Re: [aur-general] NVIDIA drivers
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 3:25 AM, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 26, 2013 7:42 AM, Maxime Gauduin aluc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Jan 26, 2013 6:10 AM, Rob Til Freedmen
rob.til.freed...@gmail.com
wrote:
There is a dependency in nvidia/PKGBUILD which is totally wrong
depends=( [...] nvidia-utils=${pkgver})
It leads to a circular dependency at ***build*** time and isn't
really
needed
at run time for nvidia to work.
depends=( [...] nvidia-utils) should be enough to pull it in when
installing/updating
I've reported it last year but didn't got any response from the
maintainer.
Have you tried installing different versions of nvidia-utils and
nvidia?
There's a reason for that versions dependency.
I did once by mistake, that wasn't pretty. No the hard dependencies are
required, the problem is the depends array implies makedepends, but
sometimes it is wrong like here. Making depends and makedepends
independent, then have makepkg check for depends only at install time
would
make more sense. However that would mean a rewrite of these 2 arrays in
all
the PKGBUILDs in the AUR, I don't see that happening.
If that makes sense I'm sure a feature request on pacman wouldn't be out of
place. Minimal benefit though, as this really only affects a handful of
packages. Doesn't makepkg have a flag to ignore dependencies? Arch laptop
died so I can't easily check, that would be easier on everyone involved
(except yaourt and similar users)
makepkg does have such an option (-d) and yaourt should too since it is a
wrapper. I have nevertheless posted a feature request on makepkg here:
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/33574
While I too believe it's not worth the trouble seeing it concerns only a
few packages, I'll see what feedback it gets.
--
Alucryd
In the name of God, impure souls of the living dead shall be banished into
eternal damnation. Amen.
Re: [aur-general] NVIDIA drivers
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Maxime Gauduin aluc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 3:25 AM, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 26, 2013 7:42 AM, Maxime Gauduin aluc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Jan 26, 2013 6:10 AM, Rob Til Freedmen
rob.til.freed...@gmail.com
wrote:
There is a dependency in nvidia/PKGBUILD which is totally wrong
depends=( [...] nvidia-utils=${pkgver})
It leads to a circular dependency at ***build*** time and isn't
really
needed
at run time for nvidia to work.
depends=( [...] nvidia-utils) should be enough to pull it in when
installing/updating
I've reported it last year but didn't got any response from the
maintainer.
Have you tried installing different versions of nvidia-utils and
nvidia?
There's a reason for that versions dependency.
I did once by mistake, that wasn't pretty. No the hard dependencies are
required, the problem is the depends array implies makedepends, but
sometimes it is wrong like here. Making depends and makedepends
independent, then have makepkg check for depends only at install time
would
make more sense. However that would mean a rewrite of these 2 arrays in
all
the PKGBUILDs in the AUR, I don't see that happening.
If that makes sense I'm sure a feature request on pacman wouldn't be out of
place. Minimal benefit though, as this really only affects a handful of
packages. Doesn't makepkg have a flag to ignore dependencies? Arch laptop
died so I can't easily check, that would be easier on everyone involved
(except yaourt and similar users)
makepkg does have such an option (-d) and yaourt should too since it is a
wrapper. I have nevertheless posted a feature request on makepkg here:
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/33574
While I too believe it's not worth the trouble seeing it concerns only a
few packages, I'll see what feedback it gets.
--
Alucryd
In the name of God, impure souls of the living dead shall be banished into
eternal damnation. Amen.
Maybe I'm missing something ... but what could possible go wrong
if we go with nvidia-utils instead of nvidia-utils=${pkgver} ?
There's only one package named nvidia-utils build from the same
source and always updated in tandem in the repo.
nvidia really only depends on the kernel header and nvidia-utils
is build from the same source - depends on nvidia at build time.
Please be patient with me, I don't get it yet.
Re: [aur-general] NVIDIA drivers
On Jan 27, 2013 4:59 AM, Rob Til Freedmen rob.til.freed...@gmail.com
wrote:
Maybe I'm missing something ... but what could possible go wrong
if we go with nvidia-utils instead of nvidia-utils=${pkgver} ?
There's only one package named nvidia-utils build from the same
source and always updated in tandem in the repo.
nvidia really only depends on the kernel header and nvidia-utils
is build from the same source - depends on nvidia at build time.
Please be patient with me, I don't get it yet.
AUR is not always in sync with the specific mirror you're using. Mirrors
sync at different times. Perhaps nvidia-utils could have a different
version in [testing].
Re: [aur-general] NVIDIA drivers
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 5:10 AM, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:32 AM, SpinFlo sl1pk...@gmail.com wrote: i ve use yaourt, yes, yaourt when make and install sucessful package delete all sources., then the symlink don't work Don't use yaourt then. On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:37 AM, SpinFlo sl1pk...@gmail.com wrote: sorry for the quotes after message, this is automatic by gmail :S And it's not 'automatic' by gmail, I use gmail, just click the 'in-line' button (3 dots). On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote: /etc/makepkg.conf - SRCDEST Set that to the directory of your choice and all source files should be saved there. Common sources will be automatically detected. (yeah, via symlinks... but if this is the approach that you meant, it wasn't clear) Yes SRCDEST is better but won't help for yaourt users. I can't remember when/why I started making my own symlinks, perhaps to prevent one directory being way too full (harder to spring clean). In any case, my apologies, SRCDEST is obviously the better solution here. Just tried setting an SRCDEST, and yaourt uses it. The redundant downloads issue is then solved. Remains the dependency problem, I thought I would build all packages separately and install all of them: building the utils packages works, they don't rely on anything but building the other which depends on the utils package requires it to be installed, except the old modules package need the old utils package and won't complete unless you force yaourt to ignore dependencies, or purge your system from all said packages before installing the new ones. I believe this is very sub-optimal and this is making NVIDIA users' lives harder, but you guys are boss. I will use the packages I made in my own little corner and won't upload them to the AUR then (I already had at least one user use them happily now, maybe I'll share them elsewhere). Thank you all for your answers. Regards, -- Alucryd In the name of God, impure souls of the living dead shall be banished into eternal damnation. Amen.
Re: [aur-general] NVIDIA drivers
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Maxime Gauduin aluc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 5:10 AM, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:32 AM, SpinFlo sl1pk...@gmail.com wrote:
i ve use yaourt, yes,
yaourt when make and install sucessful package delete all sources.,
then the symlink don't work
Don't use yaourt then.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:37 AM, SpinFlo sl1pk...@gmail.com wrote:
sorry for the quotes after message, this is automatic by gmail :S
And it's not 'automatic' by gmail, I use gmail, just click the
'in-line' button (3 dots).
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
/etc/makepkg.conf - SRCDEST
Set that to the directory of your choice and all source files should be
saved
there. Common sources will be automatically detected.
(yeah, via symlinks... but if this is the approach that you meant, it
wasn't
clear)
Yes SRCDEST is better but won't help for yaourt users. I can't
remember when/why I started making my own symlinks, perhaps to prevent
one directory being way too full (harder to spring clean). In any
case, my apologies, SRCDEST is obviously the better solution here.
Just tried setting an SRCDEST, and yaourt uses it. The redundant downloads
issue is then solved.
Remains the dependency problem, I thought I would build all packages
separately and install all of them: building the utils packages works, they
don't rely on anything but building the other which depends on the utils
package requires it to be installed, except the old modules package need
the old utils package and won't complete unless you force yaourt to ignore
dependencies, or purge your system from all said packages before installing
the new ones.
I believe this is very sub-optimal and this is making NVIDIA users' lives
harder, but you guys are boss. I will use the packages I made in my own
little corner and won't upload them to the AUR then (I already had at least
one user use them happily now, maybe I'll share them elsewhere).
There is a dependency in nvidia/PKGBUILD which is totally wrong
depends=( [...] nvidia-utils=${pkgver})
It leads to a circular dependency at ***build*** time and isn't really needed
at run time for nvidia to work.
depends=( [...] nvidia-utils) should be enough to pull it in when
installing/updating
I've reported it last year but didn't got any response from the maintainer.
Thank you all for your answers.
Regards,
--
Alucryd
In the name of God, impure souls of the living dead shall be banished into
eternal damnation. Amen.
Re: [aur-general] NVIDIA drivers
On Jan 26, 2013 6:10 AM, Rob Til Freedmen rob.til.freed...@gmail.com
wrote:
There is a dependency in nvidia/PKGBUILD which is totally wrong
depends=( [...] nvidia-utils=${pkgver})
It leads to a circular dependency at ***build*** time and isn't really
needed
at run time for nvidia to work.
depends=( [...] nvidia-utils) should be enough to pull it in when
installing/updating
I've reported it last year but didn't got any response from the
maintainer.
Have you tried installing different versions of nvidia-utils and nvidia?
There's a reason for that versions dependency.
Re: [aur-general] NVIDIA drivers
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 26, 2013 6:10 AM, Rob Til Freedmen rob.til.freed...@gmail.com
wrote:
There is a dependency in nvidia/PKGBUILD which is totally wrong
depends=( [...] nvidia-utils=${pkgver})
It leads to a circular dependency at ***build*** time and isn't really
needed
at run time for nvidia to work.
depends=( [...] nvidia-utils) should be enough to pull it in when
installing/updating
I've reported it last year but didn't got any response from the
maintainer.
Have you tried installing different versions of nvidia-utils and nvidia?
There's a reason for that versions dependency.
I did once by mistake, that wasn't pretty. No the hard dependencies are
required, the problem is the depends array implies makedepends, but
sometimes it is wrong like here. Making depends and makedepends
independent, then have makepkg check for depends only at install time would
make more sense. However that would mean a rewrite of these 2 arrays in all
the PKGBUILDs in the AUR, I don't see that happening.
--
Alucryd
In the name of God, impure souls of the living dead shall be banished into
eternal damnation. Amen.
Re: [aur-general] NVIDIA drivers
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 26, 2013 6:10 AM, Rob Til Freedmen rob.til.freed...@gmail.com
wrote:
There is a dependency in nvidia/PKGBUILD which is totally wrong
depends=( [...] nvidia-utils=${pkgver})
It leads to a circular dependency at ***build*** time and isn't really
needed
at run time for nvidia to work.
depends=( [...] nvidia-utils) should be enough to pull it in when
installing/updating
I've reported it last year but didn't got any response from the
maintainer.
Have you tried installing different versions of nvidia-utils and nvidia?
There's a reason for that versions dependency.
Do you mean something like nvidia-3xx and nvidia-utils-295?
For what reason would you want it?
Or do you mean nvidia-3xx/nvidia-utils-3xx and also nvidia-295/nvidia-utils-295?
How would it possible works?
Or do you think there are two different versions with the same name
but different versions?
Re: [aur-general] NVIDIA drivers
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Rob Til Freedmen
rob.til.freed...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Jan 26, 2013 6:10 AM, Rob Til Freedmen rob.til.freed...@gmail.com
wrote:
There is a dependency in nvidia/PKGBUILD which is totally wrong
depends=( [...] nvidia-utils=${pkgver})
It leads to a circular dependency at ***build*** time and isn't really
needed
at run time for nvidia to work.
depends=( [...] nvidia-utils) should be enough to pull it in when
installing/updating
I've reported it last year but didn't got any response from the
maintainer.
Have you tried installing different versions of nvidia-utils and nvidia?
There's a reason for that versions dependency.
Do you mean something like nvidia-3xx and nvidia-utils-295?
For what reason would you want it?
Or do you mean nvidia-3xx/nvidia-utils-3xx and also
nvidia-295/nvidia-utils-295?
How would it possible works?
Or do you think there are two different versions with the same name
but different versions?
He meant having, for example, nvidia 313.18 and nvidia-utils 310.32
installed at the same time.
--
Alucryd
In the name of God, impure souls of the living dead shall be banished into
eternal damnation. Amen.
Re: [aur-general] NVIDIA drivers
On Jan 26, 2013 7:42 AM, Maxime Gauduin aluc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Jan 26, 2013 6:10 AM, Rob Til Freedmen rob.til.freed...@gmail.com
wrote:
There is a dependency in nvidia/PKGBUILD which is totally wrong
depends=( [...] nvidia-utils=${pkgver})
It leads to a circular dependency at ***build*** time and isn't really
needed
at run time for nvidia to work.
depends=( [...] nvidia-utils) should be enough to pull it in when
installing/updating
I've reported it last year but didn't got any response from the
maintainer.
Have you tried installing different versions of nvidia-utils and nvidia?
There's a reason for that versions dependency.
I did once by mistake, that wasn't pretty. No the hard dependencies are
required, the problem is the depends array implies makedepends, but
sometimes it is wrong like here. Making depends and makedepends
independent, then have makepkg check for depends only at install time
would
make more sense. However that would mean a rewrite of these 2 arrays in
all
the PKGBUILDs in the AUR, I don't see that happening.
If that makes sense I'm sure a feature request on pacman wouldn't be out of
place. Minimal benefit though, as this really only affects a handful of
packages. Doesn't makepkg have a flag to ignore dependencies? Arch laptop
died so I can't easily check, that would be easier on everyone involved
(except yaourt and similar users)
Re: [aur-general] NVIDIA drivers
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 1:20 AM, Maxime Gauduin aluc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Rob Til Freedmen
rob.til.freed...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Jan 26, 2013 6:10 AM, Rob Til Freedmen rob.til.freed...@gmail.com
wrote:
There is a dependency in nvidia/PKGBUILD which is totally wrong
depends=( [...] nvidia-utils=${pkgver})
It leads to a circular dependency at ***build*** time and isn't really
needed
at run time for nvidia to work.
depends=( [...] nvidia-utils) should be enough to pull it in when
installing/updating
I've reported it last year but didn't got any response from the
maintainer.
Have you tried installing different versions of nvidia-utils and nvidia?
There's a reason for that versions dependency.
Do you mean something like nvidia-3xx and nvidia-utils-295?
For what reason would you want it?
Or do you mean nvidia-3xx/nvidia-utils-3xx and also
nvidia-295/nvidia-utils-295?
How would it possible works?
Or do you think there are two different versions with the same name
but different versions?
He meant having, for example, nvidia 313.18 and nvidia-utils 310.32
installed at the same time.
Would that make any sense?
Why would I want it? Really?
--
Alucryd
In the name of God, impure souls of the living dead shall be banished into
eternal damnation. Amen.
Re: [aur-general] NVIDIA drivers
Hi, According to the AUR guidelines, it should be okay with several packages for the same application, as long as they all provide something different, like applying different patches etc. Exception to this strict rule may only be packages having extra features enabled and/or patches in compare to the official ones. - https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Packaging_Standards#Submitting_packages_to_the_AUR If the *-total packages provide the same software, without any extra features enabled and/or patches, perhaps they could be kept instead of the old packages? Are there reasons to keep the old nvidia packages, if they provide the same content, instead of only having the *-total packages? -- Sincerely, Alexander Rødseth xyproto / TU
Re: [aur-general] NVIDIA drivers
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Maxime Gauduin aluc...@gmail.com wrote: That means downloading the x86_64 blob 2 times and the i686 one 1 time (I'm using a dkms version to not download them one more time for each of my kernels). Symlinks, man I fail to see the benefit beyond download size (which symlinks solve). AUR helpers do a fundamentally tough job and 'because its easier for them' isn't really an argument I think, especially with the bash hackery some PKGBUILDs use.
Re: [aur-general] NVIDIA drivers
hi before two days i ve upload to AUR this package: http://paste.ubuntu.com/1567724 (not the same, the name is nvidia-total-beta). and ipsofact deleted by @gtmanfred with this message: this is completely un necessary, please don't litter the aur with more trash well, i ve upload this package for the reason explain by @alucryd, need download up to 4 times the nvidia blob drivers for install dkms-nvidia-beta (was mine and left to use this package), nvidia-utils-beta, lib32-nvidia-utils-beta and lib32-libcl. everyone can use the package for your needs, that's what AUR, I think. the *-total* packages not add nothig in special like individual packages, only group in one some diferent packages for hel save several bandwidth/space and time i think can live with individual packages greetings pd: sorry my english 2013/1/25 Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com: Hi, According to the AUR guidelines, it should be okay with several packages for the same application, as long as they all provide something different, like applying different patches etc. Exception to this strict rule may only be packages having extra features enabled and/or patches in compare to the official ones. - https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Packaging_Standards#Submitting_packages_to_the_AUR If the *-total packages provide the same software, without any extra features enabled and/or patches, perhaps they could be kept instead of the old packages? Are there reasons to keep the old nvidia packages, if they provide the same content, instead of only having the *-total packages? -- Sincerely, Alexander Rødseth xyproto / TU
Re: [aur-general] NVIDIA drivers
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:19 AM, SpinFlo sl1pk...@gmail.com wrote: well, i ve upload this package for the reason explain by @alucryd, need download up to 4 times the nvidia blob drivers for install dkms-nvidia-beta (was mine and left to use this package), nvidia-utils-beta, lib32-nvidia-utils-beta and lib32-libcl. Bottom-post please, like this. And why will symlinks not work for your purpose? Or is the purpose to be able to use yaourt or another AUR helper?
Re: [aur-general] NVIDIA drivers
i ve use yaourt, yes, yaourt when make and install sucessful package delete all sources., then the symlink don't work greetings 2013/1/25 Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com: On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:19 AM, SpinFlo sl1pk...@gmail.com wrote: well, i ve upload this package for the reason explain by @alucryd, need download up to 4 times the nvidia blob drivers for install dkms-nvidia-beta (was mine and left to use this package), nvidia-utils-beta, lib32-nvidia-utils-beta and lib32-libcl. Bottom-post please, like this. And why will symlinks not work for your purpose? Or is the purpose to be able to use yaourt or another AUR helper?
Re: [aur-general] NVIDIA drivers
Oon-Ee Ng wrote: On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Maxime Gauduin aluc...@gmail.com wrote: That means downloading the x86_64 blob 2 times and the i686 one 1 time (I'm using a dkms version to not download them one more time for each of my kernels). Symlinks, man I fail to see the benefit beyond download size (which symlinks solve). AUR helpers do a fundamentally tough job and 'because its easier for them' isn't really an argument I think, especially with the bash hackery some PKGBUILDs use. /etc/makepkg.conf - SRCDEST Set that to the directory of your choice and all source files should be saved there. Common sources will be automatically detected. (yeah, via symlinks... but if this is the approach that you meant, it wasn't clear)
Re: [aur-general] NVIDIA drivers
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:32 AM, SpinFlo sl1pk...@gmail.com wrote: i ve use yaourt, yes, yaourt when make and install sucessful package delete all sources., then the symlink don't work Don't use yaourt then. On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:37 AM, SpinFlo sl1pk...@gmail.com wrote: sorry for the quotes after message, this is automatic by gmail :S And it's not 'automatic' by gmail, I use gmail, just click the 'in-line' button (3 dots). On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote: /etc/makepkg.conf - SRCDEST Set that to the directory of your choice and all source files should be saved there. Common sources will be automatically detected. (yeah, via symlinks... but if this is the approach that you meant, it wasn't clear) Yes SRCDEST is better but won't help for yaourt users. I can't remember when/why I started making my own symlinks, perhaps to prevent one directory being way too full (harder to spring clean). In any case, my apologies, SRCDEST is obviously the better solution here.
