[aur-general] Request for removal
Hi I just adopted and upgraded childsplay and childsplay-alphabet-sounds. From now, childsplay-plugins and childsplay-plugins-lfc are useless and don't work with childsplay > 0.9. Could a TU delete childsplay-plugins and childsplay-plugins-lfc please (they are orphans) Thanks! -- Dany Martineau Enseignant en mathématiques En congé parental jusqu'au 25 août 2009 http://arctangente.blogspot.com CSSMI
[aur-general] Request for removal
otf-symbola [1] can and should be deleted as the symbola font is now distributed in ttf form ^^ [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44076 -- (\_ /) copy the bunny to your profile (0.o ) to help him achieve world domination. (> <) come join the dark side. /_|_\ (we have cookies.)
[aur-general] Request for removal
Hello, please delete a package atomzombiesmasher-hib http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51295 because a package is double atomzombiesmasher http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45944 .
[aur-general] Request for removal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Could you please delete my package [1]powder-toy-beta as the beta releases are extremely rare. And I'm planning on uploading a -git version, that would basically be the same. [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49645 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQGcBAEBAgAGBQJOT5I6AAoJEEZYEccqviVaQWgMAJYSoY6bKduYMC2Icg4pp972 Qe0QFbfRr/KbQXXCBKY9QiHSG42T/iUjYBJNIsGFTSzToTwNJBifeSrnSzHQzvHI PXPSwJU0XDU5OIQPOh/P1REFZ9QD1hGmy1zfvILdrHML6q8nXX0xsJfWFrrk/eQw 5ADt7yxNncdtCxNA3yaA1APyRMSEfiuomVsxxxuaYNJT+60KZw4nFELRMjeCIkJa dkn94vsygZOGIK0Ymx1Qy2wfly7XCiKCZ0KCLPaXiUzm64NP+6LvXaDMfV1cCQ+K Jp1X/ggilEU+IF72zpuPgE8JfJ/Vz3BZyAPh33oVrQpsFv91vPUSGJVXeTKLfsWD 7q2M6eSMcEWFY6BhAPqOm2f/qlD8rRpVOidaKASNaTSZeZlPZl+6p0BWcO/MEfC+ TA1EW6zr92LcypXseXiVEL0KcaA+LyJTl92QjjjVzB2rZpLUaLck1kanAO/vthEJ ZKa/mngDQDzw0ev9ZMtl8XXHlhE7SvzQppzBbubcIQ== =z4B2 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
[aur-general] Request for removal
[1]spacechem-hib can be removed as [2]spacechem support both versions Humble Indie Bundel and the non hib version. [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52951 [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50886 -- (\_ /) copy the bunny to your profile (0.o ) to help him achieve world domination. (> <) come join the dark side. /_|_\ (we have cookies.)
[aur-general] Request for removal
Please remove my package [1]cpupowerutils There is pkg with better name been uploaded, wich also builds from source archive instead of git. [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47310
[aur-general] Request for removal
Coul my [1]"lib32-" pkg be removed. Adopted the lib32-talloc pkg
and changed ${_the_real_name_of_the_pkg} variable thingies
to just simply hardwired "talloc" XD, bu forgot to change that
in the pkgname.
[1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56309
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] Request for removal.
[1]xvba-video-0.8.0 provides the ready built binary version of the open- sourced version of xvba-video. [2]xvba-video-open provides the same 0.8.0 version, with the exception that it builds it from source. Practically looking the only difference is that xvba-video-open needs the xvba-sdk package as a build time depency, but that package consists only of couple header files, so building it takes <10s. So please remove [1]xvba-video-0.8.0 as it serves no reason and only complicates the xvba-video situation, by providing one more package to choose from. [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56177 [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51703 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] Request for removal
[1]plymouth-systemd-git can be removed as support for systemd was just added to [2]plymouth-git package. [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51715 [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26117 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] Request for removal
Please remove [1]voikko-openoffice as it isn't needed anymore as I assume everyone has already changed to libreoffice. [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44143 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[aur-general] Request for removal
Please nuke the following 4 packages. [1]swfdec-git ||Development has stalled 3 years ago. Only few [2]swfdec-git-pulse ||random fixes compared to the stable release, [3]swfdec-mozilla-git ||doesn't build as it is. [4]cairo-snapshot |Was needed by [1], before stable cairo 1.10 [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28182 [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28180 [3]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28183 [4]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33888 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[aur-general] Request for removal
Please nuke [1]opeengoo It seems to have been renamed to [2]fengoffice which is in AUR. [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30029 [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33478 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[aur-general] request for removal
Please remove the following packages: [1]wine-dib: Patch included in upstream since version 1.3.37 [2]wine-no-x: Really old version 1.1.39, 0 votes, orphan. Does notserve so big purpose, easy to remake the PKGBUILD if needed. [3]wine-opt: Not updated since Novenber 2011, only change compared to the repo version seems to be that this is installed in /opt dir instead of /usr, no vote, in general doesn't seem usefull at all. Reupload if needed. [4]wine-uk: Not updated since 2009, no votes, orphan. [5]wine-hacks: Git repo not updated since 2010, more likely has more bugs than fixes when compared to repo version. [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51636 [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34644 [3]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53832 [4]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33255 [5]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19675 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[aur-general] Request for removal
Please merge [1]lib32-udev to [2]lib32-systemd-tools. It is a simplish rename to represent the naming scheme used in repos. (Altought only udev is included in the new package) [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56518 [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60231 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[aur-general] Request for removal
Hello, vboxgtk-svn can now be removed. Reason: migrated to git. Thanks. Joeny (Biloky)
[aur-general] Request for removal
gstreamer-vaapi #The same package exists in extra under a differend name. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gstreamer-vaapi/
[aur-general] Request for removal
[1]memcpymemset is bad duplicate of [2]libcofi_rpi-git [2]libcofi_rpi-git has been superseded by [3]arm-mem-git Remove: [1] & [2] - [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/memcpymemset/ [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libcofi_rpi-git/
Re: [aur-general] Request for removal
Dany Martineau wrote: Hi I just adopted and upgraded childsplay and childsplay-alphabet-sounds. From now, childsplay-plugins and childsplay-plugins-lfc are useless and don't work with childsplay > 0.9. Could a TU delete childsplay-plugins and childsplay-plugins-lfc please (they are orphans) Thanks! Done
Re: [aur-general] Request for removal
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Jesse Jaara wrote: > otf-symbola [1] can and should be deleted as the symbola > font is now distributed in ttf form ^^ Done, thanks.
Re: [aur-general] Request for removal
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 3:30 PM, widomaker...@gmail.com wrote: > Hello, > please delete a package atomzombiesmasher-hib Removed, thanks.
Re: [aur-general] Request for removal
Am 20.08.2011 12:53, schrieb Jesse Jaara: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Could you please delete my package [1]powder-toy-beta as the beta releases are extremely rare. And I'm planning on uploading a -git version, that would basically be the same. [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49645 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQGcBAEBAgAGBQJOT5I6AAoJEEZYEccqviVaQWgMAJYSoY6bKduYMC2Icg4pp972 Qe0QFbfRr/KbQXXCBKY9QiHSG42T/iUjYBJNIsGFTSzToTwNJBifeSrnSzHQzvHI PXPSwJU0XDU5OIQPOh/P1REFZ9QD1hGmy1zfvILdrHML6q8nXX0xsJfWFrrk/eQw 5ADt7yxNncdtCxNA3yaA1APyRMSEfiuomVsxxxuaYNJT+60KZw4nFELRMjeCIkJa dkn94vsygZOGIK0Ymx1Qy2wfly7XCiKCZ0KCLPaXiUzm64NP+6LvXaDMfV1cCQ+K Jp1X/ggilEU+IF72zpuPgE8JfJ/Vz3BZyAPh33oVrQpsFv91vPUSGJVXeTKLfsWD 7q2M6eSMcEWFY6BhAPqOm2f/qlD8rRpVOidaKASNaTSZeZlPZl+6p0BWcO/MEfC+ TA1EW6zr92LcypXseXiVEL0KcaA+LyJTl92QjjjVzB2rZpLUaLck1kanAO/vthEJ ZKa/mngDQDzw0ev9ZMtl8XXHlhE7SvzQppzBbubcIQ== =z4B2 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Done, thank you.
Re: [aur-general] Request for removal
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 5:59 AM, Jesse Jaara wrote: > [1]spacechem-hib can be removed as [2]spacechem support both versions > Humble Indie Bundel and the non hib version. > > [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52951 > [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50886 > > -- > (\_ /) copy the bunny to your profile > (0.o ) to help him achieve world domination. > (> <) come join the dark side. > /_|_\ (we have cookies.) > done
Re: [aur-general] Request for removal
On 25/10/11 18:29, Jesse Juhani Jaara wrote: > Please remove my package [1]cpupowerutils > There is pkg with better name been uploaded, wich > also builds from source archive instead of git. What is the name of the new package?
Re: [aur-general] Request for removal
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 06:32:39PM +0300, Evangelos Foutras wrote: > On 25/10/11 18:29, Jesse Juhani Jaara wrote: > > Please remove my package [1]cpupowerutils > > There is pkg with better name been uploaded, wich > > also builds from source archive instead of git. > > What is the name of the new package? cpupower [2] that is the name of the binary as well as the name of the source dir in kernel sourcees /tools dir https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52718
Re: [aur-general] Request for removal
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Jesse Juhani Jaara wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 06:32:39PM +0300, Evangelos Foutras wrote: >> On 25/10/11 18:29, Jesse Juhani Jaara wrote: >> > Please remove my package [1]cpupowerutils >> > There is pkg with better name been uploaded, wich >> > also builds from source archive instead of git. >> >> What is the name of the new package? > > cpupower [2] that is the name of the binary as well as the > name of the source dir in kernel sourcees /tools dir > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52718 Thank you. I have deleted your package.
Re: [aur-general] Request for removal
On 02.02.2012 10:56, Jesse Juhani Jaara wrote:
> Coul my [1]"lib32-" pkg be removed. Adopted the lib32-talloc pkg
> and changed ${_the_real_name_of_the_pkg} variable thingies
> to just simply hardwired "talloc" XD, bu forgot to change that
> in the pkgname.
>
> [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56309
removed
--
Florian Pritz
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [aur-general] Request for removal.
Hi, Removed for the reasons you mentioned and for silly naming. Thanks. -- Cordially, Alexander Rødseth Arch Linux Trusted User (xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)
Re: [aur-general] Request for removal
Hi, Removed, thx. -- Cordially, Alexander Rødseth Arch Linux Trusted User (xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)
Re: [aur-general] Request for removal
Hi, Removed, thanks. While not being maintained isn't normally a reason for deletion, I see that there are still plenty of "swfdec" packages available in AUR. -- Cordially, Alexander Rødseth Arch Linux Trusted User (xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)
Re: [aur-general] Request for removal
2012/5/1 Jesse Juhani Jaara > Please nuke [1]opeengoo > It seems to have been renamed to [2]fengoffice which is in AUR. > > [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30029 > [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33478 > merged thx -- Ike
Re: [aur-general] request for removal
On Fri, 11 May 2012 16:45:28 +0300 Jesse Juhani Jaara wrote: > Please remove the following packages: > > [1]wine-dib: Patch included in upstream since version 1.3.37 > > [2]wine-no-x: Really old version 1.1.39, 0 votes, orphan. Does notserve > so big purpose, easy to remake the PKGBUILD if needed. > > [3]wine-opt: Not updated since Novenber 2011, only change compared to > the repo version seems to be that this is installed in /opt dir instead > of /usr, no vote, in general doesn't seem usefull at all. Reupload if > needed. > > [4]wine-uk: Not updated since 2009, no votes, orphan. > > [5]wine-hacks: Git repo not updated since 2010, more likely has more > bugs than fixes when compared to repo version. > > > [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51636 > [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34644 > [3]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53832 > [4]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33255 > [5]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19675 > All gone, thanks. - speps - pgpB2h0oZU1pn.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Request for removal
Op zaterdag 28 juli 2012 22:51:00 schreef Jesse Juhani Jaara: > Please merge [1]lib32-udev to [2]lib32-systemd-tools. It is a simplish > rename to represent the naming scheme used in repos. (Altought only udev > is included in the new package) > > [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56518 > [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60231 merged, thx --Ike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Request for removal
On 11/25/2012 10:50 PM, Joeny Ang wrote: Hello, vboxgtk-svn can now be removed. Reason: migrated to git. Thanks. Joeny (Biloky) Well [1] should be merged into [2], but yeah. Also, it would be good to provide links next time for the TU's convenience. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vboxgtk-svn/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vboxgtk-git/
Re: [aur-general] Request for removal
On 11/26/2012 11:54 AM, Limao Luo wrote: > On 11/25/2012 10:50 PM, Joeny Ang wrote: >> Hello, >> >> vboxgtk-svn can now be removed. Reason: migrated to git. >> >> Thanks. >> >> Joeny (Biloky) > Well [1] should be merged into [2], but yeah. Also, it would be good to > provide links next time for the TU's convenience. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vboxgtk-svn/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vboxgtk-git/ > Merged, thanks. -- Felix Yan Twitter: @felixonmars Wiki: http://felixc.at signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [aur-general] Request for removal
Hi, > On 11/26/2012 11:54 AM, Limao Luo wrote: >> Well [1] should be merged into [2], but yeah. Also, it would be good to >> provide links next time for the TU's convenience. Ok, thanks :) On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Felix Yan wrote: > Merged, thanks. Thanks :) Joeny
Re: [aur-general] Request for removal
Hi, Thanks for reporting. I see that gst-vaapi is in [extra], removing the AUR package. -- Sincerely, Alexander Rødseth xyproto / TU
Re: [aur-general] Request for removal
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Jesse Jaara wrote: > [1]memcpymemset is bad duplicate of [2]libcofi_rpi-git > > [2]libcofi_rpi-git has been superseded by [3]arm-mem-git > > Remove: [1] & [2] Removed. Thanks. -- Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer https://www.seblu.net GPG: 0x2072D77A
[aur-general] Request for removal (libkipi-svn)
Hi! I adopted digikam-svn and kipi-plugins-svn and updated them. libkipi-svn was a dependency for these packages, but now it's useless. I suggest that a TU delete libkipi-svn. Thank you!! -- Dany Martineau Enseignant en mathématiques En congé parental jusqu'au 25 août 2009 http://arctangente.blogspot.com CSSMI
[aur-general] Request for Removal: python2-oggconvert
I apologize if I'm doing something wrong, I'm uncomfortable with mailing lists. I submitted an AUR pkgbuild for python2-oggconvert, but it is no longer necessary since the oggconvert maintainer updated to account for the python upgrade. I couldn't find any information on the AUR site or the arch wiki on how to remove a package I've uploaded, but yugrotavele suggested the best way would be to subscribe to this mailing list then send an email to everyone asking for someone else to delete the package. Will someone please kill that package for me? And will someone tell me if there's a better way to do this, for future reference? http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42034 Thanks for any help, Andy
[aur-general] Request for removal (blok-git)
blok-git has been broken for some time upstream and seems unlikely to change. At the time it was sort of a proof-of-concept and now it's just source rotting. Because of this, blok-git can/should be removed. Thanks.
Re: [aur-general] Request for removal (libkipi-svn)
Dany Martineau wrote: Hi! I adopted digikam-svn and kipi-plugins-svn and updated them. libkipi-svn was a dependency for these packages, but now it's useless. I suggest that a TU delete libkipi-svn. Thank you!! Done
[aur-general] Request for removal ( alfresco-labs-tomcat )
Hi, Alfresco Labs was renamed to Alfresco Community, so I uploaded a new PKGBUILD to AUR. Please remove alfresco-labs-tomcat: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22387 Thanks. Bye. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[aur-general] Request for removal of some packages.
I think that the following should be removed: json-wheel - has been renamed to ocaml-json-wheel http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29860 mupad - isn't available from the company anymore (see last comment) http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=3315 mupad-packages - same reason as mupad http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13128 pyyaml-python - has been renamed to python-yaml http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27758 skype_video_hijacker - has been renamed to gstfakevideo http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13956 libpsychrometric - project seems to be abandoned (download link still works though) http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13206 ww2d - seems to have been discontinued and when I ran it on my computer, it seems to be a 32bit only java binary? http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=3451 ww2d-extra - the maps aren't offered any where anymore. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=3461
Re: [aur-general] Request for Removal: python2-oggconvert
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 6:52 AM, Andrew M. Kluger wrote: > I apologize if I'm doing something wrong, I'm uncomfortable with mailing > lists. You're not doing anything wrong. > I submitted an AUR pkgbuild for python2-oggconvert, but it is no longer > necessary since the oggconvert maintainer updated to account for the python > upgrade. I couldn't find any information on the AUR site or the arch wiki on > how to remove a package I've uploaded, but yugrotavele suggested the best > way would be to subscribe to this mailing list then send an email to > everyone asking for someone else to delete the package. python2-oggconvert has been deleted. > Will someone please kill that package for me? > And will someone tell me if there's a better way to do this, for future > reference? What you did is the correct and only procedure to request the deletion of a package. > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42034 > > Thanks for any help, > Andy Cheers. (By the way, Gnome most certainly is not evil. :p)
Re: [aur-general] Request for Removal: python2-oggconvert
Thank you kindly. Is this procedure documented anywhere? On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Evangelos Foutras wrote: > On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 6:52 AM, Andrew M. Kluger > wrote: > > I apologize if I'm doing something wrong, I'm uncomfortable with mailing > > lists. > > You're not doing anything wrong. > > > I submitted an AUR pkgbuild for python2-oggconvert, but it is no longer > > necessary since the oggconvert maintainer updated to account for the > python > > upgrade. I couldn't find any information on the AUR site or the arch wiki > on > > how to remove a package I've uploaded, but yugrotavele suggested the best > > way would be to subscribe to this mailing list then send an email to > > everyone asking for someone else to delete the package. > > python2-oggconvert has been deleted. > > > Will someone please kill that package for me? > > And will someone tell me if there's a better way to do this, for future > > reference? > > What you did is the correct and only procedure to request the deletion > of a package. > > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42034 > > > > Thanks for any help, > > Andy > > Cheers. > > (By the way, Gnome most certainly is not evil. :p) >
Re: [aur-general] Request for Removal: python2-oggconvert
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 22:20 -0400, Andrew M. Kluger wrote: > Thank you kindly. Is this procedure documented anywhere? http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR#Q:_Foo_in_AUR_is_outdated.3B_what_do_I_do.3F
[aur-general] Request for removal (samsung-tools-dev)
Hi, please remove package 'samsung-tools-dev', since it's been replaced by 'samsung-tools-bzr'. Link to obsolete package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44607 Thanks! :)
Re: [aur-general] Request for removal (blok-git)
On 12 May 2011 18:38, Harley Laue wrote: > blok-git has been broken for some time upstream and seems unlikely to > change. At the time it was sort of a proof-of-concept and now it's > just source rotting. > > Because of this, blok-git can/should be removed. Removed, thanks.
[aur-general] Request for removal of obsolete x2goagent
Hello, I own aur/x2goagent, which has now become obsolete since it newly exists as extra/x2go-agent. Will you pls remove it? AUR Package name: x2goagent URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/x2goagent/ regards, Milan Knížek -- http://milan-knizek.net/ About linux and photography (Czech only) O linuxu a fotografování
Re: [aur-general] Request for removal ( alfresco-labs-tomcat )
Tom wrote: Hi, Alfresco Labs was renamed to Alfresco Community, so I uploaded a new PKGBUILD to AUR. Please remove alfresco-labs-tomcat: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22387 Thanks. Bye. done. -- Ionut
Re: [aur-general] Request for removal of some packages.
On 08/03/2010, anonymous anonymous wrote: > I think that the following should be removed: Done. Except: > mupad - isn't available from the company anymore (see last comment) > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=3315 > > mupad-packages - same reason as mupad > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13128 Wait a little while, there may be another location for the sources. > libpsychrometric - project seems to be abandoned (download link still > works though) > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13206 It still works. Cunts as a helpful orphan. > ww2d - seems to have been discontinued and when I ran it on my > computer, it seems to be a 32bit only java binary? > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=3451 Still works. Or at least needs another look before being removed. -- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD
Re: [aur-general] Request for removal of some packages.
On 08/03/2010, Ray Rashif wrote: > It still works. Cunts as a helpful orphan. s/Cunts/Counts/ Glad this isn't a spoken correspondence. -- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD
Re: [aur-general] Request for removal of some packages.
On 03/07/2010 09:21 PM, Ray Rashif wrote: On 08/03/2010, Ray Rashif wrote: It still works. Cunts as a helpful orphan. s/Cunts/Counts/ Glad this isn't a spoken correspondence. -- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD Thanks for the chuckle :)
[aur-general] Request for removal (showell-svn, gexiv2-svn)
Hello, shotwell-svn and gexiv2-svn can now be removed, yorba has already migrated to git. Thanks. Joeny (Biloky)
Re: [aur-general] Request for removal (samsung-tools-dev)
On 05/06/2011 02:00 PM, Fortunato Ventre (voRia) wrote: Hi, please remove package 'samsung-tools-dev', since it's been replaced by 'samsung-tools-bzr'. Link to obsolete package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44607 Thanks! :) Gone -- Jelle van der Waa
Re: [aur-general] Request for removal of obsolete x2goagent
On 13 January 2013 12:46, Milan Knížek wrote: > Hello, > > I own aur/x2goagent, which has now become obsolete since it newly exists > as extra/x2go-agent. > > Will you pls remove it? > > AUR Package name: x2goagent > URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/x2goagent/ Removed, thanks.
[aur-general] Request for removal of kicad-doc from AUR
Would someone be as so kind as to remove the no longer needed package kicad-doc from AUR for me [0]? Thank you, Mark [0] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15958
[aur-general] Request for removal (gnome-bluetooth-svn, obexd-client)
Hello, The following packages can now be removed: 1. gnome-bluetooth-svn (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27134) Gnome has migrated to GIT, and the SVN is not updated anymore. 2. obexd-client (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28046) This is now a duplicate of the obexd package in extra since the one in extra is also compiled with --disable-server flag. Thanks. Joeny (Biloky in AUR)
Re: [aur-general] Request for removal (showell-svn, gexiv2-svn)
On 1 May 2011 12:56, Joeny Ang wrote: > shotwell-svn and gexiv2-svn can now be removed, yorba has already > migrated to git. Done, thanks.
[aur-general] Request for removal: tinyerpclient, openerp-web, openerp-server
openerp-server[1] and openerp-web[2] are unmaintained and have been merged into openerp[3] (by the vendor). tinyerp-client[4] is also unmaintained, outdated and obsolete, since it is an old version of openerp-client[5] before the name change[6]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26581 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46357 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57534 [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15425 [5] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26582 [6] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenERP
Re: [aur-general] Request for removal (gnome-bluetooth-svn, obexd-client)
Joeny Ang wrote: > Hello, > > The following packages can now be removed: > 1. gnome-bluetooth-svn (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27134) > 2. obexd-client (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28046) They have been relegated to the dust-bin of history *grin*. -- Chris
Re: [aur-general] Request for removal (gnome-bluetooth-svn, obexd-client)
> > They have been relegated to the dust-bin of history *grin*. > > -- Chris > Thanks! :)
Re: [aur-general] Request for removal: tinyerpclient, openerp-web, openerp-server
On 27 March 2012 11:10, Luis von Bernus wrote: > openerp-server[1] and openerp-web[2] are unmaintained and have been merged > into openerp[3] (by the vendor). tinyerp-client[4] is also unmaintained, > outdated and obsolete, since it is an old version of openerp-client[5] > before the name change[6]. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26581 > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46357 > [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57534 > [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15425 > [5] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26582 > [6] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenERP All done. Thanks for keeping AUR clean.
[aur-general] Request for removal: firefox-aurora-nightly and python-webdav
I maintain both firefox-aurora-nightly [1] and firefox-aurora [2]. The creation of the first was a mistake. Please remove it. Please remove python-webdav [3] as well. I recreated it as python2-webdav, [4] since it depends on python2. openerp [5], which was the only package that depended on it has already switched. Thanks Luis [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59779 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48216 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29764 [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59780 [5] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57534
Re: [aur-general] Request for removal of kicad-doc fr om AUR
-Original Message- > Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 22:20:55 +0100 > Subject: [aur-general] Request for removal of kicad-doc from AUR > From: "Mark Schneider" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" > > Would someone be as so kind as to remove the no longer needed package > kicad-doc from AUR for me [0]? > > Thank you, > Mark > > [0] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15958 > Done Regards Stefan
Re: [aur-general] Request for removal: firefox-aurora-nightly and python-webdav
Sorry, there's a typo: It should be python(2)-pywebdav instead of python(2)-webdav On 7 June 2012 22:53, Luis von Bernus wrote: > I maintain both firefox-aurora-nightly [1] and firefox-aurora [2]. The > creation of the first was a mistake. Please remove it. > > Please remove python-webdav [3] as well. I recreated it as python2-webdav, > [4] since it depends on python2. openerp [5], which was the only package > that depended on it has already switched. > > Thanks > Luis > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59779 > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48216 > [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29764 > [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59780 > [5] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57534 >
Re: [aur-general] Request for removal: firefox-aurora-nightly and python-webdav
On 7 June 2012 22:55, Luis von Bernus wrote: > Sorry, there's a typo: It should be python(2)-pywebdav instead of > python(2)-webdav > > > On 7 June 2012 22:53, Luis von Bernus wrote: > >> I maintain both firefox-aurora-nightly [1] and firefox-aurora [2]. The >> creation of the first was a mistake. Please remove it. >> >> Please remove python-webdav [3] as well. I recreated it as python2-webdav, >> [4] since it depends on python2. openerp [5], which was the only package >> that depended on it has already switched. >> >> Thanks >> Luis >> >> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59779 >> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48216 >> [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29764 >> [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59780 >> [5] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57534 >> I removed the firefox-aurora-nightly and merged python-pywebdav into python2-pywebdav. Lukas
