[aur-general] Disown requests
Hello, please disown ta3d[1], libclaw[2] and plee-the-bear[3]. I contacted maintainer darkbaboon with a patch for ta3d (2014-01-19) and received no response. The other two packages are out of date and can be updated easily. Also, please disown opensonic[4]. It does not build against recent libpng and needs a fix. I tried to contact the maintainer luceo (2014-02-13), but received no response. Apparently he disappeared from the internet by the end of 2012. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ta3d/ [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libclaw/ [3]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/plee-the-bear/ [4]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opensonic/ best regards, carstene1ns signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [aur-general] Disown requests
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 3:18 PM, carstene1ns wrote: > Hello, > please disown ta3d[1], libclaw[2] and plee-the-bear[3]. > I contacted maintainer darkbaboon with a patch for ta3d (2014-01-19) and > received no response. The other two packages are out of date and can be > updated easily. > > Also, please disown opensonic[4]. It does not build against recent > libpng and needs a fix. I tried to contact the maintainer luceo > (2014-02-13), but received no response. Apparently he disappeared from > the internet by the end of 2012. > > [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ta3d/ > [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libclaw/ > [3]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/plee-the-bear/ > [4]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opensonic/ > > best regards, > carstene1ns > > > > All yours. Cheers, -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Disown requests
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 01:47:23PM +0800, Daniel YC Lin wrote: > Could anyone help me to get the permission to adopt 'fossil'. > I've created a 'fossil-fossil' PKGBUILD. You should not do this. Instead post a link to the updated PKGBUILD in the comments. I will delete this duplicate. > But, I want to adopt the 'fossil' too. > I've reported the out-date and e-mailed the current maintainer, but no > reply for at least one or two weeks. Check your sent items and reply once it has been two weeks with no response. > (Check the outdate time, it is more than one month). There may be good reasons why a package has not been updated, so an email to the maintainer is what we go on. -- Jonathan Steel pgp5cS7XE9Nw1.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Disown requests
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 01:47:00PM +, Jonathan Steel wrote: > On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 01:47:23PM +0800, Daniel YC Lin wrote: > > Could anyone help me to get the permission to adopt 'fossil'. > > I've created a 'fossil-fossil' PKGBUILD. > > You should not do this. Instead post a link to the updated PKGBUILD in > the comments. I will delete this duplicate. On further inspection, your package should be fossil-git. Please upload with this new name and I will merge it. fossil should follow the stable version. > > But, I want to adopt the 'fossil' too. > > I've reported the out-date and e-mailed the current maintainer, but no > > reply for at least one or two weeks. > > Check your sent items and reply once it has been two weeks with no > response. > > > (Check the outdate time, it is more than one month). > > There may be good reasons why a package has not been updated, so an email > to the maintainer is what we go on. -- Jonathan Steel pgpEjcykPNoSi.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Disown requests
I've post an updated PKGBUILD on fossil & fossil-fossil. If you insist it should be rename to fossil-git, let me know, I'll upload a new PKGBUILD. On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Jonathan Steel wrote: > On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 01:47:00PM +, Jonathan Steel wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 01:47:23PM +0800, Daniel YC Lin wrote: > > > Could anyone help me to get the permission to adopt 'fossil'. > > > I've created a 'fossil-fossil' PKGBUILD. > > > > You should not do this. Instead post a link to the updated PKGBUILD in > > the comments. I will delete this duplicate. > > On further inspection, your package should be fossil-git. Please upload > with this new name and I will merge it. fossil should follow the stable > version. > > > > But, I want to adopt the 'fossil' too. > > > I've reported the out-date and e-mailed the current maintainer, but no > > > reply for at least one or two weeks. > > > > Check your sent items and reply once it has been two weeks with no > > response. > > > > > (Check the outdate time, it is more than one month). > > > > There may be good reasons why a package has not been updated, so an email > > to the maintainer is what we go on. > > -- > Jonathan Steel >
Re: [aur-general] Disown requests
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 09:50:09AM +0800, Daniel YC Lin wrote: > I've post an updated PKGBUILD on fossil & fossil-fossil. > If you insist it should be rename to fossil-git, let me know, I'll upload a > new PKGBUILD. Yes, please upload it with the right name; git packages should end with -git. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_CVS_%26_SVN_PKGBUILD_guidelines Please also do not top-post. > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Jonathan Steel wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 01:47:00PM +, Jonathan Steel wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 01:47:23PM +0800, Daniel YC Lin wrote: > > > > Could anyone help me to get the permission to adopt 'fossil'. > > > > I've created a 'fossil-fossil' PKGBUILD. > > > > > > You should not do this. Instead post a link to the updated PKGBUILD in > > > the comments. I will delete this duplicate. > > > > On further inspection, your package should be fossil-git. Please upload > > with this new name and I will merge it. fossil should follow the stable > > version. > > > > > > But, I want to adopt the 'fossil' too. > > > > I've reported the out-date and e-mailed the current maintainer, but no > > > > reply for at least one or two weeks. > > > > > > Check your sent items and reply once it has been two weeks with no > > > response. > > > > > > > (Check the outdate time, it is more than one month). > > > > > > There may be good reasons why a package has not been updated, so an email > > > to the maintainer is what we go on. -- Jonathan Steel pgp3BRDp1uQCs.pgp Description: PGP signature
[aur-general] Disown requests: ceceron's packages
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?K=ceceron&SeB=m) Neither of them has been updated in years despite both being OOD. Cheers J. Leclanche
[aur-general] Disown requests: mma and balsamiqmockups
Hi, I'd like to get mma disowned. I contacted the author and did not get a response, and the package has not been updated in over 2 years. I'd also like balsamiqmockups disowned. It has also not been updated in over a year and the maintainer has not responded to PKGBUILD maintenance. I have updates together and will adopt. Thanks, John
Re: [aur-general] Disown requests: mma and balsamiqmockups
On 20/03/14 10:44 PM, John K. Luebs wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to get mma disowned. I contacted the author and did not get a > response, and the package has not been updated in over 2 years. > > I'd also like balsamiqmockups disowned. It has also not been updated > in over a year and the maintainer has not responded to PKGBUILD > maintenance. I have updates together and will adopt. > > Thanks, > John Both are now orphaned. Please include links next time. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[aur-general] Disown requests: sddm-git, sddm-qt5-git
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sddm-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sddm-qt5-git/ I've tried contacting aavci several times through several channels to no reply. The pkgver() needs to be fixed since the git repo doesn't have tags. J. Leclanche
Re: [aur-general] Disown requests: sddm-git, sddm-qt5-git
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 6:12 AM, Jerome Leclanche wrote: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sddm-git/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sddm-qt5-git/ > > I've tried contacting aavci several times through several channels to > no reply. The pkgver() needs to be fixed since the git repo doesn't > have tags. > > > J. Leclanche > Disowned both packages, thx. -- Maxime
