Re: [aur-general] Removal package request
On 03/04/2010 02:00 μμ, Moritz Rudert wrote: Hi, Please delete http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11097 because AFAIK the support for hardware engines is in OpenSSH upstream. Thanks, Moritzhelios Rudert Done.
[aur-general] Removal package request
Hi, After I've updated the vmware-server package please delete - bin32-vmware-server - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23441 (its no necessary anymore) - vmware-server2 - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26256 (its a duplicate of vmware-server) - vmware-srv-modules - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23433 (duplicate of vmware-server-modules - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7400). Thanks, Moritz helios Rudert
Re: [aur-general] Removal package request
On 03/04/2010 03:47 μμ, Moritz Rudert wrote: Hi, After I've updated the vmware-server package please delete - bin32-vmware-server - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23441 (its no necessary anymore) - vmware-server2 - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26256 (its a duplicate of vmware-server) - vmware-srv-modules - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23433 (duplicate of vmware-server-modules - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7400). Thanks, Moritzhelios Rudert Done.
Re: [aur-general] Removal package request
Late reply, but that doesn't really help since all what was posted was the ID of the package. Now that it has been deleted, I have no way of telling which package that was. I assume it wasn't testtesttest. It was testtesttest. Lukas
Re: [aur-general] Removal package request
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 10:54, Thorsten Töpper atsut...@freethoughts.de wrote: On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:23:58 +0100 Anders Bergh ande...@gmail.com wrote: It would be nice if packages weren't just deleted, but moved somewhere else for inspection or just disabled somehow... The tarball is still available at http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/testtesttest/testtesttest.tar.gz -- Jabber: atsut...@freethoughts.de Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/ Key: 295AFBF4 FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4 Late reply, but that doesn't really help since all what was posted was the ID of the package. Now that it has been deleted, I have no way of telling which package that was. I assume it wasn't testtesttest. -- Anders Bergh
[aur-general] Removal package request
Hi, I've renamed quagga-patched - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24649 to quagga-dn42 - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35430 So please delete the first one. Thanks, Moritz helios Rudert
Re: [aur-general] Removal package request
Am 13.03.2010 13:48, schrieb Moritz Rudert: Hi, I've renamed quagga-patched - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24649 to quagga-dn42 - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35430 So please delete the first one. Thanks, Moritzhelios Rudert Done, thank you.
Re: [aur-general] Removal package request
Am 10.03.2010 08:47, schrieb Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227): On 03/10/10 at 08:41am, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: This following package does nothing. Or actually it does – it takes a lot of space (1GB). http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35338 It also doesn't exist... or did someone beat me to it? I deleted it just after reading the mail. I have answered already, so you should get the mail soon... ;)
Re: [aur-general] Removal package request
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 09:33, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) ghost1...@archlinux.us wrote: On 03/10/10 at 08:46am, Daniel Isenmann wrote: Am 10.03.2010 08:41, schrieb Lukáš Jirkovský: This following package does nothing. Or actually it does – it takes a lot of space (1GB). http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35338 Done. Totally useless package. Now i'm really curious... what was it? -- It would be nice if packages weren't just deleted, but moved somewhere else for inspection or just disabled somehow... -- Anders Bergh
Re: [aur-general] Removal package request
Original-Nachricht Datum: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 02:33:41 -0600 Von: Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) ghost1...@archlinux.us An: Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR) aur-general@archlinux.org Betreff: Re: [aur-general] Removal package request On 03/10/10 at 08:46am, Daniel Isenmann wrote: Am 10.03.2010 08:41, schrieb Lukáš Jirkovský: This following package does nothing. Or actually it does – it takes a lot of space (1GB). http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35338 Done. Totally useless package. Now i'm really curious... what was it? -- It was a package with an 1GB included patch file. But the so called patch wasn't in text form, it was something in binary form. Maybe we were misused as file hoster or somebody just tested something. -- Sicherer, schneller und einfacher. Die aktuellen Internet-Browser - jetzt kostenlos herunterladen! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/atbrowser
Re: [aur-general] Removal package request
On 10 March 2010 10:37, Daniel Isenmann daniel.isenm...@gmx.de wrote: Original-Nachricht Datum: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 02:33:41 -0600 Von: Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) ghost1...@archlinux.us An: Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR) aur-general@archlinux.org Betreff: Re: [aur-general] Removal package request On 03/10/10 at 08:46am, Daniel Isenmann wrote: Am 10.03.2010 08:41, schrieb Lukáš Jirkovský: This following package does nothing. Or actually it does – it takes a lot of space (1GB). http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35338 Done. Totally useless package. Now i'm really curious... what was it? -- It was a package with an 1GB included patch file. But the so called patch wasn't in text form, it was something in binary form. Maybe we were misused as file hoster or somebody just tested something. -- Sicherer, schneller und einfacher. Die aktuellen Internet-Browser - jetzt kostenlos herunterladen! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/atbrowser When it first appeared (it was yesterday) it was empty PKGBUILD with description I'm not trollin and foo.patch which had 256MB. The patch seemed to be an empty file (like dd if=/dev/zero of=file). I thought the uploader will ask for deletion soon but I didn't see anyone asking for deletion of the package so I checked it on the AUR. It was there but the patch had 1GB! So I asked for deletion myself. Lukas
Re: [aur-general] Removal package request
On 03/10/2010 11:54 AM, Thorsten Töpper wrote: On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:23:58 +0100 Anders Berghande...@gmail.com wrote: It would be nice if packages weren't just deleted, but moved somewhere else for inspection or just disabled somehow... The tarball is still available at http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/testtesttest/testtesttest.tar.gz i'll say to suspend his account. -- Ionut
Re: [aur-general] Removal package request
On 10/03/2010, Ionut Biru biru.io...@gmail.com wrote: On 03/10/2010 11:54 AM, Thorsten Töpper wrote: On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:23:58 +0100 Anders Berghande...@gmail.com wrote: It would be nice if packages weren't just deleted, but moved somewhere else for inspection or just disabled somehow... The tarball is still available at http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/testtesttest/testtesttest.tar.gz i'll say to suspend his account. He/she might've had a legitimate reason and no ill intent, but that can only be verified by e-mailing that person and then receiving a reply. -- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD
Re: [aur-general] Removal package request
On 10/03/10 20:11, Ray Rashif wrote: On 10/03/2010, Ionut Birubiru.io...@gmail.com wrote: On 03/10/2010 11:54 AM, Thorsten Töpper wrote: On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:23:58 +0100 Anders Berghande...@gmail.com wrote: It would be nice if packages weren't just deleted, but moved somewhere else for inspection or just disabled somehow... The tarball is still available at http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/testtesttest/testtesttest.tar.gz i'll say to suspend his account. He/she might've had a legitimate reason and no ill intent, but that can only be verified by e-mailing that person and then receiving a reply. Really... I can not think of one. I also think the account should be suspended. Allan
Re: [aur-general] Removal package request
On Wed 10 Mar 2010 10:45 +0100, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: On 10 March 2010 10:37, Daniel Isenmann daniel.isenm...@gmx.de wrote: Original-Nachricht Datum: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 02:33:41 -0600 Von: Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) ghost1...@archlinux.us An: Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR) aur-general@archlinux.org Betreff: Re: [aur-general] Removal package request On 03/10/10 at 08:46am, Daniel Isenmann wrote: Am 10.03.2010 08:41, schrieb Lukáš Jirkovský: This following package does nothing. Or actually it does – it takes a lot of space (1GB). http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35338 Done. Totally useless package. Now i'm really curious... what was it? -- It was a package with an 1GB included patch file. But the so called patch wasn't in text form, it was something in binary form. Maybe we were misused as file hoster or somebody just tested something. -- Sicherer, schneller und einfacher. Die aktuellen Internet-Browser - jetzt kostenlos herunterladen! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/atbrowser When it first appeared (it was yesterday) it was empty PKGBUILD with description I'm not trollin and foo.patch which had 256MB. The patch seemed to be an empty file (like dd if=/dev/zero of=file). I thought the uploader will ask for deletion soon but I didn't see anyone asking for deletion of the package so I checked it on the AUR. It was there but the patch had 1GB! So I asked for deletion myself. I could have sworn we had a file size cap on there. I'll have to look into that. Thanks for the notice.
Re: [aur-general] Removal package request
When it first appeared (it was yesterday) it was empty PKGBUILD with description I'm not trollin and foo.patch which had 256MB. The patch seemed to be an empty file (like dd if=/dev/zero of=file). I thought the uploader will ask for deletion soon but I didn't see anyone asking for deletion of the package so I checked it on the AUR. It was there but the patch had 1GB! So I asked for deletion myself. I could have sworn we had a file size cap on there. I'll have to look into that. Thanks for the notice. Well, if it was from /dev/zero, it compresses rather well and won't be affected by a file size limit.
Re: [aur-general] Removal package request
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 05:31, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: Really... I can not think of one. I also think the account should be suspended. Allan +1. Even if there weren't malicious intentions, it still shows a remarkable lack of common sense.
Re: [aur-general] Removal package request
On Wed 10 Mar 2010 17:26 +0100, Gereon Schomber wrote: When it first appeared (it was yesterday) it was empty PKGBUILD with description I'm not trollin and foo.patch which had 256MB. The patch seemed to be an empty file (like dd if=/dev/zero of=file). I thought the uploader will ask for deletion soon but I didn't see anyone asking for deletion of the package so I checked it on the AUR. It was there but the patch had 1GB! So I asked for deletion myself. I could have sworn we had a file size cap on there. I'll have to look into that. Thanks for the notice. Well, if it was from /dev/zero, it compresses rather well and won't be affected by a file size limit. Hmm. Any ideas on how we could avert this kind of issue?
[aur-general] Removal package request
This following package does nothing. Or actually it does – it takes a lot of space (1GB). http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35338
Re: [aur-general] Removal package request
Am 10.03.2010 08:41, schrieb Lukáš Jirkovský: This following package does nothing. Or actually it does – it takes a lot of space (1GB). http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35338 Done. Totally useless package.
Re: [aur-general] Removal package request
On 03/10/10 at 08:41am, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: This following package does nothing. Or actually it does – it takes a lot of space (1GB). http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35338 It also doesn't exist... or did someone beat me to it? --
