Re: [aur-general] Removal request for romextract
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 05:20:29AM +, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > When deletion requests were sent to this mailing list, it was expected > to add the link, however, IIRC it changed 2 or more years ago. > > "[snip] requests can be created by clicking on the "Submit Request" link > under "Package Actions" on the right hand side. This automatically > sends a notification email to the current package maintainer and to the > aur-requests mailing list for discussion. [snip]" - > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository#Other_requests Sorry, that was pretty boneheaded; I do remember this becoming a thing and haven't dealt with any AUR requests since AUR4.
Re: [aur-general] Removal request for romextract
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 22:35:57 -0400, beest wrote: >I'd like to request removal for romextract. When deletion requests were sent to this mailing list, it was expected to add the link, however, IIRC it changed 2 or more years ago. "[snip] requests can be created by clicking on the "Submit Request" link under "Package Actions" on the right hand side. This automatically sends a notification email to the current package maintainer and to the aur-requests mailing list for discussion. [snip]" - https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository#Other_requests
[aur-general] Removal request for romextract
I'd like to request removal for romextract. I sorta became upstream since it was easier at the time than patching and the source hadn't been touched in years, but I zapped most of my GH projects long ago so the source in the (orphaned) PKGBUILD is dead, and it's questionable whether this belonged in the AUR in the first place (being more of a collated collection of utilities with mixed/unknown licenses).
[aur-general] Removal request
Please remove gpsd-obsolet, i think its of no use anymore. thanks
Re: [aur-general] Removal request
Stefan, The preferred method of submitting removal requests is now through the AUR web interface. Search for the File Request link. — Jeremy 'Ichimonji10' Audet
Re: [aur-general] [Removal request] vim-lettuce
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Andy Weidenbaum archb...@gmail.com wrote: I added vim-colors-lettuce to replace vim-lettuce. The original vim-lettuce package is now obsolete. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-lettuce/ Andy, Please use the web interface to file a deletion request (on the package's page). Very Respectfully, Taylor Lookabaugh
[aur-general] [Removal request] vim-lettuce
I added vim-colors-lettuce to replace vim-lettuce. The original vim-lettuce package is now obsolete. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-lettuce/
[aur-general] Removal request -- osc-build-archlinux
Hi, osc-build-archlinux [1] should be deleted: it is outdated; more than that, it is not needed anymore, since support for this feature is included upstream now (see comments in the package). Anyway, obs-build-git [2] is an up-to-date version of it. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/osc-build-archlinux/ [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/obs-build-git/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Removal request -- osc-build-archlinux
On Tuesday 17 June 2014 00:49:06 Thiago Barroso Perrotta wrote: osc-build-archlinux [1] should be deleted: it is outdated; more than that, it is not needed anymore, since support for this feature is included upstream now (see comments in the package). Anyway, obs-build-git [2] is an up-to-date version of it. Done, thank you. -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru ICQ: 407-398-235 Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] removal request: eos-git
Please delete the unmaintained eos-git package. The source github page is down. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eos-git/
Re: [aur-general] removal request: eos-git
On Sunday, June 15, 2014 19:40:58 wrote: Please delete the unmaintained eos-git package. The source github page is down. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eos-git/ Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] Removal request spyder2-hg
Please remove spyder2-hg https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/spyder2-hg/. It will become part of split package spyder-hg https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/spyder-hg/.
Re: [aur-general] Removal request spyder2-hg
On Monday 09 June 2014 09:29:28 Willem wrote: Please remove spyder2-hg https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/spyder2-hg/. It will become part of split package spyder-hg https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/spyder-hg/. Done, thank you. -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru ICQ: 407-398-235 Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] Removal Request: linux-xps13-docs
Hi, I would like to request the following package be removed: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-xps13-docs/ It was a failed attempted a little while ago to upload my patched kernel to the AUR and I have since read up on the AUR and submitted the package using linux-ck as a guide. Thanks, Ross
Re: [aur-general] Removal Request: linux-xps13-docs
On Sunday, June 08, 2014 19:21:35 Ross Williams wrote: Hi, I would like to request the following package be removed: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-xps13-docs/ It was a failed attempted a little while ago to upload my patched kernel to the AUR and I have since read up on the AUR and submitted the package using linux-ck as a guide. Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Removal request
On Wednesday, June 04, 2014 12:20:02 李胜明 wrote: Hi, Please remove the following pkgbuilds: - 115backup-gtk2 [1]; - 115backup-gtk3 [2]; - airweibo [3]; - weiboair [4]; - xbmc-addon-repo-hdpfans [5]; I am the submitter of the 5 packages. The upstream of [1] [2] has renamed them to 115wangpan. Package [3] and [4] are the same. Package [5] is contained by xbmc-addons-chinese-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xbmc-addons-chinese-svn/. Also, It seems no one wants to maintain or use all of them. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/115backup-gtk2/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/115backup-gtk3/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/airweibo/ [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/weiboair/ [5] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xbmc-addon-repo-hdpfans/ All removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] Removal request
Hi, Please remove the following pkgbuilds: - 115backup-gtk2 [1]; - 115backup-gtk3 [2]; - airweibo [3]; - weiboair [4]; - xbmc-addon-repo-hdpfans [5]; I am the submitter of the 5 packages. The upstream of [1] [2] has renamed them to 115wangpan. Package [3] and [4] are the same. Package [5] is contained by xbmc-addons-chinese-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xbmc-addons-chinese-svn/. Also, It seems no one wants to maintain or use all of them. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/115backup-gtk2/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/115backup-gtk3/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/airweibo/ [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/weiboair/ [5] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xbmc-addon-repo-hdpfans/
Re: [aur-general] Removal request
On Sunday, June 01, 2014 20:21:54 Charles Bos wrote: Hello, I think the following package ought to be removed: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hackedbox/ The package is orphaned, hasn't been updated since 2008 and neither the upstream url nor the source link work. The following website lists 0.8.5 as the latest release: http://freecode.com/projects/hackedbox Version 0.8.5 is the same version that is in the AUR and that would indicate that upstream hasn't released a new version since January 2007 so the project would appear to be stone dead. Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Removal request
On Sunday, June 01, 2014 15:22:56 Ivaylo Kuzev wrote: Hi, The package [1] is out-of-date. Please remove [1]. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nikola-zsh-completion/[1][1] Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] Removal request
Hi, The package [1] is out-of-date. Please remove [1]. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nikola-zsh-completion/[1][1] -- Ivaylo Kuzev | @ivo
[aur-general] Removal request
Hello, I think the following package ought to be removed: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hackedbox/ The package is orphaned, hasn't been updated since 2008 and neither the upstream url nor the source link work. The following website lists 0.8.5 as the latest release: http://freecode.com/projects/hackedbox Version 0.8.5 is the same version that is in the AUR and that would indicate that upstream hasn't released a new version since January 2007 so the project would appear to be stone dead. Regards
Re: [aur-general] removal request
On Mon, 26 May 2014 13:29:32 -0600 Alexej Magura sickhadas@gmail.com wrote: This is more of should this be removed; if so, please remove it-request. package-name: epsxe-bios-scph1001 package-url: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/epsxe-bios-scph1001/ I know that the package *even* states that it is illegal to use said package without owning an actual playstation console, but still... isn't this kinda like telling people that it's illegal to steal your car, but then leaving the keys on the hood and going about your business? Peeps are gonna steal! Not sure if this is issue/concern is actually meaningful in the sense that the package *is very* useful, but... yeah. Deleted, thanks. -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski http://bpiotrowski.pl/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] removal request
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 26.5.2014 21:29, Alexej Magura wrote: This is more of should this be removed; if so, please remove it-request. package-name: epsxe-bios-scph1001 package-url: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/epsxe-bios-scph1001/ I know that the package *even* states that it is illegal to use said package without owning an actual playstation console, but still... isn't this kinda like telling people that it's illegal to steal your car, but then leaving the keys on the hood and going about your business? Peeps are gonna steal! Not sure if this is issue/concern is actually meaningful in the sense that the package *is very* useful, but... yeah. The maintainer here. If Arch Linux even so as *might* suffer from legal consequences because of it, by all means remove it immediately. If not, I don't see the harm in it being there. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJThDwRAAoJEB1x37R9kdwnlWsP/2SRx4HGTyenbUy4q4sbfzfT Z6YPXiH9kESjB30SkfxCzVzd3q3tGKlL4ipWsHLpVfyhl5oLmd9d2Os9ejKm7eHK UoPGkWs4rRzJrmPyeE2D1BW4Ge1EK5f7uqE/qPVtkygKLtHbolIZFLQ6FANhLuC1 WF1VCmHzcM9uAMq080/eQ20JAKnSXgpMKhZk/4topjlMvzr+iPoeKYijLZvUt0uD Ynff6sLdQRa/eMjbLFk7pU2+xPeIO+iHA694i7XB8E1xGpR6YeK61YmdHyXVlnkV ukfpL32MSt8X8kD5iru67nRNCxPxHrwj+l3N5IFgr2tpTSL8B1WAHwzpupD4yuxq YMSsjeq5KRBoMRfXO5FDJTqoxa0i5aT9sI2KLSQDPI4v7bFNoU9qMsZQ7eW2tRJ/ OaizfCdSvoYUkIpjE6YyixqeK/mIbZomSDF2v0o07WcQdSTTPTAAv4UyO0gw2OGG 1iVR3lFLnIZrQ7jZp90AMFL4picpO6GyAbJXBootCjlc/EcQ5jyhymb3y8LPYvtV U7/0R9iKCQBXGjblJdI/3xCaprIW1IQtfCwbddfk9U0m4dmDQOaXoPebnzUcn3Sh UvddldUqJf6lvuvebHVY4g82WHAGx8uK6AvL2N6fjWsSBwX69z04uRImdwUaKmUz qSZLjztTS8fBQRZJvOOS =33qa -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [aur-general] removal request
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 26.5.2014 21:47, Steven Honeyman wrote: Not only that - it's yet another pointless package! All it does is unzip 1 file... How does the number of files in a package relate to its usefulness? It's there for convenience, as are many other packages. Take for example packages that change only one compile flag. Guess we should remove those. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJThDwVAAoJEB1x37R9kdwnCiIP/1T3M/68ucqgwpA9EVpKGxB2 kkqHwR4iYB2Vxp7Lm9ImGeJryMePK+mp3Ad1RhuoqJ/l/WpJUnMMANIze6I2q89A +vIDNYDOvgm2axQgjZi8Hnq8XJTjAFP0VQx/+b0x2LMD1kLqi7IDiq389LDaI+4A xQpCYsoqLOc1lYVkGlXjYTJ9Z8k0EIjYzlqwpsP3Qa2uGzi7AFVGC8+dfMcqHhf9 c9CUD7Vs4KLD6D3hzcJb8F9IEwFBkFM0/dEjhE1MTrxnfjaNCYxxw8L2aZ/UfRSC 60ZQRTn0+mnh9DGfXilR3vsl3SWQdH+mGFKPvOF0pCyunfTnyciRdQiN7KijWlLh ZVfDn3flDLxMVw2JU7NrAStz3Fyiitrov5wik1U0GkLrPwxs4qGtWEOaG6tlujza z6Bx9ZsgEb1ga5vWcqo6PujXyYURzb1t3UIm909nklZfEW/+ACPaiir64pgblgaO BEPc437a20xoCG4EMiYda1/lYNS8JddfwmnP07TLbCA/qUu0Bsmy+GpixiFu8QWF /wZEoY9Cm0PYAue8O8YAz/bQLHUYZn+/2r/dU+h55f9paMMZynH5ln1KTR1m69od IY1sVeTDioPsVlj5n+GJjPU4r0TY/zTQ1Htwh49T79BMsS5WuWASL9SycE9lqCvH o6kqQdWPOJ+UP/QHzzsz =fbt0 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
[aur-general] removal request
This is more of should this be removed; if so, please remove it-request. package-name: epsxe-bios-scph1001 package-url: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/epsxe-bios-scph1001/ I know that the package *even* states that it is illegal to use said package without owning an actual playstation console, but still... isn't this kinda like telling people that it's illegal to steal your car, but then leaving the keys on the hood and going about your business? Peeps are gonna steal! Not sure if this is issue/concern is actually meaningful in the sense that the package *is very* useful, but... yeah.
Re: [aur-general] removal request
Not only that - it's yet another pointless package! All it does is unzip 1 file... That's worse than firefox addon packages or desktop wallpapers. On 26 May 2014 20:29, Alexej Magura sickhadas@gmail.com wrote: This is more of should this be removed; if so, please remove it-request. package-name: epsxe-bios-scph1001 package-url: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/epsxe-bios-scph1001/ I know that the package *even* states that it is illegal to use said package without owning an actual playstation console, but still... isn't this kinda like telling people that it's illegal to steal your car, but then leaving the keys on the hood and going about your business? Peeps are gonna steal! Not sure if this is issue/concern is actually meaningful in the sense that the package *is very* useful, but... yeah.
[aur-general] [removal request] mybb-polish
Please remove the outdated mybb-polish [1] package. I have adopted and
updated the mybb AUR package. Language packs can be easily added like I
did here [2]. If somebody likes I can create a polish language pack
('mybb-lang-pl') as well.
Stefan
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mybb-polish/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mybb-lang-ger/
[aur-general] Removal request
Hi Could a TU please remove glade3-gtk2 [1]? It's a duplicate of glade-gtk2 [2]. Both packages were orphaned and I took ownership and updated the glade-gtk2 [2] to the latest release. Thank you [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/glade3-gtk2/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/glade-gtk2/ -- Nuno Araujo nuno.ara...@russo79.com http://www.russo79.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [aur-general] [removal request] mybb-polish
On Saturday, May 24, 2014 15:31:04 Stefan Tatschner wrote:
Please remove the outdated mybb-polish [1] package. I have adopted and
updated the mybb AUR package. Language packs can be easily added like I
did here [2]. If somebody likes I can create a polish language pack
('mybb-lang-pl') as well.
Stefan
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mybb-polish/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mybb-lang-ger/
Removed [1], thanks.
Regards,
Felix Yan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Removal request
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 1:14 AM, Nuno Araujo nuno.ara...@russo79.comwrote: Hi Could a TU please remove glade3-gtk2 [1]? It's a duplicate of glade-gtk2 [2]. Both packages were orphaned and I took ownership and updated the glade-gtk2 [2] to the latest release. Thank you [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/glade3-gtk2/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/glade-gtk2/ -- Nuno Araujo nuno.ara...@russo79.com http://www.russo79.com Merged, thx. -- Maxime
[aur-general] Removal request - talesofmajeyal
Hi TUs, Please remove my package talesofmajeyal [1]. It is a duplicate of tome4[2], a package that I didn't notice until just now. Thanks, WorMzy [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/talesofmajeyal/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tome4/
Re: [aur-general] Removal request - talesofmajeyal
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 9:30 AM, WorMzy Tykashi wormzy.tyka...@gmail.comwrote: Hi TUs, Please remove my package talesofmajeyal [1]. It is a duplicate of tome4[2], a package that I didn't notice until just now. Thanks, WorMzy [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/talesofmajeyal/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tome4/ Removed. Thx, -- Maxime
[aur-general] [Removal request] kfileaudiopreview-git
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kfileaudiopreview-git/ Merged in kio-extras Thanks
Re: [aur-general] [Removal request] kfileaudiopreview-git
On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 14:09:06 Antonio Rojas wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kfileaudiopreview-git/ Merged in kio-extras Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Removal request: arc-status
On Saturday, May 10, 2014 10:58:31 David Phillips wrote: On a related note, I'd just like to ask why initscripts AUR packages aren't accepted. I was under the impression that while initscripts are no longer the official/supported init method for Arch, some people are still using them instead of systemd? They're okay to me as long as they are maintained. The package in the original request (arc-status) was an orphan and didn't get an update for more than 4 years, and that's why I think its removal is a good idea. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Removal request: arc-status
Ahh okay, thanks for clarifying that for me On 10/05/2014, Felix Yan felixonm...@gmail.com wrote: On Saturday, May 10, 2014 10:58:31 David Phillips wrote: On a related note, I'd just like to ask why initscripts AUR packages aren't accepted. I was under the impression that while initscripts are no longer the official/supported init method for Arch, some people are still using them instead of systemd? They're okay to me as long as they are maintained. The package in the original request (arc-status) was an orphan and didn't get an update for more than 4 years, and that's why I think its removal is a good idea. Regards, Felix Yan -- David Phillips GPG Key 0x7BF3D17D0884BF5B Fingerprint 2426 235A 7831 AA2F 56AF 4BC0 7BF3 D17D 0884 BF5B
Re: [aur-general] Removal request: firefox-stable
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 1:36 AM, Doug Newgard scim...@archlinux.infowrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/firefox-stable/ This is simply a duplicate of firefox in [extra]. Done, thx -- Maxime
[aur-general] Removal request for cantata-qt
Hi! The cantata package in [community] is now build with no kde dependencies so the package I maintain is now superfluous. Please delete it from the AUR. Thanks! Spyros
Re: [aur-general] Removal request for cantata-qt
On Sunday, May 11, 2014 02:48:48 Spyros Stathopoulos wrote: The cantata package in [community] is now build with no kde dependencies so the package I maintain is now superfluous. Please delete it from the AUR. Removed. Please include a link to package next time, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Removal request: arc-status
On a related note, I'd just like to ask why initscripts AUR packages aren't accepted. I was under the impression that while initscripts are no longer the official/supported init method for Arch, some people are still using them instead of systemd? On 09/05/2014, Felix Yan felixonm...@gmail.com wrote: On Thursday, May 08, 2014 15:46:28 Thiago Barroso Perrotta wrote: Hi, Just stumbled upon this[1] package, it is very old (last updated in 2009) and useful only when Arch used to have RC init scripts. I'd suggest its removal. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/arc-status/ Removed. Also, I think there are still a number of packages related to old initscripts. Do you mind if every time we find one, we request its removal here, or would this be too cumbersome? It's fine, and thanks for helping us cleaning AUR :) Regards, Felix Yan -- David Phillips GPG Key 0x7BF3D17D0884BF5B Fingerprint 2426 235A 7831 AA2F 56AF 4BC0 7BF3 D17D 0884 BF5B
[aur-general] Removal request: firefox-stable
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/firefox-stable/ This is simply a duplicate of firefox in [extra].
[aur-general] Removal request: arc-status
Hi, Just stumbled upon this[1] package, it is very old (last updated in 2009) and useful only when Arch used to have RC init scripts. I'd suggest its removal. Also, I think there are still a number of packages related to old initscripts. Do you mind if every time we find one, we request its removal here, or would this be too cumbersome? [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/arc-status/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[aur-general] Removal request: glm-0.9.4, glm094
Please remove glm-0.9.4 [1] and glm094 [2] as both are orphan and unneeded/obsolete. small explanation: vertoe (the submitter) meant to use it as a dependency for some other package he is working on. I contacted him and discussed the problems involved in having a static version of glm as dependency. After my recommendations he issued the problem upstream (where a patch is already available) which made the static glm versions obsolete (so he disowned both now). cheers Levente [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/glm-0.9.4/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/glm094/
Re: [aur-general] Removal request: glm-0.9.4, glm094
On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 15:27:00 Levente Polyak wrote: Please remove glm-0.9.4 [1] and glm094 [2] as both are orphan and unneeded/obsolete. small explanation: vertoe (the submitter) meant to use it as a dependency for some other package he is working on. I contacted him and discussed the problems involved in having a static version of glm as dependency. After my recommendations he issued the problem upstream (where a patch is already available) which made the static glm versions obsolete (so he disowned both now). cheers Levente [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/glm-0.9.4/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/glm094/ Both removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] [Removal request] kde-runtime-git
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kde- runtime-git kde-runtime is dead, long live kde-runtime
Re: [aur-general] [Removal request] kde-runtime-git
On Saturday, April 26, 2014 14:47:48 A Rojas wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kde- runtime-git kde-runtime is dead, long live kde-runtime Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] netdiscover-patched
On Tuesday 22 April 2014 20:00:57 Roel Blaauwgeers wrote: Hello, The package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/netdiscover-patched/ should be removed as it is a duplicate of 'netdiscover'. The package has been removed, thank you =) -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru ICQ: 407-398-235 Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] Removal request
Hi, Can the following package be deleted please: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libnautilus-extension-ubuntu/ I originally uploaded it because the AUR doesn't yet support split packages but it doesn't really make sense to compile the whole of nautilus twice and then throw most of it away so I've made sure that libnautilus-extension-ubuntu is provided in this package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nautilus-ubuntu/ Thanks
Re: [aur-general] Removal request
On Monday, April 21, 2014 14:49:17 Charles Bos wrote: Hi, Can the following package be deleted please: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libnautilus-extension-ubuntu/ I originally uploaded it because the AUR doesn't yet support split packages but it doesn't really make sense to compile the whole of nautilus twice and then throw most of it away so I've made sure that libnautilus-extension-ubuntu is provided in this package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nautilus-ubuntu/ Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Removal request of pywapi
On Sunday, April 13, 2014 16:17:18 willemw wrote: Please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pywapi/ and please move the votes to the renamed package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-pywapi/. Merged, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] [Removal Request] python2-pybitcointools
This package has been renamed upstream to python2-bitcoin.
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] python2-pybitcointools
On Thursday 10 April 2014 18:28:23 Andy Weidenbaum wrote: This package has been renamed upstream to python2-bitcoin. Done. Please provide links in the next time. -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru ICQ: 407-398-235 Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] [Removal request] kde4support-git
Replaced with kdelibs4support-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kde4support-git/ Thanks
[aur-general] Removal request
I propose that https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pycadf-deb/ should be deleted as https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pycadf/ replaces it and that https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-oslo-messaging-deb/ should be deleted as https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-oslo-messaging/ replaces it Thanks -- James
Re: [aur-general] Removal request
On Monday, April 07, 2014 11:02:14 James Bulmer wrote: I propose that https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pycadf-deb/ should be deleted as https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pycadf/ replaces it and that https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-oslo-messaging-deb/ should be deleted as https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-oslo-messaging/ replaces it Thanks -- James Both removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] Removal request
Could https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-ceilometerclient-deb/ be removed as I have moved all of the dependency's to https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-ceilometerclient/ Thanks
Re: [aur-general] Removal request
On Monday, April 07, 2014 11:25:19 James Bulmer wrote: Could https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-ceilometerclient-deb/ be removed as I have moved all of the dependency's to https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-ceilometerclient/ Thanks Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] [removal request] Please remove tntdb-svn from AUR
Hello, please remove tntdb-svn [1] from AUR as it's source has moved to GitHub (see [2]) Thanks, Jonas Platte [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tntdb-svn/ [2] http://www.tntnet.org/development.html
Re: [aur-general] [removal request] Please remove tntdb-svn from AUR
On 5 April 2014 15:22, Jonas Platte jonaspla...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, please remove tntdb-svn [1] from AUR as it's source has moved to GitHub (see [2]) Thanks, Jonas Platte [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tntdb-svn/ [2] http://www.tntnet.org/development.html Removed, thanks.
Re: [aur-general] [removal request] - linux-sun7i and sunxi-tools
On Saturday 05 April 2014 18:10:02 sehraf wrote: please remove linux-sun7i [1] and sunxi-tools [2] because: - both are outdated and orphaned - linux-sun7i is provided by Arch Linux ARM [3] - sunxi-tools is a duplication of sunxi-tools-git [4] I've removed linux-sun7i and have merged sunxi-tools into *-git (because it had several votes). -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru ICQ: 407-398-235 Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] Removal request - redirfs package cleanup
Hi TUs, Please could you remove the following packages: redirfs-bin [1] and redirfs-lib [2]. Neither have been updated since 2009, and both have no maintainer, any votes, and depend a non-existent redirfs-modules package. Cheers, WorMzy [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/redirfs-bin/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/redirfs-lib/
Re: [aur-general] Removal request - redirfs package cleanup
On Saturday, April 05, 2014 00:53:11 WorMzy Tykashi wrote: Hi TUs, Please could you remove the following packages: redirfs-bin [1] and redirfs-lib [2]. Neither have been updated since 2009, and both have no maintainer, any votes, and depend a non-existent redirfs-modules package. Cheers, WorMzy [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/redirfs-bin/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/redirfs-lib/ Both removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] Removal request
Hi, The package [1] is orphan and the features are provided by [2]. Please remove [1]. [1]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ratpoison-xft/[1] [2]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ratpoison-git/[2] -- Ivaylo Kuzev | @ivo
Re: [aur-general] Removal request
On 03/04/14 12:46 PM, Ivaylo Kuzev wrote: Hi, The package [1] is orphan and the features are provided by [2]. Please remove [1]. [1]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ratpoison-xft/[1] [2]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ratpoison-git/[2] -- Ivaylo Kuzev | @ivo Merged [1] into [2], thanks! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[aur-general] [Removal Request] stm32flash-svn
Hi, everyone. I hope the package stm32flash-svn in AUR can be removed. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/stm32flash-svn/ The package was orphan, and I adopted it. but now, I have made two new packages (stm32flash-git and stm32flash) to replace it. So, it's unnecessary to keep stm32flash-svn in AUR. Regards, Stephen.
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] stm32flash-svn
On Tuesday, April 01, 2014 00:53:37 Stephen Zhang wrote: Hi, everyone. I hope the package stm32flash-svn in AUR can be removed. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/stm32flash-svn/ The package was orphan, and I adopted it. but now, I have made two new packages (stm32flash-git and stm32flash) to replace it. So, it's unnecessary to keep stm32flash-svn in AUR. Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] Removal request of i3-py-git
Please remove i3-py-git. It has been replaced by python-i3-git and python2-i3-git. Willem
Re: [aur-general] Removal request of i3-py-git
On Sunday, March 30, 2014 10:18:19 willemw wrote: Please remove i3-py-git. It has been replaced by python-i3-git and python2-i3-git. Removed. Please include a link to package next time, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] [Removal request] sublime-text-3
On Thursday 27 March 2014 12:15:10 Janne Haapsaari wrote: The package sublime-text-3 [1] is a duplicate of sublime-text-dev [2] package. Please remove the former. The package has only one vote, so I've removed it. -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru ICQ: 407-398-235 Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] [Removal request] sublime-text-3
Hi, The package sublime-text-3 [1] is a duplicate of sublime-text-dev [2] package. Please remove the former. 1. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sublime-text-3/ 2. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sublime-text-dev/ Thanks! Janne
[aur-general] Removal request
Can the following package be removed: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compiz-pure/ It's supposed to provide Compiz 0.8 plus the gtk-window-decorator. The package is orphaned, hasn't been updated in nearly 4 years, is several versions out of date and doesn't build successfully. Nothing will be lost here because there is a new package which provides exactly the same things as this package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compiz-gtk-standalone/
[aur-general] [Removal Request] libebur128 related
The following Packages should be removed: 1: loudness-cli-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/loudness-cli-git/ 2: libebur128-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libebur128-git/ 3: libebur128-nu774-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libebur128-nu774-git/ 1 and 2 are orphaned, I am the maintainer of 3. None of these packages build due to git repo changes and the functionality has been replaced by: loudness-scanner-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/loudness-scanner-git/
[aur-general] [Removal Request] hubicfuse
Hi, My bad, package hubicfuse has to be removed (correct package is hubicfuse-git). Feel free to test the package, but I think I added all deps
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] libebur128 related
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Robert Mackanics schnoo...@gmail.comwrote: The following Packages should be removed: 1: loudness-cli-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/loudness-cli-git/ 2: libebur128-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libebur128-git/ 3: libebur128-nu774-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libebur128-nu774-git/ 1 and 2 are orphaned, I am the maintainer of 3. None of these packages build due to git repo changes and the functionality has been replaced by: loudness-scanner-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/loudness-scanner-git/ All merged into loudness-scanner-git, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] hubicfuse
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Mitsu archli...@suumitsu.eu wrote: Hi, My bad, package hubicfuse has to be removed (correct package is hubicfuse-git). Feel free to test the package, but I think I added all deps Removed, please include a link to the package next time. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Removal request
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Charles Bos charlesb...@gmail.com wrote: Can the following package be removed: https://aur.archlinux.org/ packages/compiz-pure/ It's supposed to provide Compiz 0.8 plus the gtk-window-decorator. The package is orphaned, hasn't been updated in nearly 4 years, is several versions out of date and doesn't build successfully. Nothing will be lost here because there is a new package which provides exactly the same things as this package: https://aur.archlinux.org/ packages/compiz-gtk-standalone/ Merged into the latter, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Removal request
On Friday, March 21, 2014 20:04:22 Ivaylo Kuzev wrote: Hi, The package [1] is orphan and the features are provided by [2]. Please remove [1]. [1]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/emacs-smex--git/ [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/emacs-smex-git/ Ivaylo Kuzev | @ivo Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] Removal request
Hi, The package [1] is orphan and the features are provided by [2]. Please remove [1]. [1]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/emacs-smex--git/ [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/emacs-smex-git/ Ivaylo Kuzev | @ivo
[aur-general] [Removal Request] linux-selinux
Please remove linux-selinux: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-selinux/ Support for SELinux has been merged into the official Arch Linux kernel. Thanks -- Timothée Ravier
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] linux-selinux
On 19/03/2014 01:11, Timothée Ravier wrote: Please remove linux-selinux: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-selinux/ Support for SELinux has been merged into the official Arch Linux kernel. Thanks Done. -- Sébastien Seblu Luttringer https://seblu.net | Twitter: @seblu42 GPG: 0x2072D77A signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks
On Fri 14 Mar 2014 at 17:36, Pyro Devil wrote: Hi again! I just wanted to remind you that my request for removal of my package still exists. ;) Deleted, thanks. Sorry for the delay; not sure why this was overlooked. Am Montag, den 03.02.2014, 14:19 +0100 schrieb Pyro Devil: Hi! I am the author of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lightworks/ and request removal because of duplication. When I created the package I didn't see that: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lwks already exists. Thanks! Pyro Devil -- Jonathan Steel pgpwUmmdC_dBd.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks
I just wanted to remind you that my request for removal of my package still exists. ;) Deleted, thanks. Sorry for the delay; not sure why this was overlooked. There was a discussion about the package name; and the suggested move was to removing lightworks, and move existing lwks into lightworks. -- Kind regards, Damian Nowak StratusHost www.AtlasHost.eu
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks
On Mon 17 Mar 2014 at 18:37, Jonathan Steel wrote: On Mon 17 Mar 2014 at 19:24, Nowaker wrote: I just wanted to remind you that my request for removal of my package still exists. ;) Deleted, thanks. Sorry for the delay; not sure why this was overlooked. There was a discussion about the package name; and the suggested move was to removing lightworks, and move existing lwks into lightworks. The official package (deb) name is lwks, and lightworks is in the description. I see no reason to change it. On second thoughts, maybe it should be listed as lightworks, but the maintainer should upload it under the new name and then request a merge here. Now lightworks is gone, he is able to. -- Jonathan Steel pgpHKygqNLmQn.pgp Description: PGP signature
[aur-general] [Removal Request]
Please remove[1] This is replaced by https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-dcpj715w-cups/ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-brother-dcpj715w-cups
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request]
On 2014-03-16 10:46 +0100 Berno Strik wrote: Please remove[1] This is replaced by https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-dcpj715w-cups/ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-brother-dcpj715w-cups done, thanks
[aur-general] [Removal Request]
Please remove[1] and [2]. They are replaced by https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl3140cn/ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl3040cn-cupswrapper [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl3040cn-lpr
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request]
Please ignore this one. I made a mistake On Sat, 15 Mar 2014 13:52:26 +0100 Berno Strik dutchma...@gmx.com wrote: Please remove[1] and [2]. They are replaced by https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl3140cn/ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl3040cn-cupswrapper [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl3040cn-lpr -- Berno Strik dutchma...@gmx.com
[aur-general] [Removal Request] brother-hl3170cdw-{cupswrapper, lpr}
Please remove[1] and [2]. They are replaced by https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl3170cdw/ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl3170cdw-cupswrapper [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl3170cdw-lpr
[aur-general] [Removal Request] pencil-svn
Request removal of: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pencil-svn/ This project is dead and development continues under the pencil2D fork (which is now also available in the AUR), making this package redundant. Thanks and best regards, N30N.
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] pencil-svn
On Saturday, March 15, 2014 21:56:25 N30N wrote: Request removal of: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pencil-svn/ This project is dead and development continues under the pencil2D fork (which is now also available in the AUR), making this package redundant. Thanks and best regards, N30N. Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] brother-hl3170cdw-{cupswrapper, lpr}
On Saturday, March 15, 2014 14:04:00 Berno Strik wrote: Please remove[1] and [2]. They are replaced by https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl3170cdw/ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl3170cdw-cupswrapper [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl3170cdw-lpr Both removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks
Hi again! I just wanted to remind you that my request for removal of my package still exists. ;) Cheers, Pyro Devil Am Montag, den 03.02.2014, 14:19 +0100 schrieb Pyro Devil: Hi! I am the author of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lightworks/ and request removal because of duplication. When I created the package I didn't see that: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lwks already exists. Thanks! Pyro Devil
[aur-general] Removal request python2-pycrypto
Hey, please remove python2-pycrypto [1] as it is an orphaned duplicate of python2-crypto [2]. Seems it was created by accident (as pointed out in the comments) [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pycrypto/ [2] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/python2-crypto/ cheers Levente
Re: [aur-general] Removal request python2-pycrypto
On Sunday, March 09, 2014 12:56:55 Levente Polyak wrote: Hey, please remove python2-pycrypto [1] as it is an orphaned duplicate of python2-crypto [2]. Seems it was created by accident (as pointed out in the comments) [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pycrypto/ [2] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/python2-crypto/ cheers Levente Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] Removal request: perl-webservice-mtgox
Hi, Please delete my package perl-webservice-mtgox [1]. It is no longer works and MtGox was closed. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-webservice-mtgox/ With the best wishes, -- Anton Leontiev
Re: [aur-general] Removal request: perl-webservice-mtgox
On Saturday, March 08, 2014 20:22:42 Anton Leontiev wrote: Hi, Please delete my package perl-webservice-mtgox [1]. It is no longer works and MtGox was closed. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-webservice-mtgox/ With the best wishes, Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] [Removal Request] weston-rbp
Hello, package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/weston-rbp is now obsolete since Raspberry Pi patched version is already included in ArchLinuxARM repositories: http://archlinuxarm.org/packages?search=weston
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] weston-rbp
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Srki srki...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/weston-rbp is now obsolete since Raspberry Pi patched version is already included in ArchLinuxARM repositories: http://archlinuxarm.org/packages?search=weston Deleted, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] bitcoin-daemon-electrum
On Friday 28 February 2014 21:12:57 Andy Weidenbaum wrote: This package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bitcoin-daemon-electrum/has been made obsolete by the new version of electrum-server-git. Removed, thank you. -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru ICQ: 407-398-235 Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] electrum-entropy
On Friday 28 February 2014 18:25:03 Andy Weidenbaum wrote: I no longer wish to maintain this packagehttps://aur.archlinux.org/packages/electrum-entropy The package has several votes and it isn't broken. So I don't think that removal of tha package is needed. And I hope someone will adopt it in the future. -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru ICQ: 407-398-235 Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
