[aur-general] delete packages
starcal-new (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32486) starcal-last (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35941) The user was creating a new package every time a new version came out. Since the original starcal was orphaned I updated it and fixed the problem with python (that all the three had.) I think these two should be deleted, even though starcal-new is not orphaned. nppangband-newest (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34119) Duplicate of nppangband from extra. rainlendar-beta (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16491) rainlendar-light is now on version 2.7, rainlendar-beta-unstable is on 2.8.b98. The two of them completely replace it. liferea-dev (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23759) Completely outdated. liferea, liferea-git and liferea-unstable are all up to date, replacing -dev.
[aur-general] delete packages
I think all of these packages should be deleted: iolang (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42613) dupe of iolanguage vimspell (http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=465) upstream itself advises to stop using it since vim7 has a better native spellchecker mkvtoolnix-patched (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41906) "A permanent official solution has been included in the new v4.4 upstream release. So this package no longer has any reason to exist." floola (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16267) OR bin32-floola ( http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18717) both provide the same (outdated) bin package. One of them should be deleted (second one is the dupe but has better naming...) searchsploit-svn (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38759) gone (?)
[aur-general] delete packages
libreoffice-bin [1] - dupe of package in extra. pyclutter-svn [2] is deprecated since pyclutter now uses git (and there is a git package in aur). Also, pyclutter [3] and python-clutter [4] are dupes. First has better naming but the second was submitted first so I don't know which one should be deleted - up to you. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41812 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18485 [3] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34322 [4] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14044
[aur-general] delete packages
Banshee mirage plugin is now part of the Banshee Community Extensions project, as you can confirm in [1] - read April 7th news and check where source link points to. Since the community extensions have an AUR package, all mirage plugin packages should be deleted [2] and [3]. Thanks in advance, João Cordeiro [1] http://hop.at/mirage/ [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19007 [3] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13138
Re: [aur-general] delete packages
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:13:14AM +, Joao Cordeiro wrote: > starcal-new (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32486) > starcal-last (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35941) > The user was creating a new package every time a new version came out. Since > the original starcal was orphaned I updated it and fixed the problem with > python (that all the three had.) I think these two should be deleted, even > though starcal-new is not orphaned. > > nppangband-newest (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34119) > Duplicate of nppangband from extra. > > rainlendar-beta (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16491) > rainlendar-light is now on version 2.7, rainlendar-beta-unstable is on > 2.8.b98. The two of them completely replace it. > > > liferea-dev (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23759) > Completely outdated. liferea, liferea-git and liferea-unstable are all up to > date, replacing -dev. Done, thanks a lot :)
Re: [aur-general] delete packages
Am 18.11.2010 16:12, schrieb Joao Cordeiro: > I think all of these packages should be deleted: > > iolang (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42613) > dupe of iolanguage > removed > vimspell () > upstream itself advises to stop using it since vim7 has a better native > spellchecker > removed > mkvtoolnix-patched (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41906) > "A permanent official solution has been included in the new v4.4 upstream > release. So this package no longer has any reason to exist." > removed > floola (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16267) OR bin32-floola ( > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18717) > both provide the same (outdated) bin package. One of them should be deleted > (second one is the dupe but has better naming...) > no, floola is the better naming. A i686-only only package is okay. > searchsploit-svn (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38759) > gone (?) > removed, this not even is a PKGBUILD. Thankyou
Re: [aur-general] delete packages
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:02 PM, Joao Cordeiro wrote: > libreoffice-bin [1] - dupe of package in extra. > > pyclutter-svn [2] is deprecated since pyclutter now uses git (and there is a > git package in aur). Also, pyclutter [3] and python-clutter [4] are dupes. > First has better naming but the second was submitted first so I don't know > which one should be deleted - up to you. Deleted the first two and pyclutter.
Re: [aur-general] delete packages
Hi. I was maintainer of the pyclutter package. Can't build python-clutter, marked it as outdated. Also, there are pyclutter-gst and pyclutter-gtk packages in AUR, it would be nice to keep the overall naming scheme of python bindings for clutter. I have nothing against if someone else will maintain this package, but it would be nice to at least rename and update it then. 2010/12/9 Evangelos Foutras : > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:02 PM, Joao Cordeiro wrote: >> libreoffice-bin [1] - dupe of package in extra. >> >> pyclutter-svn [2] is deprecated since pyclutter now uses git (and there is a >> git package in aur). Also, pyclutter [3] and python-clutter [4] are dupes. >> First has better naming but the second was submitted first so I don't know >> which one should be deleted - up to you. > > Deleted the first two and pyclutter. >
Re: [aur-general] delete packages
2010/12/9 Андрей Григорьев > Hi. > > I was maintainer of the pyclutter package. > > Can't build python-clutter, marked it as outdated. Also, there are > pyclutter-gst and pyclutter-gtk packages in AUR, it would be nice to > keep the overall naming scheme of python bindings for clutter. I have > nothing against if someone else will maintain this package, but it > would be nice to at least rename and update it then. > > 2010/12/9 Evangelos Foutras : > > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:02 PM, Joao Cordeiro > wrote: > >> libreoffice-bin [1] - dupe of package in extra. > >> > >> pyclutter-svn [2] is deprecated since pyclutter now uses git (and there > is a > >> git package in aur). Also, pyclutter [3] and python-clutter [4] are > dupes. > >> First has better naming but the second was submitted first so I don't > know > >> which one should be deleted - up to you. > > > > Deleted the first two and pyclutter. > > > The thing is, there's no point in having two packages providing the same thing. It isn't good for anyone. If you can't build python-clutter and you know how to solve it (since you packaged the same thing) just post your PKGBUILD in pastebin and leave it in the comments. If the maintainer does not answer and doesn't update the package, than I'm sure someone will orphan it so that you can adopt this package. I'm sorry that your package has been removed and I'm replying just because I was the one suggesting it (even though I didn't pick the one to be deleted), but you must understand this is the only way everyone can have a proper pyclutter package.
Re: [aur-general] delete packages
2010/12/10 Андрей Григорьев : > Hi. > > I was maintainer of the pyclutter package. Thank you for following up. > Can't build python-clutter, marked it as outdated. Also, there are > pyclutter-gst and pyclutter-gtk packages in AUR, it would be nice to > keep the overall naming scheme of python bindings for clutter. I have > nothing against if someone else will maintain this package, but it > would be nice to at least rename and update it then. Your suggestion sounds reasonable. Can you please re-upload pyclutter (see [1] for the tarball) to the AUR? I'll then delete python-clutter, and if Michael (damumbl) wants to continue maintaining it under the new name, you could disown it for him. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pyclutter/pyclutter.tar.gz
Re: [aur-general] delete packages
2010/12/10 Evangelos Foutras : > Can you please re-upload pyclutter (see [1] for the tarball) to the > AUR? I'll then delete python-clutter, and if Michael (damumbl) wants > to continue maintaining it under the new name, you could disown it for > him. Michael sent me an email and said he's fine with having pyclutter maintained by someone else. I went ahead and deleted python-clutter, re-uploaded pyclutter [1], and disowned it for Андрей to adopt. I apologize for all the mess. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44303
Re: [aur-general] delete packages
Good. Thank you. 10 декабря 2010 г. 13:15 пользователь Evangelos Foutras написал: > 2010/12/10 Evangelos Foutras : >> Can you please re-upload pyclutter (see [1] for the tarball) to the >> AUR? I'll then delete python-clutter, and if Michael (damumbl) wants >> to continue maintaining it under the new name, you could disown it for >> him. > > Michael sent me an email and said he's fine with having pyclutter > maintained by someone else. > > I went ahead and deleted python-clutter, re-uploaded pyclutter [1], > and disowned it for Андрей to adopt. > > I apologize for all the mess. > > > [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44303 >
[aur-general] Delete packages tbe and the_butterfly_effect
Hi all, tbe [1] and the_butterfly_effect [2] are duplicates of thebutterflyeffect [3], which is the first of three uploaded. Yesterday [3] has been updated at the latest version and it's actively maintained, so I'm asking for removal of [1] and [2]. I also suggested maintainer of [1] and [2] to ask for removal of their packages (see comments), they agreed but no request has been made until now. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38215 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38230 [3] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34214
Re: [aur-general] Delete packages tbe and the_butterfly_effect
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 02:22:47AM +0200, Federico Chiacchiaretta wrote: > Hi all, > tbe [1] and the_butterfly_effect [2] are duplicates of thebutterflyeffect > [3], which is the first of three uploaded. Yesterday [3] has been updated at > the latest version and it's actively maintained, so I'm asking for removal > of [1] and [2]. > I also suggested maintainer of [1] and [2] to ask for removal of their > packages (see comments), they agreed but no request has been made until now. > > [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38215 > [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38230 > [3] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34214 Done. -- Jabber: atsut...@freethoughts.de Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/ Key: 295AFBF4 FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
[aur-general] delete packages (mostly svn and cvs)
Some time ago I noticed that (obviously) there are several *-svn aur packages that no longer make sense because they were changed to git upstream. After a little thinking I came up with a list of all *-svn and *-cvs packages and made a script to check if said packages have a corresponding -git package. I believe the initial list was around the 100 packages, but then some were there due to some bugs in my script. From the final list I have been checking one by one if they should or not be deleted. It's harder than I thought, so I only managed to take care of 20-25 by now. I'll post other ones later. 1) flashrom-dev [1.1] and flashrom-svn-new [1.2] are both dupes of flashrom-svn [1.3]. 2) foobnix-svn [2.1] was replaced by foobnix-git [2.2] Homepage points to git only and svn results in out of date files. 3) fluxus-cvs [3.1] was replaced by fluxus-git [3.2] 4) django-mptt-svn [4.1] (already orphaned and flagged) was replaced by django-mptt-git [4.2] 5) dfu-util-svn [5.1] was replaced by dfu-util-git [5.2] as stated in [5.3] 6) conduit-svn [6.1] replaced by conduit-git [6.2] 7) brasero-svn [7.1] replaced by brasero-git [7.2] 8) Isn't banshee-latest-stable [8.1] a dupe of banshee [8.2] in extra? 9) banshee-svn [9.1] replaced by banshee-git [9.2] as you can see in [9.3] and [9.4]. 10) glade-svn [10.1] replaced by glade-git [10.2]. Check [10.3] and [10.4]. 11) gigolo-svn [11.1] replaced by gigolo-git [11.2] 12) gtkpod-svn [12.1] replaced by gtkpod-git [12.2]. 13) gpodder-svn [13.1] replaced by gpodder-git [13.2] 14) panache-translations-svn [14.1], panache-llibs-svn [14.2] and panache-lbase-svn [14.3] were replaced by [14.4], [14.5] and [14.6]. [1.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30391 [1.2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36865 [1.3] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23390 [2.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40181 [2.2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44053 [3.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22717 [3.2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30150 [4.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26103 [4.2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42146 [5.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21123 [5.2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43643 [5.3] https://svn.openmoko.org/trunk/src/host/dfu-util/DEPRECATED_REPOSITORY_PLEASE_READ_THIS [6.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36381 [6.2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41156 [7.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10566 [7.2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26026 [8.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41565 [8.2] http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/banshee/ [9.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=8223 [9.2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26048 [9.3] http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/banshee?view=revision&revision=5209 [9.4] http://git.gnome.org/browse/banshee/log/ [10.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23365 [10.2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38049 [10.3] http://svn.gnome.org/svn/glade3/trunk/ChangeLog [10.4] http://git.gnome.org/browse/glade3/tree/ChangeLog [11.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23840 [11.2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40811 [12.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13299 [12.2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32545 [13.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13409 [13.2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18877 [14.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30556 [14.2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30555 [14.3] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30554 [14.4] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34504 [14.5] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34503 [14.6] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34502
[aur-general] Delete packages: libmp3splt, mp3splt and mp3splt-gtk
Gentlemen, Please, delete these packages. I uploaded them thinking they didn't exist in our repositories, but the search I made was wrong. I searched with 'mp3split' but the packages are mp3splt, without that i, so I ended up creating the packages and uploading. Just noticed after the fact. Sorry for the trouble. -- A: Because it obfuscates the reading. Q: Why is top posting so bad? --- Denis A. Altoe Falqueto Linux user #524555 ---
Re: [aur-general] delete packages (mostly svn and cvs)
Am 04.12.2010 16:40, schrieb Joao Cordeiro: > Some time ago I noticed that (obviously) there are several *-svn aur > packages that no longer make sense because they were changed to git > upstream. After a little thinking I came up with a list of all *-svn and > *-cvs packages and made a script to check if said packages have a > corresponding -git package. > > I believe the initial list was around the 100 packages, but then some were > there due to some bugs in my script. From the final list I have been > checking one by one if they should or not be deleted. It's harder than I > thought, so I only managed to take care of 20-25 by now. I'll post other > ones later. > > > 1) flashrom-dev [1.1] and flashrom-svn-new [1.2] are both dupes of > flashrom-svn [1.3]. > > 2) foobnix-svn [2.1] was replaced by foobnix-git [2.2] > Homepage points to git only and svn results in out of date files. > > 3) fluxus-cvs [3.1] was replaced by fluxus-git [3.2] > > 4) django-mptt-svn [4.1] (already orphaned and flagged) was replaced by > django-mptt-git [4.2] > > 5) dfu-util-svn [5.1] was replaced by dfu-util-git [5.2] as stated in [5.3] > > 6) conduit-svn [6.1] replaced by conduit-git [6.2] > > 7) brasero-svn [7.1] replaced by brasero-git [7.2] > > 8) Isn't banshee-latest-stable [8.1] a dupe of banshee [8.2] in extra? > > 9) banshee-svn [9.1] replaced by banshee-git [9.2] as you can see in [9.3] > and [9.4]. > > 10) glade-svn [10.1] replaced by glade-git [10.2]. Check [10.3] and [10.4]. > > 11) gigolo-svn [11.1] replaced by gigolo-git [11.2] > > 12) gtkpod-svn [12.1] replaced by gtkpod-git [12.2]. > > 13) gpodder-svn [13.1] replaced by gpodder-git [13.2] > > 14) panache-translations-svn [14.1], panache-llibs-svn [14.2] and > panache-lbase-svn [14.3] were replaced by [14.4], [14.5] and [14.6]. > > > > > [1.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30391 > [1.2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36865 > [1.3] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23390 > > [2.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40181 > [2.2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44053 > > [3.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22717 > [3.2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30150 > > [4.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26103 > [4.2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42146 > > [5.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21123 > [5.2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43643 > [5.3] > https://svn.openmoko.org/trunk/src/host/dfu-util/DEPRECATED_REPOSITORY_PLEASE_READ_THIS > > [6.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36381 > [6.2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41156 > > [7.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10566 > [7.2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26026 > > [8.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41565 > [8.2] http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/banshee/ > > [9.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=8223 > [9.2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26048 > [9.3] http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/banshee?view=revision&revision=5209 > [9.4] http://git.gnome.org/browse/banshee/log/ > > [10.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23365 > [10.2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38049 > [10.3] http://svn.gnome.org/svn/glade3/trunk/ChangeLog > [10.4] http://git.gnome.org/browse/glade3/tree/ChangeLog > > [11.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23840 > [11.2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40811Danoe, many thanks! > > [12.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13299 > [12.2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32545 > > [13.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13409 > [13.2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18877 > > [14.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30556 > [14.2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30555 > [14.3] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30554 > [14.4] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34504 > [14.5] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34503 > [14.6] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34502 > Done, many thanks!
Re: [aur-general] delete packages (mostly svn and cvs)
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote: > Am 04.12.2010 16:40, schrieb Joao Cordeiro: > > Done, many thanks! > Some more: 1) qutim-svn [1.1], qutim-plugin-kde-integration-svn [1.2], qutim-plugin-icq-svn [1.3], qutim-plugin-jabber-svn [1.4], qutim-plugin-mrim-svn [1.5] were replaced by git packages - qutim-git [1.6], qutim-plugin-kde-integration-git [1.7], qutim-plugin-icq-git [1.8], qutim-plugin-jabber-git [1.9], qutim-plugin-mrim-git [1.10]. 2) xfburn-svn [2.1] was replaced by xfburn-git [2.2]. SVN URL at [2.3] points to git. 3) uimge-svn [3.1] (already orphaned and flagged) was replaced by uimge-git [3.2]. 4) rocrail-svn [4.1]. From maintainer: "Sorry. Wrong package name. Resubmitted as rocrail-bzr." 5) vala-svn [5.1] was replaced by vala-git [5.2]. Check [5.3]. 6) panache-lartworks-svn [6.1] replaced by git package as well. 7) pymt-svn [7.1] is orphaned and was replaced by pymt-git [7.2]. 8) pyclutter-svn [8.1] was replaced by pyclutter-git [8.2]. 9) pycairo-cvs [9.1] replaced by pycairo-git [9.2]. Check [9.3]. 10) miro-svn [10.1] replaced by miro-git [10.2]. 11) moorie-svn [11.1] doesn't even work anymore. moorie-devel [11.2] is deprecated - check [11.3]. Both should be replaced because they are replaced by moorie-git [11.4]. 12) netradiant-svn [12.1] was replaced by netradiant-git [12.2]. 13) netsniff-ng-svn [13.1] replaced by netsniff-ng-git [13.2]. 14) murmur-svn [14.1] replaced by murmur-git [14.2] 15) ncmpc-svn [15.1] replaced by ncmpc-git [15.2]. 16) python-soaplib-svn [16.1] also deprecated and already replaced by git package. [1.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17812 [1.2]* *http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27561 [1.3] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27556 [1.4] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27557 [1.5] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27559 [1.6] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33002 [1.7] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33006 [1.8] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33004 [1.9] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33003 [1.10] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33005 [2.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16894 [2.2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34252 [2.3] http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfburn [3.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18015 [3.2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22033 [4.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36987 [5.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21151 [5.2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31429 [5.3] http://live.gnome.org/Vala/Code [6.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30553 [7.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25405 [7.2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36947 [8.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18485 [8.2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36197 [9.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22894 [9.2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40920 [9.3] http://www.cairographics.org/download/ [10.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12090 [10.2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37168 [11.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21555 [11.2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18284 [11.3] http://hg.sharesource.org/moorie [11.4] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35522 [12.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23523 [12.2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36239 [13.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36319 [13.2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41984 [14.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20442 [14.2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32900 [15.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1947 [15.2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20139 [16.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31552
Re: [aur-general] delete packages (mostly svn and cvs)
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Joao Cordeiro wrote: > > > On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Stefan Husmann > wrote: > >> Am 04.12.2010 16:40, schrieb Joao Cordeiro: >> >> Done, many thanks! >> > > Some more: > > (... ... ...) > Was I supposed to create a new mail instead of replying to the previous one? Anyway, powertop-svn [1], lgob-svn [2], gnuradio-svn [3] and pcmanfm-svn [4] all have been abandoned upstream and have git package. Thanks in advance Joao Cordeiro [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13502 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25571 [3] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29748 [4] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15696
Re: [aur-general] delete packages (mostly svn and cvs)
Joao Cordeiro wrote: > Was I supposed to create a new mail instead of replying to the previous one? > > Anyway, > powertop-svn [1], lgob-svn [2], gnuradio-svn [3] and pcmanfm-svn [4] all > have been abandoned upstream and have git package. > > > Thanks in advance > Joao Cordeiro > > [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13502 > [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25571 > [3] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29748 > [4] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15696 Deleted, thanks. Ah, just saw the previous message... Ok, done too (I think). Thanks again!
Re: [aur-general] delete packages (mostly svn and cvs)
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Xyne wrote: > > Ah, just saw the previous message... > > Ok, done too (I think). > > you forgot to delete [9.1] and [10.1]: [9.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22894 [10.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12090 Everything else is fine. Thank you.
Re: [aur-general] Delete packages: libmp3splt, mp3splt and mp3splt-gtk
On 2 December 2010 12:56, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto wrote: > Gentlemen, > > Please, delete these packages. I uploaded them thinking they didn't > exist in our repositories, but the search I made was wrong. I searched > with 'mp3split' but the packages are mp3splt, without that i, so I > ended up creating the packages and uploading. Just noticed after the > fact. Sorry for the trouble. > > -- > A: Because it obfuscates the reading. > Q: Why is top posting so bad? > > --- > Denis A. Altoe Falqueto > Linux user #524555 > --- > Thank you, deleted.
