Re: [aur-general] Could someone please bring back the skypeforlinux-beta-bin package?

2017-11-13 Thread Oon-Ee Ng via aur-general 
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 10:51 PM, Eli Schwartz 
wrote:

> On 11/13/2017 09:35 AM, Michael Kogan wrote:
> > @1) Sorry, I am using the GMail web interface and forgot that it is
> quoting
> > previous mails automatically.
>
> I feel so sorry for you! :D I hope you have the opportunity to get back
> to using a proper email client soon. :)
>
> It's actually a fantastic email client for those of us who transition
often between devices and operating systems. Obviously for mailing list
usage its less than ideal though (until you get used to clicking that
three-dot button)

Re: [aur-general] Could someone please bring back the skypeforlinux-beta-bin package?

2017-11-13 Thread Eli Schwartz 
On 11/13/2017 09:35 AM, Michael Kogan wrote:
> @1) Sorry, I am using the GMail web interface and forgot that it is quoting
> previous mails automatically.

I feel so sorry for you! :D I hope you have the opportunity to get back
to using a proper email client soon. :)

> @2) Thanks, I will have read it up at some point (I'm a bit ill currently,
> so probably in a few days).

https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-dev/2017-November/004398.html

-- 
Eli Schwartz



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Could someone please bring back the skypeforlinux-beta-bin package?

2017-11-13 Thread Michael Kogan 
@1) Sorry, I am using the GMail web interface and forgot that it is quoting
previous mails automatically.

@2) Thanks, I will have read it up at some point (I'm a bit ill currently,
so probably in a few days).

Re: [aur-general] Could someone please bring back the skypeforlinux-beta-bin package?

2017-11-13 Thread Eli Schwartz 
On 11/13/2017 07:32 AM, Michael Kogan wrote:
> Since we are speaking about it, where is a good place to read the
> documentation? :) I have got along with
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository#Submitting_packages
> so far but looks like this is not enough for some cases...

1) Please do not top-post on mailing lists. :)

2) The available options are shown using `ssh a...@aur.archlinux.org
help`, and further elaborated upon in the file "doc/git-interface.txt"
in the source code. Sadly, it appears that it is not available on the
web interface the same way "doc/rpc.txt"  is available as
https://aur.archlinux.org/rpc

I think the solution is to simply copy web/html/rpc.php as
git-interface.php and have it show the contents of git-interface.html
instead of rpc.html

Hopefully we can make this available in the next release (which is
scheduled soon!)

-- 
Eli Schwartz



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Could someone please bring back the skypeforlinux-beta-bin package?

2017-11-13 Thread Michael Kogan 
Since we are speaking about it, where is a good place to read the
documentation? :) I have got along with
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository#Submitting_packages
so far but looks like this is not enough for some cases...

2017-11-13 13:26 GMT+01:00 Eli Schwartz :

> On 11/13/2017 07:22 AM, Bennett Piater wrote:
> >> In this situation you should bump the pkgrel and push it. This would
> >> "create"
> >> the package again in the AUR.
> >>
> >> We don't actually delete the repositories, they are always there.
> >
> > Or, ssh aur.archlinux.org restore $pkgbase
> >
> > Even better because you don't need to touch the pkgrel.
>
> Oh no, someone who actually *reads the documentation*!
>
> Burn the witch! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrzMhU_4m-g
>
> :p
>
> --
> Eli Schwartz
>
>

Re: [aur-general] Could someone please bring back the skypeforlinux-beta-bin package?

2017-11-13 Thread Eli Schwartz 
On 11/13/2017 07:22 AM, Bennett Piater wrote:
>> In this situation you should bump the pkgrel and push it. This would
>> "create"
>> the package again in the AUR.
>>
>> We don't actually delete the repositories, they are always there.
> 
> Or, ssh aur.archlinux.org restore $pkgbase
> 
> Even better because you don't need to touch the pkgrel.

Oh no, someone who actually *reads the documentation*!

Burn the witch! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrzMhU_4m-g

:p

-- 
Eli Schwartz



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Could someone please bring back the skypeforlinux-beta-bin package?

2017-11-13 Thread Bennett Piater 
> In this situation you should bump the pkgrel and push it. This would
> "create"
> the package again in the AUR.
> 
> We don't actually delete the repositories, they are always there.

Or, ssh aur.archlinux.org restore $pkgbase

Even better because you don't need to touch the pkgrel.

Cheers,
Bennett

-- 
GPG fingerprint: 871F 1047 7DB3 DDED 5FC4 47B2 26C7 E577 EF96 7808



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Could someone please bring back the skypeforlinux-beta-bin package?

2017-11-13 Thread Michael Kogan 
Actually, I also thought so but when I tried, git told me that the repo is
up to date, so nothing changed and the package didn't appear in the AUR as
well...

2017-11-13 12:54 GMT+01:00 Carlos Mogas da Silva via aur-general <
aur-general@archlinux.org>:

> On 2017-11-13 10:57, Michael Kogan wrote:
>
>> several complaints now that the issues are not solved for everybody. So I
>> would like to request to put this package back to the AUR. Unfortunately,
>> I
>> cannot do it myself because its git repo still exists:
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=skype
>> forlinux-beta-bin
>>
>
>
> I think you could do it yourself. Just git clone the repo as before and
> push again (not sure it works, but I think it does).
>

Re: [aur-general] Could someone please bring back the skypeforlinux-beta-bin package?

2017-11-13 Thread Carlos Mogas da Silva via aur-general 

On 2017-11-13 10:57, Michael Kogan wrote:
several complaints now that the issues are not solved for everybody. So 
I
would like to request to put this package back to the AUR. 
Unfortunately, I

cannot do it myself because its git repo still exists:
https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=skypeforlinux-beta-bin



I think you could do it yourself. Just git clone the repo as before and 
push again (not sure it works, but I think it does).

Re: [aur-general] Could someone please bring back the skypeforlinux-beta-bin package?

2017-11-13 Thread Morten Linderud 
I have restored the package :)

-- 
Morten Linderud

PGP: 9C02FF419FECBE16


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

[aur-general] Could someone please bring back the skypeforlinux-beta-bin package?

2017-11-13 Thread Michael Kogan 
Hello everybody,

about a month ago I submitted the skypeforlinux-beta-bin package to the AUR
due to an issue which appeared in newer skypeforlinux versions. Yesterday I
decided to get this package deleted because several people reported and I
could verify myself that the issue was fixed in the most recent
skypeforlinux versions. However, after the package has been deleted, I got
several complaints now that the issues are not solved for everybody. So I
would like to request to put this package back to the AUR. Unfortunately, I
cannot do it myself because its git repo still exists:
https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=skypeforlinux-beta-bin

Thanks for your time and sorry for the hassle!
Michael