Re: [aur-general] [Merge Request] qwtpolar and qwtpolar-svn

2014-03-08 Thread Saulteau Don 
Thanks for the clarification Doug and the wiki reference. It was helpful.



Donovan.

On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Doug Newgard  wrote:
> 
>
> 1. They are not the same, one pulls from a branch, the other pulls from trunk.
> 2. When pulling from trunk, -svn is the correct name.
> 3. You are using a very old PKGBUILD template. Please see 
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/VCS_PKGBUILD_Guidelines

Re: [aur-general] [Merge Request] qwtpolar and qwtpolar-svn

2014-03-07 Thread Doug Newgard 

> Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 11:00:13 -0700
> From: sault@gmail.com
> To: aur-general@archlinux.org
> Subject: [aur-general] [Merge Request] qwtpolar and qwtpolar-svn
>
> Afternoon TU's.
>
> Seeking guidance and advice, I'd like to propose that qwtpolar-svn[1]
> be merged into qwtpolar[2] in the AUR if I'm following procedures
> properly here =)
>
> I'm trying to clean these qwtpolar packages up a bit.
>
> They were both recently orphaned so I upgraded qwtpolar[2] to latest
> release which is also the same as qwtpolar-svn[1].
>
>
>
>
> SaultDon
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qwtpolar-svn/
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qwtpolar/

1. They are not the same, one pulls from a branch, the other pulls from trunk.
2. When pulling from trunk, -svn is the correct name.
3. You are using a very old PKGBUILD template. Please see 
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/VCS_PKGBUILD_Guidelines