[aur-general] Merge package request
Dear TU's, I have uploaded the following packages to the AUR: python2-biopython python-biopython to replace: biopython python3-biopython respectively and make the packages respect the new arch linux naming guidelines. I have kept both versions in the AUR for a week, to give a chance for packages that depended on biopython to update their dependences, which they now have (one of those packages seems not to be maintained any more tough). Could you please merge the old packages with the new ones, keeping the comments and votes? Thank you very much. Francisco Pina Martins
Re: [aur-general] Merge package request
On 12/03/2012 05:08 PM, Francisco Pina Martins wrote: Dear TU's, I have uploaded the following packages to the AUR: python2-biopython python-biopython to replace: biopython python3-biopython respectively and make the packages respect the new arch linux naming guidelines. I have kept both versions in the AUR for a week, to give a chance for packages that depended on biopython to update their dependences, which they now have (one of those packages seems not to be maintained any more tough). Could you please merge the old packages with the new ones, keeping the comments and votes? Thank you very much. Francisco Pina Martins Both merged. Please include links to packages you mentioned next time in these requests, thanks! -- Felix Yan Twitter: @felixonmars Wiki: http://felixc.at signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[aur-general] Merge package request
Hello, Please, could you merge these 2 packages: Old one: servicemenu-encfs-kde4 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26567 New one: kde-servicemenus-encfs (which comply to the new naming guidelines) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61523 Thanks ;) -- Hyacinthe signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] Merge package request
Hello, could you please merge iceweasel[1] under iceweasel libre[2] Thanks in advance. 1.- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59185 2.- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61502
Re: [aur-general] Merge package request
On Aug 5, 2012 7:55 PM, Jorge Barroso jorge.barroso...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, could you please merge iceweasel[1] under iceweasel libre[2] Thanks in advance. 1.- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59185 2.- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61502 I tend to think the former is a much better name than the latter. If the browser is already I designed to be libre, why does it require the statement in the name?
Re: [aur-general] Merge package request
2012/8/6 Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com I tend to think the former is a much better name than the latter. If the browser is already I designed to be libre, why does it require the statement in the name? Jaja you're right but I thought all the PKGBUILD around that name (i had to rewrite it because the former didn't work) and forget to rename the src.tar.xz package before uploading it. But... if you like the former one I can do it again with that name, so... remove iceweasel-libre then XD Thanks!
Re: [aur-general] Merge package request
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 02:23:40AM +0200, Jorge Barroso wrote: 2012/8/6 Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com I tend to think the former is a much better name than the latter. If the browser is already I designed to be libre, why does it require the statement in the name? Jaja you're right but I thought all the PKGBUILD around that name (i had to rewrite it because the former didn't work) and forget to rename the src.tar.xz package before uploading it. But... if you like the former one I can do it again with that name, so... remove iceweasel-libre then XD Thanks! Always favor the upstream name. I've deleted -libre.
