[aur-general] Package deletion requests
I'm the maintainer of the following packages on AUR. They've been added to [community] so the AUR ones should be deleted now. idris haskell-annotated-wl-pprint haskell-charset haskell-cheapskate haskell-fingertree haskell-language-javascript haskell-libffi haskell-parsers haskell-reducers haskell-shakespeare haskell-trifecta haskell-wai-app-static haskell-warp-tls haskell-xss-sanitize
Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request
Hi :) On Sun, 28 Dec 2014 12:55:46 +0200, foalsrock wrote: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-bidi/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-bidi/ Click the links, then log in. At the right side is an "Package Actions" box. Click "File Request". "Request type: Deletion" is the default. When was the last time, that you read an email sent to aur-general AT archlinux.org? Regards, Ralf -- Waveya or Pina Bausch?
[aur-general] Package deletion request
Hi, I'd like the removal of two freshly uploaded packages. I've uploaded them without much testing (shame on me) and they now unnecessarily conflict. python-bidi: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-bidi/ python2-bidi: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-bidi/ Thanks
Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request
You can make the delete request through the aur interface on that packages page. Check the file request link. Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 22, 2014, at 11:45 PM, Mike Dacre wrote: > > Hi All, > > I maintain qguiconnect at https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qguiconnect/ > > It has been superseded by qconnect, so could you please delete qguiconnect? > > Thanks, > > Mike
[aur-general] Package deletion request
Hi All, I maintain qguiconnect at https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qguiconnect/ It has been superseded by qconnect, so could you please delete qguiconnect? Thanks, Mike
Re: [aur-general] Package deletion
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Maxime Gauduin wrote:
>
> And I just realized you might want to use it outside of RockboxUtility and
> create your own voice files by external means. In any case, your deps and
> makedeps are wrong, the provides line is useless, you're installing ghost
> files (the rbspeex{enc,dec} are placed one directory above) and you need to
> create bin beforehand or add -D to install. Anyway, I submitted a split
> PKGBUILD which builds rbutil-git and rbspeex-git to AUR.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Maxime
As Maxime had announced after your other emails. Content repeated
above for your convenience.
cheers!
mar77i
Re: [aur-general] Package deletion
Ack. Sorry about the noise. Just looked at the other emails sent around and saw that there were (two?) other threads created about this same issue. (That is itself annoying.)
Re: [aur-general] Package deletion
> I'm attaching it for any advice on correcting it. I see no attachment. I suspect the AUR mailing list service strips attachment. Throw it up on pastebin or similar? — Jeremy "Ichimonji10" Audet
[aur-general] Package deletion
Hi, My package rbspeex-git was deleted with no explination and no time to fix whatever errors may exist in the package. I was lead to believe that if errors were found in a package that the maintainer was to be given an alert of the problems and time to fix it. I know of at least 10 people who were asking for this package, and it's removal in such an unprofessional manner intrupts service for at least some of them. Just in case there are errors in the PKGBUILD, I'm attaching it for any advice on correcting it. I'm just kind of surprised that some of the people who review packages aren't familiar with proceedures, or just choose to ignore them. What steps should be taken to complain about a member who has gone about the process in the wrong way? Thanks Storm -- Powered by Arch Linux! I am registered Linux user number 508465: https://linuxcounter.net/user/508465.html My blog, Thoughts of a Dragon: http://www.stormdragon.tk/ get my public PGP key: gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 43DDC193 Follow me on Pump.io: http://microca.st/stormdragon2976 "Yeah my whole family done give up on me, and it makes me feel oh so bad. The only one who'll hang out with me is my dear ol' grand dad, and we drink alone." George Thorogood - I Drink Alone pgpJCXGQeCs5f.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request for sublime-text-beta
On 08/17/14 at 07:32am, Evangelos Foutras wrote: > On 17 August 2014 06:25, Ronald Kinard wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I accidentally uploaded a package which is an effective duplicate of > > sublime-text-dev, named sublime-text-beta. I'm requesting that my package > > sublime-text-beta be deleted. > > > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sublime-text-beta/ > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sublime-text-dev/ > > > > Thanks > > Please click on the "File Request" link on the package page to request > its deletion. It's gone now ;) -- Jelle van der Waa signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request for sublime-text-beta
On 17 August 2014 06:25, Ronald Kinard wrote: > Hello, > > I accidentally uploaded a package which is an effective duplicate of > sublime-text-dev, named sublime-text-beta. I'm requesting that my package > sublime-text-beta be deleted. > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sublime-text-beta/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sublime-text-dev/ > > Thanks Please click on the "File Request" link on the package page to request its deletion.
Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request for sublime-text-beta
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Ronald Kinard wrote: > Hello, > > I accidentally uploaded a package which is an effective duplicate of > sublime-text-dev, named sublime-text-beta. I'm requesting that my package > sublime-text-beta be deleted. > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sublime-text-beta/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sublime-text-dev/ > > Thanks > Hi, Use the web interface system to file a delete request(on the package's page). Taylor Lookabaugh
[aur-general] Package deletion request for sublime-text-beta
Hello, I accidentally uploaded a package which is an effective duplicate of sublime-text-dev, named sublime-text-beta. I'm requesting that my package sublime-text-beta be deleted. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sublime-text-beta/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sublime-text-dev/ Thanks
Re: [aur-general] Package Deletion
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 8:12 AM, John D Jones III wrote: > Please delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-cpan-meta-yaml the > module it provides is provided as a CORE Perl module now. > > -- > Thanks, > John D Jones III > UNIX Zealot; Perl Lover > unixgeek1...@gmail.com > jnbek1...@gmail.com\ > http://zoelife4u.org/ > Deleted, thx. -- Maxime
[aur-general] Package Deletion
Please delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-cpan-meta-yaml the module it provides is provided as a CORE Perl module now. -- Thanks, John D Jones III UNIX Zealot; Perl Lover unixgeek1...@gmail.com jnbek1...@gmail.com\ http://zoelife4u.org/
Re: [aur-general] package deletion request
On Friday, June 06, 2014 12:32:13 Schala Zeal wrote: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-zlib-static/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-winpthreads-static/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-wxmsw2.9/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-wxmsw2.9-static/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-wxmsw2.9-static-with-debug/ > > The regular wxmsw packages provide version 3.0, obsoleting the 2.9 > packages. The static libraries of zlib and winpthrerads are already > provided in their main packages. All removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] package deletion request
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-zlib-static/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-winpthreads-static/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-wxmsw2.9/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-wxmsw2.9-static/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-wxmsw2.9-static-with-debug/ The regular wxmsw packages provide version 3.0, obsoleting the 2.9 packages. The static libraries of zlib and winpthrerads are already provided in their main packages.
Re: [aur-general] package deletion request my-little-investigation
On Sunday, April 13, 2014 01:35:06 Matthias Devlamynck wrote: > Hi, > > I've created a package named "my-little-investigation" and some time > after noticed that the project is named "my-little-investigations" with > an "s". My bad. > > So anyone can delete this package to avoid the duplicate ? > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/my-little-investigation/ Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] package deletion request my-little-investigation
Hi, I've created a package named "my-little-investigation" and some time after noticed that the project is named "my-little-investigations" with an "s". My bad. So anyone can delete this package to avoid the duplicate ? https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/my-little-investigation/ With thanks, Matthias Devlamynck
Re: [aur-general] Package Deletion
On Thursday, April 03, 2014 18:01:35 Josh Klar wrote: > I'd like to request my package dmenu-xy be deleted - it's been out of > date for somewhere around a year and a half and someone already updated > the patchset to 4.5 and merged it into dmenu-patchy (which I've been > using for quite a while now myself). > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dmenu-xy Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] Package Deletion
I'd like to request my package dmenu-xy be deleted - it's been out of date for somewhere around a year and a half and someone already updated the patchset to 4.5 and merged it into dmenu-patchy (which I've been using for quite a while now myself). https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dmenu-xy Thanks! -- Josh Klar
Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request
On 2014-02-09 03:35 -0500 Joseph Carta wrote: >Hi. I've just claimed ownership to and updated the previously orphaned >package extract-xiso [1]. Since the author of this program incorporated >the somski mod into it, the package extract-xiso-somski [2] has been >made redundant and should be deleted. > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/extract-xiso/ >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/extract-xiso-somski/ merged, thanks
[aur-general] Package deletion request
Hi. I've just claimed ownership to and updated the previously orphaned package extract-xiso [1]. Since the author of this program incorporated the somski mod into it, the package extract-xiso-somski [2] has been made redundant and should be deleted. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/extract-xiso/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/extract-xiso-somski/
Re: [aur-general] package deletion
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 3:58 AM, Eduardo Martins Lopes < edumlo...@yahoo.com.br> wrote: > Hi guys, > > Please delete the following packages owned by me: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gromacs-mpi-3/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gromacs-407/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tcl84/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tk84/ > > Both gromacs packages were needed at the lab i used to work, but now they > were phased out and no interest appeared on them from the community. > > The last two were required by pymol-svn for some time, but not anymore. > Although they have some votes, i honestly cant recall when they were cast. > > Thanks. > > -- > Eduardo Martins Lopes > Laboratory of Theoretical Chemistry > Federal University of São Carlos > All gone, thx. -- Maxime
[aur-general] package deletion
Hi guys, Please delete the following packages owned by me: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gromacs-mpi-3/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gromacs-407/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tcl84/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tk84/ Both gromacs packages were needed at the lab i used to work, but now they were phased out and no interest appeared on them from the community. The last two were required by pymol-svn for some time, but not anymore. Although they have some votes, i honestly cant recall when they were cast. Thanks. -- Eduardo Martins Lopes Laboratory of Theoretical Chemistry Federal University of São Carlos
Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Nuno Araujo wrote: > Please delete subvein [1]. > It has been renamed upstream to mutantfactions [2]. > > Thank you > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/subvein/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mutantfactions/ > -- > Nuno Araujo > Done, thx. -- Maxime
[aur-general] Package deletion request
Please delete subvein [1]. It has been renamed upstream to mutantfactions [2]. Thank you [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/subvein/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mutantfactions/ -- Nuno Araujo signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request: libassuan1
On Sunday, November 17, 2013 22:46:36 Tom wrote: > Nowadays libassuan1 isn't required by any current package and at least I > don't expect it to be so in the future. Thanks. Removed. Please include a link to package next time, thanks! Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] Package deletion request: libassuan1
Nowadays libassuan1 isn't required by any current package and at least I don't expect it to be so in the future. Thanks.
Re: [aur-general] package deletion
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Daniele Formichelli wrote: dkms-rpi-rtl8188eu-git can be deleted (see the comments) Deleted, please include a link to the AUR page next time. -- Maxime
[aur-general] package deletion
dkms-rpi-rtl8188eu-git can be deleted (see the comments)
Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request
On 22/09/13 02:35 PM, Haffmans, Wouter wrote: > Hello, > > The package doxgen-git[1] was uploaded with a typo in the package name > (I've replaced it with doxygen-git[2] - the "y" was missing). Please > remove the doxgen-git variant. > > Thanks. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/doxgen-git > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/doxygen-git > Removed, thanks. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[aur-general] Package deletion request
Hello, The package doxgen-git[1] was uploaded with a typo in the package name (I've replaced it with doxygen-git[2] - the "y" was missing). Please remove the doxgen-git variant. Thanks. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/doxgen-git [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/doxygen-git
Re: [aur-general] package deletion
On Tuesday, September 03, 2013 09:59:50 Lorenzo Porta wrote: > Can you please shred > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/suse_studio_imagewriter ? It's mine but > now I've adopted the original one > (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/imagewriter) so it bacame useless Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] package deletion
Can you please shred https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/suse_studio_imagewriter ? It's mine but now I've adopted the original one (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/imagewriter) so it bacame useless
Re: [aur-general] Package deletion requests: perl-rdf-vcard-babelfish and perl-rdf-trineshortcuts
On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 21:51:25 Jason St. John wrote: > perl-rdf-vcard-babelfish has a source that 404s, and its CPAN page has > been deleted. > -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-rdf-vcard-babelfish/ > -- http://search.cpan.org/search?query=rdf%3A%3Avcard&mode=all > > perl-rdf-trineshortcuts has the same issues. > -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-rdf-trineshortcuts/ > -- http://search.cpan.org/search?m=dist&q=RDF-TrineShortcuts > > Jason Both removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] Package deletion requests: perl-rdf-vcard-babelfish and perl-rdf-trineshortcuts
perl-rdf-vcard-babelfish has a source that 404s, and its CPAN page has been deleted. -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-rdf-vcard-babelfish/ -- http://search.cpan.org/search?query=rdf%3A%3Avcard&mode=all perl-rdf-trineshortcuts has the same issues. -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-rdf-trineshortcuts/ -- http://search.cpan.org/search?m=dist&q=RDF-TrineShortcuts Jason
Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request: nghost3
On 2013-06-20 14:28, Jonas Heinrich wrote: > Hey, > unfortunately this project is dead and discontinued: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nghost3/ > Please remove the packae, thank you! > > - onny > Done, thank you. -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski http://bpiotrowski.pl/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[aur-general] Package deletion request: nghost3
Hey, unfortunately this project is dead and discontinued: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nghost3/ Please remove the packae, thank you! - onny pgpb9UkuA4ArL.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request
On 16 April 2013 20:17, Benoît Zugmeyer wrote: > chromium-nightly > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/chromium-nightly/ > > I made a mistake by submitting a duplicate package (duplicates > chromium-browser-bin). A little too enthusiastic about sharing my package. Removed, thanks.
Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request
On 17 April 2013 02:17, Igor Cardoso wrote: > About a month ago I submitted a package (vmware-usbarbitrator) that > contained the VMware-USBArbitrator script, as well as a systemd service to > automatically run it on computer startup. > > Now, Det has managed to integrate that, among other interesting features, > in one package only: vmware-patch; thus making VMware on Arch Linux much > less fragmented concerning additional packages required. > > The package vmware-usbarbitrator is now deprecated. Please remove it when > you have the time. Removed, thanks.
[aur-general] Package deletion request
About a month ago I submitted a package (vmware-usbarbitrator) that contained the VMware-USBArbitrator script, as well as a systemd service to automatically run it on computer startup. Now, Det has managed to integrate that, among other interesting features, in one package only: vmware-patch; thus making VMware on Arch Linux much less fragmented concerning additional packages required. The package vmware-usbarbitrator is now deprecated. Please remove it when you have the time. Best regards, Igor Duarte Cardoso. -- http://igordcard.blogspot.com
[aur-general] Package deletion request
chromium-nightly https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/chromium-nightly/ I made a mistake by submitting a duplicate package (duplicates chromium-browser-bin). A little too enthusiastic about sharing my package. Sorry about that, won't happen again. -- Benoît Zugmeyer
Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request
On Sunday, December 30, 2012 12:41:30 PM Krzysztof AS wrote: > Hi, > Packages with request: > > -- > derpity-gtk-theme: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/derpity-gtk-theme/ > - author changed name to zukitwo > - no updates after 2011-05 > - page at gnome-looks been deleted > - probably some latest changes in gtk3 make it worthless for user > -- > linuxdcpp-bzr-pl: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linuxdcpp-bzr-pl/ > - no need after they merged this two branches together > -- > gtk2-theme-neutronium: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk2-theme-neutronium/ > - very old theme, last update 2008-08 > - without gtk3 css > - page at gnome-looks been deleted > - this is hosted by aur after cleenup the some mess in original tar files > -- > > Have a nice day. All removed, thanks. -- Felix Yan Twitter: @felixonmars Wiki: http://felixc.at signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request
On 28.12.2012 15:45, LordAro wrote: > On 28 December 2012 14:35, Robert Knauer wrote: >> On 28.12.2012 15:28, Charles Pigott wrote: >>> Ha, got it wrong :L >>> >>> Several problems with that: >>> - http://www.transporttycoon.net/where does not contain anywhere you >>> can download the files >>> - What do you mean "no unfree files in the source package" ? ALL those >>> files are unfree and are only available (legally) from the TTD CD >>> >> >> Okay, download was the wrong word... On the page linked in the PKGBUILD >> are links for buying TTD to get the files. >> And if you look into the package tarball[1], you can see that there are >> no unfree files, only the PKGBUILD. >> The purpose of the package is that you download the PKGBUILD, buy TTD, >> copy the files from TTD into the directory with the PKGBUILD, run >> makepkg and install the package you got. There's nothing illegal about >> it and in my opinion no reason to delete the package from AUR. >> >> Regards, >> Robert >> >> [1] >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/op/openttd-ttdwin/openttd-ttdwin.tar.gz > > Ah, sorry, i'm new to these things. > In that case is there any point in having the package at all if it > just contains the PKGBUILD file? > Installation instructions are clearly documented on OpenTTDs wiki.. > http://wiki.openttd.org/Installation#Choosing_TTD_for_base_graphics > (I know they are put in different folders, but they do the same thing...) > Well, all PKGBUILDs are only a kind of installation instructions, readable for machines. Normally, there are URLs to the sources in the PKGBUILD and they get automatically downloaded when you run makepkg. The problem here is that the files aren't (legally) available in the internet, so makepkg can't get these files. It is not really a fancy solution, but there is no alternative and there is a note in the PKGBUILD that you need to get the files from TTD before creating the package, so normally there should be no problem, because (in my opinion) everybody should take a look at the PKGBUILD before installing a package. Regards, Robert -- GnuPG-Key: EDC67BBA Fingerprint: D5F0 BC03 3F6D 521C 6F2D 40C8 DDBA 25D9 EDC6 7BBA signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request
On 28 December 2012 14:35, Robert Knauer wrote: > On 28.12.2012 15:28, Charles Pigott wrote: >> Ha, got it wrong :L >> >> Several problems with that: >> - http://www.transporttycoon.net/where does not contain anywhere you >> can download the files >> - What do you mean "no unfree files in the source package" ? ALL those >> files are unfree and are only available (legally) from the TTD CD >> > > Okay, download was the wrong word... On the page linked in the PKGBUILD > are links for buying TTD to get the files. > And if you look into the package tarball[1], you can see that there are > no unfree files, only the PKGBUILD. > The purpose of the package is that you download the PKGBUILD, buy TTD, > copy the files from TTD into the directory with the PKGBUILD, run > makepkg and install the package you got. There's nothing illegal about > it and in my opinion no reason to delete the package from AUR. > > Regards, > Robert > > [1] > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/op/openttd-ttdwin/openttd-ttdwin.tar.gz Ah, sorry, i'm new to these things. In that case is there any point in having the package at all if it just contains the PKGBUILD file? Installation instructions are clearly documented on OpenTTDs wiki.. http://wiki.openttd.org/Installation#Choosing_TTD_for_base_graphics (I know they are put in different folders, but they do the same thing...)
Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request
On 28.12.2012 15:28, Charles Pigott wrote: > Ha, got it wrong :L > > Several problems with that: > - http://www.transporttycoon.net/where does not contain anywhere you > can download the files > - What do you mean "no unfree files in the source package" ? ALL those > files are unfree and are only available (legally) from the TTD CD > Okay, download was the wrong word... On the page linked in the PKGBUILD are links for buying TTD to get the files. And if you look into the package tarball[1], you can see that there are no unfree files, only the PKGBUILD. The purpose of the package is that you download the PKGBUILD, buy TTD, copy the files from TTD into the directory with the PKGBUILD, run makepkg and install the package you got. There's nothing illegal about it and in my opinion no reason to delete the package from AUR. Regards, Robert [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/op/openttd-ttdwin/openttd-ttdwin.tar.gz -- GnuPG-Key: EDC67BBA Fingerprint: D5F0 BC03 3F6D 521C 6F2D 40C8 DDBA 25D9 EDC6 7BBA signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request
Ha, got it wrong :L Several problems with that: - http://www.transporttycoon.net/where does not contain anywhere you can download the files - What do you mean "no unfree files in the source package" ? ALL those files are unfree and are only available (legally) from the TTD CD
Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request
On 28.12.2012 15:08, Charles Pigott wrote: > Hi, hopefully, i'm getting this mailing list format right... :L > > I believe that package openttd-ttdwin ( > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openttd-ttdwin/) should be removed as it > contains copyrighted files, that are illegal to distribute > > Thanks for your attention > I don't think that it's illegal, because there are no unfree files in the source package. There's a note in the PKGBUILD to download the files from http://www.transporttycoon.net/where Regards, Robert -- GnuPG-Key: EDC67BBA Fingerprint: D5F0 BC03 3F6D 521C 6F2D 40C8 DDBA 25D9 EDC6 7BBA signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[aur-general] Package deletion request
Hi, hopefully, i'm getting this mailing list format right... :L I believe that package openttd-ttdwin ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openttd-ttdwin/) should be removed as it contains copyrighted files, that are illegal to distribute Thanks for your attention
Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request.
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:47:37PM +0100, N30N wrote: > The following pacages are now avalible in the ArchLinuxARM repos. So I > would like to request they be removed from the AUR. > > marvell-xbmc-git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/marvell-xbmc-git/ > marvell-ipp: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/marvell-ipp/ > > Thanks and best regards, > N30N. both deleted, thx -- Ike pgp6H66ozqhd7.pgp Description: PGP signature
[aur-general] Package deletion request.
The following pacages are now avalible in the ArchLinuxARM repos. So I would like to request they be removed from the AUR. marvell-xbmc-git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/marvell-xbmc-git/ marvell-ipp: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/marvell-ipp/ Thanks and best regards, N30N.
Re: [aur-general] Package deletion
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 06:17:58PM -0300, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote: > Hi, > > I believe the following should be deleted: > > ccsm-unity-git 20110210-1 > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44299 > Seriously out of date, orphaned. Also the website is just a blank page, deleted. > emerald-git 0.9.5-3 > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59325 > No longer works with current versions of compiz. Not sure about this one, it was updated two months ago (however now an orphan), but there are no comments about it not working. Even if it is broken now, do you not think it will be fixed? Thanks, -- Jonathan Steel pgptojoL9y95m.pgp Description: PGP signature
[aur-general] Package deletion
Hi, I believe the following should be deleted: ccsm-unity-git 20110210-1 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44299 Seriously out of date, orphaned. emerald-git 0.9.5-3 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59325 No longer works with current versions of compiz. Thanks, -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request - i3-pango
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Patrice Peterson wrote: > Hey, > > Please delete my package i3-pango [1]. I3 officially supports Pango > since version 4.3, making this package obsolete. > > Thanks, > Patrice > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59344 Removed, thanks.
[aur-general] Package deletion request - i3-pango
Hey, Please delete my package i3-pango [1]. I3 officially supports Pango since version 4.3, making this package obsolete. Thanks, Patrice [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59344 pgpiSmssXHLXd.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request
Op dinsdag 31 juli 2012 14:42:40 schreef Patrice Peterson: > Hi, > > Please delete my tm-tools package [1]. I was being an idiot and didn't > notice it already existed as tmtools [2]. > > Thanks in advance, > Patrice > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59994 > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55169 it was deleted, but not notified here (now it is :p) thx --Ike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] Package deletion request
Hi, Please delete my tm-tools package [1]. I was being an idiot and didn't notice it already existed as tmtools [2]. Thanks in advance, Patrice [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59994 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55169 pgpiVbR9tSQCG.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 1:49 PM, mitsu...@gmail.com wrote: > Please delete python-wtforms[1] because it was replaced with python2-wtforms. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26120 > > Thanks. Done, thanks.
[aur-general] Package deletion request
Please delete python-wtforms[1] because it was replaced with python2-wtforms. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26120 Thanks. -- Tomoya Kose (mitsuse) mitsu...@gmail.com
Re: [aur-general] Package Deletion Requests (rtmpdump-yle & asp)
ke, 2012-07-11 kello 19:40 -0400, Jason St. John kirjoitti: > Please delete rtmpdump-yle[1] because the maintainer of the package > made the following comment: > > "THIS PACKAGE IS DEPRECATED! DO NOT USE THIS! > You need to install the new yle-dl package from AUR, which will work > with the new Areena." Thank you for reporting this. I myself had completely forgotten to send the deletation request. I wanted to give the users some time to find the new package ^_^ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [aur-general] Package Deletion Requests (rtmpdump-yle & asp)
Op woensdag 11 juli 2012 19:40:15 schreef Jason St. John: > Hello, > > Please delete rtmpdump-yle[1] because the maintainer of the package > made the following comment: > > "THIS PACKAGE IS DEPRECATED! DO NOT USE THIS! > You need to install the new yle-dl package from AUR, which will work > with the new Areena." > > Please delete asp[2] because the package is very old (from 2006), > links to some Sun thing which is now owned by Oracle, and the source > link is broken and doesn't even use DNS. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29792 > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5896 > > Thanks deleted, thx --Ike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] Package Deletion Requests (rtmpdump-yle & asp)
Hello, Please delete rtmpdump-yle[1] because the maintainer of the package made the following comment: "THIS PACKAGE IS DEPRECATED! DO NOT USE THIS! You need to install the new yle-dl package from AUR, which will work with the new Areena." Please delete asp[2] because the package is very old (from 2006), links to some Sun thing which is now owned by Oracle, and the source link is broken and doesn't even use DNS. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29792 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5896 Thanks
Re: [aur-general] Package deletion
On 09/07/12 01:58 AM, Seb wrote: > Hi, > > I am the maintainer of the following package: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48354 > > The package winefish in community no longer uses gnome deps so this package > is not needed anymore. > Could you please delete it? > > Thank you :) > Seb Deleted, thanks :). signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[aur-general] Package deletion
Hi, I am the maintainer of the following package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48354 The package winefish in community no longer uses gnome deps so this package is not needed anymore. Could you please delete it? Thank you :) Seb
Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:57:01AM +0200, Heiko Baums wrote: > Am Wed, 27 Jun 2012 18:33:10 -0700 > schrieb Connor Behan : > > > On 27/06/12 06:20 PM, Skydrome wrote: > > > Requesting to delete my aur pkg > > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53452 I have made a split > > > package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30375 which > > > incorporates the former. > > > Thanks > > Done. There has been some discussion on this list about whether the > > "true && pkgname" hack should be used - but split packages are > > convenient. > > > > No, they are not convenient on AUR! They are only conveniant in the > binary repos! > > When do people understand, that split packages in AUR regularly cause > problems as long as split packages are not officially supported by AUR? > They regularly cause problems with the AUR helpers like yaourt, > aurbuild, etc. And there are even more problems if other packages > depend on a subpackage of these split packages on AUR, because neither > pacman nor the AUR helper nor anything else can find those subpackages > and resolve those dependencies. Not this garbage again. When will you understand that guidelines for PKGBUILD submission aren't based on the inabilities of even less supported AUR tools? > Either AUR finally gets official support for split packages or split > packages are avoided in AUR. Or projects like yaourt, aurbuild, etc. can figure out a way to support them. They already contains all sorts of other ugly hacks. Why not find a way to support this as well? > The problem are not the split packages themselves, the problem is that > AUR can't handle them. The AUR handles them just fine. Just like last time you ranted about this, you're conflating two very separate problems.
Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request
Am Wed, 27 Jun 2012 18:33:10 -0700 schrieb Connor Behan : > On 27/06/12 06:20 PM, Skydrome wrote: > > Requesting to delete my aur pkg > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53452 I have made a split > > package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30375 which > > incorporates the former. > > Thanks > Done. There has been some discussion on this list about whether the > "true && pkgname" hack should be used - but split packages are > convenient. > No, they are not convenient on AUR! They are only conveniant in the binary repos! When do people understand, that split packages in AUR regularly cause problems as long as split packages are not officially supported by AUR? They regularly cause problems with the AUR helpers like yaourt, aurbuild, etc. And there are even more problems if other packages depend on a subpackage of these split packages on AUR, because neither pacman nor the AUR helper nor anything else can find those subpackages and resolve those dependencies. Either AUR finally gets official support for split packages or split packages are avoided in AUR. The problem are not the split packages themselves, the problem is that AUR can't handle them. Heiko
Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request
yes i wish i didnt have to that, but if i didnt aur upload wont take it saying the name needs to be all lowercase... On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Connor Behan wrote: > On 27/06/12 06:20 PM, Skydrome wrote: >> Requesting to delete my aur pkg >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53452 >> I have made a split package >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30375 which incorporates the >> former. >> Thanks > Done. There has been some discussion on this list about whether the > "true && pkgname" hack should be used - but split packages are convenient. >
Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request
On 27/06/12 06:20 PM, Skydrome wrote: > Requesting to delete my aur pkg > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53452 > I have made a split package > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30375 which incorporates the > former. > Thanks Done. There has been some discussion on this list about whether the "true && pkgname" hack should be used - but split packages are convenient. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[aur-general] Package deletion request
Requesting to delete my aur pkg https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53452 I have made a split package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30375 which incorporates the former. Thanks
Re: [aur-general] package deletion request: fhs
On 05/22/2012 06:28 PM, Alexander Rødseth wrote: > Hi, > > Could it considered to be documentation for the "filesystem" package? > If that should be the case, "fhs" could be renamed "filesystem-docs" > by submitting a new package and requesting a delete+merge of the old > one. > Interesting, I did not think of that. However, I do not believe that treating standard X, that system Y is applicable to, as part of Y's documentation package is elegant; instead, Y's documentation should merely reference X (as hier(7) does in the "CONFORMING TO" section). The reasoning is that system Z might also be applicable to X (inelegant, since there would exist a redundant copy of X), and more importantly, X is self-contained. That would mean that X should exist separately as a package, instead of being a component of Y-docs and Z-docs. I do not believe that this packaging infrastructure (pacman, official and unofficial repos, AUR) is well suited for offline content not pertaining to specific software, since the functionality is specifically targetted towards software packages. If my reasoning is sound, then a FHS package is outside the scope of this infrastructure. -Ruslan -- Ruslan Nabioullin rnabioul...@gmail.com signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [aur-general] package deletion request: fhs
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:28:48AM +0200, Alexander Rødseth wrote: > Hi, > > Could it considered to be documentation for the "filesystem" package? > If that should be the case, "fhs" could be renamed "filesystem-docs" > by submitting a new package and requesting a delete+merge of the old > one. > > -- > Best regards, > Alexander Rødseth > Arch Linux Trusted User > (xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR) Much of this is covered in hier(7).
Re: [aur-general] package deletion request: fhs
Hi, Could it considered to be documentation for the "filesystem" package? If that should be the case, "fhs" could be renamed "filesystem-docs" by submitting a new package and requesting a delete+merge of the old one. -- Best regards, Alexander Rødseth Arch Linux Trusted User (xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)
[aur-general] package deletion request: fhs
I am requesting that the AUR package fhs [1] be deleted, as standards documents are outside the scope of the AUR. I am the current maintainer of the package. -Ruslan [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56396 -- Ruslan Nabioullin rnabioul...@gmail.com signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [aur-general] package deletion request: django-svn
Thanks! --- Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Evangelos Foutras wrote: > On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Alper Kanat wrote: > > Hey There, > > > > I'm the maintainer of django-svn. Mainstream just migrated from their own > > subversion server to github. Therefore I created a new package > (django-git) > > and uploaded it to AUR. I don't know whether if renaming packages on AUR > is > > possible or not but it'd be nice to keep the comments and votes. If so, > > please let me know. > > Removed django-svn and merged its votes and comments into django-git. >
Re: [aur-general] package deletion request: django-svn
Op dinsdag 1 mei 2012 20:41:14 schreef Evangelos Foutras: > On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Alper Kanat wrote: > > Hey There, > > > > I'm the maintainer of django-svn. Mainstream just migrated from their own > > subversion server to github. Therefore I created a new package > > (django-git) > > and uploaded it to AUR. I don't know whether if renaming packages on AUR > > is > > possible or not but it'd be nice to keep the comments and votes. If so, > > please let me know. > > Removed django-svn and merged its votes and comments into django-git. sorry to send someone did merge and did not notify, seems like i did not yet receive it --Ike
Re: [aur-general] package deletion request: django-svn
Op dinsdag 1 mei 2012 17:18:15 schreef Alper Kanat: > Hey There, > > I'm the maintainer of django-svn. Mainstream just migrated from their own > subversion server to github. Therefore I created a new package (django-git) > and uploaded it to AUR. I don't know whether if renaming packages on AUR is > possible or not but it'd be nice to keep the comments and votes. If so, > please let me know. > > Thanks! > > --- > Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? someone merged it i guess but did not notify on the mailinglist --Ike
Re: [aur-general] package deletion request: django-svn
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Alper Kanat wrote: > Hey There, > > I'm the maintainer of django-svn. Mainstream just migrated from their own > subversion server to github. Therefore I created a new package (django-git) > and uploaded it to AUR. I don't know whether if renaming packages on AUR is > possible or not but it'd be nice to keep the comments and votes. If so, > please let me know. Removed django-svn and merged its votes and comments into django-git.
[aur-general] package deletion request: django-svn
Hey There, I'm the maintainer of django-svn. Mainstream just migrated from their own subversion server to github. Therefore I created a new package (django-git) and uploaded it to AUR. I don't know whether if renaming packages on AUR is possible or not but it'd be nice to keep the comments and votes. If so, please let me know. Thanks! --- Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Re: [aur-general] package deletion request for facebook python sdk
Hi, Removed, thanks. -- Cordially, Alexander Rødseth Arch Linux Trusted User (xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)
[aur-general] package deletion request for facebook python sdk
Hey There, Can you please delete the following packages? Some are removed in upstream and don't have any maintainer on AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45906 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45908 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34328 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55193 This one should have a -git in its name: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56712 --- Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Re: [aur-general] package deletion request
On 04/03/12 11:10, s...@archlinux.us wrote: I would like to request the removal of the package retro-fossil [1], as the project has switched DVCS and is superceded by retro-bzr [2]. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45134 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57263 removed! -- Jelle van der Waa
[aur-general] package deletion request
I would like to request the removal of the package retro-fossil [1], as the project has switched DVCS and is superceded by retro-bzr [2]. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45134 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57263
Re: [aur-general] Package Deletion/Merge: batterymon
On 03/02/2012 05:37 PM, Jarek Sedlacek wrote: > Package batterymon [1] is broken and will remain broken as long as arch > kernels are built without CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER. > > It can be replaced by batterymon-clone [2] which is a fork of the same > project that gets battery information from /sys instead of /proc. > > Could batterymon be deleted and the votes merged? > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24694 > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52974 > > Thanks, > Jarek Sedlacek And done. Thanks. -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski Arch Linux Trusted User http://archlinux.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[aur-general] Package Deletion/Merge: batterymon
Package batterymon [1] is broken and will remain broken as long as arch kernels are built without CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER. It can be replaced by batterymon-clone [2] which is a fork of the same project that gets battery information from /sys instead of /proc. Could batterymon be deleted and the votes merged? [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24694 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52974 Thanks, Jarek Sedlacek
Re: [aur-general] Package Deletion: perltidy
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Jarek Sedlacek wrote: > Package perltidy in aur seems to be a duplicate of perl-tidy in community. > It hasn't been updated since 2010, and in the comments on the AUR page the > maintainer acknowledges it can go. > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34248 > > Thanks, > Jarek Sedlacek removed
[aur-general] Package Deletion: perltidy
Package perltidy in aur seems to be a duplicate of perl-tidy in community. It hasn't been updated since 2010, and in the comments on the AUR page the maintainer acknowledges it can go. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34248 Thanks, Jarek Sedlacek
Re: [aur-general] Package Deletion Request: 3to2-hg
Hi, Removed the 3to2-hg orphan. Please include a direct link next time. Thanks. -- Sincerely, Alexander Rødseth Arch Linux Trusted User (xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)
[aur-general] Package Deletion Request: 3to2-hg
Can someone delete 3to2-hg? I maintain 3to2 as well as the latest version from mercurial, but since the project has stopped updating there is no point in maintaining the development version. Thanks, Jarek Sedlacek
Re: [aur-general] package deletion request: waf-svn
On 02/27/2012 08:28 PM, François Boulogne wrote: > Hi > > Could you delete python-waf-svn > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48189 > Reason, waf moved to git as announced in one comment. > > Thank you. > Cheers, > Done. -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski Arch Linux Trusted User http://archlinux.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[aur-general] package deletion request: waf-svn
Hi Could you delete python-waf-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48189 Reason, waf moved to git as announced in one comment. Thank you. Cheers, -- François Boulogne. https://www.sciunto.org
Re: [aur-general] Package Deletion Request: sqlplus11
On 25 February 2012 23:04, Jason St. John wrote: > sqlplus11[1] should be deleted because the submitter of the package > basically admitted that sqlplus11 was a duplicate of > instantclient-sqlplus[2] > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36198 > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16724 > > Thanks! > > __ > Jason St. John > Graduate Research Assistant, > Department of Computer and Information Technology, > Purdue University Done, thanks
Re: [aur-general] Package Deletion Request: perl-shared
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Jason St. John wrote: > perl-shared[1] should be deleted because it is *very* out of date, has > 0 votes, has been orphaned, and the official 'perl' package provides > the same functionality[2]. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25536 > [2] > https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=packages/perl > > Thanks! > > __ > Jason St. John > Graduate Research Assistant, > Department of Computer and Information Technology, > Purdue University Deleted, thanks. -- -Justin
[aur-general] Package Deletion Request: sqlplus11
sqlplus11[1] should be deleted because the submitter of the package basically admitted that sqlplus11 was a duplicate of instantclient-sqlplus[2] [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36198 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16724 Thanks! __ Jason St. John Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Computer and Information Technology, Purdue University
[aur-general] Package Deletion Request: perl-shared
perl-shared[1] should be deleted because it is *very* out of date, has 0 votes, has been orphaned, and the official 'perl' package provides the same functionality[2]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25536 [2] https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=packages/perl Thanks! __ Jason St. John Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Computer and Information Technology, Purdue University
Re: [aur-general] package deletion request
Done. -Kyle http://kmkeen.com On 7/21/11, Auguste Pop wrote: > Hi, > > I am the current maintainer of osd-lyrics > (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30489). One of the upstream > developer commented on the package and requested a rename to > osdlyrics, and I have uploaded osdlyrics > (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50877) accordingly to AUR. > Although upstream page on googlecode is still osd-lyrics, their github > name is osdlyrics. and I have found a git commit explicitly convert > all osd-lyrics occurrences into osdlyrics. So, osdlyrics should be the > upstream choice for the package's name. > Sorry for all the mess this package has created. > > Best Regards, >
[aur-general] package deletion request
Hi, I am the current maintainer of osd-lyrics (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30489). One of the upstream developer commented on the package and requested a rename to osdlyrics, and I have uploaded osdlyrics (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50877) accordingly to AUR. Although upstream page on googlecode is still osd-lyrics, their github name is osdlyrics. and I have found a git commit explicitly convert all osd-lyrics occurrences into osdlyrics. So, osdlyrics should be the upstream choice for the package's name. Sorry for all the mess this package has created. Best Regards,
Re: [aur-general] Package deletion tomcat-fhs
On Tuesday 10 May 2011 12:11:56 Guillaume ALAUX wrote: > Hello, > > Package "tomcat-fhs" [0] from AUR is an out-of-date duplicate of [1] with no > particular improvement (along with strange naming). > > I would thus vote for deletion of "tomcat-fhs" [0] even though it seems it > was submitted first. > > [0] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14324 > [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19452 Done -- Andrea
[aur-general] Package deletion tomcat-fhs
Hello, Package "tomcat-fhs" [0] from AUR is an out-of-date duplicate of [1] with no particular improvement (along with strange naming). I would thus vote for deletion of "tomcat-fhs" [0] even though it seems it was submitted first. [0] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14324 [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19452 -- Guillaume
Re: [aur-general] package deletion request
On 7 March 2011 12:35, yanchenko.i...@gmail.com wrote: > please delete package pygments3 > (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37546) , its in comunity > now with name python-pygments > Deleted. Thank you. Lukas
