[aur-general] How about hashtags in package description?
We have the limited category list. Sometimes I need accurate description when package can use. How about to use hashtags like #hamradio etc. -- Sincerely yours, Vitaliy Berdinskikh (Виталий Бердинских)
Re: [aur-general] How about hashtags in package description?
2009/3/15, Vitaliy Berdinskikh : > We have the limited category list. > > Sometimes I need accurate description when package can use. > > How about to use hashtags like #hamradio etc. Great! I like that... -- Arch Linux Developer (voidnull) AUR & Pacman Italian Translations Microdia Developer http://www.archlinux.it
Re: [aur-general] How about hashtags in package description?
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 05:14, Giovanni Scafora wrote: > 2009/3/15, Vitaliy Berdinskikh : >> We have the limited category list. >> >> Sometimes I need accurate description when package can use. >> >> How about to use hashtags like #hamradio etc. > > Great! > I like that... > > > -- > Arch Linux Developer (voidnull) > AUR & Pacman Italian Translations > Microdia Developer > http://www.archlinux.it > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/7132
Re: [aur-general] How about hashtags in package description?
Note @ self: always check bug tracker before submitting suggestions. -AT On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 5:11 AM, Daenyth Blank wrote: > On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 05:14, Giovanni Scafora wrote: >> 2009/3/15, Vitaliy Berdinskikh : >>> We have the limited category list. >>> >>> Sometimes I need accurate description when package can use. >>> >>> How about to use hashtags like #hamradio etc. >> >> Great! >> I like that... >> >> >> -- >> Arch Linux Developer (voidnull) >> AUR & Pacman Italian Translations >> Microdia Developer >> http://www.archlinux.it >> > > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/7132 >
Re: [aur-general] How about hashtags in package description?
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 10:49:06AM +0200, Vitaliy Berdinskikh wrote: > We have the limited category list. > > Sometimes I need accurate description when package can use. > > How about to use hashtags like #hamradio etc. What's the practical difference between a tag and a hashtag?
Re: [aur-general] How about hashtags in package description?
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 11:33, Loui Chang wrote: > On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 10:49:06AM +0200, Vitaliy Berdinskikh wrote: >> We have the limited category list. >> >> Sometimes I need accurate description when package can use. >> >> How about to use hashtags like #hamradio etc. > > What's the practical difference between a tag and a hashtag? > > I think that he means to put tags as comments? I have no clue really
Re: [aur-general] How about hashtags in package description?
Le Sun, 15 Mar 2009 11:54:12 -0400, Daenyth Blank a écrit : > > What's the practical difference between a tag and a hashtag? > I think that he means to put tags as comments? I have no clue really I thought he was talking about something like tags used in Jabber or Identi.ca posts. They are inline and begin with a hash, like that: I think #Arch #Linux is awesome. -- catwell
Re: [aur-general] How about hashtags in package description?
В Sun, 15 Mar 2009 08:11:32 -0400 Daenyth Blank пишет: > On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 05:14, Giovanni Scafora > wrote: > > 2009/3/15, Vitaliy Berdinskikh : > >> We have the limited category list. > >> > >> Sometimes I need accurate description when package can use. > >> > >> How about to use hashtags like #hamradio etc. > > > > Great! > > I like that... > > > > > > -- > > Arch Linux Developer (voidnull) > > AUR & Pacman Italian Translations > > Microdia Developer > > http://www.archlinux.it > > > > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/7132 Great! -- Sincerely yours, Vitaliy Berdinskikh (Виталий Бердинских)
Re: [aur-general] How about hashtags in package description?
Am Sonntag 15 März 2009 17:00:05 schrieb Pierre Chapuis: > Le Sun, 15 Mar 2009 11:54:12 -0400, > > Daenyth Blank a écrit : > > > What's the practical difference between a tag and a hashtag? > > > > I think that he means to put tags as comments? I have no clue really > > I thought he was talking about something like tags used in Jabber or > Identi.ca posts. They are inline and begin with a hash, like that: > > I think #Arch #Linux is awesome. The sense escapes me. o_O
Re: [aur-general] How about hashtags in package description?
On Sun, 15 Mar 2009 17:55:01 +0100
Jens Maucher wrote:
> Am Sonntag 15 März 2009 17:00:05 schrieb Pierre Chapuis:
> > Le Sun, 15 Mar 2009 11:54:12 -0400,
> >
> > Daenyth Blank a écrit :
> > > > What's the practical difference between a tag and a hashtag?
> > >
> > > I think that he means to put tags as comments? I have no clue
> > > really
> >
> > I thought he was talking about something like tags used in Jabber or
> > Identi.ca posts. They are inline and begin with a hash, like that:
> >
> > I think #Arch #Linux is awesome.
>
> The sense escapes me. o_O
I see people doing this on twitter.
Functionality-wise they are just tags.
the hash ('#') sign in front is to just mark "this is a tag", which is
useful for other tools and scripts to parse/categorize/... content
Dieter
Re: [aur-general] How about hashtags in package description?
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 08:32:29PM +0100, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Mar 2009 17:55:01 +0100
> Jens Maucher wrote:
>
> > Am Sonntag 15 März 2009 17:00:05 schrieb Pierre Chapuis:
> > > Le Sun, 15 Mar 2009 11:54:12 -0400,
> > >
> > > Daenyth Blank a écrit :
> > > > > What's the practical difference between a tag and a hashtag?
> > > >
> > > > I think that he means to put tags as comments? I have no clue
> > > > really
> > >
> > > I thought he was talking about something like tags used in Jabber or
> > > Identi.ca posts. They are inline and begin with a hash, like that:
> > >
> > > I think #Arch #Linux is awesome.
> >
> > The sense escapes me. o_O
>
> I see people doing this on twitter.
> Functionality-wise they are just tags.
> the hash ('#') sign in front is to just mark "this is a tag", which is
> useful for other tools and scripts to parse/categorize/... content
So it isn't really any more useful than just searching a well written
description eh?
Re: [aur-general] How about hashtags in package description?
Re: searching descriptions: when searching via description, you're
likely to find descriptions that have whatever keyword you typed, but
not in the scenario you had in mind.
Example:
You searched for "office" and that matches the description
"Game about shooting people at the office"
If instead you had a tag system, searching --tag office would,
presumably, match office applications only. Anyway, this may not be a
tremendously great example, but I think there is somewhat of a point
here.
-AT
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Loui Chang wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 08:32:29PM +0100, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
>> On Sun, 15 Mar 2009 17:55:01 +0100
>> Jens Maucher wrote:
>>
>> > Am Sonntag 15 März 2009 17:00:05 schrieb Pierre Chapuis:
>> > > Le Sun, 15 Mar 2009 11:54:12 -0400,
>> > >
>> > > Daenyth Blank a écrit :
>> > > > > What's the practical difference between a tag and a hashtag?
>> > > >
>> > > > I think that he means to put tags as comments? I have no clue
>> > > > really
>> > >
>> > > I thought he was talking about something like tags used in Jabber or
>> > > Identi.ca posts. They are inline and begin with a hash, like that:
>> > >
>> > > I think #Arch #Linux is awesome.
>> >
>> > The sense escapes me. o_O
>>
>> I see people doing this on twitter.
>> Functionality-wise they are just tags.
>> the hash ('#') sign in front is to just mark "this is a tag", which is
>> useful for other tools and scripts to parse/categorize/... content
>
> So it isn't really any more useful than just searching a well written
> description eh?
>
>
