneVVolf  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> please delete mesa-r600-r700-git package  [1].
> reasons :
>
> orphan
> last updated in dec 2011
> flagged out-of-date since june 10, 2013
>
> There are several maintained alternatives, like aur mesa-git package [2],
> Lordheavy's unofficial mesa-git repo [3] and my own
> mesa-r300-r600-radeonsi-git package [4]
>
> Lone_Wolf
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mesa-r600-r700-git/
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mesa-git/
> [3] http://pkgbuild.com/~lcarlier/mesa-git/
> [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mesa-r300-r600-radeonsi-git/
>
>
Done, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Request remove: openhevc

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 7:30 PM, SpinFlo  wrote:

> Hi ppl
>
> please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openhevc/
>
> i've upload package with wrong name (is openhevc-git, now uploaded)
>
>
> greetings
>

Deleted, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Simon Lipp  wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python3-imaging/
>
> Upstream (myself) abandoned the project in favor of python-pillow which
> is already in community.
>
> Regards,
>
> Simon Lipp
>

Deleted, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] [Orphanage Request] electrum-server-git

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 4:31 AM, Andy Weidenbaum  wrote:

> Requesting orphanage of
> electrum-server-git >;
> the
> maintainer of this package has not been responsive to inquiries. I have an
> updated PKGBUILD prepared:
> https://github.com/atweiden/pkgbuilds/tree/master/electrum-server-git
>

What sort of inquiries? Did you try shooting him an email? That and 2 weeks
without an answer are required for us to disown a package.

Cheers,
-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] weston-rbp

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Srki  wrote:

> Hello,
>
> package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/weston-rbp is now obsolete
> since
> Raspberry Pi patched version is already included in ArchLinuxARM
> repositories: http://archlinuxarm.org/packages?search=weston
>

Deleted, thx.
-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] dzen2-* cleanup

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 09:51 +0100, Florian Bruhin wrote:
> * Maxime Gauduin  [2014-03-03 09:32:02 +0100]:
> > On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 07:17 +0100, Florian Bruhin wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > there's a bit of a chaos with dzen2-* packages.
> > > 
> > > dzen2-gadgets-svn[1]:
> > > Gadgets are also in the normal packages, upstream switched to git,
> > > should be merged into dzen2-git[2].
> > > 
> > > dzen2-parallel[3]:
> > > Old and weird pkgbuild, orphaned, and I'm not interested in
> > > maintaining it. Maybe should be dropped or merged into
> > > community/dzen2.
> > > 
> > > dzen2-xft-xpm-xinerama-svn[4] and dzen2-xft-xpm-xinerama-fixed-svn[5]:
> > > Relying on outdated SVN source, should be merged into
> > > dzen2-xft-xpm-xinerama-git[6].
> > > 
> > > dzen2-bskv-git[7]:
> > > Just an updated dzen2-git package because the latter was really
> > > outdated before I adopted it. Should be merged into dzen2-git[2].
> > > 
> > > Florian
> > > 
> > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dzen2-gadgets-svn/
> > > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dzen2-git/
> > > [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dzen2-parallel/
> > > [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dzen2-xft-xpm-xinerama-svn/
> > > [5] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dzen2-xft-xpm-xinerama-fixed-svn/
> > > [6] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dzen2-xft-xpm-xinerama-git/
> > > [7] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dzen2-bskv-git/
> > > 
> > 
> > All taken care of, thx.
> 
> Thanks. dzen2-bskv-git still is there though.
> 
> Florian
> 

My bad, a checkbox not checked and here's what happens :) Fixed, thx for
checking.
-- 
Maxime


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [aur-general] Rename request; {python-,}pyprof2calltree

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 07:55 +0100, Florian Bruhin wrote:
> * Evgeniy Alekseev  [2014-03-01 14:14:09 +0400]:
> > On Thursday 27 February 2014 06:19:05 Florian Bruhin wrote:
> > > I just picked up python-pyprof2calltree[1] which was orphaned. Since
> > > it's a tool and not a library, it shouldn't have the python- prefix.
> > > Can someone please rename it?
> > 
> > You should upload a package with correct name first, as it was said by Doug 
> > earlier. Then we may merge old package into new one.
> 
> * Doug Newgard  [2014-02-26 23:20:37 -0600]:
> > You need to upload the new package, then a TU can merge them.
> 
> Sorry for taking so long to reply, I was a bit busy.
> 
> I now uploaded the package under the new name, so please merge
> python-pyprof2calltree[1] into pyprof2calltree[2].
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Florian
> 
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-pyprof2calltree
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pyprof2calltree
> 

Done, thx.
-- 
Maxime


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [aur-general] dzen2-* cleanup

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 07:17 +0100, Florian Bruhin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> there's a bit of a chaos with dzen2-* packages.
> 
> dzen2-gadgets-svn[1]:
> Gadgets are also in the normal packages, upstream switched to git,
> should be merged into dzen2-git[2].
> 
> dzen2-parallel[3]:
> Old and weird pkgbuild, orphaned, and I'm not interested in
> maintaining it. Maybe should be dropped or merged into
> community/dzen2.
> 
> dzen2-xft-xpm-xinerama-svn[4] and dzen2-xft-xpm-xinerama-fixed-svn[5]:
> Relying on outdated SVN source, should be merged into
> dzen2-xft-xpm-xinerama-git[6].
> 
> dzen2-bskv-git[7]:
> Just an updated dzen2-git package because the latter was really
> outdated before I adopted it. Should be merged into dzen2-git[2].
> 
> Florian
> 
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dzen2-gadgets-svn/
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dzen2-git/
> [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dzen2-parallel/
> [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dzen2-xft-xpm-xinerama-svn/
> [5] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dzen2-xft-xpm-xinerama-fixed-svn/
> [6] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dzen2-xft-xpm-xinerama-git/
> [7] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dzen2-bskv-git/
> 

All taken care of, thx.
-- 
Maxime


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [aur-general] Delete proposal: amsn-*

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 14:04 +1100, Phillip Smith wrote:
> On 3 March 2014 10:46, WorMzy Tykashi  wrote:
> 
> >
> > The amsn2-git package is, itself, orphaned, and the last development
> > on the amsn2-git repo appears to be almost 3 years ago. Does it still
> > build?
> >
> 
> 
> The whole project will be redundant soon anyway since Microsoft are
> planning to shutdown the servers soon [1] and I don't see anything on their
> website [2] suggesting the package supports any other protocols? No release
> for nearly 2 years as well.
> 
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Messenger_service#Closure​​
> [2] http://www.amsn-project.net/

I've deleted all amsn-* and amsn2-git packages since it's only a matter
of days before msn servers are shut down (if anyone feels the urge to
use msn one last time before it's killed, pidgin is their friend
anyway :P)

Cheers,
-- 
Maxime


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [aur-general] Merge request: Various VCS-packages

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Rikard Falkeborn <
rikard.falkeb...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Please merge the following VCS packages. Reason? Upstream switched to git.
>
> doxygen-svn [https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/doxygen-svn/] into
> doxygen-git [https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/doxygen-git/]
>
> flamerobin-svn [https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/flamerobin-svn/] into
> flamerobin-git [https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/flamerobin-git/]
>
> obnam-bzr [https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/obnam-bzr/] into obnam-git [
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/obnam-git]
>
> python2-cvxpy-svn [https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-cvxpy-svn/]
> into python2-cvxpy-git [
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-cvxpy-git/]
>
> subtitlecomposer-svn [
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/subtitlecomposer-svn/] into
> subtitlecomposer-git [
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/subtitlecomposer-git/].
>
> supertuxkart-svn [https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/supertuxkart-svn/]
> into supertuxkart-git [
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/supertuxkart-git/
> ].
>
> tv-viewer-bzr [https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tv-viewer-bzr/] into
> tv-viewer-git [https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tv-viewer-git/]
>
> w3af-svn [https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/w3af-svn/] into w3af-git [
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/w3af-git/]
>
> wifite-svn [https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wifite-svn/] into
> wifite-git
> [https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wifite-git/].
>
> Thanks,
>

All merged, thank you.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: fluidr3

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:

> On 23 February 2014 05:02, Maxime Gauduin  wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Jerome Leclanche  >wrote:
> >
> >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fluidr3/
> >>
> >> Appears to be the same packaged data as
> >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/soundfont-fluid/ except it doesn't
> >> build properly. Note: I might be wrong on this, but I can't figure out
> >> how to make it build.
> >>
> >> J. Leclanche
> >>
> >
> > I haven't tried building the fluidr3 package recently, but that sfark
> > format is a pain in the neck anyway. The fluidr3 soundfont from
> > soundfont-fluid doesn't use that and comes with changes from the
> musescore
> > guys, so it's actucally a more up-to-date version of the original fluidr3
> > by hammersound. I'll merge fluidr3 into soundfont-fluid. Thx.
>
> Sfark decompression became a non-issue early last year. [1][2] The
> upstream author made contact, and sfarkxtc is maintained by a known
> (at least to me) member of the Linux audio community. [3]
>
> A sfark-compressed soundfont is still helpful for people with slow
> Internet connections; 72 MB from 124 MB is a 42%, 52 MB reduction!
> That's an extra 13 minutes and a dollar (or even more) for some.
>
> Fair enough.


> In conclusion, soundfont-fluid is a better package name, but the
> original fluidr3 that existed in the AUR and depended on a
> decompressor is (since Feb 2013) not obsoleted by musescore's changes
> -- unless they're actually critical to be worth the extra megs.
>
> Here is the changelog from MuseScore (BlissSam: which BTW is shipped in
the archive, along with the original ReadMe from Hammersound):

"Missing note (#94) added to Violin and range extended to G7 (MIDI#103) for
compatibility with MuseScore 2"

Anyone not using the Violin font or MuseScore may argue that the changes
aren't critical enough.


>
> [1] http://melodymachine.com/sfark-linux-mac
> [2]
> http://www.linuxmusicians.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=9854&start=15#p35712
> [3] https://github.com/raboof/sfarkxtc
>
> --
> GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1
>

I'd rather stick with the version from MuseScore, but yeah, bandwitdth is
not a problem here and as you pointed out, I understand if people would
like to have separate packages. How about soundfont-fluid for the original
soundfont from hammersound and soundfont-fluid-musescore for the modified
soundfont?

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: fluidr3

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:31 PM, Rob Til Freedmen <
rob.til.freed...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Maxime Gauduin 
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Jerome Leclanche  >wrote:
> >
> >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fluidr3/
> >>
> >> Appears to be the same packaged data as
> >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/soundfont-fluid/ except it doesn't
> >> build properly. Note: I might be wrong on this, but I can't figure out
> >> how to make it build.
>
> Not sure what your problem was.. I had it installed for some time
> and I'm sure I would have complained if there were problems.
>
> > I haven't tried building the fluidr3 package recently, but that sfark
> > format is a pain in the neck anyway. The fluidr3 soundfont from
>
> Not sure what you mean by 'sfark format' in this context - both install
> .sf2
> Though, one installs it in upper case...
>
> The original fluid soundfont is compressed as an sfark archive which needs
to be decompressed by an external tool (sfarkxtc) before you get an sf2
(sf2 != sfark). The one from MuseScore is a more common GZip archive.



>  > soundfont-fluid doesn't use that and comes with changes from the
> musescore
>
> Yes, a missing note (#94) - and soundfont-fluid should have added the
> Changelog.txt
>
> > guys, so it's actucally a more up-to-date version of the original fluidr3
> > by hammersound. I'll merge fluidr3 into soundfont-fluid. Thx.
>
> But soundfont-fluid not only misses a Changelog.txt but also Fluid R3-
> Readme.doc and
> a proper url (still at "http://www.hammersound.net"; instead of
> "http://www.musescore.org/...";
> *and* introduces blanks in the sound font file name "FluidR3 GM2-2.sf2"
>
> Look at https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/soundfont-fluid/ for complains.
>

I'm not sure changelog and readme are essential here, but I agree that
whitespace is a _bad_ choice. I'd rather have it named 'FluidR3_GM.sf2'. As
for the URL, you could argue that both URLs are valid, as Hammersound is
the original author of the soundfont.

Anyway, I'm CCing the current maintainer, and will take over the package in
2 weeks time if nothing has changed since I've had a PKGBUILD for this
soundfont around for some time.

Cheers,
-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Package with arch-depending source

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Ismael Bouya
wrote:

> (Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:46:48AM +0100) Maxime Gauduin :
> > Yes it is, see the nvidia package for instance:
> >
> https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=packages/nvidia
>
> Of course... It is always when I try to find an example file that I cannot
> find one... Thanks!
>
> Should I maybe add a section for this kind of example on the wiki?
> --
> Ismael
>

Sure, it can't hurt having it documented, please do.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Package with arch-depending source

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Ismael Bouya
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm maintaining a package in the AUR whose source is "arch-depending"
> (anaconda)
>
> For the moment I deal with that by putting the x86_64 version in the
> source/md5 array and adding a
> if [ "$CARCH" == "i686" ] (...)
> just after to modify it.
>
> Is that the usual way to do that? Or how should it be done? I see no
> information about that in the AUR guidelines.
> --
> Ismael
>

Yes it is, see the nvidia package for instance:
https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=packages/nvidia

Cheers,
-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] deletion request: pylint-python3

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:31 AM, Jeremy Audet  wrote:

> Please delete pylint-python3 [1]. It is out of date, incorrectly named and
> a duplicate of python-pylint [2].
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pylint-python3/
> [2] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/python-pylint/
>
> --Jeremy
>

Deleted, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: fluidr3

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Jerome Leclanche wrote:

> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fluidr3/
>
> Appears to be the same packaged data as
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/soundfont-fluid/ except it doesn't
> build properly. Note: I might be wrong on this, but I can't figure out
> how to make it build.
>
> J. Leclanche
>

I haven't tried building the fluidr3 package recently, but that sfark
format is a pain in the neck anyway. The fluidr3 soundfont from
soundfont-fluid doesn't use that and comes with changes from the musescore
guys, so it's actucally a more up-to-date version of the original fluidr3
by hammersound. I'll merge fluidr3 into soundfont-fluid. Thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] delete libftdi1

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 9:15 PM, xantares 09  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> This package has been rendered useless as the same features have been
> added to the libftdi package from main repo:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libftdi1/
> See bug report below.
>
>
> > To: b...@archlinux.org
> > Subject: FS#38526: [libftdi] enable python bindings
> > Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:52:13 +
> > From: b...@archlinux.org
> >
> > THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
> >
> > The following task has a new comment added:
> >
> > FS#38526 - [libftdi] enable python bindings
> > User who did this - Kyle Keen (keenerd)
> >
> > --
> > At some point the makefile became really hard to split.  The python
> bindings are only 200KB extra.  So they will be bundled with python as an
> optdep.
> >
> > Also enabled tests.
> > --
> >
> > More information can be found at the following URL:
> > https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/38526#comment119573
> >
> > You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the
> Flyspray bugtracking system.  If you did not expect this message or don't
> want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings
> at the URL shown above.
>


Deleted, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request - gtk-theme-ambiance-crunchy

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 9:46 PM, Izumi Natsuka wrote:

> Hello,
>
> The package, gtk-theme-ambiance-crunchy has been flagged out-of-date since
> 2013-07-26 and I try to email the maintainer, seems that his/her email has
> been unavailable, so I request to orphan the package:
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-ambiance-crunchy/
>
> Regards,
>
> Izumi
>


Disowned, go get it :)

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] delete libusbx packages

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:51 AM, xantares 09 wrote:

>
> The following packages have been replaced by their libusb equivalent (like
> in the main repo see
> https://www.archlinux.org/packages/core/x86_64/libusb/) and are useless
> now since libusbx has been merged back to libusb:
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-libusbx/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-libusbx/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw32-libusbx/
>
> Regards,
> xan
>


Taken care of, thx.

-- 
Maxime