[aur-general] Leaving Arch Linux (and computer world for a while) (delete AUR account)
Hi! Due to new responsibilities in my life, i have to abandon all packages that i've owned in AUR (there are 150 of them). I think that the easier way to do it is to delete my AUR account. Is it possible to do it so? Maybe i'll have to work with Arch Linux when i'll get more time in my hands someday Thank you to all for your support! -- Dany Martineau Enseignant en mathématiques École secondaire du Harfang 5e secondaire http://danym.org CSSMI
Re: [aur-general] Leaving Arch Linux (and computer world for a while) (delete AUR account)
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 14:55, Dany Martineau dany.luc.martin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! Due to new responsibilities in my life, i have to abandon all packages that i've owned in AUR (there are 150 of them). I think that the easier way to do it is to delete my AUR account. Is it possible to do it so? Maybe i'll have to work with Arch Linux when i'll get more time in my hands someday Thank you to all for your support! Sorry to hear that you have to go. Can you link to your AUR user page? I think we can orphan from the list view
Re: [aur-general] Leaving Arch Linux (and computer world for a while) (delete AUR account)
On 18 October 2010 20:57, Daenyth Blank daenyth+a...@gmail.com wrote: Can you link to your AUR user page? I think we can orphan from the list view http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?SeB=mK=danym -- andreascarpino.it Arch Linux Developer
Re: [aur-general] Leaving Arch Linux (and computer world for a while) (delete AUR account)
On 10/18/2010 09:55 PM, Dany Martineau wrote: Hi! Due to new responsibilities in my life, i have to abandon all packages that i've owned in AUR (there are 150 of them). I think that the easier way to do it is to delete my AUR account. Is it possible to do it so? Maybe i'll have to work with Arch Linux when i'll get more time in my hands someday Thank you to all for your support! i'm against deleting accounts -- Ionuț
Re: [aur-general] Leaving Arch Linux (and computer world for a while) (delete AUR account)
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 14:59, Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org wrote: On 18 October 2010 20:57, Daenyth Blank daenyth+a...@gmail.com wrote: Can you link to your AUR user page? I think we can orphan from the list view http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?SeB=mK=danym I got the first page of them orphaned... There really needs to be a select all button somewhere... Ow. Someone else can get the rest.
Re: [aur-general] Leaving Arch Linux (and computer world for a while) (delete AUR account)
2010/10/18 Daenyth Blank daenyth+a...@gmail.com daenyth%2ba...@gmail.com On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 14:59, Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org wrote: On 18 October 2010 20:57, Daenyth Blank daenyth+a...@gmail.comdaenyth%2ba...@gmail.com wrote: Can you link to your AUR user page? I think we can orphan from the list view http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?SeB=mK=danym I got the first page of them orphaned... There really needs to be a select all button somewhere... Ow. Someone else can get the rest. Sorry to see you leave, thx for the great effort in so many packages
Re: [aur-general] Leaving Arch
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 20:15:22 +0200 Christoph Zeiler rab...@moonblade.org wrote: This is to a) inform the TUs that I've switched distros and won't be able to maintain my packages in the AUR anymore. Feel free to orphan all 358 of them. b) say Thank you! to everybody who notified me of outdated packages, sent suggestions and/or patches or helped otherwise. c) give reasons for leaving: My mind is on things other than bleeding-edge and system-tinkering. Over time I also became dissatisfied with the official way of handling source packages. IMO Arch could be great at both source and binary, but the source part doesn't get enough love. Why not add source support for pacman? Oh, and why not compress packages with LZMA? d) wish every Arch user all the best and lots of fun with his/her/its distro of choice! Greetings, Christoph Zeiler aka rabyte aka Moonborn Have fun there. I'd be interested in maintaining some of your packages: glista: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19388 swami: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11642 klick: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20840 gtklick: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20841 pianobooster: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24276 Best regards, Philipp
Re: [aur-general] Leaving Arch
hollun...@gmx.at wrote: On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 20:15:22 +0200 Christoph Zeiler rab...@moonblade.org wrote: This is to a) inform the TUs that I've switched distros and won't be able to maintain my packages in the AUR anymore. Feel free to orphan all 358 of them. b) say Thank you! to everybody who notified me of outdated packages, sent suggestions and/or patches or helped otherwise. c) give reasons for leaving: My mind is on things other than bleeding-edge and system-tinkering. Over time I also became dissatisfied with the official way of handling source packages. IMO Arch could be great at both source and binary, but the source part doesn't get enough love. Why not add source support for pacman? Oh, and why not compress packages with LZMA? d) wish every Arch user all the best and lots of fun with his/her/its distro of choice! Greetings, Christoph Zeiler aka rabyte aka Moonborn Have fun there. I'd be interested in maintaining some of your packages: glista: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19388 swami: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11642 klick: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20840 gtklick: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20841 pianobooster: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24276 Best regards, Philipp The requested packages have been disowned. Feel free to adopt them! -- Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) griffith...@archlinux.us http://ghost1227.com
Re: [aur-general] Leaving Arch
Could I have: 1: gx (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11197) 2: freespeak (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21897) 3: ipodfs (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10237) 4: tangerine (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10192) 5: ripenc (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7947) 6: ocre (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22407) 7: simpleburn (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23670) 8: mp3plot (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25671) Thanks, Laurie 2009/6/13 Daniel J Griffiths ghost1...@archlinux.us: hollun...@gmx.at wrote: On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 20:15:22 +0200 Christoph Zeiler rab...@moonblade.org wrote: This is to a) inform the TUs that I've switched distros and won't be able to maintain my packages in the AUR anymore. Feel free to orphan all 358 of them. b) say Thank you! to everybody who notified me of outdated packages, sent suggestions and/or patches or helped otherwise. c) give reasons for leaving: My mind is on things other than bleeding-edge and system-tinkering. Over time I also became dissatisfied with the official way of handling source packages. IMO Arch could be great at both source and binary, but the source part doesn't get enough love. Why not add source support for pacman? Oh, and why not compress packages with LZMA? d) wish every Arch user all the best and lots of fun with his/her/its distro of choice! Greetings, Christoph Zeiler aka rabyte aka Moonborn Have fun there. I'd be interested in maintaining some of your packages: glista: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19388 swami: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11642 klick: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20840 gtklick: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20841 pianobooster: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24276 Best regards, Philipp The requested packages have been disowned. Feel free to adopt them! -- Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) griffith...@archlinux.us http://ghost1227.com
Re: [aur-general] Leaving Arch
Laurie Clark-Michalek wrote: Could I have: 1: gx (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11197) 2: freespeak (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21897) 3: ipodfs (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10237) 4: tangerine (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10192) 5: ripenc (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7947) 6: ocre (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22407) 7: simpleburn (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23670) 8: mp3plot (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25671) Thanks, Laurie 2009/6/13 Daniel J Griffiths ghost1...@archlinux.us: hollun...@gmx.at wrote: On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 20:15:22 +0200 Christoph Zeiler rab...@moonblade.org wrote: This is to a) inform the TUs that I've switched distros and won't be able to maintain my packages in the AUR anymore. Feel free to orphan all 358 of them. b) say Thank you! to everybody who notified me of outdated packages, sent suggestions and/or patches or helped otherwise. c) give reasons for leaving: My mind is on things other than bleeding-edge and system-tinkering. Over time I also became dissatisfied with the official way of handling source packages. IMO Arch could be great at both source and binary, but the source part doesn't get enough love. Why not add source support for pacman? Oh, and why not compress packages with LZMA? d) wish every Arch user all the best and lots of fun with his/her/its distro of choice! Greetings, Christoph Zeiler aka rabyte aka Moonborn Have fun there. I'd be interested in maintaining some of your packages: glista: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19388 swami: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11642 klick: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20840 gtklick: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20841 pianobooster: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24276 Best regards, Philipp The requested packages have been disowned. Feel free to adopt them! -- Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) griffith...@archlinux.us http://ghost1227.com The requested packages have been orphaned. Please feel free to adopt them. -- Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) griffith...@archlinux.us http://ghost1227.com
Re: [aur-general] Leaving Arch
I'll take: - ruby-sdl - rubygame Thanks, -AT
Re: [aur-general] Leaving Arch
Andrei Thorp wrote: I'll take: - ruby-sdl - rubygame Thanks, -AT The requested packages have been disowned. -- Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) griffith...@archlinux.us http://ghost1227.com
Re: [aur-general] Leaving Arch
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 20:15 +0200, Christoph Zeiler wrote: This is to a) inform the TUs that I've switched distros and won't be able to maintain my packages in the AUR anymore. Feel free to orphan all 358 of them. b) say Thank you! to everybody who notified me of outdated packages, sent suggestions and/or patches or helped otherwise. c) give reasons for leaving: My mind is on things other than bleeding-edge and system-tinkering. Over time I also became dissatisfied with the official way of handling source packages. IMO Arch could be great at both source and binary, but the source part doesn't get enough love. Why not add source support for pacman? Oh, and why not compress packages with LZMA? d) wish every Arch user all the best and lots of fun with his/her/its distro of choice! Greetings, Christoph Zeiler aka rabyte aka Moonborn i'll take these: go_big: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24621 gnome-whitenoise: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19818 viewnior: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26547 gitg: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26045 uget: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25887 streamtuner2: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23738 gnetworktester: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24321 thanks, M Rawash
Re: [aur-general] Leaving Arch
M Rawash wrote: On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 20:15 +0200, Christoph Zeiler wrote: This is to a) inform the TUs that I've switched distros and won't be able to maintain my packages in the AUR anymore. Feel free to orphan all 358 of them. b) say Thank you! to everybody who notified me of outdated packages, sent suggestions and/or patches or helped otherwise. c) give reasons for leaving: My mind is on things other than bleeding-edge and system-tinkering. Over time I also became dissatisfied with the official way of handling source packages. IMO Arch could be great at both source and binary, but the source part doesn't get enough love. Why not add source support for pacman? Oh, and why not compress packages with LZMA? d) wish every Arch user all the best and lots of fun with his/her/its distro of choice! Greetings, Christoph Zeiler aka rabyte aka Moonborn i'll take these: go_big: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24621 gnome-whitenoise: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19818 viewnior: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26547 gitg: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26045 uget: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25887 streamtuner2: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23738 gnetworktester: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24321 thanks, M Rawash The requested packages have been disowned. -- Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) griffith...@archlinux.us http://ghost1227.com
Re: [aur-general] Leaving Arch
Why don't disown all packages at one time? and people will take care of adopt them, and let this thread die? Thanks -- Angel Velásquez angvp @ irc.freenode.net Linux Counter: #359909
[aur-general] Leaving Arch
This is to a) inform the TUs that I've switched distros and won't be able to maintain my packages in the AUR anymore. Feel free to orphan all 358 of them. b) say Thank you! to everybody who notified me of outdated packages, sent suggestions and/or patches or helped otherwise. c) give reasons for leaving: My mind is on things other than bleeding-edge and system-tinkering. Over time I also became dissatisfied with the official way of handling source packages. IMO Arch could be great at both source and binary, but the source part doesn't get enough love. Why not add source support for pacman? Oh, and why not compress packages with LZMA? d) wish every Arch user all the best and lots of fun with his/her/its distro of choice! Greetings, Christoph Zeiler aka rabyte aka Moonborn
Re: [aur-general] Leaving Arch
On 2009-06-12 20:15 +0200, Christoph Zeiler wrote: Too bad. Even though I'm just a user for a couple of month now. I feel the need to say something. but the source part doesn't get enough love. Why not add source support for pacman? Mostly because pacman is for the binary packages and abs is for the source. But even pacman can build every package if you want. Oh, and why not compress packages with LZMA? I think on arch-general was a discussion about that just last month. No really solution in the discussion though. Thomas
Re: [aur-general] Leaving Arch
On Fri 12 Jun 2009 20:15 +0200, Christoph Zeiler wrote: This is to a) inform the TUs that I've switched distros and won't be able to maintain my packages in the AUR anymore. Feel free to orphan all 358 of them. b) say Thank you! to everybody who notified me of outdated packages, sent suggestions and/or patches or helped otherwise. c) give reasons for leaving: My mind is on things other than bleeding-edge and system-tinkering. Over time I also became dissatisfied with the official way of handling source packages. IMO Arch could be great at both source and binary, but the source part doesn't get enough love. Why not add source support for pacman? Oh, and why not compress packages with LZMA? d) wish every Arch user all the best and lots of fun with his/her/its distro of choice! Greetings, Christoph Zeiler aka rabyte aka Moonborn Nooo. Yeah I agree that managing source packages could be improved. Cheers!
Re: [aur-general] Leaving Arch
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 14:15, Christoph Zeilerrab...@moonblade.org wrote: This is to a) inform the TUs that I've switched distros and won't be able to maintain my packages in the AUR anymore. Feel free to orphan all 358 of them. Christoph Zeiler aka rabyte aka Moonborn Sorry to hear you're going to go. I'll see what I can do about having some of the Arch-Games team take some of your packages.
Re: [aur-general] Leaving Arch
Christoph could you tell us to which distro you switched to? Thanks.
Re: [aur-general] Leaving Arch
Sad to hear you are leaving. But everybody has a freedom of choice. Would be interesting to know which distro you are going to use after Arch :) Thanks for nice wishes. Wish you the same! Have a lot of fun! Best, Jozsef -- Fear God, and give Him glory, because the hour of His judgment has come; worship Him who made the heaven and the earth and sea and springs of waters. Revelation 14:7 On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Christoph Zeiler rab...@moonblade.orgwrote: This is to a) inform the TUs that I've switched distros and won't be able to maintain my packages in the AUR anymore. Feel free to orphan all 358 of them. b) say Thank you! to everybody who notified me of outdated packages, sent suggestions and/or patches or helped otherwise. c) give reasons for leaving: My mind is on things other than bleeding-edge and system-tinkering. Over time I also became dissatisfied with the official way of handling source packages. IMO Arch could be great at both source and binary, but the source part doesn't get enough love. Why not add source support for pacman? Oh, and why not compress packages with LZMA? d) wish every Arch user all the best and lots of fun with his/her/its distro of choice! Greetings, Christoph Zeiler aka rabyte aka Moonborn
Re: [aur-general] Leaving Arch
2009/6/12 Jozsef joz...@gmx.com Sad to hear you are leaving. But everybody has a freedom of choice. Would be interesting to know which distro you are going to use after Arch :) Thanks for nice wishes. Wish you the same! Have a lot of fun! Best, Jozsef -- Fear God, and give Him glory, because the hour of His judgment has come; worship Him who made the heaven and the earth and sea and springs of waters. Revelation 14:7 On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Christoph Zeiler rab...@moonblade.org wrote: This is to a) inform the TUs that I've switched distros and won't be able to maintain my packages in the AUR anymore. Feel free to orphan all 358 of them. b) say Thank you! to everybody who notified me of outdated packages, sent suggestions and/or patches or helped otherwise. c) give reasons for leaving: My mind is on things other than bleeding-edge and system-tinkering. Over time I also became dissatisfied with the official way of handling source packages. IMO Arch could be great at both source and binary, but the source part doesn't get enough love. Why not add source support for pacman? Oh, and why not compress packages with LZMA? d) wish every Arch user all the best and lots of fun with his/her/its distro of choice! Greetings, Christoph Zeiler aka rabyte aka Moonborn Be happy in your other distro, and thanks for all the packages :) i can imagine, by you comment, that is gentoo, right? :) -- Felipe de Oliveira Tanus E-mail: fota...@gmail.com Blog: http://fotanus.blogspot.com/ Site: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br/~fotanus/ - Aperture Science: We do what we must because we can For the good of all of us except for the ones who are dead
